Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Exactly. You're exactly the type of person I was talking about in a previous post of mine. You have been trained to be completely uncomfortable when presented with "too many" windows, as you put it.

Now, the debate here is about the Green button, and what it should really do, from a choice of two options:

Fit to Content - the more flexible and multitasking-friendly method that may seem a bit complex or overwhelming to people such as yourselves.

Maximize - the totally not flexible, primitive method that would be completely utterly unacceptable to anybody who is used to the previous way.

Now, who do you think would suffer more:

The single-app maximize types such as yourself who have to manually drag their windows the full size of the screen, or familiarize yourself with the way Apple intended you to work with your computer.

- or -

The people who are already fluent in the operation of the green button and use their computers with lots of windows and the desktop visible at all times, who would then have completely lost the content-aware resizing feature and have to manually drag and resize their windows, in addition to un-learning the long established function of that button?

Apple isn't going to change it, and its pretty dumb for people to expect them to. You're basically asking them to go backwards.
Wow, I can't believe this - how can you be so ignorant? You simply assume that the allmighty Apple is absolutely correct and build your whole post on this assumption.

I could copypaste your post and just switch maximised and regular-sized windows so it would look like maximisation is the best way. What if you are the one trained to be completely uncomfortable when presented with just one window? Everyone is mentioning GUI experts - I'm sure Microsoft and other OS developers have them too, and as many people said - let us have our way of doing things. After all, It's not a perfectly objective thing, you can't put it through GUIMark 2007 and say it beats the competition by 3420 GUI points.

Oh, and another thing - nobody forces you to maximise things in windows, but still - so many people do it. How come such a small number of users actually leaves their windows regularly sized? Sure, the green button is missing, but that's just an additional feature, the basic idea of having smaller windows and placing them around as you wish still is still readily available. How come Windows users don't do it the Apple way? If it's as superior as you say, I'd expect at least half of the users to do it. Is Microsoft forcing them to maximise with subliminal messages in wallpapers?
 
I don't really understand this all.. :p


Copy that text and save it in Applescript as maximize.scpt

Then in Quicksilver, set run maximize.scpt as a trigger. The details you'll have to work out on your own ;-)

(The + is not great on that button. Just like shutting down Windows requires the Start button if I remember correctly. People are pretty good at applying symbols to concepts if those concepts are consistent. The green button should absolutely not totally maximize, but as said before it could be more consistent. Truly toggling would be a start. )
 
It is hilarious seeing how many Apple denigrators here are asserting they know more about Human Interface Guidelines and know more about how to design a GUI than Apple do.

This is somewhat ingenious as it suggests all the GUI elements are dictated by the Apple interface design team alone which is clearly not the case. No doubt things that they don't like appear in the final product due to other issues - the marketing team for example. (3-D dock on the bottom of the screen, come on down! Transparent menu at the top, take a bow!) For all we know the GUI guys are complaining about the + themselves but they weren't allowed to change it because 'we want a traffic signal look with 3 math symbols looks nicer', say. Doesn't change the fact that the + should not totally maximize.
 
Now, the debate here is about the Green button, and what it should really do, from a choice of two options:

Fit to Content - the more flexible and multitasking-friendly method that may seem a bit complex or overwhelming to people such as yourselves.

Maximize - the totally not flexible, primitive method that would be completely utterly unacceptable to anybody who is used to the previous way.

It doesn't have to be a choice. We could do both. Click the Zoom button to Fit to Content, Option-Click to Maximise (Dock & Menubar excepted). Or vice versa, ideally this could be configured in System Preferences.

Badda bing. Everyone's happy.
 
Copy that text and save it in Applescript as maximize.scpt

Then in Quicksilver, set run maximize.scpt as a trigger. The details you'll have to work out on your own ;-)

(The + is not great on that button. Just like shutting down Windows requires the Start button if I remember correctly. People are pretty good at applying symbols to concepts if those concepts are consistent. The green button should absolutely not totally maximize, but as said before it could be more consistent. Truly toggling would be a start. )

oh, i will try that..

EDIT:i did that, but it doesn't work... what could be the problem??
 
Just like shutting down Windows requires the Start button if I remember correctly. People are pretty good at applying symbols to concepts if those concepts are consistent.

You know i don't get the whole thing against windows using the start button to shut down, in a car you use the ignition to turn the car off.

In a way it makes sense, you can start a program or start shutting down the PC.
 
You know i don't get the whole thing against windows using the start button to shut down, in a car you use the ignition to turn the car off.

In a way it makes sense, you can start a program or start shutting down the PC.

My grandmother (at the time 81 years old) did not find it so easy to grasp...
 
My point is only that someone who can understand that you click an apple to shutdown a computer can easily understand that you click start to shut down a computer too.

I agree, in fact i think that Apples implementation is actually worse because it is not obvious that you can click on the :apple:. Where as in windows (not vista though) there was a big screaming button saying press me.
 
