Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It is not BS. Let's take Logic Pro for example. With the 13", you cannot see all plugins on 1 channel sometimes because the screen is literally too small for that. So you basically have to go to the mixer every single time to deal with this limitation.

Also some plugins eat up so much screen real estate, it is already problematic on a 16" display, let alone a 13" display.

It is BS because you made a general statement saying:

Working on a 13" screen is simply too small for a notebook [] Apple should release a 15" M3 MBA as 13" is simply way too small to work on.

Just because certain applications don't work on a 13" screen doesn't mean you can then declare the 13" to be unusable for work in general!
 
Last edited:
It is BS because you made a general statement saying:



Just because certain applications don't work on a 13" screen doesn't mean you can then deem the 13" to be unusable for all kinds of work!

The general statement is true since a bigger screen is better to work on. I can give many more examples, this was just one of them.

Hence a 13” laptop cannot be the best laptop ever created.
 
The general statement is true since a bigger screen is better to work on. I can give many more examples, this was just one of them.

Hence a 13” laptop cannot be the best laptop ever created.

A bigger screen being better doesn't equate to a 13" screen being "way too small to work on". It doesn't help your argument. You can give me more examples of how a 13" is too small for work. I can also tell you that I've been doing work on my 13" screen for years without issue.

So again, to haphazardly lay out a claim saying a 13" screen is too small for work is just silly.
 
You guys keep saying I missed the 12" MacBook. NO I DIDN'T. Re-read my original post - that is what I am referring to... I should have just said MacBook not MBA but that is what I meant:

"Thin and light beyond thin and light: this is effectively the thinnest and lightest laptop Apple has ever made (yes the smaller netbook MBA is an exception)."
................

I was merely pointing out the absurdity of you getting upset that other people didn't realize you meant the the 12" MacBook when you literally said "MBA".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The general statement is true since a bigger screen is better to work on. I can give many more examples, this was just one of them.

Hence a 13” laptop cannot be the best laptop ever created.
Yes a 13" laptop can be the best laptop ever created. Its smaller physical dimensions and light weight coupled with a generous sized screen that is actually bigger than the previous MBA model make this device hit a sweet spot in terms of usability and portability.

The bigger the screen the less portability and worse of a laptop experience the device becomes. I also have a 16" MBP M1 and it is horrible for lap use and travel because of how physically big it is.

You are using the wrong attribute to grade how good a laptop is. The very essence and function of a laptop is portability. On your logic, absurd results follow: why not just get a laptop with a 27" screen...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DavidChoux
Not really. Working on a 13" screen is simply too small for a notebook. The 16" is the superior Notebook as you don't miss not having an external display with you.

For this reason, Apple should release a 15" M3 MBA as 13" is simply way too small to work on.
You are on an island all by yourself with this take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidChoux
You are on an island all by yourself with this take.

Yeah man. I am totally wrong and also all other companies who invests alot of money buying external displays for their employees, because according to MacRumors 13" is all you need.
 
Last edited:
Yeah man. I am totally wrong and also all other companies who invests alot of money buying external displays for their employees, because according to MacRumors 13" is all you need.

You're taking the argument to it's extremes and arguing about something none of us said. I'm sure no one disagrees that a bigger than 13" screen is better for work.

Let me help you understand. You're suggesting a 13" is simply too small for work. Myself and others are saying it's not, and that we have done plenty of work on 13" screens. We're not disagreeing that a bigger screen is better for work. We're disagreeing with your point that 13" is too small for work.

I.e.

You:
13" = too small, 15" = acceptable

Me and others:
13" = acceptable, 15" = better

Hope that makes it clearer.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jdb8167
Let me know when you guys get a real job and you will see nobody works on a 13" screen.

But I let you guys believe that people actually do their job on tiny 13" screens all day if that makes you happy.
Well I don’t know about you, but at my job we have these things called “desktop computers.” They tend to be a bit bigger than “laptop computers”, which are primarily for portability. The majority of users have no need for a 16’ inch laptop. If YOU need one for YOUR personal workflow, then that‘s fine. But to suggest that the average consumer runs Logic Pro on a 16’ inch screen is nothing more than willful ignorance.

You’ve already had multiple posters tell you that they work just fine on a 13’ inch screen, yet here you are doubling down on denial.
 
