Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which chip does your 6s(6s+) have?

6S with Samsung chip, a lot of stuttering even after a complete restore in 9.02.

For those who tell that TSMC chip is causing lags, you're wrong.

edit :
Single-core : 2555
Multi-core : 4435
 
Last edited:
T-mobile week 38 6s 64gb
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    225.9 KB · Views: 195
Jman13 said:
I know what yours is: it's an Apple A9. It meets Apple's specs, and everything else is essentially irrelevant.
Click to expand...
I am curious how the 2013 Air SSD write speed debacle fits into your notion of irrelevance? The Sandisk blades wrote 1/2 as fast as the Samsung and did not meet the advertised speeds. Surely Apple thought at the time that the Sandisk met their specs too? But they didn't and in 2014 all Air SSDs were Samsung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaciMac100
[
jmfangio said:
I am curious how the 2013 Air SSD write speed debacle fits into your notion of irrelevance? The Sandisk blades wrote 1/2 as fast as the Samsung and did not meet the advertised speeds. Surely Apple thought at the time that the Sandisk met their specs too? But they didn't and in 2014 all Air SSDs were Samsung.
Click to expand...

iPad 2 was also manufactured using two different A5 chips, performance was the same, but one had significant battery life improvements. Apple made no mention of this in specs or elsewhere.
 
I think we have conclusive proof that there is no conclusive proof of any difference.

Some are seeing TSMC scores right with Samsung's, but scores fluctuate each time you run them on the same phone let alone a different phone.

I would bet a whole lot of money whatever advantages the 2nm smaller chip gave were weeded out by Apple in the software to make them both even. All we are seeing is normal deviations in the data.
 
stulaw11 said:
I think we have conclusive proof that there is no conclusive proof of any difference.

Some are seeing TSMC scores right with Samsung's, but scores fluctuate each time you run them on the same phone let alone a different phone.

I would bet a whole lot of money whatever advantages the 2nm smaller chip gave were weeded out by Apple in the software to make them both even. All we are seeing is normal deviations in the data.
Click to expand...

If you look at Geekbench battery life scores we have currently, TSMC scores aren't near Samsung's, but it's too early to tell for sure how this will turn out.
 
MaciMac100 said:
If you look at Geekbench battery life scores we have currently, TSMC scores aren't near Samsung's, but it's too early to tell for sure how this will turn out.
Click to expand...

You consider less than 1/2 a percent difference statistically significant? You are talking 10 points out of approx. 2500 afterall; or 20 out of approx 4400.
 
soupsoupsoup said:
At this point you are all jumping to conclusions.
Click to expand...

At this point we are gathering data to see what it shows. Reviewing early preliminary data is not jumping to conclusions.

ChinaRye said:
I am quite obsessive about my gadgets, but this thread is completely ridiculous. There is absolutely no proof that one is better than the other.
Click to expand...

There was no proof the earth was round until enough data was gathered.
 
Joe1602 said:
At this point we are gathering data to see what it shows. Reviewing early preliminary data is not jumping to conclusions.
Click to expand...

I am talking about people who are hell bent to declare one chip superior based on tiny samples. I am not against people collecting data.
 
iPhone 6S+ 128GB Space Grey TSMC
ios 9.02
Geekbench 3

SC 2524
MC 4396

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/3658399

I just did a geekbench right after this one and got way different results. It just goes to show how much the geekbench can vary.
Sc 2524
MC 4415
Not sure why it scored lower. Here are my past results:
Test 1:
SC 2534
MC 4421
Test 2:
SC 2524
MC 4414
Test 3:
SC 2516
MC 4397

Average Scores
Sc: 2524.4
MC: 4408

I'll do a battery score tonight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaciMac100
soupsoupsoup said:
I am talking about people who are hell bent to declare one chip superior based on tiny samples. I am not against people collecting data.
Click to expand...

You said, "you are all jumping to conclusions." Sounded to me like you were talking about "all" of us.
Just wanted to point out that many of us are not concluding anything yet.
 
Joe1602 said:
At this point we are gathering data to see what it shows. Reviewing early preliminary data is not jumping to conclusions.



There was no proof the earth was round until enough data was gathered.
Click to expand...

I hear Elvis is still alive. Maybe you should look into that one as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back