Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think one advantage of an Airplay-based system over a Sonos-based system is multi-user usage.

Whilst multiple people can use the same Sonos system, it is not very multi-user considerate. By this I mean you can only connect one account from any given source and therefore everyone in the household sees the same music, same playlists, and has the same playback history via the controller app. I find this annoying (everyone has unique tastes) and think Sonos should solve this by giving different people on the same network different user profiles when using the controller app.

This feature now been marked as as 'Planned' on the 'ask sonos' site. see here https://ask.sonos.com/sonos/topics/support_multiple_spotify_accounts

This means that it will be coming in the next 1-2 release cycles. There was one in May, another in September so I guess a couple more months before the next.

If you're already a customer you can apply to their beta program and you get to test new features before they are made publicly available. If you read some of the comments in the thread you might even get the impression its coming sooner rather than later ;)
 
This feature now been marked as as 'Planned' on the 'ask sonos' site. see here https://ask.sonos.com/sonos/topics/support_multiple_spotify_accounts

This means that it will be coming in the next 1-2 release cycles. There was one in May, another in September so I guess a couple more months before the next.

If you're already a customer you can apply to their beta program and you get to test new features before they are made publicly available. If you read some of the comments in the thread you might even get the impression its coming sooner rather than later ;)

Yep ;-)
 
I can't speak to the streaming services since I only play music from my music library. One thing I often do is stream to multiple rooms when I'm getting ready in the morning, since I"m getting dressed, showered, making breakfast, checking email, etc before work all in different rooms.

With Airplay, I'd have to leave a computer with iTunes running, fire up Apple remote, select my music, select my Airplay-connected speakers, set the volume on each speaker, and then press play.

With Sonos, I can select music on my phone/ipad, select the speaker group, and then press play. I might need to adjust the volume, and I might not. My computer can be off which saves me at least some electricity/hassle.

Another feature that I have yet to try it pairing speakers to get stereo sound.I plan on trying it soon, though. This is similar to setting up 5.1 HT system with the soundbar and play:1/5 and subwoofer speakers connected wirelessly. It's very expensive to set up, but I plan on trying that as well.


One thing that is a pain is watching movies/TV shows on my iPad before bed while outputting audio to the Sonos speaker. To do this, I use Airplay to send the audio to an Airport Express that then feeds the audio into the line in of an Play:5 next to my bed. I could also plug the iPad into the Sonos, but it would be a lot easier to just select the speaker in the Sonos software and output to the speaker directly and wirelessly from my iPad.
 
I really love the sonos system. It is so easy to use and has great sound for what it is
 
So I just purchased a Sonos Play 1 on ebay. Two sets of friends (both of whom use Apple TV and are otherwise Apple devotees) highly recommended Sonos, one of them had previously used an Airplay speaker and got frustrated with frequent dropouts, saying that his Sonos has never dropped out.

One difference between their setups and the one I will have (unit should arrive next week) is that Sonos has since made it so that the speakers now can use your regular wifi network without a bridge and without any wired connection to your router (As of Sep 2, see excerpt from article below). From what I understand, this means that in this "station mode", there is no SonosNet mesh network being transmitted, and the speakers use the same WiFi network that Airplay speakers would use (albeit without the Airplay protocol).

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-09/02/sonos-station-mode
Starting today Sonos users will no longer need a separate £40 Bridge to stream music to the brand's multiroom speaker systems. It will now be able to operate in "Station Mode" using your existing home router.

A firmware update, expected since April after selected users were allowed to test a beta version of the software, will finally render the home streaming system completely wireless.

Currently, all Sonos speakers communicate via the SonosNet peer-to-peer mesh network, which must be connected directly to a router via the Bridge device.

The firmware update will work with all existing Sonos products, but there are a few limitations to the new "wire free" Sonos setup. If you use a Playbar and Sonos speakers to create a surround sound system for watching TV and films, then this will not work properly in Station Mode, apparently due to latency issues.

Similarly, in Station Mode, Sonos speakers themselves will not be able to act as repeaters, as they do currently using SonosNet through a Bridge. This means that if any speaker in your house is out of range of your router then it will not connect to the network, even if it is range of another Sonos speaker that is connected to the router.

So, don't throw out that Bridge if you have one. In fact, according to Andrew Schulert, vice president Quality at Sonos, the best option in fact is to have both as the system will automatically switch between the two networks depending on what it deems will give the best performance for each individual speaker.

So we shall see if my use of this Play 1 will be any more reliable than an airplay speaker (I would guess not, unless Airplay as firmware is inherently less stable than Sonos' firmware, since both Sonos and Airplay will be operating on the exact same wireless network in my case, as I will have no Bridge.)

Was really on the fence about getting the Play 1 vs. an airplay speaker, but I had a coupon on ebay that was going to expire in a couple days, and found a new Play 1 for sale for $185 with free shipping, so I ended up paying less than $100 for it (thanks to the coupon). And based on my friends' recommendations I thought I'd try it out.

