That's what I'm afraid of. Fortunately there are moderators for this.
To protect those with thin skins.
That's what I'm afraid of. Fortunately there are moderators for this.
Nobody said he was an idiot, sounds like the poster just doesn't think Cook, as a CEO, has his priorities straight.I agree the hardware is in need of a revamp, more specifically MacBook Pro's. But to call him an idiot is disrespectful and back handed. I know your entitled to your opinion, but there is no need for name calling. Some are believers, others are not.
I'm waiting to hear from you why people shouldn't feel this way? Are you seeing something from Apple the rest of us aren't? Just look at the opinions here...no new products, no innovation, buggy releases, etc. A few years ago, the "doomed" thing was sort of a joke, but as each year goes by, it's starting to become more and more of a possibility.
Nobody said he was an idiot, sounds like the poster just doesn't think Cook, as a CEO, has his priorities straight.
Really?
I would think Cook would or should have final say on OK'ing important design matters and major product releases.
To protect those with thin skins.
Why should Cook have final say? He's not a designer, software engineer, electrical engineer or anything similar. He hires people who ARE experts in these fields to do that work so he can concentrate on running the day-to-day operations. This is what any smart manager does. Cook does have to know enough to step in when he sees something truly wrong, but for the most part he lets his teams make the decisions.
"What goes up must come down"
Gravity rules. No exceptions, even in Cupertino.
Great. Then I look forward to reading more of your educating insightful posts later. I feel better now. Thanks.
No ****ing ****, you ****ing ********er.
Give us all a break - the CEO is responsible for the product line or lack thereof.
Tim Cook seems to be a delegator. So look t the people he put in charge of those groups.But he sets the importance, funds the R&D, and sets the environment where the best people want to work. Everyone inside Apple knows that Macs are doomed, since they are so neglected. Nobody is rushing to be a Mac engineer or Mac product innovator. Apple's DNA is to throw everything out with the bathwater, unless someone stands up and says "No, we need this for long term". Cook's long term is the next quarter and he is failing at that.
Really?
I would think Cook would or should have final say on OK'ing important design matters and major product releases.
So Steve Jobs never did any of this? Just hired others to put out the products? Man, the **** is so deep here that my boot tops are turning brown.
Did somebody wake up on the wrong side of the bed?
How?
Tim Cook seems to be a delegator. So look t the people he put in charge of those groups.
Final say, yes. But I'd argue the failing comes from whoever is leading the hardware side of things to bring him something.
[doublepost=1469554312][/doublepost]
Steve Jobs was not a normal CEO
Hey, you're the one who started whining about moderators, not me. It's amazing that people like you can go day to day without killing yourself because someone like me called Tim Cook an idiot and this offends you. Like I said, thin skin. You would have never made it a damn day in my last job. You would have been thrown overboard on a cloudy night with no float coat or glow stick and the watchstanders would have been given ten bucks to not hear anything.
Ridiculous. By your logic, toilet paper manufacturers should have highest PE.MSFT has a much more foreseeable future and solid business than AAPL, that's for sure, that's why it has a higher PER.
Maybe if that idiot Tim Cook spent more time on the product line up and making it better instead of being a social justice warrior, things would have been in the positive. But that's just my opinion.
Ridiculous. By your logic, toilet paper manufacturers should have highest PE.
Yeah, stupid comments make me wake up on the wrong side of the bed. See your comment for clarification. And Steve Jobs was bull headed son of a bitch who wanted things done his way. That's the way a CEO turns a garage business into what Apple used to be. He's the kind of CEO I would love to work for.
Haha, wowww. Are you seriously implying that Apple is going to surprise us all with a new iPhone in a month that doesn't look at all like what the rumors have been saying?Cool story. Where did you get that from? The rumor blogs that so far know absolute nothing about iPhone 7?
Need I remind you the same "sources" of information knew absolutely nothing about iOS 10 this year?
No. They are in the stock PE space, just like Apple is.toilet paper manufacturers are in the IT/hardware space?
It is possible that upgrading to iOS 10 may need you to have more space if you don't use a PC or MacThe amount of storage on an iPhone is not the real subject of this thread but for many of us, 16Gb is perfect. My 16Gb iPhone 6 has 7.6Gb of storage free. Please explain why I need more storage? Come on, the floor is yours.
Note, we are not all app junkies you know.
Steve Jobs was not a normal CEO
Take the name "Apple" off and what do you have? A company selling old tech on products that can't be upgraded or easily repaired - for top dollar. Add to that an OS that is buggy, and more dumbed-down and locked down with every new release. Any other company with a business model like that would have gone out of business by now.
To make matters worse Tim & Co seem to have forgotten that the ecosystem drives product sales among devices. When only one of those products is keeping up with the competition, it doesn't take an PhD to figure out that one leg can't hold up a table. For a company with as much cash as apple, there is no excuse for ignoring every product line except iPhone.
Another problem is that AppleCare service seems to be slipping. This has always been a major selling point for me and often justified paying more for hardware. There are just too many bad decisions being made about what Apple is about these days. The only place to point the finger is at the boss. Placing the quest for profits to satisfy stockholders above all else is a VERY long way from the Steve Jobs business model.
No. They are in the stock PE space, just like Apple is.