Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Holy ****...you're a genius! I didn't even think of it that way. It didn't even occur to me, until you said it, that all of the Sonos speakers are daisy-chained (wirelessly). So, if I'm understanding you correctly, If I Airplay to one Sonos speaker (via an Airport Express), it will daisy-chain that signal to all the speakers in the network that are configured (in the Sonos app) to play synchronously?

Please tell me I understood that correctly...

Correct. You would set up your AirPlay input to one Sonos unit (A Connect or a Play:5 typically, since those are the ones with a line input that you could connect an Airport Express to). Then configure it as an AirPlay line in and you can choose to configure it to auto play as soon as an input is detected. From then on that AirPlay input is available as a source to any other Sonos unit on your network.

Give it a try. I think you'll be impressed :)
 
I don't have any experience with Bose Soundlink, but don't let my testimony sway your decision. Airplay is certainly cheaper, but this evening's experience, is making me re-think the whole investment. I'm not eager to spend TWICE the amount spent on my Pioneer speakers, but the network disconnections are driving me up the wall...I'm just really going to hate losing native Apple software support if I jump ship to Sonos :(

Not to sound like a Sonos pitchman, but this is exactly the sort of thing that Sonos aims to avoid. Assuming your home isn't problematic for wireless (say, full of concrete and brick walls that block wireless signals), Sonos should be much more reliable.

Part of the reason is because each Sonos unit forms part of a peer to peer mesh network, so wireless signals don't all have to go through your router. So the wireless performance improves with the number of Sonos devices, and you don''t have to worry that one of your players (say, in an upstairs bedroom) is far away from the router in the basement, because it will just talk to the Sonos unit in the kitchen.

The other thing is that Sonos units are not passively receiving a data stream (and thus susceptible to wireless interference in real-time), but when you tell a Sonos unit to play a song from your iOS device or your NAS, you are telling it to go retrieve the mp3 file off the network, buffer it locally, then play back. Any other Sonos devices that are also playing back the same song will do the same, and then they talk to each other to maintain synchronization. What this means in practice is much less network traffic and much less susceptibility to hiccups or network congestion.

Oh, and as a bonus, all Sonos devices have an Ethernet port that you can plug your laptop or Xbox into for wired ethernet access (using the Sonosnet as a bridge)!
 
Having recently bought a Synology NAS, I really wanted to like Audiostation and the DS Audio app, but I just found it frustrating. I probably could have lived without the star-rating based smart playlists in iTunes, but unless I missed something (which is entirely possible) the functionality of Apple's Remote App (especially with regard to turning multiple zones on & off, and managing volume levels independently. And one time I got two different songs playing on two different zones, and could not figure out how to re-synch them.

Did I miss something in DS Audio?
The DS Audio app will manage the volume of each device independently. The part that is confusing is you have two separate airplay options on an iPhone running DS Audio. One is the normal option to airplay from the iOS device. The other is the option to Airplay directly from the NAS and control each device from inside the software.

To turn off a zone, you pick it from the app (from the app's airplay choices) and then hit the black square button for stop.

If you are asking whether it is possible to have 3 separate songs playing on three different Airplay devices and then all of a sudden switching back to one song across all three, I have never tested it. There is a "network audio" airplay device that is in the Airplay device list, but I have no idea what it does because I have never tried it. To be honest, I normally only play music on one device at a time.

I am not arguing that DS Audio is a better music player than iTunes, although I bet a lot of people would just because you can play from folders and more formats. However, it does what I need when I need to use it.

It also has the capability of sending audio from the NAS to the iPhone outside of the home, which is how I mainly use it. This gives you access to your entire library while still being able to leave your computer off.

The Airport Express can also share and expand the network:

"If you already have a wireless network in your home and want to extend its range, AirPort Express can help. Just place it in range of your primary base station — an AirPort Extreme, AirPort Time Capsule, or another AirPort Express — and near the area where you want your wireless connection. Launch the easy‑to‑use AirPort Utility app on your iOS device or Mac, and you’re mere minutes away from long‑range Wi‑Fi enjoyment."
 
Airplay gives more flexible systems at far less money

Not knocking Sonos great stuff. But I have been using airport express since it debuted back then it was called AirTunes. So my whole home is setup with combo of airport express and Apple TV's. What works so well with airport express is powered speaker systems you can pick and choose brand, size and sound you like. Also you may have some laying around you can use. I had a pair of JBL sound sticks with sub add airport express and that's my kitchen system. You can also pick up used systems on craigslist add airport express and save tons of money. You can also power much higher end speakers than Sonos. I have a pair of towers in my living room powered by a Bose SA 3 amplifier which works great with airport express drives a clean 100 watts per channel, auto power hides under a sofa.
 