Where did I say anything about that? I just said its faster in day to day performance, thats not an opinion, its a fact. Which means for an ultra portable day to day machine, its hard to beat. Get over it
That is not the main thing everyone is looking for.. the M1 itself was already so fast the previous air/pro with that still beats so many other old machines, yes M2 is slightly faster in single core. But that one fact doesn't make it an unbeatable machine??
If, for example, theoretically the pro 14" was cheaper than the air, more people would buy the pro.
Simple as that
 
Yeah man. I am totally wrong and also all other companies who invests alot of money buying external displays for their employees, because according to MacRumors 13" is all you need.
Dude stop with the strawman. Yes people use external monitors with laptops. It enables laptops to FUNCTION LIKE A DESKTOP. In others words, external monitors extend the functionality of a laptop.

But a laptop is not a desktop computer: its very design and purpose is to NOT BE THAT, in the same way that a desktop is designed to not be a laptop and in the same way a car is not designed to be a watch. The difference though is that a desktop cannot be a laptop but a laptop CAN be a desktop which is what is so remarkable about them.

As a laptop, the M2 MBA is excellent, and this is what it says to you:

 
Well I don’t know about you, but at my job we have these things called “desktop computers.” They tend to be a bit bigger than “laptop computers”, which are primarily for portability. The majority of users have no need for a 16’ inch laptop. If YOU need one for YOUR personal workflow, then that‘s fine. But to suggest that the average consumer runs Logic Pro on a 16’ inch screen is nothing more than willful ignorance.

You’ve already had multiple posters tell you that they work just fine on a 13’ inch screen, yet here you are doubling down on denial.
Nails it.
 
The general statement is true since a bigger screen is better to work on. I can give many more examples, this was just one of them.

Hence a 13” laptop cannot be the best laptop ever created.
One being better doesn’t make the other unusable. Similarly, a 27” display doesn’t make a 24” impossible to work on.

You may need (or, more likely, prefer) more screen real estate, but plenty of people do just fine on a 13” display.
 
Yeah man. I am totally wrong and also all other companies who invests alot of money buying external displays for their employees, because according to MacRumors 13" is all you need.
You’re wrong because you make sweeping generalizations. No one is saying larger displays are useless, but you made the claim that 13” displays are too small to work on and then had no real points to back up your BS point.
 
Yeah man. I am totally wrong and also all other companies who invests alot of money buying external displays for their employees, because according to MacRumors 13" is all you need.
If I am in a situation where I need a large display, I'm going to plug into one (or both) of the 24" monitors I have on my desk. If what I'm doing requires a large display, I'm likely to need an external keyboard, mouse, ergonomic chair and desk anyways.

A 15" screen doesn't add enough real estate vs. a 13.6" for me to want to deal with its extra bulk when moving it around or holding it on my lap. What I need to do when a laptop is on my lap can easily be accomplished with the 13.6" of the M2 Air.
 
You’re wrong because you make sweeping generalizations. No one is saying larger displays are useless, but you made the claim that 13” displays are too small to work on and then had no real points to back up your BS point.
Exactly. Even though he tried to go back & edit a few of his posts after the fact, the argument still holds absolutely zero weight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidChoux
Man people really get bent out of shape over others opinions... go enjoy your damn laptops, instead of debating who you thinks is better. Gets embarrassing eventually

TBH I just come here to laugh at the dumb sh*t some people say. Let's be real that's probably why a lot of folk come here too. Oh, and seeing what delights the mods may cook up for you. Today I had a post saying "Well done" get removed. I wouldn't be surprised it this post was removed too.
 
I liked the RIC video too. Couldn't stop laughing on that one.
Other than that, I keep the popcorn crunchy and ready for the next round.
 
If I am in a situation where I need a large display, I'm going to plug into one (or both) of the 24" monitors I have on my desk. If what I'm doing requires a large display, I'm likely to need an external keyboard, mouse, ergonomic chair and desk anyways.

A 15" screen doesn't add enough real estate vs. a 13.6" for me to want to deal with its extra bulk when moving it around or holding it on my lap. What I need to do when a laptop is on my lap can easily be accomplished with the 13.6" of the M2 Air.
Nails it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chateaunole-du-Pape
Nevertheless it's a weird argument. "It's the lightest laptop Apple ever made! Except that laptop Apple sold for years that was 25% lighter."

Why even begin with a superlative? But I agree with the rest. It is probably (still waiting on mine) the best laptop ever made, at least for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidChoux
Ehh. The M2 Macbook Air is really good, but is it Apple's best they ever made? No, that would be the 2015 15 inch Macbook Pro and 14/16 inch Macbook Pros hands down. The 2015 15 inch has legacy as so many pros still use it, and from a technical spec the 14/16 inch are better. Especially at the spec you ordered your Air, you'd get more performance out of a 14 inch Macbook Pro instead just for the simple fast that laptop has a heatsink, as well as a 1440p 120hz display
 
  • Love
Reactions: miq and jezbd1997
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.