Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

What actions do you want?


  • Total voters
    576
The addition of the 'K' suffix signifies Intel HD 4000 graphics

No, the K signifies unlocked multipliers. Something only useful for overclockers and therefor caries a higher price-tag. You shouldn't expect one in the iMac line-up.

----------

Plz show me how it will be made thiner, look at the iMac internals, if super drive is taken out maybe, but the iMac is thin as it is. Any thinner and dispite Ivy Bridge being cooler than some Sandy bridges , there would likely be more heat issues.

Ever heard of the concept 'laptop' or 'ultrabook' :rolleyes: They iMac can most definitely get 'even' thinner.
 
Ever heard of the concept 'laptop' or 'ultrabook' :rolleyes: They iMac can most definitely get 'even' thinner.
They can make it thinner but confinement = heat
Put your hand on top of an iMac. It puts out more heat than a fat PS3.

If Apple makes the iMac thinner, they better make sure the heat is evacuated/vented properly.
 
Yes it will be better I know. Point was was wondering if apple will use this on base model? Will confuse people with 2010 i3 on base model.

its only dual core with HT so it will not be present in imacs. maybe in macbook pros but i think they'll also go all quad core this year
 
Ever heard of the concept 'laptop' or 'ultrabook' :rolleyes: They iMac can most definitely get 'even' thinner.

Yeah, by utilizing low-power laptop CPUs and scrapping dedicated graphics altogether... That would be a nice thing :rolleyes:

I'd rather have the iMac half a cm thicker, if I had user-upgradable HDD and maybe a desktop-class GPU (although the high-end monile is ok as well).
 
I'd rather have the iMac half a cm thicker, if I had user-upgradable HDD and maybe a desktop-class GPU (although the high-end monile is ok as well).

Now that would be a welcomed refresh.
User serviceable HDD/SSD but apple probably believes that should be left to the experts at apple to perform such routine tasks.
 
Now that would be a welcomed refresh.
User serviceable HDD/SSD but apple probably believes that should be left to the experts at apple to perform such routine tasks.

Well, I wouldn't say that. They do offer user serviceable HDD for the laptops. I think they didn't go that route with the iMac because it would be a bit more problematic from the engineering or design standpoint. A latch on the back of the iMac would be ugly, besides that would have to build the logic board the other way around if the HDD were to accessed from the back — which is not really possible. The bottom of the iMac is just too thin to fit a sliding HDD. Now, it they would remove the optical drive, they would have more space to fit a user-serviceable bay...
 
imac 2012 (2013)

Non Glare sceen is essential.
Though a geniune -non glass- MATT screen, like the one on my MacBook Pro 15" that I ordered on an upgrade is best but not happening. As the glass on the ipad evolves for each generation, so we hope each iMac that comes out will brandish the same one as well!

Remember the large mac monitors screens a few years ago, including 30" were pure screen and zero glass! Just a different experience total. (which is why I am writting this post here, with an older mac mini connected to a samsung LED pure matt screen monitor)

blu-ray of course.... cant keep hiding from it and not letting the now millions of owners not playback their blu-ray discs. forcing them to buy the vastly now inferior dvd format.

OLED and or Retina display. how these would ever work together is not understood by myself.
if using only LED as the lighting it needs to be micro dimming not just backlit.

Finally it must play full P R O G R E S S I V E HD video image & fast Hz refresh rate.
As good as the best Samsung HDTV montiors which do connect to a apple!!
 
Last edited:
Non Glare sceen is essential.

As far as I know, this hasn't been hurting Apple's bottom line.

Though a geniune -non glass- MATT screen, like the one on my MacBook Pro 15" that I ordered on an upgrade is best but not happening. As the glass on the ipad evolves for each generation, so we hope each iMac that comes out will brandish the same one as well!

The only problem I see with adding a matte option is that Apple will have to remove the glass on the black bezel, like they had to with the Macbook Pro 15" and the Macbook Airs. However, this works for the macbook line because the display is separate from the main computer. The iMac, in it's design, is not. So if you take a closer look at the iMac from the side you'll obviously notice that the glass is a noticeable layer that meets the chin of the iMac. Remove that glass and now you have a horridly unstreamlined appearance. You could propose an idea to add a replacement silver bezel layer to it, but then you would have a line in the design, a break if you will; absolutely no-no in Apple's book (unless you're talking about of course iPhone 4 antennas). What's the other solution? Creating a second subset of unibody chassis designs to accommodate a glass-less iMac? Now that's going to complicate manufacturing and production.

I think a matte option for the currently designed iMac is never going to happen. Actually, until the chin goes away permanently, I don't think Apple can ever opt for a matte display, unless they are willing to complicate their manufacturing.

Remember large mac monitors screens a few years ago, including 30" were pure screen and zero glass!

And as a result, the display was not flush, end to end like it is now.

blu-ray of course.... cant keep hiding from it and not letting the now millions of owners not playback their blu-ray discs. forcing them to buy the vastly now inferior dvd format.

Never going to happen. ODD is already gone from Macbook Air and Mac Mini already. The direction Apple is heading is in the opposite direction of blu-rays.

Furthermore, the iTunes store is now filled with 1080p content as of Wednesday. Forget the arguments about bitrates and whatnot. Although blu-ray will still be technically superior, Apple now has better leverage with it's movies and TV show market. Now they can tout 1080p next to blu-ray, and you can bet they'll push the iTunes store strategy as hard as they can and work more vigorously with the studios to gain more digital content.

OLED and or Retina display. how these would ever work together is not understood by myself.
if using only LED as the lighting it needs to be micro dimming not just backlit.

