Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
HDMI 1.4 also supports automotive video systems, so by your "logic" Apple should also have included automotive video systems with the ATV4. LOL :D

Logical fallacies rarely make for a compelling argument.

As I said before; the existing hardware (including the A8 chipset) offer native support for 4K. Apple had to purposefully disable 4K via software. Had Apple not taken this route, in theory, 4K would have been supported by default. Why disable something that is already supported by your hardware? And please... for the love of my sanity don't repeat the same baseless argument "Lack of content".

There is nothing to gain by disabling something your hardware already supports because the content isn't there. You leave it enabled and promote it as a future-proofing feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halifax126
ATV4 uses HDMI 1.4. HDMI 1.4 supports 4K video.
Not really. The problem is that HDCP 2.2 copy protection is mandatory for transmitting UHD content over HDMI (all previous versions of HDCP have been broken). But HDCP 2.2 is only available for HDMI 2.0 ports. This means that the HDMI licensing agreements will not allow playback of commercial 4K content on the Apple TV 4, even though its HDMI 1.4 port is physically capable of carrying video at 4K resolution.
 
On the subject of 4K support... the 4th Generation Apple TV uses HDMI 1.4... which technically supports 4K video. That means that the inability of the Apple TV to process 4K videos is purposeful and likely disabled via software. Now there are a couple of theories on this:
  • iTunes doesn't support 4K; so Apple doesn't want it on their aTV (for now)
  • HDMI 1.4 isn't up to snuff for 4K; so Apple doesn't want you using it and then blaming the low FPS on the device
  • Apple doesn't feel 4K is 'mature' enough to warrant support
  • Planned obsolescence (ie. Upgrade to the Apple TV 5; with 4K Video Support Summer 2017!)
In literally every above scenario Apple is making a decision for you- disregarding that you may already own a 4K tv and may have access to your own 4K-compatible videos. Apple has decided you should not watch videos in this format and has locked you out of the option to choose otherwise, despite offering you hardware that should be capable of handling 4K.

Now lacking a 4K television I have no horse in this race... but I can certainly appreciate people who do have 4K-compatible devices finding themselves upset that Apple has made this decision on their behalf.

I think saying that Apple has decided you should not watch videos in this format is a little extreme. Plenty of other options to watch 4K content (limited in my opinion, but this is what the 4K people tell me). Apple is simply deciding that the distribution of 4K content is not where it needs to be for them to support it. No one is forcing you to buy an Apple TV. It is the consumers decision on where/how they want to consume content, not Apples. They are making a decision in the best interest of their company (monetary or otherwise).
 
It's somewhat amusing to go back in time and read the comments when the Apple TV 2 was announced without 1080p support:

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...renamed-itv-utilizes-apps-lacks-1080p.991329/

Then too, the apologists found lots of excuses why Apple was right not to support the then state-of-the-art video standard, and why you don't really need anything more than 720p. Of course, when the ATV3 with 1080p came out it was suddenly the greatest thing ever. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fancuku
Exactly!! So why not give us 4K capabilities in the Apple TV?

probably 1 in 1000 ATV4 buyers will plug it into a 4K TV.
Content availability would be a strong argument against their releasing a device capable of 4K playback. But the hardware in the ATV4 is fully capable of 4K support; it's just disabled via software. So... why? If the device is already able to support 4K why take the extra steps to disable that support?

Why purposefully disable support for emerging tech when the device has native support for it via the hardware? "Lack of Content" isn't a good argument for that decision.

I bought a Samsung 4K TV for almost $4000 last year. So far, I've watched ONE movie in true 4k.

The rest of the time, it acts as an amazing photo viewer. Even the photos that I take with my phone at 16mbps look absolutely breathtaking on the 4k screen.

I wonder how the ATV4's aerial screensavers will looks if it's in 4K? :)
 
probably 1 in 1000 ATV4 buyers will plug it into a 4K TV.


I bought a Samsung 4K TV for almost $4000 last year. So far, I've watched ONE movie in true 4k.

