Don't the leaks confirm 2gb ram and A8X?
Yes. Almost, as long as they are no fake images but they were from 2 different sources so it looks good
Don't the leaks confirm 2gb ram and A8X?
The second chip appears to be below and to the left of the A8X in the picture in the AnandTech thread. I didn't even notice it until I looked closely.There are two ELPIDA dram chips next to the A8x and with some
imagination we might read the (very blurry) part number right below
the ELPIDA logo as "FA164A..." which would make them 16Gb LPDDR3
parts each with a 2x32 bit databus.
That would make a decent 4GB dram in total with a wide 128 bit bus.
I'm not sure if it's been mentioned on this forum yet, but there is some speculation that the upcoming iPad could have 4 GB of RAM.
The second chip appears to be below and to the left of the A8X in the picture in the thread. I didn't even notice it until I looked closely.
Wow....do you have to wait 3 seconds for it to refresh? Boo hoo.....what an age we live in.
I'm sticking with my air unless it halves in weight....that's the only thing that may convince me to upgrade.....frankly they can put in 8GB Ram in for all i care, if it weighs the same I'm sticking!
3 seconds to refresh followed by 5-10 minutes filling in the form that has just discarded all my data.
It looks like a reasonable conclusion from the picture but I agree that it might seem a bit high. I think 4 GB could make sense if split-screen multitasking is being introduced with the iPad Air 2, so the RAM amount would be doubled from a hypothetical 2 GB iPad Air with no split-screen.
As for the iPad mini, it could go to 2 GB, which may be related to the following possibilities:
- The iPad mini would have the same density RAM chip as the iPad Air, assuming the former uses the A8 chip
- Apple has decided that 2 GB is the minimum RAM required for the split-screen feature
But Cperchard doesn't care about that so we are the ones complaining
----------
While I feel that it too far fetched, I really would love to be proved wrong![]()
You even then have the Solid State memory, 16GB, 32GB 64GB, 128GB to which most apps will be carrying out their in memory paging, this requires good quality coding to ensure that this takes place and is a mix of the iOS and also the apps coding itself.
Great response, I haven't run into a response like this before. So kudos.
I now am waiting for the counter response indicating that RAM after all the process of elimination is the real issue. Any takers?
Wow....do you have to wait 3 seconds for it to refresh? Boo hoo.....what an age we live in.
I'm sticking with my air unless it halves in weight....that's the only thing that may convince me to upgrade.....frankly they can put in 8GB Ram in for all i care, if it weighs the same I'm sticking!
As I said.....if you were doing something THAT important, I wouldn't be using an iPad anyway.....use a proper computer!
Besides.....I've got 5 tabs loaded up......once they are all loaded, they seem to stay loaded for me.....until I close safari completely.....so I really don't understand everyones problem!
I took a chance on the Lynx because a refurb was deeply discounted (~$200) and had killer specs. No complaints. I've heard lots of good things about S2, but I think the Lynx will fill my needs for at least two more years.
Knowing Apple's pattern, I am pessimistic that this year iPad can have 2GB RAM. But there are rumors which say that it could possibly be featured with 2 GB ram, there's even pictures of it.
Gonna keep the mindset of 2GB ram as a pleasant bonus.
RAM should NEVER be a consideration when buying a new iOS device. I'm happy with whatever Apple determines to be the perfect amount to ensure long battery life and ultimate performance. So I'll be buying iPad Air 2 whether it has 1GB or 2GB.
I just think it's Safari not lack of RAM. When I run Chrome on iOS there's no problem.
I still don't get what critically important "forms" people could possibly be filling out on their iPads? Forms so important (mind you) that they couldn't possibly just dedicate one tab (because that would work flawlessly), they need to have 6 different "forms" open and be playing music, watching video, and playing games (all while filling out multiple critically important forms). It's kinda silly when you think about it.
And ask them to demonstrate a RAM related issue?
"well, it's, um... intermittent, ya, but if you don't think it's real... ohhh boy!"
So I renew my challenge: Show me how to demonstrate a RAM related issue.
It'd be great if it didn't involve filling out 8 forms at once while playing Bioshock in the rain, but hey, I can't even get mine to falter then, so go for it!
![]()
iOS does lacks part of the paging ability, but read-only, storage-mapped memory can be pageable as usual. The problem with Safari in iOS (as it seems) is that it holds the content only in the memory, except history & web local storage, but never the non-volatile memory. I guess pretty much all the mobile browsers do this, as you wouldn't want to wear out the NVM.A rudimentary web search couldn't find a source, but I remember reading that iOS does not allow virtual memory to address the SSD. No paging to the non volatile storage. To the non technical people, this is the reason why an old 512 MB computer(laptop or desktop) does not need to reload tabs but a 1 GB iOS device does. Assuming what I remember is true (no paging to the SSD), a bump in RAM should help the reload issue.
Everybody's here asking for 2GB of RAM because of Safari tab crashing/reloading issue right?
What if Apple could somehow fix that issue without increasing the RAM size to 2GB? Is there anything critical that impacts the majority of users regarding RAM size?
Maybe for the iPad Pro? I don't see them jumping from a 'too low' 1GB to 'overkill' 4GB.