I personally can't wait for OLEDs and retina displays, however considering the iPad's 9.7" display just got updated to retina, you can bet a retina display on a monster 27" iMac ain't happening anytime soon.

As for OLEDs, LG will be releasing their killer CES show stopper OLED later this year so this market is just around the corner.

finally it must play full 1080 P R O G R E S S I V E video as good as the best Samsung HDTV montiors which do connect to a apple!!

Um, iMacs have been displaying 1080p for quite some time now? And Samsung isn't the leader in HDTV video quality so it shouldn't be difficult to achieve that. Actually, I'm not sure but the displays shipping currently with iMacs today might already be from Samsung or LG (someone can check that).
 
Last edited:
iMac pro anyone?

I believe Apple may launch an iMac pro version of the iMac. That's what I would do. I have noticed a shift with my clients and other editors I work with. It seems they are moving away from Mac pros and are working on iMacs now. So why not an imac pro? I really have no idea what more it would offer. Im going to wait to find out though. And it sucks. But hopefully worth the wait.
 
I believe Apple may launch an iMac pro version of the iMac. That's what I would do. I have noticed a shift with my clients and other editors I work with. It seems they are moving away from Mac pros and are working on iMacs now. So why not an imac pro? I really have no idea what more it would offer. Im going to wait to find out though. And it sucks. But hopefully worth the wait.

I doubt it. The thermal profile of the iMac doesn't allow anything more "pro" than the current top of the line model (or its forthcoming IVB equivalent). Even if you could fit the new Xeon chips, or a dual CPU configuration, or a desktop-sized GPU into the iMac, it wouldn't work because those components generate more heat that the iMac can dissipate.
 
iMac Pro would be nice. Might be faster. Anybody have a hint as to when?
 
Last edited:
iMac Refurbished

I was just in the iMac refurb store. There was a 21.5 iMac, 3.6 GHz. How? Never saw an option to upgrade when I bought mine 3 yrs ago. All Apple or 3rd party? Would never buy a refurb but would tend to think it might be better as it was checked out thouroughly. Mine now is 2.4 but would like a lot faster if possible.
 
I am hoping to see a new wireless keyboard with backlighting and an integrated trackpad. I suspect they'll increase the iMac size to 30" but I think once you go beyond 27" you enter the point of diminishing returns. Why? Because you can fit two full application windows side by side on a 27" monitor.

I also reckon they'll include some sort of TV functionality and replace the ODD with an option for SSD or something similar.
 
ultra thin , ultra light , and 100% silent imac

If you remember when the first imac was introduced, Apple decided to remove the floppy disk at a time where everyone thought it would be a mistake to remove. and it was still there in every other computers.
They made the floppy disk optional. you could buy it if really you need it and plug it by USB.

I believe the majority of people don't need CD or DVD's anymore. it's a real pain to get buy a CD/DVD, then copy it into your computer. Compare this to few clicks to get it online. For videos, it is so much easier to have your collection of movies into your computer and it takes time and pain to rip the dvd to get it into your computer. Really, cd's and dvd's have no future.

Also, the current imac is so fat thick and slow because of the HDD. I don't really see the point of keeping an HDD into the mac.
Imagine how could be the mac without dvd/hdd. Incredibly thin, beautiful, absolutely silent and fast. That would be a real change, and that is going to be the future imac.

Apple fan's don't want anymore this big and fat imac when you can build a lighter and thinner one. The imac has never been a storage machine. it always got small HDD's. current ssd size is enough. If you want terabytes, buy a time capsule or a network HDD's.
 
"The thermal profile of the iMac doesn't allow anything more "pro" than the current top of the line model (or its forthcoming IVB equivalent). Even if you could fit the new Xeon chips, or a dual CPU configuration, or a desktop-sized GPU into the iMac, it wouldn't work because those components generate more heat that the iMac can dissipate."

Take the iMac's -power supply- OUT of the back panel, and put it into an external "power block". This provides the additional room and cooling capacity to accommodate more powerful components inside. Even with those components, the internal temps would probably be easier to control with the power supply outside. And perhaps this would reduce the likelihood of the "heat burn" that has been a problem on some iMac displays....
 
I haven't read through this thread so I'm sure it's been beaten to death and I've even seen it mentioned on this page, but a matte screen option would be great. If Apple insists on making their mid-range computer with an attached screen there should be more options. I know it's not completely feasible but the design should be changed to accommodate it.

Ideally, I'd love to see a headless option, but we all know Apple has done that before. I love the iMacs but I have a matte screen on my MBP and it's nice because i don't feel like I'm looking into a mirror.
 
Take the iMac's -power supply- OUT of the back panel, and put it into an external "power block". This provides the additional room and cooling capacity to accommodate more powerful components inside. Even with those components, the internal temps would probably be easier to control with the power supply outside. And perhaps this would reduce the likelihood of the "heat burn" that has been a problem on some iMac displays....

iMacs are not pro machines. They are computers for everyone, and they usually get components from laptops. The average imac user don't need latest high end processor that needs lots of energy. Look, design, and easy to use software is far more important.
 
Am looking at moving from Windows to my first imac. I found a 2011 iMac 27-inch 2.7GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5 factory refurbished for $1180 otd. Even though everything says to wait, I think that this price may be too good to pass up. Thoughts?
 
Am looking at moving from Windows to my first imac. I found a 2011 iMac 27-inch 2.7GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5 factory refurbished for $1180 otd. Even though everything says to wait, I think that this price may be too good to pass up. Thoughts?

the longer you wait the cheaper it gets
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.