The rest of the time, it acts as an amazing photo viewer. Even the photos that I take with my phone at 16mbps look absolutely breathtaking on the 4k screen.

I wonder how the ATV4's aerial screensavers will looks if it's in 4K? :)

The screensavers were actually shot in 4K, they are just scaled down for the ATV4.
 
Maybe it's because I just watched American Horror Story last night where the entitled hipsters were complaining that the bathroom tile had a crack in it,

I will agree with you on most of the points, however, releasing an Apple TV that has a remote with two microphones in it and the hyped promise of Siri integration and then not allowing that remote to convert speech-to-text in text boxes as almost everyone expected is a lousy customer experience and the criticism on that front is 100% deserved.

I didn't expect 4K, I didn't expect Profiles, I didn't expect it to make orange juice. But I did expect it to execute basic dictation, no different than how Siri and Dictation co-exist in every app in the iOS App Store. That was misleading and a major frustration and disappointment. Here's your new magical microphone remote and here's your crappy new click-click-click keyboard. Awful.

BJ
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
First Amendment guarantees my right to complain and/or bitch about new Apple products.

Second Amendment guarantees my right to lawfully carry my beloved Glock.

I think I also have the right to go out to an empty field and use my Glock to shoot the Apple product that I hate. (at my own expense, of course)
That's not what the first amendment guarantees you. The first amendment prevents the government from infringing upon freedom of speech. Apple is not a government and therefore it doesn't apply. This is why when people like Donald Sterling (NBA Clipper's owner) says stupid, racist crap, they get fired or forced out with no freedom of speech protection. Furthermore, freedom of speech rights are not absolute. The supreme court has deemed several categories of speech that are excluded from freedom of speech allowing the government (again, not a private company like Apple) to restrict speech as they see fit.

Not sure what they're teaching in schools these days.
 
Logical fallacies rarely make for a compelling argument.

As I said before; the existing hardware (including the A8 chipset) offer native support for 4K. Apple had to purposefully disable 4K via software. Had Apple not taken this route, in theory, 4K would have been supported by default. Why disable something that is already supported by your hardware? And please... for the love of my sanity don't repeat the same baseless argument "Lack of content".

There is nothing to gain by disabling something your hardware already supports because the content isn't there.
Revenue to gain when the 5 comes out with 4K support. This is Apple we're talking about. They've employed the same strategy in every product they release. The only way you can oppose is to not support their products. While I agree that it should have 4K, I'm not particularly bothered or surprised by the lack of support. I'll hold off on updating my 3 for a while.
 
Last edited:
That's not what the first amendment guarantees you. The first amendment prevents the government from infringing upon freedom of speech. Apple is not a government and therefore it doesn't apply. This is why when people like Donald Sterling (NBA Clipper's owner) says stupid, racist crap, they get fired or forced out with no freedom of speech protection. Furthermore, freedom of speech rights are not absolute. The supreme court has deemed several categories of speech that are excluded from freedom of speech allowing the government (again, not a private company like Apple) to restrict speech as they see fit.

Not sure what they're teaching in schools these days.

Who can run the country better? The Republicans, the Democrats, or Apple, Inc. Give Apple a chance. They can't do any worse than the career politicians. Although, that's just one step away from relinquishing control to Skynet, is it? :(
 
That's not what the first amendment guarantees you. The first amendment prevents the government from infringing upon freedom of speech. Apple is not a government and therefore it doesn't apply. This is why when people like Donald Sterling (NBA Clipper's owner) says stupid, racist crap, they get fired or forced out with no freedom of speech protection. Furthermore, freedom of speech rights are not absolute. The supreme court has deemed several categories of speech that are excluded from freedom of speech allowing the government (again, not a private company like Apple) to restrict speech as they see fit.

This ^

(and thank you bpeeps)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Böhme417
I like the starters post.

As I said in another post, there was plenty of information out there in regards to what the ATV4 is, was and what it will be.
Yet, there are plenty of posts saying its a failure.

My reasoning behind the purchase was hopes for better wifi (I got), NHL Game Center (I got), and the ability to play a mindless game every so often.