I'll let you know if I experience any problems.
 
So we shall see if my use of this Play 1 will be any more reliable than an airplay speaker (I would guess not, unless Airplay as firmware is inherently less stable than Sonos' firmware, since both Sonos and Airplay will be operating on the exact same wireless network in my case, as I will have no Bridge.)

I guess it depends on what content you're streaming. If you're streaming content from your device to the speaker, there may be no difference between Airplay and Sonos without its proprietary network.

But if you're streaming content from the cloud (Spotify, etc), I'd still expect Sonos to be more reliable since the content is streaming direct to the speaker rather than being relayed via your computer or mobile device.
 
I guess it depends on what content you're streaming. If you're streaming content from your device to the speaker, there may be no difference between Airplay and Sonos without its proprietary network.

But if you're streaming content from the cloud (Spotify, etc), I'd still expect Sonos to be more reliable since the content is streaming direct to the speaker rather than being relayed via your computer or mobile device.

Apple TV streams directly from the "cloud" (i.e. Apple's servers or supported 3rd party "Apps") to the Apple TV. The only content it gets from your computer is your own iTunes library (that which is already stored locally on your computer).

Nothing is more reliable than streaming from your own computer as it it is in no way dependent on the Internet (which can go to hell in some areas based on local competing traffic, especially apparent with movies that are being streamed). IN other words, I see zero advantage to Sonos. It doesn't even handle VIDEO *AT ALL*. Why would anyone spend $185 for Sonos when you can get an AppleTV for $99 that does VIDEO as well as audio? I can stream almost anything from my Mac or iPod Touch to my Apple TV as well (e.g. Pandora or even a video game from the Mac to my living room which I can play in that room with a PS3 bluetooth controller as if the Mac were connected in that room like a console). Sonos can't do anything like that. It used to need its own network on top of that. No thanks.

My only real complaint about AppleTV is they need to let more 3rd party "Apps" get on-board like XBMC (aka now "Kodi"...ack I hate that name) or Pandora or whatever the user may like to run without an iOS device or Mac having to mirror it since Apple doesn't support it directly. Admittedly, I don't use Internet radio at all (I like to listen to what I like, not crap others pick out), but iTunes doesn't handle several other video formats like AVI (which one of my cameras still uses) and it'd be nice to not have to convert everything (losing quality in the process since they are already compressed). If Apple would stop playing these format games and just support all the standards, it wouldn't be an issue.
 
Apple TV streams directly from the "cloud" (i.e. Apple's servers or supported 3rd party "Apps") to the Apple TV. The only content it gets from your computer is your own iTunes library (that which is already stored locally on your computer).

When we're talking about music, it's only really iTunes/iTunes Radio that can be streamed direct from the cloud to Apple TV isn't it? You can't do Spotify, for example. Sonos supports something like 25 cloud-based services.

Plus, I'm not really a fan on having to switch on my TV to listen to music. My understanding with Airplay speakers (or Airport Express connected speakers) is the content is not going direct from the cloud to the speakers, even with iTunes/iTunes Radio. Rather it needs to be relayed via your computer or iOS device. Is that not true? This relay adds a step that is unnecessary with Sonos.
 
Why would anyone spend $185 for Sonos when you can get an AppleTV for $99 that does VIDEO as well as audio?

I have apple TV. I love Apple TV. It is the center of my home entertainment system. I think you are drawing a false dichotomy with "Sonos vs. Apple TV". When my Play 1 arrives next week, I will have both. I don't see that as conflictual.

I do use my Apple TV currently to play iTunes Radio, but frankly my TV's built-in speakers aren't the greatest, and I'd rather just have a speaker for audio stuff like pandora, podcasts, NPR radio, etc so I don't have to turn on the TV to listen to that. So for me the decision was really whether to get an Airplay speaker (like the Bowers and Wilkins Z2, for example, which gets good reviews), or a Sonos speaker.

Plus, I'm not really a fan on having to switch on my TV to listen to music. My understanding with Airplay speakers (or Airport Express connected speakers) is the content is not going direct from the cloud to the speakers, even with iTunes/iTunes Radio. Rather it needs to be relayed via your computer or iOS device. Is that not true? This relay adds a step that is unnecessary with Sonos.

What eventually pushed me toward the Sonos were the following points:

-Across the forums and comment sections of the internet, the consistent refrain from Sonos owners is that they never drop out, never cut off the first few seconds of a track, never play fine for 2 minutes and then just disconnect randomly from the network. Whereas such issues seem to occur sporadically with Airplay speakers (including, as we've seen, for the OP of this very thread).