My router (Netgear WNDR 3700 dual-band) is located on one end of a 2100 square foot bi-level house on the 2nd floor. I do not get audio dropouts even on the other end of the house on the first floor with Airplay/iTunes/AppleTV/Airport Express. The idea that Apple would be unreliable for music sounds doesn't play well here. Maybe if you had a mansion you'd need Sonos's peer-to-peer network (I believe that would slow things down and thus be unsuitable for video like Airplay), but then shouldn't you have wired Ethernet in such a dream home?

I am unhappy about the newer AppleTV units with the 48kHz re-sampling. My mind boggles at why Apple can't manage straight pass-through when a simple Airport Express can handle it. I have a quite a few DTS Music CDs and they play fine on 1st Gen AppleTV and Airport Express rooms. I do wonder if XBMC on a newer AppleTV2 unit could decode it and output as straight multi-channel PCM over HDMI, though (haven't tried it), but with a CrystalHD card added, the original AppleTV is a better choice anyway.
 
I wanted to mention that I looked at the syncing feature of playing the same song to several airplay units when I got home from work on the Synology NAS. You have to initially setup the Airplay units you want included in the "Multiple Airplay Devices" on the computer. Once you have them setup, you just choose "Multiple Airplay Devices" from the Airplay device drop down list and the same audio will be sent to each device in sync.

To me, it has a lot more uses than iTunes. You can also take advantage of DLNA devices on the same network. As a result, you can play on more devices and it allows you to play 24/96 files that Airplay devices can't handle. My Denon has DLNA and Airplay built in, so I have them option to use either.

I don't use playlists very often. I am more oriented to listening to albums or I just put on MOG radio or iTunes radio. However, adding a playlists seemed easy enough in the DS Audio app.

Sorry to derail the thread, but I wanted to respond to the question.

I do want to mention that another cool benefit of having several Airplay devices is the ability to send the signal from the AppleTV to any of them. I have a headphone setup with an Airport Express next to the bed, so I can start a movie on AppleTV and send the audio to my headphone setup.
 
The Synology DS Audio app has Airplay built in. If I wanted, I could start the DS Audio app from 100 miles away from home and have it play on my Denon receiver within seconds. I know because I did this on accident one day.

The issues with streaming different music to multiple players is an issue on the computer, but Synology has figured out a way around it. Through the DS Audio app, you can send a different song to different airplay receivers without a problem.

While some are touting Sono's sound quality as better than the Airport Express, I am not sure because I haven't tested them against each other. However, the Airport Express has a digital out that is bit perfect with CD quality files (16/44.1). What this means is that it will send a bit perfect audio stream to your outboard DAC (receiver) for processing.

Obviously, for video, Airplay kills the Sonos. The Sonos is only for music and Airplay works with audio and video.

The Airplay devices work with just about every audio app for the iPhone (I haven't run across an audio that doesn't work with Airplay in a very long time). The Sonos has built in apps, so it would not have the same library as iOS. Also, the iPhone/iPad control center works with Airplay which makes it easier to get to if you own iOS devices with iOS7.

Airplay is built into more products. My receiver, which has been calibrated for my room with Audyssey has Airplay built in. I can simply send the audio to the receiver and it will flip the receiver on and let me control the volume in the app. The Sonos, if you have one that can be hooked up to a receiver, will require you to turn the receiver on separately.

The main upside to Sonos is that it creates its own network and that can be beneficial to people with old routers or other issues. I don't want to play this feature down, but I have several Airplay setups that work with an Airport Extreme without the audio dropouts described. I do have one Airplay device (Philips Fidelio SoundRing ) that does seem to disconnect from my network, but I think there is some time out feature built in that I haven't researched. With my Airport Express units I have not had the issue.

The other possible issue with Airport Express is the digital out may cause issues with some DACs. It doesn't send a signal between songs, so the DAC may have to reconnect and you could miss the first second of a song. I have several DACs and have never had the issue, but it does require research if you want to use it with a DAC.

Also, the Apple TV2/3 are not bit perfect with 16/44.1. All audio is converted to 48khz. For audiophiles, this is a big deal. Most everyone else won't notice a difference.

Thanks for the detailed answer. For using an Airport Express kind of defeats the purpose. If I have to use two units anyway, I might as well go for the Sonos and the Apple TV and have the best of both worlds.
I wish Apple would take some cues from Sonos for Apple TV but oh well. Thanks again for your input, it has made some things clearer for me. :)
 
Thanks for the detailed answer. For using an Airport Express kind of defeats the purpose. If I have to use two units anyway, I might as well go for the Sonos and the Apple TV and have the best of both worlds.
I wish Apple would take some cues from Sonos for Apple TV but oh well. Thanks again for your input, it has made some things clearer for me. :)
What do you mean it "defeats the purpose" or "the best of both worlds"?

