Pure class.
I shall be first in line for an Apple Watch. $29,000 is too much to spend on a watch no matter how wealthy you are.
Thanks for trying.
i respectfully disagree.
This mentality is why the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
What do you think costs more; the Apple watch or a $29,000 Patek?
The Apple watch does. Fine watches, if bought properly, can APPRECIATE in value. In 10 years your ugly, obsolete Apple watch will be worth $0. The Patek will most likely go up in value. They say a fool and his money are soon parted. The guy with the Patek will still have his money. You wont.
Irony: People on an APPLE forum judging how other people spend their earnigs.
People used examples here of watches appreciating and really, none of them show more appreciation than a less than poorly performing stock portfolio. If you were smart, you'd buy $350 for an apple watch and spend the $28,650 in a well diversified stock portfolio.
You completely missed the point.
I don't view watches as investments.People used examples here of watches appreciating and really, none of them show more appreciation than a less than poorly performing stock portfolio. If you were smart, you'd buy $350 for an apple watch and spend the $28,650 in a well diversified stock portfolio.
120USD, the Sector which is announced by Jorge Lorenzo.
Image
Pure class. Everyone spending more than that on a watch must be stupid.
nobody mentioned any expensive pocket watches. guess people dont use em much anymore.
I don't view watches as investments.
I also don't plan to sell any of my watches.
I rotate various watches from:
Masayuki Kurokawa
Uniform Wares
Stock
NAVA
Starck
Alessi
...and a couple of joke Casios
I only wear quite simple or slightly quirky design watches. Nothing clunky and metallic.
They normally run £100 -£150 each.
There is no way I'm replacing a collection of watches for different situations for an overpriced disposable Apple thing that won't look half as good (subjective, I know) on my wrist...
The person whose comment I commented on say rich people do...![]()
No I absolutely did not say that. Like I said, you are completely missing the point. I imagine you have a lot of preconceived biases and trying to make you understand is probably fruitless.
Nice! I've been eyeing up a Braun recently too. The Dezeen Watch Store is often a good place to go for some interesting designed watches - it's a nice coincidence that it stocks half my watches and overlaps our preferences...
In 1985 spent I believe $1140 on a Rolex Submariner. I still wear it today.
I think they sell for over $3k these days?
Stainless steel submariner is well over $8000 new today.
What a beauty! Which model is that?
It's a Mondaine, as far as I know it's just called the "Automatic" as it has the Swiss auto movement, rather than the quartz that most of them have.
Mine has a day date function, though they did do an older, smaller one, that didn't.
I've had it about 5 years now, and was going to swap it for the new "stop2go" version they released, until I heard of the problems with it.
What problems? The stop to go would be a dream Mondaine to have.
The problems I've heard have been mainly about the movement not keeping accurate time. It's supposed to sweep a minute in 58 seconds so it can jump at 12 o'clock every 60 seconds, but I've heard of it fairly quickly gaining anything up to 5 minutes a day.
Another one I heard was the jump happening at the wrong time. I went to look at one in John Lewis - it was stopping at the 55 marker, jumping 2 seconds and sweeping round from there.
And the other thing people have said is that it's quite fragile. A small bump has totally knocked the movement out of whack, and it's had to be sent back for repair/replacement. So far I've not heard of them charging for this, but they will do one day.
As for being the "dream" Mondaine to have, I respectfully disagree. My dream Mondaine would have the stop2go functionality, but the automatic movement to provide a smooth sweep of the second hand. The current stop2go is just not smooth enough.