-I like the idea of not having my phone or iOS device tied up, as it effectively is when air playing to a speaker. From what I understand, with Sonos, once you command it to play it either starts buffering the content from your source device, or simply connects directly to the internet so that your source device is not really necessary to relay the playback. People talk about how you can use your phone to make calls, or even leave the house entirely, without it impacting the playback. Any interruptions on your phone when air playing will interrupt the playback.

-I like the idea of having wireless coordinated stereo between two Play 1's.

Aside from those three points, I was totally on the fence between getting an Airplay speaker or a Sonos. Now that I've pulled the trigger on a Sonos, I guess I'll see for myself how relevant any of these points are to how I use the device.
 
Last edited:
I have apple TV. I love Apple TV. It is the center of my home entertainment system. I think people are drawing a false dichotomy with "Sonos vs. Apple TV". When my Play 1 arrives next week, I will have both. I don't see that as conflictual.

Agreed.

What eventually pushed me toward the Sonos were the following points:

-Across the forums and comment sections of the internet, the consistent refrain from Sonos owners is that they never drop out, never cut off the first few seconds of a track, never play fine for 2 minutes and then just disconnect randomly from the network. Whereas such issues seem to occur sporadically with Airplay speakers (including, as we've seen, for the OP of this very thread).

My Sonos speaker has been perfect in this regard. But I'm using the Sonos proprietary network via the Sonos bridge, so interested to hear how you get on with standard wifi.

-I like the idea of not having my phone or iOS device tied up, as it effectively is when air playing to a speaker. From what I understand, with Sonos, once you command it to play it either starts buffering the content from your source device, or simply connects directly to the internet so that your source device is not really necessary to relay the playback. People talk about how you can use your phone to make calls, or even leave the house entirely, without it impacting the playback. Any interruptions on your phone when air playing will interrupt the playback.

This is something drew me to Sonos as well, and is now a characteristic of a wireless music system I wouldn't want to be without.
 
When we're talking about music, it's only really iTunes/iTunes Radio that can be streamed direct from the cloud to Apple TV isn't it? You can't do Spotify, for example. Sonos supports something like 25 cloud-based services.

AppleTV doesn't have support for Spotify (directly anyway). Obviously, they could easily add support at any time, but who is to guess when/if that will happen. I'm hoping for full 3rd party App support this year. You can, of course, play any Airplay supported App to the AppleTV from an iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad or Mac in the mean time. I'm not a fan of radio of any kind, so I don't miss them, personally, but obviously many do. Apple has been steadily adding video sources over the years, but I'd still prefer 3rd party App support so I can add something like XBMC/Kodi myself. But even so, Sonos has no video support what-so-ever so it's rather moot to me given I don't care about radio sources (and yes you can get iTunes Radio and their regular radio services directly without a computer or mobile device.

The thing is that I now use my two older iPod Touches as remotes for two of my rooms (plugged in so I don't have to worry about battery life; they sit by my bed and my living room listening chair). I use them as remotes and to do light surfing, but I could easily stream Pandora or something from them to the AppleTV as well. They're already sitting there so it wouldn't tie up my Touch Gen 5 or my Phone to do it.

Plus, I'm not really a fan on having to switch on my TV to listen to music.

So don't. I use my my iPod Touch to control all three of my AppleTVs and my computer as well. AppleTV has had iOS "Remote" support for almost as long as it is has existed. In other words, I don't have to turn on my TV to play music or to redirect it anywhere in my house. I now have three iPod Touches (Gen 1, 4 and 5) and I've relegated my older ones as the battery gets worse or new apps aren't supported to remote and armchair surfing duties. I now have a dedicated Touch in my living room main audio room and my bedroom (which is Airport Express only with Klipsch 2.1 THX Sat/Sub speakers). I carry the 5 around with me.

understanding with Airplay speakers (or Airport Express connected speakers) is the content is not going direct from the cloud to the speakers, even with iTunes/iTunes Radio. Rather it needs to be relayed via your computer or iOS device. Is that not true?

No, it's not true. The AppleTV will send the iTunes Radio songs and any other cloud-based music you have on their server directly to your speakers or any other Airplay speakers straight from the AppleTV interface (anything you buy from Apple is automatically available in the Cloud, audio and video alike, plus you can get a service to put your entire library in the Cloud if you want. The older AppleTVs can, of course store music directly on their own hard drive as well). Movies you've purchased can be streamed directly from the Cloud to AppleTV as well (and the audio can be redirected to another or even an additional room if you like). AppleTV and iTunes also supports whole house audio mode (i.e. I can sync all SIX of my rooms to play the same audio at the same time, which is great for house parties or Christmas/mood music or when you're doing chores around the house or whatever.

This relay adds a step that is unnecessary with Sonos.

The ONLY thing you need your computer on for is to stream music or video that is locally stored on your computer's iTunes library. If it's on the iTunes Cloud server (whether put there by you or anything you bought from Apple automatically along with movie rentals or iTunes Radio or any other supported audio/video service), you can watch/listen to them directly from AppleTV and AppleTV can redirect the audio to any other AppleTV or Airport Express room in your house directly, no computer needed.