Also, what cues should Apple take from Sonos related to the AppleTV? Sonos has nothing on the market like it.
 
I am a big fan/ advocate of both Sonos and all things Apple. For me, they work well together. I have an airport express hooked onto the SOnos unit, but have rarely, if ever used it. I use Sonos for music, it is connected to my system with timecapsule that stores my music. I also use SiriusXM and Spotify on Sonos.

I have Apple TV which I use for TV and movies that can plays sound through my existing home receiver, if i choose (seperate from Sonos).

So, for me Apple TV/ airplay/ airport express and Sonos are seperate entities, but equally valuable. I have 7 Sonos zones and 3 ATV units in my home.

I am absolutely sold that Sonos is the best in its space, and has been for years; however, i expect the competition to pick up as the technology continues to advance.

I have some concerns about ATV as it seems that Roku and others are picking up momentum and dividing that market. See the recent TWC app announcement that spurned ATV.
 
Best Buy has the Pioneer A3 Airplay speaker on sale today for $70, normally $200.

I own 2 Pioneer A1's and they are great. Never had an issue with them. Setup is not complicated, just follow the instructions that come with the speaker.
 
At the risk of starting to feel more like a Sonos fanboy than the casually-satisfied customer that I am, I think it will be helpful to others considering a purchase to continue elucidating some of the differences between the systems. :)

While some are touting Sono's sound quality as better than the Airport Express, I am not sure because I haven't tested them against each other. However, the Airport Express has a digital out that is bit perfect with CD quality files (16/44.1). What this means is that it will send a bit perfect audio stream to your outboard DAC (receiver) for processing.

A DAC is a digital-to-analog converter. "Bit perfect" speaks only to the digital side of that equation.

It means that the converter can and will utilize all of the data in the 16-bit/44.1khz stream, and that there's no data loss in the process of getting the digital data from a file on your hard drive to the entry point of the DAC.

This is all well and good, but it happens before the actual conversion to analog sound. Bit-perfect gets you cleanly to the entry "door" of the DAC, but what happens inside the DAC can result in different audio coming out the exit. Once you start talking about one DAC being better than another one, things get rather subjective, but it is certainly possible to demonstrate that a majority of people may prefer one to another. Ultimately, though, what matters is what you yourself hear and prefer.

I will note here that a truly bad DAC will be noticeable to anyone. But the gradation between good and great is much finer. Having listened extensively to both systems, I consider either one to have good quality for any non-obsessive casual audiophile. A/B test them if you're dead set on finding "the best", but either one will serve you with good sound quality (as far as the DAC is concerned).

Obviously, for video, Airplay kills the Sonos. The Sonos is only for music and Airplay works with audio and video.

For video it's a tie. In either system you'll need an AppleTV to Airplay video to your TV. In either system you can route the accompanying audio from the video stream.

The Airplay devices work with just about every audio app for the iPhone (I haven't run across an audio that doesn't work with Airplay in a very long time). The Sonos has built in apps, so it would not have the same library as iOS.

Sonos has built-in apps for a large selection of streaming services, including Spotify, Rdio, Stitcher, Songza, Amazon Cloud, TuneIn, MOG, 8tracks, last.fm, etc.

Does iOS have more Airplay-enabled apps than Sonos has Sonos apps? Absolutely. I have some seriously niche-y audio apps that I am sure will never get a native Sonos app (check out Raudio). I do hope they will add Soundcloud and Bandcamp soon, though. But again, all you need is a $99 Apple TV to get those Airplay apps streaming into your system.

Also, there is an advantage to the built-in Sonos apps: they run from the Sonos devices, not from your iOS or OSX device. So, for example, if I am throwing a party and I wander out of range of the WiFi while I am outside checking on the grill, the music keeps going because it's running from the Sonos, not from my phone. This also saves battery life on your iOS devices, and enables nifty features like the Sonos alarm which reliably wakes me up to DKFM lite streaming radio every morning even if the battery is dead on every iOS device in the house.

Sonos won't integrate directly with your iOS music library, it is true. But it does integrate well with your iTunes library and playlists. The one caveat here is having to manually tell Sonos to sync the latest updates if you edit your playlists in iTunes. That is a little annoying, frankly.

Airplay is built into more products.

Absolutely true, and the fact that there is more competition in the Airplay-enabled speaker arena helps to keep their costs down. This one is a clear advantage.

Sonos is a closed system for a reason, though, which is the mesh networking explained above by notjustjay.

I can simply send the audio to the receiver and it will flip the receiver on and let me control the volume in the app. The Sonos, if you have one that can be hooked up to a receiver, will require you to turn the receiver on separately.

The Sonos system is designed to be receiver-less. And it's auto-on when audio is present, too. For example, if I Airplay something to the living room Apple TV, the speakers in that zone come on automatically.

