Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
For once I was hoping for Samsung (before I came upon this thread). I checked my CPU and I'm happy to say I have TSMC. Thank God I got what I didn't initially want. :D I used my phone for 6+ hours today and it only dropped to 80%. Granted I only have my screen brightness at 1/4th but its much better than my old crappy Android junk. This is my first iPhone (but not first Apple product) and I'm extremely pleased.

I ran the Antutu benchmark just to see what I got but not really sure if its good or how it stacks up.

Edit: iPhone 6s 64GB Space Gray
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0001.PNG
    IMG_0001.PNG
    373.6 KB · Views: 217
I been using my iPhone 6s+ pretty heavily on safari and Facebook for 4 hours now and still have 76%

Have Samsung chip, no overheating issues, no freezing or lag

And that last video shows both a9 chips doing the identical tasks and the battery scores are identical

Apple would never ship out their phones if they had a 20% difference in battery life. You don't think this is tested?
The same way they tested the iPhone 4 ROFL!
 
People should start adding the model number of your iPhone to this. I got the iPhone 6S and 6S+ both for Tmobile Model A1688 (GSM) and Model A1687 (GSM) for the Plus and they came with samsung chip.

While my friend got a 6S+ the ATT version with Band 30 Model A1634 and his came with a TSMC chip.

http://www.apple.com/iphone/LTE/

Not even sure why they made two different models GSM phones this year, but maybe this has something to do with what chip you get. Not color or size.
 
Why don't people post up some screen shots of actual normal usage times that they're getting on their phones?
 
Congrats to all those who contributed nothing to the discussion. As if color, carrier, or capacity has anything to do with it.

At least some people posted their actual experiences with their given CPU. The rest who merely posted their chip brand are just yammering away taking up space. The thread should have had a poll, otherwise it's meaningless. And it's probably meaningless even with a poll.

Do you need a tissue for your tears?
 
Congrats to all those who contributed nothing to the discussion...

...At least some people posted their actual experiences with their given CPU. The rest who merely posted their chip brand are just yammering away taking up space....

To be fair, this thread IS titled "Which chip does your 6s(6s+) have?"
 
With all the pandemonium going on with the Samsung vs TSMC chip, how affected are you about this? Do you particularly care about the chip you get, desiring the best of your hard-earned smartphone, or are you not sweating about it?
 
This thread is hilarious. I have gotten sucked in and read the entire thing. I refuse to check to see what chip my phone has though. If I find out my phone has a "bad chip" I will start to notice poor performance- and I am happy with it right now.
I'm getting a new iPhone next year anyway.
 
If you don't want to install an app, I found that low battery logs also list what chip is in your phone. Privacy>Diagnostics & Usage>Diagnostic & Usage Data>LowBatteryLog-2015-XX-YY-ZZZZZZ.ips
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
The video does my last long enough to be conclusive, at all. If the difference is 20 percent, then the Samsung should lose approximately 1 percent every 5 percent drop.


The video only ran the batteries down 6 percent - - not long enough to be conclusive that there is no difference in battery life.

If the difference is 15 percent, then this video didn't last long enough for the Samsung to "fall behind".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.