I do use my Apple TV currently to play iTunes Radio, but frankly my TV's built-in speakers aren't the greatest, and I'd rather just have a speaker for audio stuff like pandora, podcasts, NPR radio, etc so I don't have to turn on the TV to listen to that. So for me the decision was really whether to get an Airplay speaker (like the Bowers and Wilkins Z2, for example, which gets good reviews), or a Sonos speaker.


-Across the forums and comment sections of the internet, the consistent refrain from Sonos owners is that they never drop out, never cut off the first few seconds of a track, never play fine for 2 minutes and then just disconnect randomly from the network. Whereas such issues seem to occur sporadically with Airplay speakers (including, as we've seen, for the OP of this very thread).

I have six rooms of audio and the only time I EVER had a song miss the first few seconds is when I used an ancient (circa 1997) home theater surround processor (external type you used to connect via 6-input connection on early receivers when Dolby Digital/DTS first came out). That DAC in it cannot instantly lock onto a signal for some reason. I've got a $25 little external stand-alone DAC in my living room (purely to isolate a ground loop caused somehow by having HDMI and the analog outputs on my 1st Gen ATV) and it syncs instantly and I miss nothing and the same is true of my home theater room's receiver's internal DAC. I've never had an Apple Airport Express have that problem either and I don't think I've ever lost a connection with a unit playing audio either (that would be a router signal issue and could happen with Sonos if you put the receivers too far away as well; they aren't without range).

It sounds like you just want to buy an all-in-one speaker/receiver. Personally, I would never go that way because most of those speakers are total garbage sound quality-wise. I bought the Klipsch 2.1 sat/sub speaker system (around $150 on average) for my bedroom and both my Mac Mini and Macbook Pro's Dock station and it sounds simply unbelievably good for the money in a small room. My main living room is set up with Carver ribbon speakers/subs bi-amped with 500 watts total using a custom active crossover network and a sonic holography pre-amp. I also have a full analog vinyl rig (~$500 setup) installed in addition to AppleTV, the HD cable box and a CD player (never gets used anymore for obvious reasons) and my digital Roland piano plugged in there plus the Macbook Pro recording setup set on top of the piano for recording my own music (I play guitar also) and its plugged in as well.

As you might guess, it's not a low-end system (I have another system for home theater with a 6.1 setup with a 93" screen and projector; this one is for high-end audio and two years ago, TV as well when I hung a plasma on the wall above the piano where I used to have a picture frame). Not counting the computer and instruments, it's probably about $9000 invested. I cannot tell the difference between AppleTV (using 1st gen here) and the CD or even my digital recordings of my analog records (before I clean them of all clicks/pops using the Macbook or my Mac Mini). It'd be nice if Apple would support 24/96 playback through AppleTV (and 44.1 even for the newer Gen2/3 boxes, as 48kHz conversion kills the DTS CDs I have dumped). Otherwise, I have no real complaints. They could add the super audio formats that BDs have, I suppose (obviously only useful for my home theater room).

What I'm getting at is that when I say the Klipsch 2.1 speakers sound unbelievable for $150 in a small room, I'm not kidding. They sound better than my Alpine/Sub system in the car in my den and bedroom. I would NOT want a cheap Airplay "Speaker". It's simply not hard to connect either an AppleTV or Airport Express to a quality speaker system and then you're not dependent on the limited choices offered in such configurations (i.e. they know people that buy them are looking for convenience, not sound quality). I set up my mother's house for playback using her Bose Radio in her living room. It's not even in the same league as those speakers + an Airport Express. I can't imagine an Airplay speaker (or similar Sonos variety) sounding any/much better than a Bose Wave Radio. Yes, it's impressive sounding for a tiny radio. No, it's not a real "HiFi" speaker system, IMO.

What eventually pushed me toward the Sonos were the following points:

-I like the idea of not having my phone or iOS device tied up, as it effectively is when air playing to a speaker. From what I understand, with

My Mac Mini is available 24/7 to my system. AppleTV CAN/WILL wake my Mini from sleep when AppleTV or an iOS device with Remote requests to paly a song/movie/whatever. In other words, I don't have to leave the computer "ON". It can go to sleep. I have had problems with my mother's Macbook doing that, but it's missing the "Wake on LAN" button that is present on my Mac Mini's preference pane.

Sonos, once you command it to play it either starts buffering the content from your source device, or simply connects directly to the internet so that your source device is not really necessary to relay the playback.

Yeah, my AppleTV does the same thing. I never use my iPod Touch to play music on it to my own system (I will use it at my mom's house since it's my music on my iPod as oppose to her library; she also has an Airplay capable receiver there as well, so I don't even need an AppleTV to send Airplay music to her main living room). As I said above, my master library (containing around 9000 songs, 700 movies and dozens of tv shows locally, not counting Cloud content) is the source device and it wakes up on demand from my Mac Mini Server. I don't need to wake it to play Cloud content or Internet Radio.

