But the hardware in the ATV4 is fully capable of 4K support
Which chips in the ATV4, specifically, do you think support 4K?
But the hardware in the ATV4 is fully capable of 4K support
Which chips in the ATV4, specifically, do you think support 4K?
HDMI 1.4 also supports automotive video systems, so by your "logic" Apple should also have included automotive video systems with the ATV4. LOLWhich chips in the ATV4, specifically, do you think support 4K?
Everyone who has an iPhone 6s or 6s Plus has the content. How many millions of users is that??Again, for the hundredth time (you might want to write this down) there is little content to watch with them.
HDMI 1.4 also supports automotive video systems, so by your "logic" Apple should also have included automotive video systems with the ATV4. LOL![]()
Not really. The problem is that HDCP 2.2 copy protection is mandatory for transmitting UHD content over HDMI (all previous versions of HDCP have been broken). But HDCP 2.2 is only available for HDMI 2.0 ports. This means that the HDMI licensing agreements will not allow playback of commercial 4K content on the Apple TV 4, even though its HDMI 1.4 port is physically capable of carrying video at 4K resolution.ATV4 uses HDMI 1.4. HDMI 1.4 supports 4K video.
Everyone who has an iPhone 6s or 6s Plus has the content. How many millions of users is that??.
Logical fallacies rarely make for a compelling argument.
On the subject of 4K support... the 4th Generation Apple TV uses HDMI 1.4... which technically supports 4K video. That means that the inability of the Apple TV to process 4K videos is purposeful and likely disabled via software. Now there are a couple of theories on this:
In literally every above scenario Apple is making a decision for you- disregarding that you may already own a 4K tv and may have access to your own 4K-compatible videos. Apple has decided you should not watch videos in this format and has locked you out of the option to choose otherwise, despite offering you hardware that should be capable of handling 4K.
- iTunes doesn't support 4K; so Apple doesn't want it on their aTV (for now)
- HDMI 1.4 isn't up to snuff for 4K; so Apple doesn't want you using it and then blaming the low FPS on the device
- Apple doesn't feel 4K is 'mature' enough to warrant support
- Planned obsolescence (ie. Upgrade to the Apple TV 5; with 4K Video Support Summer 2017!)
Now lacking a 4K television I have no horse in this race... but I can certainly appreciate people who do have 4K-compatible devices finding themselves upset that Apple has made this decision on their behalf.
Exactly!! So why not give us 4K capabilities in the Apple TV?
Content availability would be a strong argument against their releasing a device capable of 4K playback. But the hardware in the ATV4 is fully capable of 4K support; it's just disabled via software. So... why? If the device is already able to support 4K why take the extra steps to disable that support?
Why purposefully disable support for emerging tech when the device has native support for it via the hardware? "Lack of Content" isn't a good argument for that decision.
probably 1 in 1000 ATV4 buyers will plug it into a 4K TV.
I bought a Samsung 4K TV for almost $4000 last year. So far, I've watched ONE movie in true 4k.
The rest of the time, it acts as an amazing photo viewer. Even the photos that I take with my phone at 16mbps look absolutely breathtaking on the 4k screen.
I wonder how the ATV4's aerial screensavers will looks if it's in 4K?![]()
Maybe it's because I just watched American Horror Story last night where the entitled hipsters were complaining that the bathroom tile had a crack in it,
That's not what the first amendment guarantees you. The first amendment prevents the government from infringing upon freedom of speech. Apple is not a government and therefore it doesn't apply. This is why when people like Donald Sterling (NBA Clipper's owner) says stupid, racist crap, they get fired or forced out with no freedom of speech protection. Furthermore, freedom of speech rights are not absolute. The supreme court has deemed several categories of speech that are excluded from freedom of speech allowing the government (again, not a private company like Apple) to restrict speech as they see fit.First Amendment guarantees my right to complain and/or bitch about new Apple products.
Second Amendment guarantees my right to lawfully carry my beloved Glock.