Now, where one might run into issues is having existing equipment such as a receiver or pre-amp that doesn't support auto-on, which you want to integrate with the Sonos Connect products. But you'd have that same problem if you were doing an Airplay system as well. Neither system will magically make your beloved single-end-triode tube amp behave like a network-aware device.

The main upside to Sonos is that it creates its own network and that can be beneficial to people with old routers or other issues.

It can be beneficial to anyone with high network usage. Even if you're not getting audio drop-outs either way, there can be other benefits. The bandwidth not being used by the audio stream that is running locally on a Sonos speaker instead of streaming live can be used by Netflix to provide a higher streaming rate for an HD movie, for example.

Certainly, it is possible to build an Airplay system that practically never drops audio. But until Airplay implements a mesh-network-and-sync system like Sonos has, Sonos should always result in more free bandwith on your WiFi network for other tasks.

The other possible issue with Airport Express is the digital out may cause issues with some DACs. It doesn't send a signal between songs, so the DAC may have to reconnect and you could miss the first second of a song. I have several DACs and have never had the issue, but it does require research if you want to use it with a DAC.

Sonos has some similar edge cases, too. For example, you need to be very careful about your choice of TV if you want to build a home theater system around the Playbar. Not all TVs can decode a 5.1 stream from the Playbar's digital output. I did my research in advance and made sure my TV was supported, but it's something to be aware of. (Google around, there are threads where people post reports of TVs that are compatible for 5.1)

Also, the Apple TV2/3 are not bit perfect with 16/44.1. All audio is converted to 48khz. For audiophiles, this is a big deal. Most everyone else won't notice a difference.

I wouldn't even consider this a strike against the aTV. Upsampling (i.e. increasing the sample rate) is much less of a problem than downsampling, and as you say is practically inaudible for most people, just as expanding a 1024x768 photo to 1280x1024 doesn't result in any noticeable loss of fidelity.

What works so well with airport express is powered speaker systems you can pick and choose brand, size and sound you like. Also you may have some laying around you can use. I had a pair of JBL sound sticks with sub add airport express and that's my kitchen system. You can also pick up used systems on craigslist add airport express and save tons of money. You can also power much higher end speakers than Sonos.

Although the Sonos-designed speakers are the heart of their marketing for obvious reasons, you can use their Connect and Connect:Amp to connect to whatever super-high-end audiophile amps/receivers/speakers you may have (or whatever cheap stuff you can scavenge from Craigslist). The caveat here is that the Connect products are currently stereo-only, so you can use one for an audio-only zone, or to power the surround speakers of your choice in a home theater configuration. But you would still need the Sonos Playbar to do a home theater setup.


OK, finally let me tout one specific example where Airplay really shines: portable battery-powered speakers, which is a product category not currently served by Sonos. I have a Pioneer A4 Airplay/Bluetooth speaker for that.

---

To sum up, let me say that I'd consider the entire Sonos system a non-starter if the AppleTV didn't exist. While Sonos has a decent variety of native audio apps, for us iOS and OSX users that is not enough. It's not a question of "Sonos or Airplay" but rather "Definitely Airplay! I want my video streams and all my iOS apps...but what system do I want to manage my actual listening equipment?"

The real question, for Apple users, is "Airplay alone, or Airplay and Sonos?" They work very well together, so for me the answer has been "Both" and I've been pleased with the results.

I hope this response has been helpful. I think now I should go help build a house for someone in need and let Sonos do their own marketing. :D
 
Last edited:
I don't have time to go into every point right now. However, the question was about Sonos vs Airplay. The Apple TV (2 & 3) are Airplay devices. They do video which is an obvious advantage of Airplay. Not sure how that isn't an advantage. You may only need two Airplay devices and both of them could be Apple TVs. If you chose Sonos instead, you would not get video or the many other features on the Appletv.

The reason I mention bit perfect audio is because it is the main possible issue with the Appletv vs Airport Express (I am not sure the Sonos is bit perfect... Stereophile proved bit perfect accuracy with the Airport Express). In most systems, I doubt anyone would notice a difference. If you have a high end system with high end speakers, it may be noticible in an ABX test, but I haven't seen such a test.

Be aware that many systems/DACs upsample anyway. The question is how it is done and whether it degrades the sound.
 
Last edited:
Not knocking Sonos great stuff. But I have been using airport express since it debuted back then it was called AirTunes. So my whole home is setup with combo of airport express and Apple TV's. What works so well with airport express is powered speaker systems you can pick and choose brand, size and sound you like. Also you may have some laying around you can use. I had a pair of JBL sound sticks with sub add airport express and that's my kitchen system. You can also pick up used systems on craigslist add airport express and save tons of money. You can also power much higher end speakers than Sonos. I have a pair of towers in my living room powered by a Bose SA 3 amplifier which works great with airport express drives a clean 100 watts per channel, auto power hides under a sofa.