People talk about how you can use your phone to make calls, or even leave the house entirely, without it impacting the playback. Any interruptions on your phone when air playing will interrupt the playback.

So don't use your phone. I don't. What I'm saying is that other than Pandora/Spotify type radio things, I don't see any advantage to Sonos and it doesn't do video and it doesn't do whole house synced audio (the last time I checked, anyway; I haven't really looked at it lately; your statement next seems to indicate maybe they have). Given I have two older iPod Touches lying around as remotes for my system, I can stream Pandora off of them if I like without tying up my Phone. I guess that makes them both a remote and a "source".

-I like the idea of having wireless coordinated stereo between two Play 1's.

I have wireless coordinated stereo between 3 AppleTVs, 2 Airport Express units and my Mac Mini available and I don't need a special network to do it. In fact, I can put the ATVs on separate bandwidths (2.4 and 5GHz) and stream multiple HD sources at the same time to different rooms in the house from my library even without any stutters.
 
Last edited:
Well my Sonos 1 showed up yesterday and I set it up last night. No "bridge" is necessary any more, nor do you need to plug the speaker into ethernet for setup. Just plug it into power, hold down two buttons, the Play 1 creates a temporary wifi network that I connect to from my iPhone, once connected the app asks me for the SSID and password of my home's wifi network, and that's it. Up and running.

Initial (perhaps naive) reactions:

-It seems as though this device is "always on". (I wonder how much power it draws?) But I have to say it is nice to be able to be anywhere in the house and just start playing a song or a podcast from my phone without having to switch anything else on or take any additional steps.

-There really are a LOT of streaming services available for this thing. Most of them I've never heard of, but it's nice to know I have so many free options for streaming music.

-Apparently the "stitcher" service is the one to use for streaming podcasts on Sonos. I found popular ones like Serial and News from Lake Woebegone on stitcher, but oddly This American Life didn't pop up, which is the one I want most. Not a big deal, really, since I can just download that podcast using the podcasts app on my phone, and then the Sonos app on my phone will see the podcast and play/stream/buffer it on the Play: 1.

-I had seen reviews where people talked about how they had started playing something from a phone, and then left the home and yet the music kept playing on the speaker. As an experiment, I started playing a song that was only stored on my phone, played it for about 15 seconds, and then suddenly turned off my phone's power. The song kept playing for about 10 seconds after my phone had turned off, but then abruptly stopped. I'm guessing that the song had started buffering but hadn't finished by the time my phone turned off, so the Sonos kept playing what part of the song it had already buffered. It would be nice if there were a way to tell (in the app) how much of a given song/podcast/playlist has been buffered to the speaker.

-Gotta say, I really like the simple, elegant appearance.

-I am not an audiophile, but I'm pretty sure it sounded better than any other speaker in my house. (This may not be saying much, as the only other speakers in my house I'm used to listening to music on are my Sharp TV's speakers and a small bluetooth speaker.)

-The Play 1 is plenty loud for me. I have it in our main living room (an open kitchen, dining, living room that's probably about 25' x 25') and the speaker was "too loud for my tastes" before I could max out the volume level. By too loud for my tastes, I mean loud enough that you couldn't easily hold a conversation with someone even when sitting at the far end of the room from the speaker.

-That said, I'm already thinking of getting a second play 1 some time in the future so that I can set one at each end of the room and to the stereo synchronization (that check box in the Sonos app is just itching to be checked!).

-No network drop-offs yet. But it's only been one day.

-I really like how I can make a "SONOS playlist" on my phone that includes songs/podcasts/whatever from ANY source. So a playlist might have 1 song that's only on my phone, followed by a song that is only on my computer, followed by a track from spotify, etc. Not sure how much I'll actually use that feature but it definitely has a nice "unifying" feeling.

-One bummer: any DRM protected iTunes music won't play on the SONOS (but of course, WOULD play over airplay!). In the SONOS app they are visible in your playlists but are just grayed out. Luckily most of my library does not have DRM. Still, I may look into doing whatever is necessary to convert my DRM songs to non-DRM'd. .. any suggestions on that?

----------

It sounds like you just want to buy an all-in-one speaker/receiver. Personally, I would never go that way because most of those speakers are total garbage sound quality-wise. I bought the Klipsch 2.1 sat/sub speaker system (around $150 on average) for my bedroom and both my Mac Mini and Macbook Pro's Dock station and it sounds simply unbelievably good for the money in a small room. My main living room is set up with Carver ribbon speakers/subs bi-amped with 500 watts total using a custom active crossover network and a sonic holography pre-amp. I also have a full analog vinyl rig (~$500 setup) . . ..
As you might guess, it's not a low-end system (I have another system for home theater with a 6.1 setup with a 93" screen and projector; this one is for high-end audio and two years ago, TV as well when I hung a plasma on the wall above the piano where I used to have a picture frame). Not counting the computer and instruments, it's probably about $9000 invested. . . .

