Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
You can get a firewire/usb bluetooth dongle for your camera and use that to transfer all your pics over to your macbook/macbook pro with built in bluetooth, it takes seconds for hundreds of high resolution pictures so problem solved quit whining.

what dont you people get about

"Steve knows what you want, and you dont want firewire in your macbooks anymore"

problem over:apple:
 
You can get a firewire/usb bluetooth dongle for your camera and use that to transfer all your pics over to your macbook/macbook pro with built in bluetooth, it takes seconds for hundreds of high resolution pictures so problem solved quit whining.

what dont you people get about

"Steve knows what you want, and you dont want firewire in your macbooks anymore"

problem over:apple:

Are you kidding? No one is talking about photos from a digital camera. We're talking about video (SD and HD) from a camcorder. If USB2 isn't quite up to transferring video at 36Mbps without dropout, I would be quite sure that Bluetooth would fare even worse.

I get it. Firewire is quickly becoming an irrelevant port. I can accept the fact that FW took up too much space on the MBs and was left out. That's fine, I just won't buy an MB. Maybe I'll buy an MBP, maybe not. Maybe I'll hang onto my wife's MB for a few extra years, no problem.

ft
 
Sushi,

You might have missed my post a few pages back, but mosx is correct about transfering video off of the tape using USB. There were some miniDV camcorders (Sonys mostly) that had a feature called USB streaming. The video would be down-rezzed to about 352x288 and converted to M-JPEG prior to importing and presumably, the video would look like crap.

This method of video import has nothing to do with the flash-card video that many camcorders also use.
Thanks for the feedback -- I did indeed miss your post.

However, if this is what he is referring to, then my premise stands.

The only way to get the actual DV video from a MiniDV camera is via FW.
 
This is the most pointless thread ever. If there is no FireWire in the macbooks, wtf are you gonna do about it? Last time I checked, nobody here knows Steve Jobs nor has any power to influence Apple's decisions (in mass, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt because in the past Apple has somewhat listened to people). I think you should be concentrating your whining in emails to Apple or the suggestion page at apple or something that is not just bitching on MacRumors lol. Wtf is anyone here gonna do to help you?
 
This is the most pointless thread ever. If there is no FireWire in the macbooks, wtf are you gonna do about it? Last time I checked, nobody here knows Steve Jobs nor has any power to influence Apple's decisions (in mass, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt because in the past Apple has somewhat listened to people). I think you should be concentrating your whining in emails to Apple or the suggestion page at apple or something that is not just bitching on MacRumors lol. Wtf is anyone here gonna do to help you?

I think most people here have sent messages on the suggestion page. I know I have.
 
Let's see....

iMac 20" - Firewire 400/800 - $1199
Mac Mini - Firewire 400 - $599
Last Gen Macbook Pro - Firewire 400/800 - $1299 new at MacMall

I think Mom and Dad are currently covered.....

Get over the fact the new Macbook doesn't have FW and move on.
 
Let's see....

iMac 20" - Firewire 400/800 - $1199
Mac Mini - Firewire 400 - $599
Last Gen Macbook Pro - Firewire 400/800 - $1299 new at MacMall

I think Mom and Dad are currently covered.....

Get over the fact the new Macbook doesn't have FW and move on.

This whole issue is getting tired, however, I'll bite.

I think the folks here lamenting the loss of FW on the new Macbooks see the writing on the wall. And that writing is saying that when the time comes to update the iMac and mini, that FW will be dropped from them as well. Leaving FW only on the "Pro" Macs.

Thinking back on the whole thing, we should have all seen the signs that this would be happening sooner rather than later. The first sign was dropping FW from the iPods. The second and more ominous sign was when Steve showed off the new iMovieHD (I think it was '06) with the Panasonic HD5, and AVCHD camcorder. Back then, AVCHD was nowhere near as good as HDV, yet Apple was sort of endorsing it.

In the end, I'll eventually do one of three things.

1. Buy a new camcorder - Apple gets no money

2. Delay the purchase of a new Macbook - Apple waits to get my money

3. Buy a MBP - Apple gets my money

Honestly, the most likely would be #1. Had the new MBs had Firewire, I would think that 1 and 2 would have been equally likely. In any case, I don't think #3 is likely at those prices.

ft
 
You still have not provided the make and model number so that we can see.