Not true about Sonos and high power speakers. If you get a Connect:Amp (with a built-in 55W per channel amp, you can drive bigger speakers. I had them driving Mission 753 units for years. OR if you want to use your own amps, then get a Connect unit. If you want the very best audio then there are specialists who have modded the Connect units with even better DAC units etc.
 
I was all set to budget for a Sonos Playbar despite the lack of DTS support and the HDMI inputs (optical only so you better be lucky and own a HDTV that sends 5.1 audio out over toslink)

However. CES 2014 had a big announcement that Is going to factor into this discussion.

Airplay initially was run on a hardware and software stack by a company named Bridgeco. Bridgeco was eventually acquired by SMSC.

I had my doubts about how effective this would be for Airplay until a couple of days ago. The 800 LB Gorilla has entered the fray. (Broadcom)

So what Broadcom has done is create a turnkey solution based on their chipset and software. It not only supports Airplay but also DNLA and more. High Bit-rate audio is supported and they mention synchronization so I believe the goal is to have phase accurate simultaneous audio playback. They call the platform WICED (pronounced like "wicked"). Here are some links.

WICED+ - for Apple devices (Airplay turnkey solution)

SD Times -


Advanced synchronization delivers multi-room, multi-zone coverage for playing range of audio content in different areas of the home

Advanced Sync
Multi-Zone coverage

are direct attacks on the "bread n butter" featureset of Sonos. I've got no choice but to hold out. Knowing Broadcom, there will likely be products hitting with WICED chips late summer.

Big news for those with the dilemma of "Airplay vs Sonos"
 
What do you mean it "defeats the purpose" or "the best of both worlds"?

Also, what cues should Apple take from Sonos related to the AppleTV? Sonos has nothing on the market like it.

Sorry, should've been clearer. For me it defeats the purpose to go the Apple route if I have to use two boxes (AppleTV AND an AExpress). If I have to use two boxes I'd rather use Sonos and AppleTV and have the best of both worlds in terms of audio and video.
The cues Apple should take are the network approach, the bit perfect passthrough and the possibility to play from a NAS for example.
 
Sorry, should've been clearer. For me it defeats the purpose to go the Apple route if I have to use two boxes (AppleTV AND an AExpress). If I have to use two boxes I'd rather use Sonos and AppleTV and have the best of both worlds in terms of audio and video.
The cues Apple should take are the network approach, the bit perfect passthrough and the possibility to play from a NAS for example.

I think the network approach of Sonos is one of the reasons I didn't like it at all. Why on earth would I want to run another separate network in the house when I've already got dual-band going as it is. My neighbors are all using WiFi now so the airwaves are getting pretty darn crowded with signals. So WHY ON EARTH would I want to run ANOTHER network in the same relative frequency range? As far as I can tell, it does overlap the 2.4GHz spectrum so it WILL interfere if your channels have overlap (i.e. I'm having enough problems keeping my network from overlapping my neighbors let alone my own devices). More to the point, WTF would I NEED it on a separate network? It's just audio. It uses next to no bandwidth.

Their web site is deceitful, IMO. It shows a chart that claims a phone call will interrupt Airplay, but not Sonos. WTF is that supposed to mean? How would a phone-call interrupt my WiFi? Is the phone I'm using supposed to be on the same spectrum? Isn't that kind of presumptive of them about what kind of phone you use? My old wireless phone uses 900MHz which is nowhere NEAR 2.4GHz (let alone people that have a wired only phone system or use their cell phone as their home phone, etc.) My new AT&T wireless system uses 2.1GHz which is supposed to avoid interference with WiFi. But if it does interfere with my 2.4GHz signal, it will probably interfere with theirs as well. Besides, I can run Airplay on 5GHz if I want to. I have no such option with Sonos to avoid interference. Yet Sonos touts their separate network as a boon. :confused:

They claim you can't expand Airplay for multi-room playback of the same of different songs. Apparently, they must be referring to 3rd party equipment that uses Airplay and not genuine Apple equipment like AppleTV because I most certainly can sync ALL my rooms to play the same song or set them to use different songs if they have AppleTV in them (and AppleTV is now as cheap as an Airport Express so there's no reason a room couldn't have one if it has video capability). Plus each AppleTV can receive its own Airplay signals from an iPod/iPad/iPhone/whatever. It says you can't use Airplay for MP3 + Music Services + Internet Radio. I can play all of those off my iPod Touch to any of my AppleTV units via Airplay (including Pandora or whatever). AppleTV itself has my music collection plus Apple's own Internet Radio service built-in as well. In fact, I can play any Internet music OR video source to my newer AppleTV2 or 3 units from my Macintosh. To go even one further, I can play VIDEO GAMES on my AppleTV units via Airplay from my Macintosh computer by sending the game's audio and video to the AppleTV via Airplay and using a Bluetooth gaming controller (I use a PS3 one and OSX has a driver for it built-in). I can't do ANY of those things on Sonos. And back when I first looked at Sonos, Apple had "Remote" for the iPhone and iPod Touch while Sonos was still only using its own custom remote system (they added Android/iOS support much later) so it was a total no-brainer back then. Frankly, if Apple would add 3rd party App support to AppleTV (i.e. so Pandora, etc. could be added to ATV itself), there'd be literally nothing for Sonos to brag about, IMO. Yeah, newer ATVs aren't bit-perfect, but I have two older ones for my two serious listening rooms plus Airport Express in my bedroom. I even have an Airport Express in my guest bedroom. Guests can access my iTunes library via the share function and play music to that room or they can Airplay it directly to the speakers there and play their own music or sleep effects. And I didn't have to buy any overpriced Sonos pre-amps or amplifiers, etc. I could use any equipment I wanted to use with the audio jack on the Airport Express.
 
Sorry, should've been clearer. For me it defeats the purpose to go the Apple route if I have to use two boxes (AppleTV AND an AExpress). If I have to use two boxes I'd rather use Sonos and AppleTV and have the best of both worlds in terms of audio and video.
The cues Apple should take are the network approach, the bit perfect passthrough and the possibility to play from a NAS for example.
Most people wouldn't consider needing a separate device for music if they had an AppleTV. Also, those type of people would be more than happy to live with iTunes Match and 256k AAC files of their music if they wanted to leave their computers off.

Those that do care are probably audiophiles. Most of them have moved on to also wanting hi rez streaming. Currently, DLNA devices are better for that purpose. My receiver has Airplay and DLNA built in, but I think Denon and Marantz make stand alone media audio/network players that handle hi rez. For less money, I know some are going to Raspberry Pi setups. Logitech Touch was probably the most popular 24/96 device, but Logitech is abandoning the Squeezebox platform, so I don't think I would go that route at this point. Personally, I think hi rez is overrated, but that's a subject for another day.

I want to also mention Home Sharing on iOS devices (at least those on iOS7). They can handle 24/96, but you need a compliant DAC or CCK, USB hub, and USB DAC to use them. Home Sharing is also very useful for Airplay. While some have noted that you can't send multiple/separate streams from iTunes to separate Airplay devices at the same time, you can use Home Sharing on 2 separate iOS devices and send separate streams to separate Airplay devices using the same iTunes library.

Airplay works great with the Synology NAS and DS Audio app. I am not sure I understand the complaint about it. As I mentioned, Airplay is built into many Synology NAS.

As for the separate mesh system. For me, it doesn't have any appeal at all. One of the huge benefits of the Airport Express is the ability to expand your main wifi network. I have an Airport Express hooked up to a T-amp/Outdoor speaker setup in our sunroom. It will not only work for playing audio, but it extends my network to a point that I can use an iPad (without burning up cell minutes) from anywhere in the backyard. I can also stream Slingbox out there, if I want.

I have 3 Aiirport Express devices around the house that feed three separate setups and expand wifi to give a great signal from anywhere in the house or backyard. The 3 units cost less than one Connect (which is the only Sonos I would consider for a system made for critical listening because of its digital outputs).
 
Ive run a wireless audio setup for awhile now. And tried many things to get something I am happy with. My favorite device for purely audio is still the Logitech squeezebox line, which I am surprised hasn't been mentioned yet, though its discontinued.

I missed the dedicated box boat but do use an iPad, audio dock and iPeng ios app that uses the same protocol to great effect, while running the open source Logitech Media Server software backend on a Windows Server. Its bullet proof, save for some idiosyncrasies ios7 brought to the table. Digital Dock or CCK to USB DAC to Power Amp to Speakers.... magic.

Bonus is that it also allows android devices to act as controllers as well with some nice apps, or anything that can hit a web page (though the web interface isn't as nice as a dedicated app). It controls very well adding tracks to a playlist, queueing, even supports a party mode.

My next choice would be the Sonos but it still hasn't implemented the number one requested feature, 24bit and higher sample rate support. Ive ripped some vinyl at 24/96 that won't play on Sonos. Otherwise I find it bullet proof, and it still has some of the slickest controls for queueing music and handling playlists, years after its debut. Other than that, its only other major knock is that its pricey. I find the purpose built controller is better than its iOS app but each "controller" is $100 so it adds up, but it predates the app store and smartphone revolution, I haven't tried the latest version of the app, it may be better.

Another option I was waiting for is the Olive One but its still MIA and morphed from what was promised with the kickstarter to be more of an all-in-one device with speaker stack, rather than just a media player. And bypassing its DAC is needlessly complicated. Still its neat.

