Except that unlike the car engine, you don't have to crack open your mac to service every other week.
Man, what kind car do you drive? That shouldn't be happening.
Except that unlike the car engine, you don't have to crack open your mac to service every other week.
Remember USB is still a CPU-sucking parasite of an I/O standard. You won't get anywhere near the peak speed, so it's probably horrid to use for regular booting. I'd definitely be interested to see some benchmarks of internal HDD vs external USB 3 SSD though.
I'll gloss over the second paragraph. No one's saying they KNOW when it's coming out... it's OPINIONS - which is what forums are about.Long time lurker here on the forum but first time poster. I am waiting for the refresh but maybe not for the same reason as most. I am probably in the market for a refurb i7 2011 model. I am simply waiting for the 2012 to evaluate the CPU and GPU advancements. From things I have read, it will not be revolutionary and a refurb i7 2011 may still have incredible bang for the buck at an even better price after the refresh. I am sure this will be heavily flamed but I thought I would add another perspective.
Also, just wanted to say how funny these forums and especially this post is. I love reading how every single poster knows exactly when this or that product will come out. "The refresh will happen in June... May 15...within a week...on Tuesday and on and on. It's a riot, keep it up. I love reading it.![]()
Where's the "expect new iMacs this Tuesday" tipper I've been waiting for? My '08 iMac GPU bit the dust a week ago, so I'm a little more than ready. Running off the old '05 iMac the kids use is getting old.
In my opinion the new iMac cant get that much faster within one year. The screen would be to big for them to introduce retina display, and SSD is overpriced now so they aren't just gonna chuck it on the new iMac for the same prices or even close to similar. The ''ideal iMac'' would be going with the times and upgrading gradually and at the same time trying to keep the prices the same! Im yet to recieive my new iMac and im waiting to see what the glare is what people complain about? Is it that annoying? Or is it people being picky? Keiran!
I don't think the iMacs need to go Retina. Here's how to build them so that everyone benefits.
1. Get rid of the slot loading Superdrive. The external $79 drive that sells for Mac mini/MBA owners should work fine for installs/burns
The money saved on this should pay for 32/64GB of NAND storage for every iMac. Some consumers will complain but SSD for the iMac benefits EVERY user whereas integrated Superdrive only benefit the dwindling number of people that still regularly use discs.
2. Use integrated graphics on the lowest end iMacs. Enable new pricing
$999 for the iMac 21.5
$1499 for the iMac 27"
There's a large contingent of consumers that just don't need a dedicated GPU. The Intel HD4000 is going to be just fine for their needs.
That program should start at wwdc or around that week
Backlit keyboard
I suspect they'll want to take two bites of the cherry by launching in mid-May and then have another blitz when the Back to school promo begins. Obviously more relevant to the macbook pro range but I can't see an update on the iMacs without one in the higher volume MBPs. My running hypothesis is mid to late May
----------
Just out of interest, why would you want backlit keyboard? Obviously it's useful in laptops but surely a desktop will be static and if you are working on a computer, you are unlikely to be doing it in total darkness. And if you do, you have the option of flicking the light switch on. I don't get it.
Unless I'm missing something... why can't you turn a light on when using a laptop mate?Just out of interest, why would you want backlit keyboard? Obviously it's useful in laptops but surely a desktop will be static and if you are working on a computer, you are unlikely to be doing it in total darkness. And if you do, you have the option of flicking the light switch on. I don't get it.
Unless I'm missing something... why can't you turn a light on when using a laptop mate?![]()
Just out of interest, why would you want backlit keyboard? Obviously it's useful in laptops but surely a desktop will be static and if you are working on a computer, you are unlikely to be doing it in total darkness. And if you do, you have the option of flicking the light switch on. I don't get it.
I don't think the iMacs need to go Retina. Here's how to build them so that everyone benefits.
1. Get rid of the slot loading Superdrive. The external $79 drive that sells for Mac mini/MBA owners should work fine for installs/burns
The money saved on this should pay for 32/64GB of NAND storage for every iMac. Some consumers will complain but SSD for the iMac benefits EVERY user whereas integrated Superdrive only benefit the dwindling number of people that still regularly use discs.
2. Use integrated graphics on the lowest end iMacs. Enable new pricing
$999 for the iMac 21.5
$1499 for the iMac 27"
There's a large contingent of consumers that just don't need a dedicated GPU. The Intel HD4000 is going to be just fine for their needs.
It would be for a similar reason as an anti-glare screen.. I use my Mac in total darkness, in part because gaming in total darkness is fun, and in part because the reflection off the screen is impossible to handle. I have an old backlit gaming keyboard, but its time is about at an end, and I do like the feel of the Apple keyboards, so I too am hoping they have a backlight solution for it.
Here's how to build them so that everyone benefits.
1. Get rid of the slot loading Superdrive. The external $79 drive that sells for Mac mini/MBA owners should work fine for installs/burns
The money saved on this should pay for 32/64GB of NAND storage for every iMac. Some consumers will complain but SSD for the iMac benefits EVERY user whereas integrated Superdrive only benefit the dwindling number of people that still regularly use discs.
2. Use integrated graphics on the lowest end iMacs. Enable new pricing
$999 for the iMac 21.5
$1499 for the iMac 27"
There's a large contingent of consumers that just don't need a dedicated GPU. The Intel HD4000 is going to be just fine for their needs.
+1 to that.
Change the whole range so it follows like this.
Desktops
Mac Mini (Current specs, £499, Ivy bridge)
Mac Server (Mac Mini in taller body, £999, two ethernet, 1 PCIe, 2.5GHz i7 quad, Ivy bridge)
iMac (As above, £799)
iMac Pro (As above, £999)
Laptops
Macbook (Current Macbook Air, same specs and prices, Ivy bridge)
Macbook Pro (Current 15" Macbook Pro, same prices, no optical, Ivy bridge)
That seems okay to me...
Thoughts?