I am used to what was available here in Japan. Many models do not get exported to the states. Sometimes I get confused which ones we are referring to. That is why I asked you for the make and model number so that we would both be on the same sheet of music, per se.

As I said... how many weeks ago now? If you want to hunt the person down that I helped, feel free. Again, as I stated a very long time ago earlier in this thread, she moved away and her friends in this area have not heard from her and do not know where she is currently living.

Also, nice job ignoring what I said in what you were quoting. You're trying to tell me it was a flash based camera I was using at a time when flash memory large enough to hold an hours worth of DVD quality video in ANY format was either not yet available or prohibitively expensive.

Please provide a reference for this.

You simply stating this as fact, does not make it true.

BTW, I have done large file transfers on both Mac and PC using both FW and USB. FW400 trumps USB 2.0 in sustained transfer rates for both large and small files.

If you have an Intel Mac, install Windows. Try it for yourself. Anyone with an Intel Mac can try it themselves and see, as long as Windows is installed via Boot Camp and not in a virtual machine.

Do some quick googling. I already went over this in a later post. USB 2 has a proven sustained transfer rate of 40MB/sec, where as Firewire 400 has a sustained transfer rate of around 30 depending on the Mac model, and 800 is around 55MB/sec.

Most do not have Giga Ethernet at home, but rather Fast Ethernet (100Mbps). FW400 is much faster than this. Plus if your network is passing other information at the same time, you may not see the full bandwidth provided.

Gigabit ethernet has been available for a rather long time in PCs and Macs.

Also, with Target Disk Mode, you can use it to trouble shoot another Mac, recover files, and install systems, all without network support.

Gee, sounds like something you can do with an external USB device on the same system, without going through the hassle of connecting one computer to another.

BTW, FWIW, I've booted my MBP from a SDHC card.

Further proving that FireWire is useless.

Actually it doesn't in many cases. Then again, it is becoming quite evident that you know little about FW and TDM.

Why not? Optical discs can contain a full running operating system as well as an OS installer. So it makes perfect sense to boot off of an optical disc rather than going through the hassle of finding and connecting two computers. Not everyone has a Mac you know. Including me, I can count the number of Mac owners I know on one hand. On the other hand, when it comes to PCs, I can't think of anyone I know that does NOT own a Windows system.

A MiniDV based camcorder needs FW to move the video from the MiniDV tape to the computer.

If I am wrong, please show me a specific make and model that does not have FW and uses USB instead. Note, I am not talking about the many MiniDV camcorders out there that allow you to capture video to a flash memory card.

www.wikipedia.org clearly states that Firewire is NOT part of the DV spec and that cameras have included USB as a means of transferring video without recompression. And as I stated above, which you conveniently ignored:

Secondly, the compressed video that DV uses equals about 4.5MB/sec worth of data. That works out to be less than half the speed that an HDD-based iPod syncs. Not to mention thats slower than the painfully slow iPhone and iPod touch sync at.

So you're going to try to tell me that USB 2.0 can't sustain 4.5MB/sec?

Even if the video was sent through uncompressed, uncompressed standard definition video works out to be roughly 20MB/sec. You're going to try to tell me that USB 2.0 can't sustain 20MB/sec when max the spec can handle is 60 (480Mbps)? So you're going to try to tell me that USB 2.0 can't sustain less than half of its maximum transfer rate?

In that past that would have only been an issue because the HDD itself could not keep up, but that would have affected both Firewire and USB 2.0. But for the past few years, even "slow" notebook HDDs have an average write speed of about 45MB/sec. So this is simply not an issue.

And one final thing on this topic. If USB 2.0 was so incapable of handling high quality high bandwidth video, why are there so many USB 2.0 HDTV tuners that grab the signal from the air and push it to your computer WITHOUT recompression? OTA HDTV is second only to blu-ray in terms of quality. So if USB 2.0 was so "slow", why would we have those devices? Why would we have devices that can capture 1080i video over component cables and send it to the computer as 20+Mbps H.264?

If USB was so incapable, why do the HDD based iPods and iPod nanos sync at more than double the bandwidth of DV video?

Now can you stop digging up old posts and bring up arguments that are old and proven wrong, such as DV needing firewire?
 