Finally Ive had the ATV3 since Mar. 2012 but the 48KHz sampling rate kills it for me. So its out. I am also not a fan of using iTunes as my backend. If it ran as a proper service and I didn't keep loosing connection to home sharing (which was pretty good in the ios5 and 6 era and itunes 10, but with itunes 11 and ios7 i constantly have to restart itunes for the ATV to see my library again. The funny thing is, airplay itself and a photo stream screensaver always works, but it won't see the homeshare music library thats running on the same itunes, even if my itunes can see the ATV as an airplay target. For awhile I solved it by disabling ipv6 on my network card in Windows but something still happens with home share that causes it to be flaky. I also dislike the fact I have to connect to apple servers to "authorize" homeshare to share something over my own home network. Really wish the ATV could just read a SAMBA share rather than only work with its own protocol. That goes for movies as well. A jailbroken ATV2 with XBMC shows its not the hardware but design decisions for the device. I still hold out hope for an app store but I don't think XBMC or another media player will be approved, likely just a game store. Still as a streaming device, its my favorite, it just could be so much more in such a small package.
 
Ill also add that using Remote app to control itunes is nice but its control scheme is not the best.

I love the option of play (immediately), play next, add to end of queue to an active "now playing" queue. For the longest time, selecting an item in Remote app would add the entire album to the queue, rather than the individual song that was selected. I think this changed in itunes 11 and/or the newer Remote app but it was a pain for the longest time.

Yes you could go into a playlist edit mode first and add individual songs that way but there is a nice fluidity to building a music queue on the fly while it is playing. This is something the Sonos does well, and the logitech setup as well, but I haven't found many other control software that does it as nicely. Linn Kinsky DLNA controller app on iphone has those features, but Ive never had luck with DNLA.
 
I use currently Airplay for my whole-house audio solution where I can do work around the house and even dip outside to take out the trash while still listening to the the same podcast or music track without interruption. While Airplay via Airport Express works well for me, there are some rooms where I'd rather not have the ugly wall wart in the outlet, or there is only one outlet and it's only has one plug available, so I can plug in a speaker and a AE without added a power strip. For example, my bathroom only has one outlet and I listen to podcasts/music where while getting ready for work. Add to that the fact that 2.4Ghz frequency is saturated where I live, and you have a good case for a 5GHz Airplay speaker.

With Sonos, you can plug an Airport Express(AE) into a Sonos Connect and then stream to Sonos speakers throughout the house from iTunes or from your iOS device. Note that I said "speakers" , plural, which you can't do from your iOS devices using only Airplay. That may change with a future version of iOS, but for now your iPhone/iPad can only select a single Airplay device for output.

Even though Sonos is 2.4GHz, I'm getting great audio from it whereas my Airport Express audio would drop out or disappear completely from the network when I used them on a 2.4GHz wireless network.

It's a pain to have to shell out bunch of cash and then use 2 apps ( you airplay friendly app for audio source and Sonos app to select speakers for output ) , but it's the only reliable solution that I could find.

For Airplay to beat Sonos it needs to:
Create a seat of Airplay Speakers with same quality and reliability as Sonos
Allow simultaneous streaming to multiple Airplay devices from iOS.

Sonos isn't perfect. It needs to open up it's devices to 3rd parties so that more apps can access the Sonos speakers. Right now Sonos seems like a control freak where they only want their software talking to their hardware.
 
At the moment we're refurbishing our house, and I decided to add a bit of technology to it. So we put 1 ceiling speaker in each bathroom, connected to a cheap amp, connected to new Airport Express' in the room next door. Then, we've got one left over for in the dining room, connected to a hifi system. And an Apple TV in one of the bedrooms. This is connected wirelessly (for now) to an Airport Extreme AC, on a separate 5GHz network. I can stream music to all floors of our house, without fault (9 times out of 10).
The main reason I went with Airplay instead of Sonos is the cost. For £110, I got a dual way built in speaker, an Amp, and a refurbished Express, that to me has as good sound quality.
 
While Airplay via Airport Express works well for me, there are some rooms where I'd rather not have the ugly wall wart in the outlet, or there is only one outlet and it's only has one plug available, so I can plug in a speaker and a AE without added a power strip.

I believe the newer Airport Express models have an option to have a power cord attached instead like the notebooks have had for years. They've also been 5GHz capable for a few years now.

For example, my bathroom only has one outlet and I listen to podcasts/music where while getting ready for work. Add to that the fact that 2.4Ghz frequency is saturated where I live, and you have a good case for a 5GHz Airplay speaker.