I agree, in fact i think that Apples implementation is actually worse because it is not obvious that you can click on the :apple:. Where as in windows (not vista though) there was a big screaming button saying press me.

Don't really agree with this. True it is better the first time on Windows, and then on the other 2 - 9999999999 times you have an annoying large button to deal with. Whereas on the Mac is it a bit tricky the first time but better the next 2 - 9999999999 times. And given the ridiculousness of the shutdown in Vista with its 9 different ways. Insanely bad.

21vistaoff.png
 
Don't really agree with this. True it is better the first time on Windows, and then on the other 2 - 9999999999 times you have an annoying large button to deal with. Whereas on the Mac is it a bit tricky the first time but better the next 2 - 9999999999 times.

What :confused:, there really isn't any difference between a big button and a small button in this regard.:rolleyes:
 
I agree, in fact i think that Apples implementation is actually worse because it is not obvious that you can click on the :apple:. Where as in windows (not vista though) there was a big screaming button saying press me.

The vista implementation is quite lacking. The big button that looks like an off button will actually put your computer to sleep or on other occasions shut your computer down. Plus it's not clear that you have to click the arrow for other options.

All previous versions of windows were very clear, click shut down to shut down (or at least give you the options).

The apple one is a bit tricky because as you say you don't know you can click it. However if you do know it is clickable then it makes sense. The Apple menu controls your apple, and you shut down your apple through the apple menu.
 
Wow, I can't believe this - how can you be so ignorant? You simply assume that the allmighty Apple is absolutely correct and build your whole post on this assumption.

I could copypaste your post and just switch maximised and regular-sized windows so it would look like maximisation is the best way. What if you are the one trained to be completely uncomfortable when presented with just one window? Everyone is mentioning GUI experts - I'm sure Microsoft and other OS developers have them too, and as many people said - let us have our way of doing things. After all, It's not a perfectly objective thing, you can't put it through GUIMark 2007 and say it beats the competition by 3420 GUI points.

Oh, and another thing - nobody forces you to maximise things in windows, but still - so many people do it. How come such a small number of users actually leaves their windows regularly sized? Sure, the green button is missing, but that's just an additional feature, the basic idea of having smaller windows and placing them around as you wish still is still readily available. How come Windows users don't do it the Apple way? If it's as superior as you say, I'd expect at least half of the users to do it. Is Microsoft forcing them to maximise with subliminal messages in wallpapers?

having done it the "microsoft" way for a long time, and the "apple" way a short time, i find that the "apple" way is far superior. i work more efficiently not having to dig through a bunch of maximized windows, especially when moving files between programs. and i don't think i could live without expose.
 
having done it the "microsoft" way for a long time, and the "apple" way a short time, i find that the "apple" way is far superior. i work more efficiently not having to dig through a bunch of maximized windows, especially when moving files between programs. and i don't think i could live without expose.

And if you made the Mighty Mouse nipple to be Expose for current application, it's awesome.
 
There is a really simple resolution to this. After reading much of this thread I have come to the conclusion that those that are complaining about the function of the maximize button are former Windows users. And I bet many of you still spell Mac in caps, like so: MAC

So how about going back to being a Windows user? What is next though, you want to try out Linux and complain about how the "dock" does not work right?

Maximize is meant to maximize the efficient use of the window. Having a window at full screen is not always efficient.

Personally I like the fact that I have grown up to use a computer and not just a window. I can use Safari and keep iChat at its side to see buddy status. I can drag images from a folder or the desktop into a document editor without having to go through SEVERAL steps to "insert" an image.

Join use tomorrow as we discuss how the Mac's "trash" can is politically incorrect in some abstract way and how Windows "recycle bin" is so much more appropriate.

Then next week will be touch on how screen tearing is the best way to display an opening window in Windows and how Apple implementation of clean rendering is too GPU intense and a waste of valuable resources.
 
Yep, the Vista shutdown method definitely wins the "terrible usability of the year" award :)

I don't understand it. I had a class on Usability and Human-Computer Interaction as part of a very basic 2 year college course (part time, a couple of evenings a week), and yet *yes* even I seem to know more about interface design than Microsoft... or even Apple sometimes (though they're usually top notch). The principles are not that difficult: be consistent, provide visual cues, break up information into chunks, display things clearly etc. There's a huge list of them but once you've read them they seem like common sense.

To make an off-button that can be either a standby or shutdown button without changing in appearance, to dump the other options within a difficult-to-spot hidden menu, to have this hidden menu with important options as a plain text list with no icons / visual cues, to make the off-button instantly do what the user will frequently find is not the behaviour they wanted, without any prompting... just some of the things that are wrong with Microsoft's design there... I'd have failed the assignment! Honestly there is no excuse for a multi billion dollar corporation to be getting basics like that so wrong.
 