As I said... how many weeks ago now? If you want to hunt the person down that I helped, feel free. Again, as I stated a very long time ago earlier in this thread, she moved away and her friends in this area have not heard from her and do not know where she is currently living.

Also, nice job ignoring what I said in what you were quoting. You're trying to tell me it was a flash based camera I was using at a time when flash memory large enough to hold an hours worth of DVD quality video in ANY format was either not yet available or prohibitively expensive.
We will continue going around in circles on this issue. That is, until you can provide a reference. In the meantime, we might as well drop this topic because you can't provide a reference and no one here seems to know of a camcorder that can do this.

BTW, there are other members on this board who work professionally in the field. I am sure they would chime in if they have a camcorder that can move full DV video from a MiniDV based camcorder to a computer via USB with no change in the compression, quality, FPS, etc.

Moving full DV video from a MiniDV based camcorder to a computer via FW is the norm. I do not know of a MiniDV based camcorder than can move full DV video from the camcorder to a computer via USB. I would love to see this as it would provide a needed solution for what I would like to do. So please, show me a model that does this. I will thank you if you can. :)

Do some quick googling. I already went over this in a later post. USB 2 has a proven sustained transfer rate of 40MB/sec, where as Firewire 400 has a sustained transfer rate of around 30 depending on the Mac model, and 800 is around 55MB/sec.
You are the one professing the above.

Show the links that prove your point.

Gigabit ethernet has been available for a rather long time in PCs and Macs.
Until recently, Giga routers, switches, hubs and appropriate Ethernet cables were a bit expensive for the average home user. Even today, it still is not cheap and from my experience most still only have Fast Ethernet which is only 100Mbps.

Why not? Optical discs can contain a full running operating system as well as an OS installer. So it makes perfect sense to boot off of an optical disc rather than going through the hassle of finding and connecting two computers. Not everyone has a Mac you know. Including me, I can count the number of Mac owners I know on one hand. On the other hand, when it comes to PCs, I can't think of anyone I know that does NOT own a Windows system.
The example that you give is what I would call the stone age way of fixing computers.

TDM is much easier, simpler, faster, and provides many more options when fixing a Mac. I take my laptop over to my friends house to fix his computer. I merely connect the two via a simple FW cable. Start his up in TDM and now I can trouble shoot his system. So simple. So easy. Way more powerful that booting from CD.

Again, learn about TDM and what you can really do with it before merely dismissing it.

www.wikipedia.org clearly states that Firewire is NOT part of the DV spec and that cameras have included USB as a means of transferring video without recompression. And as I stated above, which you conveniently ignored:

Now can you stop digging up old posts and bring up arguments that are old and proven wrong, such as DV needing firewire?
Please show me a specific camera that can do this. That is exporting the full DV video via USB. That I can purchase today.

If you are going to multi-quote, it would be greatly appreciated if would include the member's name whom you are quoting. TIA.
 
I wouldn't want to be the one to bring the firewire debate here, but others have done so for me. While you certainly spout a number of fun facts, your dismissive attitude did prompt me to ...
Do some quick googling.
of the term "firewire vs USB" finding this and this, each stating the technical advantage of firewire 400 over USB 2.0, and it's prevalence to date on many platforms.

A quick search of my favourite camera shop finds not only a popular MiniDV video camera that uses firewire to transfer video, but a sidebar explaining a common breakdown of camera formats and transfer technologies used. Surprise, they consider MiniDV and Firewire to be current technologies. For fun, here is that sidebar:
vistek.jpg


Sure you could probably provide links to prove your point, but the fact is that firewire is still a current and common protocol. Dumping the port in the MacBook (and potentially in the Mac Mini and iMac as well), compromises what would otherwise be a completely suitable piece of professional equipment. Using that as an argument to upgrade to a higher level of hardware is complete bunk. As a professional, is it not in my interest to reduce capital expenditures where possible?

The implied gist of this thread, "Is Apple making decisions that financially hurts the Pro user", looks at a larger question than firewire alone. The sad fact is that usability even on models that are labelled as Pro, is being diminished.

I think most people here have sent messages on the suggestion page. I know I have.

Amen.
 
