I find every reason to have it. I have no intention of taking it out of my house with any frequency, but certainly intend to move it all over inside my house. My wife and I have a large living room and are often a pretty good distance from an outlet, so Magsafe would provide some added security if the cord is taut or close to it. We have three cats who are known to be rambunctious, and I could certainly see them accidentally pulling a USB-C powered laptop to the floor.I find no reason to have MagSafe on the cheapest, lowest power MacBook. It’s a portable machine and whilst MagSafe is awesome, no one wants to carry around a dedicated charger when the USB C works just fine. 1 less port to keep costs down.
Same as MBP, maximize laptop display with 1080p cam with notch.Honest question that I'm asking others (and myself)...would you rather have a 720p cam, and no notch or 1080p cam with notch.
Fair point, but why add in an extra port ($$) when it’s not needed for this device? Genuine question.
The notch doesn't allow a higher resolution cam.Honest question that I'm asking others (and myself)...would you rather have a 720p cam, and no notch or 1080p cam with notch.
My 12" MacBook came out at WWDC 2017. So did my 27" iMac. The MacBook Air was also updated at the same time.WWDC is the spotlight for the Mac Pro. Apple wouldn't announce the consumer M2 Macbook Air until later this year in November, just like when they announced the M1 Macbook Air.
Not that I think they'll do this, but a nice simple lineup for Apple, kinda hearkening back to the G4 days, would be:Prob 14" is possible now
That was 5 years ago. Since then, the only Mac announced were the 3rd gen Mac Pro in 2019, and the A12Z developer transition kit in 2020 (if we count that one). Apple seems to refocus WWDC to be mainly about the OSes.My 12" MacBook came out at WWDC 2017. So did my 27" iMac. The MacBook Air was also updated at the same time.
options. these machines can all be charged using usbc. magsafe is in addition to this.I find no reason to have MagSafe on the cheapest, lowest power MacBook. It’s a portable machine and whilst MagSafe is awesome, no one wants to carry around a dedicated charger when the USB C works just fine. 1 less port to keep costs down.
fair enough, I didn't think about it from the bus connection aspect. Thinking about that now I don't mind the re-addition of those 2 at the cost of a port. SD isn't super useful to me on my work laptop, like it is for some, but would be if my 16" were a personal machine (I have a lot of raspberry pis handling projects around the house for one thing), and the HDMI port is useful when I have to go somewhere and present, and with conferences coming back to being in person that's going to become a thing again.FYI, the 4th Thunderbolt port was replaced with the HDMI + SD card slot, as they take up one of the Thunderbolt buses on the M1 Pro / Max. I personally would also rather have a Thunderbolt 4 port instead, but small price to pay for all of the other advantages of the new hardware vs. legacy Intel machines.
I would assume Apple would still include 2 Thunderbolt ports on the Air.
...if they only sold a standalone notch
I think the point here is that Apple releases Macs when it makes sense to release them, whether or not it's WWDC or some other event, or no event at all.That was 5 years ago. Since then, the only Mac announced were the 3rd gen Mac Pro in 2019, and the A12Z developer transition kit in 2020 (if we count that one). Apple seems to refocus WWDC to be mainly about the OSes.
We'll see soon enough.![]()
Here's to hoping Apple *really* surprises us and introduces an M2 that blows everyone away with performance. I doubt it, but you never know. Though it does sound more like the M2, when it does get released, is going to be a relatively modest performance bump (OTOH the M1 is still so fast that that's ok)I think the point here is that Apple releases Macs when it makes sense to release them, whether or not it's WWDC or some other event, or no event at all.
If the new MacBook Air is ready to be released here, it will be. If it's not, it won't.
Also, if it did actually include M2, WWDC would be the perfect venue for it.
If that's the case, then the Mac Pro must be using an M2 Ultra or something. It would be awkward if Apple announced an M2 Macbook Air, but still used M1-derivative for the much more expensive Mac Pro.Also, if it did actually include M2, WWDC would be the perfect venue for it.
I mentioned in other threads that I believe the Mac Pro won't be M anything. I believe it will have a different nomenclature, regardless of what core architecture it is based upon.If that's the case, then the Mac Pro must be using an M2 Ultra or something. It would be awkward if Apple announced an M2 Macbook Air, but still used M1-derivative for the much more expensive Mac Pro.
I'm a 12" MacBook owner, and I prefer smaller sized Mac laptops. However, I think the market has spoken with regards to that size.Personally what I really want though is the 2016 12" Macbook, but with an M2 and the current keyboard. I think Apple sees iPads as covering that end of the market these days however
That makes absolutely no sense at all. Nothing about the M2 requires dev attention. It is a chip with modestly boosted cores. No new technology to develop for. Least of all its use in the lowest end product in the lineup that developers don't even use.Also, if it did actually include M2, WWDC would be the perfect venue for it.