If the Amazon fire had the NHL Game Center, I would have had no need for Apple.

The lack of 4K has me baffled. Especially with their iMac and iPhone supporting it.
Some say the market penetration isn't strong enough to warrant it.
My tin foil hat thinks Apple didn't include 4K as Samsung would have sold more expensive TVs increasing their bottom line.

Isn't 2160p around 70MB? Still below the 100MB threshold.

I did see the episode of AHS. I hear things, to a lesser degree, from younger employees.
 
Not really. The problem is that HDCP 2.2 copy protection is mandatory for transmitting UHD content over HDMI (all previous versions of HDCP have been broken). But HDCP 2.2 is only available for HDMI 2.0 ports. This means that the HDMI licensing agreements will not allow playback of commercial 4K content on the Apple TV 4, even though its HDMI 1.4 port is physically capable of carrying video at 4K resolution.
Studios still persisting with their futile war...
 
Not really. The problem is that HDCP 2.2 copy protection is mandatory for transmitting UHD content over HDMI (all previous versions of HDCP have been broken). But HDCP 2.2 is only available for HDMI 2.0 ports. This means that the HDMI licensing agreements will not allow playback of commercial 4K content on the Apple TV 4, even though its HDMI 1.4 port is physically capable of carrying video at 4K resolution.

I could be wrong, but I haven't heard of any copy protection that hasn't been broken.
 
Agree 100% plus this is NOT a first generation device. By my count this is the 4th generation and should be a lot more polished and complete.

Let's be real here.... This is 4th gen in name only. None of the previous models are like this one. The 2 and 3 were buried in the iPod section for a reason. With tvOS Apple is basically starting from scratch. Be patient... Improvements are coming.


And to the OP... Well said!

The specs of this Device was documented well before the release. So I still don't get all the angst about 4K. Or lack of keyboard, remote app support. That would've been mentioned. Or Siri not searching for apps/NAS/home sharing (don't see those happening)

Relax people.... tvOS is brand new
.....In literally every above scenario Apple is making a decision for you......

You must not be familiar with Apple. This has been their MO since their inception.
 
4k support doesn't really concern me, I think it is a fad technology that will fall to the wayside like BetaMax. HDR is where it is really at. Studios already shoot in HDR, most new smartphones support HDR. So the only place it is missing is our TVs. There are HDR TVs out there, but they are still pretty expensive. I haven't seen one in person, but the description of the picture quality is pretty compelling.

I don't know the technical requirements, but I assume ATV4 would be able to support HDR with a software update.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/this-year-buy-a-tv-thats-actually-better-1447181077
 
4k support doesn't really concern me, I think it is a fad technology that will fall to the wayside like BetaMax. HDR is where it is really at. Studios already shoot in HDR, most new smartphones support HDR. So the only place it is missing is our TVs. There are HDR TVs out there, but they are still pretty expensive. I haven't seen one in person, but the description of the picture quality is pretty compelling.

I don't know the technical requirements, but I assume ATV4 would be able to support HDR with a software update.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/this-year-buy-a-tv-thats-actually-better-1447181077


I respectfully disagree with you on that one. I think HDR TVs(like 3D TVs) is a fad and the future is 4k OLED TVs. :) My old aging eyes are so used to my 4k TV now. Due to the obvious lack of TV/movie content in 4k, I mostly use it to watch 4k videos that I shot on my phone or camcorder, as well as digital photos. They look absolutely spectacular. When I play the same videos/photos on my other TV(1080p), I feel like going from HD(1080i) back to SD(480i).
 
It's somewhat amusing to go back in time and read the comments when the Apple TV 2 was announced without 1080p support:

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...renamed-itv-utilizes-apps-lacks-1080p.991329/

Then too, the apologists found lots of excuses why Apple was right not to support the then state-of-the-art video standard, and why you don't really need anything more than 720p. Of course, when the ATV3 with 1080p came out it was suddenly the greatest thing ever. :D

Reminds me at another Apple forum, every now and then this pops up. "You don't know want you want, but Apple does"
As if.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.