Sure you could probably provide links to prove your point, but the fact is that firewire is still a current and common protocol. Dumping the port in the MacBook (and potentially in the Mac Mini and iMac as well), compromises what would otherwise be a completely suitable piece of professional equipment. Using that as an argument to upgrade to a higher level of hardware is complete bunk. As a professional, is it not in my interest to reduce capital expenditures where possible?

The implied gist of this thread, "Is Apple making decisions that financially hurts the Pro user", looks at a larger question than firewire alone. The sad fact is that usability even on models that are labelled as Pro, is being diminished.

I did not see that too many people were saying that FW is not common or current, but clearly as a camera interface it is declining. DV tape will too becase as consumers go, so will professionals right? Do you see videographers still using tape 5 years from now?

BTW here is another buying guide;

http://camcorders.about.com/od/camcorder101/bb/RightCamcorder.htm
 
... as consumers go, so will professionals right? Do you see videographers still using tape 5 years from now?

Don't forget, in the past consumers went VHS and professional broadcasters went Betacam. ;) That said, I think you could find the successor to any current technology already in the R&D pipeline. The question is, did Apple retire firewire in the MacBooks too soon? Many say yes.

Personally, I hope they didn't do it just to make room for the batt indicator.
 
Don't forget, in the past consumers went VHS and professional broadcasters went Betacam. ;) That said, I think you could find the successor to any current technology already in the R&D pipeline. The question is, did Apple retire firewire in the MacBooks too soon? Many say yes.

Personally, I hope they didn't do it just to make room for the batt indicator.

Broadcasters never "went" betacam -- VHS was never ever ever part of the broadcast equation.

Many say "yes" ..... on these forums. Of the millions of MacBook owners out there, I wonder how many really care about FW. And are "upset" that the new MacBook doesn't have it.

IN ANY CASE ... if you complain to Apple, they'll just tell you to buy a Pro (for more money) OR a WhiteBook (for less money). Big deal dudes ... I don't even know what's to talk about anymore.
 
WOW I am amazed how far this got, and it's all a good read. I have no uses for a FW, BUT I feel that if people still use it they should have kept it. They could even make it an option on Macbooks and standard on MBP's or something.
Also a note, everyone uses great info backing what they say, but you can't really use Wikipedia for a reliable source. Anyone can change info on that site and it's not 100% reliable.
 
We will continue going around in circles on this issue. That is, until you can provide a reference. In the meantime, we might as well drop this topic because you can't provide a reference and no one here seems to know of a camcorder that can do this.

As I said, if you want to find the person, be my guest. I'm not about to hunt someone down to answer a question on a forum posed by someone who doesn't know what they're talking about.

BTW, there are other members on this board who work professionally in the field. I am sure they would chime in if they have a camcorder that can move full DV video from a MiniDV based camcorder to a computer via USB with no change in the compression, quality, FPS, etc.

Most of the members here are diehard Apple fans who will defend anything Apple does, and even support things Apple has created more than Apple itself does.

Oh and Wikipedia states that USB can be used. Thats good enough for me and any other sensible person.

Moving full DV video from a MiniDV based camcorder to a computer via FW is the norm. I do not know of a MiniDV based camcorder than can move full DV video from the camcorder to a computer via USB. I would love to see this as it would provide a needed solution for what I would like to do. So please, show me a model that does this. I will thank you if you can.

www.wikipedia.org search it yourself. Besides, I already posted bandwidth specs which you've conveniently ignored.

You are the one professing the above.

Show the links that prove your point.

www.google.com I don't have time to go over all of this again because you've decided to dig up posts that are weeks old now when the conversation was resolved and ended almost as long ago.

The example that you give is what I would call the stone age way of fixing computers.

TDM is much easier, simpler, faster, and provides many more options when fixing a Mac. I take my laptop over to my friends house to fix his computer. I merely connect the two via a simple FW cable. Start his up in TDM and now I can trouble shoot his system. So simple. So easy. Way more powerful that booting from CD.

Again, learn about TDM and what you can really do with it before merely dismissing it.

How does TDM offer more than an optical disc? As I said, optical discs can contain entire functioning operating systems that work just as if they are installed with complete drivers.

And it saves the hassle of having to use multiple computers and connecting them.

