Whats the most you've ever spent on a watch

I shall be first in line for an Apple Watch. $29,000 is too much to spend on a watch no matter how wealthy you are.

Thanks for trying.

This mentality is why the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

What do you think costs more; the Apple watch or a $29,000 Patek?

The Apple watch does. Fine watches, if bought properly, can APPRECIATE in value. In 10 years your ugly, obsolete Apple watch will be worth $0. The Patek will most likely go up in value. They say a fool and his money are soon parted. The guy with the Patek will still have his money. You wont.


Irony: People on an APPLE forum judging how other people spend their earnigs.
 
Last edited:
£35 for a swatch watch, repeatedly. Keep the time well but man do these things scratch, discolour and fall apart.
 
This mentality is why the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

What do you think costs more; the Apple watch or a $29,000 Patek?

The Apple watch does. Fine watches, if bought properly, can APPRECIATE in value. In 10 years your ugly, obsolete Apple watch will be worth $0. The Patek will most likely go up in value. They say a fool and his money are soon parted. The guy with the Patek will still have his money. You wont.


Irony: People on an APPLE forum judging how other people spend their earnigs.

People used examples here of watches appreciating and really, none of them show more appreciation than a less than poorly performing stock portfolio. If you were smart, you'd buy $350 for an apple watch and spend the $28,650 in a well diversified stock portfolio.
 
People used examples here of watches appreciating and really, none of them show more appreciation than a less than poorly performing stock portfolio. If you were smart, you'd buy $350 for an apple watch and spend the $28,650 in a well diversified stock portfolio.

You completely missed the point.
 
People used examples here of watches appreciating and really, none of them show more appreciation than a less than poorly performing stock portfolio. If you were smart, you'd buy $350 for an apple watch and spend the $28,650 in a well diversified stock portfolio.
I don't view watches as investments.
I also don't plan to sell any of my watches.
 
120USD, the Sector which is announced by Jorge Lorenzo.

Image

Pure class. Everyone spending more than that on a watch must be stupid.

That is the one of the most garish, ugly and cheap looking things I have ever seen. Classy is the last word that could be used to describe it.

----------

nobody mentioned any expensive pocket watches. guess people dont use em much anymore.

Not since the early 20th Century..no..


But having said that, I do have a few pocket watches, including a lovely 1912 Omega that my wife bought me for my 30th Birthday (which was in 2012, so the watch was 100 years old then) and a late 19th Century Waltham.

Rarely get the chance to wear them these days, although last year I broke my wrist in a fall off my bike, so wasn't able to wear a wristwatch. I felt like such a hipster carrying round a pocket watch everywhere!
 
I rotate various watches from:

Masayuki Kurokawa
Uniform Wares
Stock
NAVA
Starck
Alessi

...and a couple of joke Casios :p

I only wear quite simple or slightly quirky design watches. Nothing clunky and metallic.

They normally run £100 -£150 each.

There is no way I'm replacing a collection of watches for different situations for an overpriced disposable Apple thing that won't look half as good (subjective, I know) on my wrist...
 
I rotate various watches from:

Masayuki Kurokawa
Uniform Wares
Stock
NAVA
Starck
Alessi

...and a couple of joke Casios :p

I only wear quite simple or slightly quirky design watches. Nothing clunky and metallic.

They normally run £100 -£150 each.

There is no way I'm replacing a collection of watches for different situations for an overpriced disposable Apple thing that won't look half as good (subjective, I know) on my wrist...

Ooh, I like those. This is what I'm wearing today:

Braun-BN0035.jpg
 
The person whose comment I commented on say rich people do... ;)

No I absolutely did not say that. Like I said, you are completely missing the point. I imagine you have a lot of preconceived biases and trying to make you understand is probably fruitless.
 
No I absolutely did not say that. Like I said, you are completely missing the point. I imagine you have a lot of preconceived biases and trying to make you understand is probably fruitless.

It sounds like you have preconceived biases ;) I understand trying to limit purchases of things that depreciate but I wouldn't say rich people are generally good at this (maybe Warren Buffet). But the thing is, if you buy something that depreciates and costs a relatively small amount than it is probably more financially prudent than buying something that costs a lot and appreciates a tiny amount rather than putting that money elsewhere where it can appreciate more.
 
In 1985 spent I believe $1140 on a Rolex Submariner. I still wear it today.
I think they sell for over $3k these days?
 
What a beauty! Which model is that?

It's a Mondaine, as far as I know it's just called the "Automatic" as it has the Swiss auto movement, rather than the quartz that most of them have.

Mine has a day date function, though they did do an older, smaller one, that didn't.

I've had it about 5 years now, and was going to swap it for the new "stop2go" version they released, until I heard of the problems with it.
 
It's a Mondaine, as far as I know it's just called the "Automatic" as it has the Swiss auto movement, rather than the quartz that most of them have.

Mine has a day date function, though they did do an older, smaller one, that didn't.

I've had it about 5 years now, and was going to swap it for the new "stop2go" version they released, until I heard of the problems with it.

What problems? The stop to go would be a dream Mondaine to have.
 
What problems? The stop to go would be a dream Mondaine to have.

The problems I've heard have been mainly about the movement not keeping accurate time. It's supposed to sweep a minute in 58 seconds so it can jump at 12 o'clock every 60 seconds, but I've heard of it fairly quickly gaining anything up to 5 minutes a day.

Another one I heard was the jump happening at the wrong time. I went to look at one in John Lewis - it was stopping at the 55 marker, jumping 2 seconds and sweeping round from there.

And the other thing people have said is that it's quite fragile. A small bump has totally knocked the movement out of whack, and it's had to be sent back for repair/replacement. So far I've not heard of them charging for this, but they will do one day.

As for being the "dream" Mondaine to have, I respectfully disagree. My dream Mondaine would have the stop2go functionality, but the automatic movement to provide a smooth sweep of the second hand. The current stop2go is just not smooth enough.
 
The problems I've heard have been mainly about the movement not keeping accurate time. It's supposed to sweep a minute in 58 seconds so it can jump at 12 o'clock every 60 seconds, but I've heard of it fairly quickly gaining anything up to 5 minutes a day.

Another one I heard was the jump happening at the wrong time. I went to look at one in John Lewis - it was stopping at the 55 marker, jumping 2 seconds and sweeping round from there.

And the other thing people have said is that it's quite fragile. A small bump has totally knocked the movement out of whack, and it's had to be sent back for repair/replacement. So far I've not heard of them charging for this, but they will do one day.

As for being the "dream" Mondaine to have, I respectfully disagree. My dream Mondaine would have the stop2go functionality, but the automatic movement to provide a smooth sweep of the second hand. The current stop2go is just not smooth enough.

Didn't realize it was quartz. Now I'm disappointed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top