I don't maximize things like Safari because most webpages aren't designed to be resolution independent, so on most websites you get a huge swath of white all around the page (sometimes the designer will mix it up with gray, or tulips or some such) and this is on my little 13" screen. Imagine how horrid it was when I was dual screening with a 23" Cinema Display!

By all means, refuse to maximize all you want. I'm merely explaining how I work best -- and that's generally with each window filling the screen. As I've already pointed out, I don't generally look at too many websites with fixed div widths, like blogs and stuff. Most of what I look at when I am online are databases that actually benefit from increased real estate.

...uses for not maximizing...

That's fantastic, but surely you understand that switching between multiple applications rapidly is not the same as performing them simultaneously. As pointed out, I do that too -- by watching movies on my Apple TV, by listening to music in iTunes, by using the Dock or Exposé to switch between multiple applications (when conversing in iChat and so forth).

I also explained that I don't maximize all of my windows -- in fact, that whether or not I maximize a window depends on what I am currently doing with it. I do a lot of stuff in Terminal and in the Finder.

Exactly. You're exactly the type of person I was talking about in a previous post of mine. You have been trained to be completely uncomfortable when presented with "too many" windows, as you put it.

Perhaps you have been "trained" to forget background applications if they're not peeking out behind something. I haven't -- I'm well aware of every application I currently have open. I can drag any element from any window of any application to any section of any other application I have running. I can view every single application and every single window I have open just by pressing a button.

So far I've made the argument that maximizing an application is beneficial because many apps benefit from having a larger work area. Is this being "trained"? I'm perfectly capable of working with many, many small applications on a screen at one time -- I used to use gDesklets :D What I have trained myself to do, though, over years of computer usage, is to eliminate clutter and maximize efficiency. Shutting out distractions, in other words.

What we've learned in psychology is that people aren't particularly good multitaskers. That's why schools give advice before exam days like "Minimize distractions in your study area." Me, I'm a terrible multitasker -- and not because I was trained by Windows in some immense conspiracy aimed at keeping Apple a fringe company, but because of my basic psychology. I was like this long before I ever even touched a Windows computer.

Now, the debate here is about the Green button, and what it should really do, from a choice of two options:

See, I think you're the one who is confused here -- I'm explaining why maximization is beneficial to me, and you're complaining about how I'm evil and want to take away your happy green button. I don't care about the green button at all, even though many people in this thread (including myself) have already pointed out how it's inconsistent across different applications. I'm not arguing in favor of a fourth button either.

I'm merely explaining why maximizing windows is useful -- a quick way to gain maximal screen real estate for an application that benefits from such a thing.

Now, who do you think would suffer more:

No one has to suffer. Please pay attention.

That is really quite false, especially on Mac OS X, with all the drag and drop action. Judging by your response, I gather you aren't very familiar or even aware of how it works in Mac OS X.

On a Mac, "drag and drop" doesn't only apply to dragging files from one folder to another folder in the Finder.

I can drag and drop between maximized applications, even maximized applications on different workspaces, and even maximized applications on different computers. I can do it with Linux and Windows too.



There is a really simple resolution to this. After reading much of this thread I have come to the conclusion that those that are complaining about the function of the maximize button are former Windows users. And I bet many of you still spell Mac in caps, like so: MAC

Yeah, I'm a former Windows user. You know why? Because System 7, OS 8, and OS 9 were steaming piles of ****. Even Apple knew their OS sucked, which is why they spent several years trying to buy other companies' operating systems!

So how about going back to being a Windows user? What is next though, you want to try out Linux and complain about how the "dock" does not work right?

I've already tried out Linux -- and FreeBSD, OS/2, and several other OSes. Even the lowly BeOS :rolleyes: What's your point? That people cannot use an OS and criticize its missing functions?

Go read Low End Mac some more, where people always bitch about the useless eye candy of OS X and advocate going back to System 7 so that their Performas will keep running.

Maximize is meant to maximize the efficient use of the window. Having a window at full screen is not always efficient.

The OS is not intelligent enough to determine what is most efficient for me -- UI designers, while intelligent, operate by statistics. Remember we're discussing a computer that used a one-button mouse for over two decades because that extra button would confuse people...

I'll determine what is efficient for me and act accordingly. And if you can find it in your heart to allow me to use maximized windows, then I'd much appreciate it.

Personally I like the fact that I have grown up to use a computer and not just a window. I can use Safari and keep iChat at its side to see buddy status. I can drag images from a folder or the desktop into a document editor without having to go through SEVERAL steps to "insert" an image.

There are proxies and proxy methods for maximized apps throughout the OS -- the Services, the Dock, Exposé, Spaces... all put there to make working with maximized applications just as easy as having two small apps side by side. All the benefits of maximized windows (increased screen real estate, focus) and all the benefits of small windows side by side (easy workflows).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.