Yes, because I'm not lazy nor irresponsible.So, your computer is always fully charged and ready to go when you decide you need to use it?
So you're buying it more for fashion than to actually use?I will never buy a macbook with white bezels and especially a white keyboard.
So if a need comes up that you weren't expecting, and your laptop isn't fully charged then, is that because you're lazy, or because you're irresponsible?Yes, because I'm not lazy nor irresponsible.
Here's what's going to happen. They'll release it. Everyone on here will complain it has white bezels, and is "terrible value".
It will go on to be the best selling apple computer, have some insane battery life, regular folks will love it and the colors. Reviews will say it's good, but not a "pro" machine.
Six months later, a bunch of youtube "pro's" will talk about how great it actually is, and how it actually can do a lot of "pro" like work.
If it has better than the 14 inch battery life I'll probably get it.
I don't love the concept of white bezels, but I also spend 80% of my time in a word processor. I'll get used to it when I am in a coffee shop. As for the keyboard, if it has the same style keyboard as the other modern macs but white, great. I'll bring my smallest MK to work at a coffee shop (and a stand for ergonomics) to work anyway. (Keychron q2, a great keyboard).
I don't need a new Air presently, but I'll be buying one of the current ones anyway as a hedge against getting stuck with a white keyboard and bezels.White bezel and keyboard, no thanks you can count me out. I want something that looks elegant and not childish. Second, a white keyboard is horrible idea in any respect as it would show dirt over time. Black keyboards luckily don't have that issue.
Sure, their interest was in the iBook, however, their interest was also in the guy with the interesting taste in laptops. Women love fashion, and they love guys with good fashion. If a man puts care into his appearance, then there is a reasonable assumption that he puts care into other parts of his world. If he is a lazy slob in his appearance, then guess how other parts of his life will be. All this happens at a subconscious level.I've told this story before, and I'll tell it again.
When I first got my 12" G3 iBook way back in 2001, all of a sudden young women came out of the woodwork to ask me about it. I'd be sitting at a bench outside or else in a coffee shop, and these pretty young ladies would randomly strike up conversations with me. As a straight guy who isn't much to look at, I must say I was quite pleased.
Then in 2002 I got a G4 PowerBook Titanium, and all of a sudden all of the interest stopped.
It's obvious that they were just interested in the iBook, but nonetheless I appreciated the attention. Suffice it to say I have very fond memories of my white iBook.
Fair point, but why add in an extra port ($$) when it’s not needed for this device? Genuine question.
I live in a four-story house. (Think rather narrow, deep and tall, Amsterdam style.) If I'm hanging out on the top floor at 11 pm, using my computer, and realize I'm tired and ready to go to bed but decide not to go down two floors and back up again just to retrieve the charger that's in the living room, I think I am responsible (going to sleep when I know it's time, rather than breaking the spell just to fetch a charger), knowing that I can charge it in the morning.Yes, because I'm not lazy nor irresponsible.
Good point but I like the idea of all the MacBooks offering both options since they've brought it back/set a precedent on the latest MBPs.I find no reason to have MagSafe on the cheapest, lowest power MacBook. It’s a portable machine and whilst MagSafe is awesome, no one wants to carry around a dedicated charger when the USB C works just fine. 1 less port to keep costs down.
A 12" and a 15" instead of a 13.3" and both just 'MacBook' unless they try to sell the old MBAs as the cheapest option/'MacBook'.Give us a 15" Macbook Air.
No... It wouldn't be an Air.Give us 14", 15" or "16" please.
Why not? The Air has shared the same size (13") as the smaller MacBook Pro for many years. So the Air could also be the same size as the new smaller MBP (14") and still carry the 'Air' moniker.No... It wouldn't be an Air.
Did you ever see the Air's original introduction? There is a reason why the Air went down in size versus up. It's meant as an ultraportable that fits in an office envelope. Anything bigger than 13" is not ultraportable as it adds size, weight and complexity. In other words, not Air qualities.Why not? The Air has shared the same size (13") as the smaller MacBook Pro for many years. So the Air could also be the same size as the new smaller MBP (14") and still carry the 'Air' moniker.
As has been pointed out in these forums in the past, both 13.3" and 11.6" models of the MacBook Airs has/had thick bezels.Did you ever see the Air's original introduction? There is a reason why the Air went down in size versus up. It's meant as an ultraportable that fits in an office envelope. Anything bigger than 13" is not ultraportable as it adds size, weight and complexity. In other words, not Air qualities.
fr I'm forcer to pass on that one and wait for the next iteration...even tho there may never be a 15"Give us a 15" Macbook Air.
unlikely to happen this time around though ,perhaps with the next MBA ,we shall seeYep. The M2 would be more than enough power for what I do on a daily basis but I don’t want to be stuck with a small screen. The fact that there’s going to be an “iPhone 14 Max” makes me think we’re finally starting to move away from the idea that “larger = pro”.
I had the White MacBook 2007 & 2009 for years.I have fond memories of my G4 ibook. Loved the white.