I think I also have the right to go out to an empty field and use my Glock to shoot the Apple product that I hate. (at my own expense, of course)
Revenue to gain when the 5 comes out with 4K support. This is Apple we're talking about. They've employed the same strategy in every product they release. The only way you can oppose is to not support their products. While I agree that it should have 4K, I'm not particularly bothered or surprised by the lack of support. I'll hold off on updating my 3 for a while.Logical fallacies rarely make for a compelling argument.
As I said before; the existing hardware (including the A8 chipset) offer native support for 4K. Apple had to purposefully disable 4K via software. Had Apple not taken this route, in theory, 4K would have been supported by default. Why disable something that is already supported by your hardware? And please... for the love of my sanity don't repeat the same baseless argument "Lack of content".
There is nothing to gain by disabling something your hardware already supports because the content isn't there.
That's not what the first amendment guarantees you. The first amendment prevents the government from infringing upon freedom of speech. Apple is not a government and therefore it doesn't apply. This is why when people like Donald Sterling (NBA Clipper's owner) says stupid, racist crap, they get fired or forced out with no freedom of speech protection. Furthermore, freedom of speech rights are not absolute. The supreme court has deemed several categories of speech that are excluded from freedom of speech allowing the government (again, not a private company like Apple) to restrict speech as they see fit.
Not sure what they're teaching in schools these days.
That's not what the first amendment guarantees you. The first amendment prevents the government from infringing upon freedom of speech. Apple is not a government and therefore it doesn't apply. This is why when people like Donald Sterling (NBA Clipper's owner) says stupid, racist crap, they get fired or forced out with no freedom of speech protection. Furthermore, freedom of speech rights are not absolute. The supreme court has deemed several categories of speech that are excluded from freedom of speech allowing the government (again, not a private company like Apple) to restrict speech as they see fit.
Studios still persisting with their futile war...Not really. The problem is that HDCP 2.2 copy protection is mandatory for transmitting UHD content over HDMI (all previous versions of HDCP have been broken). But HDCP 2.2 is only available for HDMI 2.0 ports. This means that the HDMI licensing agreements will not allow playback of commercial 4K content on the Apple TV 4, even though its HDMI 1.4 port is physically capable of carrying video at 4K resolution.
Not really. The problem is that HDCP 2.2 copy protection is mandatory for transmitting UHD content over HDMI (all previous versions of HDCP have been broken). But HDCP 2.2 is only available for HDMI 2.0 ports. This means that the HDMI licensing agreements will not allow playback of commercial 4K content on the Apple TV 4, even though its HDMI 1.4 port is physically capable of carrying video at 4K resolution.
Agree 100% plus this is NOT a first generation device. By my count this is the 4th generation and should be a lot more polished and complete.
.....In literally every above scenario Apple is making a decision for you......
Again, for the hundredth time (you might want to write this down) there is little content to watch with them.
4k support doesn't really concern me, I think it is a fad technology that will fall to the wayside like BetaMax. HDR is where it is really at. Studios already shoot in HDR, most new smartphones support HDR. So the only place it is missing is our TVs. There are HDR TVs out there, but they are still pretty expensive. I haven't seen one in person, but the description of the picture quality is pretty compelling.
I don't know the technical requirements, but I assume ATV4 would be able to support HDR with a software update.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/this-year-buy-a-tv-thats-actually-better-1447181077
It's somewhat amusing to go back in time and read the comments when the Apple TV 2 was announced without 1080p support:
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...renamed-itv-utilizes-apps-lacks-1080p.991329/
Then too, the apologists found lots of excuses why Apple was right not to support the then state-of-the-art video standard, and why you don't really need anything more than 720p. Of course, when the ATV3 with 1080p came out it was suddenly the greatest thing ever.![]()
I agree with the improvements part, but it is a 4th gen device. A generation doesn't stop just because of product advancement. Just the opposite.With tvOS Apple is basically starting from scratch. Be patient... Improvements are coming.