And like I said, very few people have Macs anyway. Of three people I know with a Mac now (most sold off their Mac and bought a PC or just bought a PC and their Mac goes unused), 2 of them have aluminum Macs. They bought Macs before I could show them the "truth" and I didn't find out until the return window had closed.

Besides, if something goes wrong with an OS that stops it from properly booting, then "fixing" that problem is the worst possible course of action to take. Recovering the files and doing a fresh install of the OS after a wipe is the best course of action. An optical disc + USB drive, or even just booting off of the USB drive itself, provides the best way to do things.

Please show me a specific camera that can do this. That is exporting the full DV video via USB. That I can purchase today.

Better yet, out of the 6 consumer DV cams on Amazon's top 100 video camera list (out of 12 total), how about you show me one that is actually worth buying over the flash and HDD based cameras.

As I said, Wikipedia states DV cams have done it. I myself have done it years ago. I'm not going to search for something that you can do yourself just because you refuse to accept fact.

If you are going to multi-quote, it would be greatly appreciated if would include the member's name whom you are quoting. TIA.

Sure, when the forum rules state I have to and the HTML code is made more easily available so I can do it while I type my post in TextEdit or WordPad.

of the term "firewire vs USB" finding this and this, each stating the technical advantage of firewire 400 over USB 2.0, and it's prevalence to date on many platforms.

Ones a store the other provides no information.

A quick search of my favourite camera shop finds not only a popular MiniDV video camera that uses firewire to transfer video, but a sidebar explaining a common breakdown of camera formats and transfer technologies used. Surprise, they consider MiniDV and Firewire to be current technologies. For fun, here is that sidebar:

Well, their little "sidebar" is completely inaccurate. Only basic editing from DVD and HDD based cameras? Why? Thats stupid to say that and it shows that they're just playing to the now more expensive Firewire market to make people buy more expensive and more profitable equipment.

Sure you could probably provide links to prove your point, but the fact is that firewire is still a current and common protocol.

Go to wikipedia.

Dumping the port in the MacBook (and potentially in the Mac Mini and iMac as well), compromises what would otherwise be a completely suitable piece of professional equipment. Using that as an argument to upgrade to a higher level of hardware is complete bunk. As a professional, is it not in my interest to reduce capital expenditures where possible?

As I said, Firewire is useless. Wikipedia, a more trusted source than a store trying to upsell you on my expensive equipment while lying about the capabilities of other equipment, clearly states that USB can and has been used for DV. I've used it myself.

And, I'll say again, even if standard definition video is sent uncompressed from the camera to the PC for editing, that only works out to be 20MB/sec, less than half of USB 2.0's proven sustained transfer rate and even slower than some of the bad chipsets out there from a few years ago.

Oh and its hilarious that the little sidebar there says that DVD cameras offer limited editing capabilities. You know why? Because HD MiniDV cams use the EXACT SAME COMPRESSION as DVDs do. So somehow DVD editing is more limited despite being in the same format as MiniDV HD?
 
Are you saying Apple is justified in asking $700 for an express slot, firewire and 2 more inches? I don't think so. I see this as greed and a slap in the face to those that made apple who they are.

Express slot, firewire, 2 more inches, larger hard drive, better parts, yeah maybe not $700 but you left a lot of things out, like different high end parts. Maybe another 400-500 max
 
Express slot, firewire, 2 more inches, larger hard drive, better parts, yeah maybe not $700 but you left a lot of things out, like different high end parts. Maybe another 400-500 max

It's not even a full size ExpressCard slot.

PC manufacturers offer higher resolution screens than the MBP, and did glass MONTHS before Apple did, full size ExpressCard, HDMI, eSATA, multiple USB, card readers, fingerprint readers, faster processors, more RAM, better GPUs and more memory on those GPUS, etc. etc. for LESS than the aluminum MacBook costs.

The MacBook Pro is priced about double what it should be.
 
As I said, Firewire is useless.

1. Note how your user name appears above, right after it says "Originally Posted by"? You are going out of your way to make things harder for others.

2. Funny how you can question the validity of the links in the posts of others, when you fail to provide any yourself, let alone back up your claims with requested model information. Link up, provide facts, or:

3. Your posts are as useless as you say Firewire is.
 
Who thinks a new year means a new thread about firewire at some later future point?

I thought so. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.