Yeah, I think our levels of enthusiasm for audio are just way different. (and that's totally cool). I was really just looking for the simplest, most reliable system that would let me listen to music/podcasts in my home without turning on the TV and without tying up a device. For example, I probably would never fork over the $700 for the SONOS play bar (my friend has that and loves it, but I just can't justify that cost for the sake of higher quality audio. It just doesn't matter that much to me.

What I see likely going forward is that all my music and podcasts get played through my sonos most days. But then I'll still probably use my Apple TV whenever someone wants to airplay a video, or whenever we want to play a slideshow with music attached.
 
Well my Sonos 1 showed up yesterday and I set it up last night. No "bridge" is necessary any more, nor do you need to plug the speaker into ethernet for setup. Just plug it into power, hold down two buttons, the Play 1 creates a temporary wifi network that I connect to from my iPhone, once connected the app asks me for the SSID and password of my home's wifi network, and that's it. Up and running.

Thanks for reporting back. Glad to hear that its working well without a Sonos bridge!

-I had seen reviews where people talked about how they had started playing something from a phone, and then left the home and yet the music kept playing on the speaker. As an experiment, I started playing a song that was only stored on my phone, played it for about 15 seconds, and then suddenly turned off my phone's power. The song kept playing for about 10 seconds after my phone had turned off, but then abruptly stopped. I'm guessing that the song had started buffering but hadn't finished by the time my phone turned off, so the Sonos kept playing what part of the song it had already buffered. It would be nice if there were a way to tell (in the app) how much of a given song/podcast/playlist has been buffered to the speaker.

They will be talking about playback of music that is not stored on your phone.

For example, use your phone to initiate playback from an internet music service or a network drive. Then turn your phone off. Sonos will continue to play the playlist/album until it completes, until you press the stop button on the speaker, or until you boot up your phone and start controlling the playback again.
 
For example, use your phone to initiate playback from an internet music service or a network drive. Then turn your phone off. Sonos will continue to play the playlist/album until it completes, until you press the stop button on the speaker, or until you boot up your phone and start controlling the playback again.

Got it. Makes sense. Frankly that is not all that different from Airplay, in that you could use the Remote App on your iPhone to have your computer start playing a playlist on an airplay speaker, and then turn off your phone and it should keep going (. . . I think). But most airplay speakers don't have streaming services like Pandora (or do they?) so if you air played your iPhone's pandora/spotify/whatever music to an airplay speaker, turning off your phone or taking a call would interrupt the speaker.
 
Got it. Makes sense. Frankly that is not all that different from Airplay, in that you could use the Remote App on your iPhone to have your computer start playing a playlist on an airplay speaker,

When it comes to playing content from your local network, one aspect of Sonos that I appreciate is that it can stream direct from a NAS (which is where I store my local music). In an Airplay setup, I understand you can also store the music on a NAS, but you still need an iTunes client running on an Mac or PC to be able to interface with it.

and then turn off your phone and it should keep going (. . . I think).

I guess so, but perhaps someone else can confirm as I no longer have an Airplay connected speaker.
 
2 weeks in and I'm happy to report the SONOS Play 1 has performed excellently.

-My wife has been using it to play either music or NPR radio every day she gets home from work, and we've been consistently putting light classical music on it for background during dinner.

-I have experienced ZERO network dropouts, skipping of the first few/last seconds of a track, or anything like what I have seen people complaining about for Airplay speakers. Again, I'm only 2 weeks in, but so far this thing really does "just work". (And remember, this is without a Bridge. My wifi network is supported only by a $30 dollar wireless router. The Sonos is about 40 ft away from it.)

-Frankly, the device is about as easy to use as I could imagine. Controlling it with the iPhone or iPad feels like you are just temporarily tasking your iDevice to tell the Sonos what to do, and then you get the use of your iDevice back to do whatever else you want with it.

-I really like the play/pause and volume physical buttons on the speaker. They come in handy when you want to stop the music for a few moments or even for the evening. Also handy to be able to control the volume without having to pull out and unlock your iPhone. Also, if you had been playing a streaming service or playlist the previous day and then stopped it when you went to bed, you can just resume that same streaming service (like NPR) or playlist by simply pressing the play/pause button on the speaker without ever getting your phone out.

-Frankly, I am surprised at how I am using the speaker. I had expected I'd be mainly using it to play songs stored on my Mac via the Sonos Controller app (it reads your iTunes library). But the streaming services are so good and easy to use that I haven't even bothered setting up the Sonos Controller program on my mac yet, instead using the built-in streaming services most of the time for music, podcasts, and radio, and occasionally playing a playlist from my phone.
 