There's another option you might consider given it's about the same price as an Airport Express unit and that is an AppleTV unit. You don't HAVE to use AppleTV with a television, after all once configured. You can use it as a an Airplay device. Of course, you'll need a DAC if your speaker setup doesn't offer one (I got a rather nice one for around $30 that will do 24/96 and 24/192 if support were added to the ATV drivers).

With Sonos, you can plug an Airport Express(AE) into a Sonos Connect and then stream to Sonos speakers throughout the house from iTunes or from your iOS device. Note that I said "speakers" , plural, which you can't do from your iOS devices using only Airplay. That may change with a future version of iOS, but for now your iPhone/iPad can only select a single Airplay device for output.

But you CAN do that from an AppleTV which costs the same price as an Airport Express so your arguments are pretty much moot, IMO. AppleTV runs at either 2.4GHz or 5GHz and it can control multiple speakers either through remote or its own interface if you connect a monitor/tv. You could also get any number of 3rd party devices or computers and run XBMC which accepts Airplay signals PLUS it can run 24/96 audio with the proper hardware. Either way, I'd never consider Sonos because of the network limitations, audio-only setup and high prices. I've got three ATVs and two Airport Express units for 6 rooms of audio total including the den where the server is in (which has rather nice Klipsch 2.1 self-powered sat/sub speakers connected directly to the Mac Mini and outputs 24/96 just fine through iTunes).

Even though Sonos is 2.4GHz, I'm getting great audio from it whereas my Airport Express audio would drop out or disappear completely from the network when I used them on a 2.4GHz wireless network.

It's a pain to have to shell out bunch of cash and then use 2 apps ( you airplay friendly app for audio source and Sonos app to select speakers for output ) , but it's the only reliable solution that I could find.

For Airplay to beat Sonos it needs to:
Create a seat of Airplay Speakers with same quality and reliability as Sonos
Allow simultaneous streaming to multiple Airplay devices from iOS.

The reliability factor is a direct result of the WiFi router you're using. I have a nice Netgear dual-band router with simultaneous 2.4 and 5GHz channels and have no problem getting a solid signal on the other side/floor of a 2300 sq. ft. bi-level. I can even use 2.4 for one AppleTV and 5GHz for the other one and send simultaneous 1080p movies on different channels from one server. I certainly have no trouble sending multiple channels of audio around the house (each AppleTV can receive its own stream and also control any other Airplay speakers around the house from its own interface) plus I can send one channel from iTunes itself to Airport Express speakers or even all speakers in the house at once for whole house audio (great for Christmas music or parties). In other words, by using AppleTV instead of Airport Express, all your problems are solved. Plus even the Airport Express in the guest bedroom system allows a guest to directly send music from their iPhone to the speakers there. Good luck sending audio to Sonos from guest iPhones without a hassle.
 
It's not necessarily an either/or proposition. I made a Sonos Soundbar and an AppleTV the core of my system. The Apple TV lets me Airplay anything I like to the TV and/or sound system, and the Sonos system gives me listening zones and an iPad app that integrates all my music sources in one place.

They're a potent combination.

I'll grant that the Sonos stuff is pricy, but the sound quality is good and the user experience is well executed. And if you use an Apple TV as your hub, it's not an extra "$100 per speaker", it's just the one-time cost of the AppleTV.

It will be even better when Apple makes the Apple tv the hub fort all your home devices. One device That connects then all
 
I think one advantage of an Airplay-based system over a Sonos-based system is multi-user usage.

Whilst multiple people can use the same Sonos system, it is not very multi-user considerate. By this I mean you can only connect one account from any given source and therefore everyone in the household sees the same music, same playlists, and has the same playback history via the controller app. I find this annoying (everyone has unique tastes) and think Sonos should solve this by giving different people on the same network different user profiles when using the controller app.

Airplay is inherently multi-user friendly because things are streamed from personal iDevces, personal computers, etc, so each person is in control of their sources and playback history.

Sonos isn't perfect. It needs to open up it's devices to 3rd parties so that more apps can access the Sonos speakers. Right now Sonos seems like a control freak where they only want their software talking to their hardware.

Opening up control to 3rd parties so you could cast direct from a 3rd party app to Sonos would also solve my multi-user issue. I'd be able to cast from my personal Spotify account, and someone else in the house would be able to cast their own personal Spotify account, for example. You can currently do this from the Google Play Music app on Android, but tie in with more 3rd party clients needs to be added.
 
I went the apple route for my home music system. I have a lot of older Bose stuff that sounds to good to replace.

I am using 1 Apple tv, 4 airport express (bought used on eBay for $50 each) and 1 wireless ihome speaker. System works great,was cheap and easy to set up.

I also found an app called Whaale that lets you stream to multiple locations with an iPad or iPhone. Right now it works with your iTunes music on your iPhone or iPad, and with a bunch of Internet radio stations. It does not work with streaming services like slacker or pandora.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.