Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Isn't Apple routing those calls (like iMessages)? So Apple is basically setting up an ad hoc peer to peer connection. Which is different than what I imagine the cell service providers are doing which is actually receiving your call and patching it into the nationwide phone service. So you can reach grandma on her old rotary phone or your favorite techno dweeb who is calling from behind seven proxies.


The phone company routes them not Apple.
 
But I can't use Wi-Fi calling outside of the U.S. :(
For that you need an app like "Bria" or "Softphone", then you open an account, let's say at voip.ms, add some fund, configure your app, and you are ready to make phone calls from all over the world using WiFI at the domestic rate, less than one cent per minute.

I do that all the time when I travel oversea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
  • Like
Reactions: DotCom2
Just used AT&T Wi-Fi calling to make a call to a landline. The quality sounded on par with FaceTime Audio (i.e. better than traditional cellular).

Anyone care to travel across the Canada or Mexico border and see what happens when you try to place a Wi-Fi call? I know AT&T says it won't work. I wonder if connecting to a VPN in the U.S. would circumvent Wi-Fi calling not working outside the U.S. and its territories?
I'm curious about using a VPN as well. Not sure if you'd be successful though.
 
Works great for me!

ed629468648d5addaa7cce4ba98b1e71.jpg
 
It's pretty sad folks are getting excited about a service that uses YOUR wi-fi bandwidth and YOUR talk minutes because their network has lousy coverage, and can't penetrate buildings very well.

Hey, I'm paying you monthly service so you can use my high-speed internet (which I'm also paying for) to make phone calls! Thank you AT&T!
 
charging long distance fees when using a service that puts 0 load on their networks is criminal as does the reoccurring hd-voice fee.
WiFi calling is a replacement for the wireless connection to a tower. The WiFi call and the radio call through the tower still meet at the same place to complete the connection and all (most) of the backend hardware is shared. If you would have paid for the call wireless then using WiFi does not make it magically do something different to happen, its just an option in the event your radio signal is low.
 
It says it requires AT&T HD Voice which requires both the caller and receiver to have AT&T HD Voice. This means, you cannot use this feature to call outside of AT&T.

If this is indeed the case (which I have no reason to doubt your statement), than this is exactly as I suspected from Ralph and company. They found a way to F'k everyone anyway. I don't have HD voice in my area (testing T-mobile currently btw), so I will have to keep my microcell anyway w/ATT if I choose to keep them.

ATT just loves to push the envelope on you can "IF"...
 
It's pretty sad folks are getting excited about a service that uses YOUR wi-fi bandwidth and YOUR talk minutes because their network has lousy coverage, and can't penetrate buildings very well.

Hey, I'm paying you monthly service so you can use my high-speed internet (which I'm also paying for) to make phone calls! Thank you AT&T!
No, its an optional service. You have a choice of using bandwidth at home or not but have you looked at the amount this service uses? In a month I bet you will talk less bandwidth than you use watching a decent quality YouTube video. The usage is very low. Businesses have for the most part moved to all IP services in some way or another and the call capacity is much higher than you might suspect. So, true you're using your bandwidth but its very little and optional. It would be nice to have a full radio signal everywhere all the time but we all know there are areas that still need some work so until then, we have an option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
So now I get to pay AT&T & Comcast to use my own network and the public internet to route my calls. All to make up for AT&T's crummy service coverage?

Where do I sign up?
Have you tried the service? It's nice. I can't tell you that you should not have better coverage, you should, but this does give you an option. I have been using it here and it works well.
 
So now I get to pay AT&T & Comcast to use my own network and the public internet to route my calls. All to make up for AT&T's crummy service coverage?

Where do I sign up?
Why is it that when TMobile launched WiFi calling, everyone was hailing it as the best thing since sliced bread, but it's suddenly a different tune when AT&T launches it?

A major point that needs to be raised is that over 100 million customers are just fine and dandy on AT&T's network without the need for wifi calling.

If TMobile didn't have wifi calling, a significant portion of their subscribers would be screwed due to their shoddy coverage.
 
Just curious what port does the Wi-Fi calling require some work places and businesses nearly block all their ports.
This is a really good question.

I enabled it a while ago but don't see the "AT&T Wi-Fi" status, then I realized I am at work. We cannot access personal Mail because the port is blocked, and now this likely isn't working for the same reason.

So much for getting phone coverage at work deep inside a building. Sucks.
 



AT&T has flipped the switch on Wi-Fi calling, making it available to customers with eligible plans that are running iOS 9. MacRumors has received tips from customers who were able to activate Wi-Fi calling and we were able to activate the feature on our own iPhones. A number of readers in our forums are also having success activating Wi-Fi calling.

Wi-Fi calling is a feature that lets calls be placed over a wireless connection when cellular connectivity is poor, functioning much like an AT&T M-Cell does now. It's similar to Apple's own FaceTime Audio feature, which also routes calls over a Wi-Fi connection.

AT&T customers can turn on Wi-Fi calling by going to the Phone section of the Settings app and toggling on the Wi-Fi calling feature. From there, there are a set of steps to walk through, including entering an emergency 911 address. Wi-Fi calling is available on the iPhone 6, 6s, 6 Plus, and 6s Plus running iOS 9.

att_wifi_calling_setup_1-800x704.jpg

Customers who want to use Wi-Fi calling need to have AT&T HD voice features enabled, along with an Internet connection. Wi-Fi calling can be used for voice calls within the United States, Puerto Rico, and United States Virgin Islands at no charge. Long distance global voice calls will be charged standard long distance rates.

Once the setup process is complete, customers are receiving notifications letting them know the Wi-Fi calling feature will be available after a short activation period.

att_wifi_calling_setup_2-800x354.jpg

AT&T promised to launch Wi-Fi calling alongside iOS 9, but last week announced the feature was delayed due to its inability to get an FCC waiver that would temporarily allow the carrier to forgo offering support options for deaf and hard-of-hearing customers. On Tuesday of this week, AT&T finally received the waiver that it needed to move forward with Wi-Fi calling.

Article Link: Wi-Fi Calling Now Available for AT&T Users
I don't think you need HDVoice for this to work. You will need access to VoLTE for proper hand-off but HDVoice is just a service and it too relies on VoLTE to work but its a wide-band audio format and has nothing to do with transmission. VoLTE on the other hand is a technology that describes in a short sentence the use of LTE and Voice on a shared data connection.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.