Thought I'd add my recent experience since I read through quite a bit of this thread before making a decision. I've had an Airplay set-up in my house for a couple of years now. My main objective was to stream my music library that sits on my imac to multiple speakers through out my house. To be honest airplay never worked well for me and for several years I kept chasing the problem by upgrading speakers or adding a wireless bridge in hopes in would fix that problem.

Each time I'd try to turn on the system it took several minutes and steps. It might have been speakers that were supposed to auto-on that never did. Or watching itunes try and fail to connect to the speakers. Or having the remote app take an extra long time to load my music library (or not even find the music library). Then when I'd get it up and running, it would be fine for a while and then one speaker would disconnect for no reason.

Finally I decided to invest in a couple of Sonos components and it's like night and day. This morning I woke up, fired up the app and turned on the bedroom speaker. It took 2 seconds, with Airplay it would be at least a minute for Remote to load and connect to the speaker. When I went to the kitchen I went back into the app and added the kitchen speaker, another two seconds. When my wife wanted to watch TV, I could easily turn off the bedroom speaker remotely. All of these things would be constant sources of frustration and now they worked just perfectly.

I'm sure there's many reasons to use Airplay and that for many people "it just works" but my only regret in switching to Sonos is that I didn't do it sooner.
 
Wow. There is so much misinformation about AirPlay capabilities out there. For example "I like the idea of not having my phone or iOS device tied up, as it effectively is when air playing to a speaker", which was posted earlier in this thread.

In my opinion, Sonos is better if you use streaming services, and that's it. Otherwise, AirPlay is just cheaper. This website shows quite clearly the differences between the two systems http://nattyhouse.com/home/sonos-and-airplay-basics/sonos-and-airplay-recommendations/
 
Wow. There is so much misinformation about AirPlay capabilities out there. For example "I like the idea of not having my phone or iOS device tied up, as it effectively is when air playing to a speaker", which was posted earlier in this thread.]

I posted that. How is it misinformation?

When I Airplay a song to my Apple TV from my iPhone, it will stop if I get a phone call or an alert. This is the case (for me) whether I am Airplaying a song that lives on my iPhone, or a streaming service (like YouTube).

Does it work differently for you? (I don't have an Airplay speaker, just an Apple TV. I'd be interested to know if Airplay works differently on a speaker than Apple TV.)

With Sonos, if I play a streaming service using the Sonos App on my phone, I could literally turn my phone off and the music would keep playing.

----------

In my opinion, Sonos is better if you use streaming services, and that's it. Otherwise, AirPlay is just cheaper. This website shows quite clearly the differences between the two systems http://nattyhouse.com/home/sonos-and-airplay-basics/sonos-and-airplay-recommendations/

To each their own, of course. But the primary driver of my decision was reliability. I have found way more examples of people complaining about Airplay reliability (several in this very thread), and have not found any complaints about Sonos reliability.
 
In my opinion, Sonos is better if you use streaming services, and that's it. Otherwise, AirPlay is just cheaper. This website shows quite clearly the differences between the two systems http://nattyhouse.com/home/sonos-and-airplay-basics/sonos-and-airplay-recommendations/

Streaming services are a pretty big deal though.

Even if you don't use much streaming services, I would also say Sonos should be given serious consideration if

a) you store your local music on a NAS.
If you use Airplay, you have to have a powered Mac or PC running iTunes on your network in addition to the NAS. With Sonos you don't.

b) You don't live in an all Apple household or don't want to tie yourself to an all Apple ecosystem in the future. There are Airplay clients on non-Apple OSs, but in my experience they are pretty flaky

I do have one major criticism of Sonos - I don't get why the Connect has to be so expensive (esp. when Play:1 is fairly reasonably priced). Connect should be similar in price to Airport Express, or at least cheaper than the Play:1. I'm hoping Google Cast speakers and Connect-like devices will drive Sonos' prices down.
 
Even if you don't use much streaming services, I would also say Sonos should be given serious consideration if

a) you store your local music on a NAS.

b) You don't live in an all Apple household or don't want to tie yourself to an all Apple ecosystem in the future.

I don't disagree but my use case included a music library stored on my iMac hard drive, managed by iTunes in a fully Apple household (Apple TV to home stereo, airport extreme router, express bridge, multiple iOS devices running Remote to control.) At least for me so far, Sonos is a much better, more reliable experience.

I do have one major criticism of Sonos - I don't get why the Connect has to be so expensive (esp. when Play:1 is fairly reasonably priced). Connect should be similar in price to Airport Express, or at least cheaper than the Play:1. I'm hoping Google Cast speakers and Connect-like devices will drive Sonos' prices down.

Fully agree here. Plus the lack of a permanent outdoor option. I'm still going to have to rely on Airplay in the yard or start unplugging things.
 
In an Airplay setup, I understand you can also store the music on a NAS, but you still need an iTunes client running on an Mac or PC to be able to interface with it.
Wrong. I have a Synology NAS that I discuss earlier in the thread that has Airplay built in. It will allow you to stream directly from the NAS to any Airplay device in the house with the DS Audio app on the iPhone. It can also send different music to different Airplay devices. You do not need a PC or MAC in the loop. Even if you just hooked a hard drive to a router, you can use an app like FileBrowser to Airplay the music to Airplay devices.

Also, someone mentioned that Sonos is better for streaming services. This is really up for debate and depends on the person's preferences. It is limited compared to being able to Airplay every audio app (and most video apps) on iOS. It also takes great app design and puts it in a Sono's box. In other words, Spotify has a full featured app on iOS. If the Sonos Forums are correct, the Sonos version of the app is dumbed-down in comparison. It is one of the main reasons I avoided Sonos from the start. Also, it is dependent on the service provider giving them access. If Apple (or any other provider) decides they don't want to give them access to Beats, you will have to switch to another option or buy an Airplay device to plug in to the Sonos.

Personally, I can be listening to the Overcast app in my car, walk in the house, click on the screen, and send that audio to Airplay devices in the house. You can't do any of that with Sonos...no support for Overcast (or many other apps) and no way to use the technology without opening the Sonos app.
 
I posted that. How is it misinformation?

When I Airplay a song to my Apple TV from my iPhone, it will stop if I get a phone call or an alert. This is the case (for me) whether I am Airplaying a song that lives on my iPhone, or a streaming service (like YouTube).

Does it work differently for you? (I don't have an Airplay speaker, just an Apple TV. I'd be interested to know if Airplay works differently on a speaker than Apple TV.)

With Sonos, if I play a streaming service using the Sonos App on my phone, I could literally turn my phone off and the music would keep playing.


Perhaps "misinformation" was a bit strong. If you are playing music via AirPlay directly from your phone, you are correct.

Many people are unaware, however, of the Apple Remote app for iOS devices (or the similar Retune app for Android/BlackBerry). These apps remotely control iTunes, and the music is streamed from iTunes to any number of AirPlay speakers. So you can literally turn your phone off and the music would keep playing. The "catch" is that you need iTunes running. But you need some sort of storage device active with Sonos as well (if you are playing downloaded music).

This is all detailed at http://nattyhouse.com/home/sonos-and-airplay-basics/


To each their own, of course. But the primary driver of my decision was reliability. I have found way more examples of people complaining about Airplay reliability (several in this very thread), and have not found any complaints about Sonos reliability.

I don't have direct experience with the proprietary Sonos mesh network, but I have heard it has superior reliability. That said, you need at least two Sonos devices to make that work. For sure, you need a rock-solid WiFi network for AirPlay.
 
Also, someone mentioned that Sonos is better for streaming services. This is really up for debate and depends on the person's preferences. It is limited compared to being able to Airplay every audio app (and most video apps) on iOS. It also takes great app design and puts it in a Sono's box. In other words, Spotify has a full featured app on iOS. If the Sonos Forums are correct, the Sonos version of the app is dumbed-down in comparison.

You are quite correct. If you must have the full-featured streaming app, you are better off with AirPlay. Keep in mind these limitations though:

- you are pretty much limited to iOS devices (with some exceptions for rooted Android devices detailed here: http://nattyhouse.com/home/sonos-and-airplay-basics/sonos-and-airplay-detailed/)

- you can only play to one AirPlay zone at a time (unless using Airfoil + Airfoil Remote, also detailed at the nattyhouse site, above)

- your iOS device must stay (reliably) connected to your WiFi network

The above limitations do not apply to Sonos, which is why I said it was superior for streaming services (for most people, most of the time). You are correct that you rely on a continued relationship between Sonos and the streaming providers.
 
You are quite correct. If you must have the full-featured streaming app, you are better off with AirPlay. Keep in mind these limitations though:

- you are pretty much limited to iOS devices (with some exceptions for rooted Android devices detailed here: http://nattyhouse.com/home/sonos-and-airplay-basics/sonos-and-airplay-detailed/)

- you can only play to one AirPlay zone at a time (unless using Airfoil + Airfoil Remote, also detailed at the nattyhouse site, above)

- your iOS device must stay (reliably) connected to your WiFi network

The above limitations do not apply to Sonos, which is why I said it was superior for streaming services (for most people, most of the time). You are correct that you rely on a continued relationship between Sonos and the streaming providers.
Once again, it depends on preferences. I don't own Android..if I did I would root it. I have a computer running Airfoil and I have wifi at home that works. The best, most versatile, streaming option for me is Airplay. It isn't even close. Using the native apps, control from the lockscreen, and being able to stream anything on my computer or iOS device are just much better options.

If you have horrible wifi, Android that you don't want to root, and don't own a computer (and don't want to buy one) and need to stream to multiple locations...Sonos may be a better option.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.