Why can’t you go back?Even if they do I probably will not do the update until Spring 2024. Just because Ventura has been pretty bad (I wish I could go back to Monterey), so I want to know if Sonoma is possibly worse.
Why can’t you go back?Even if they do I probably will not do the update until Spring 2024. Just because Ventura has been pretty bad (I wish I could go back to Monterey), so I want to know if Sonoma is possibly worse.
You’re joking rightThe release schedule allows us to get new features quicker versus waiting 3 years for a feature that probably will be outdated at release. Not sure why folks are complaining about FREE YEARLY OS UPGRADES because they don't get blown away each release? People are become too spoiled and ungrateful!
Beta 5 also wasn't quite up to snuff, with some issues added by battery charging optimization. But Beta 6 fixed most things, and Beta 7 the latest is good enough to be a RC almost IMHO.Sonoma seems super stable to me so far - beta 4 update was a disaster but aside from that, smooth sailing.
Exactly. I pine for the good old days when a new Mac OS came out every couple of years it actually MEANT something. Now they release a new OS not because it's a big improvement, but because that's what the stupid schedule mandates.
What bugs have you experienced?No chance I'm updating until at least the 2nd round of software updates to fix all the bugs.
Imagine being on Ventura, waiting for that to happen. It has to be the buggiest version of macOS yet.No chance I'm updating until at least the 2nd round of software updates to fix all the bugs.
It's not as of beta 7, at least as far as my testing goes. Screen savers and desktop using Apple photos is a mess. I did find a workaround by actually using a photos folder atm.I had a few amusing bugs but I think the main one has been one of the screensavers hitching - haven't had time to see if it's still doing it on the latest beta.
check out their last… 15 years of quarterly earnings calls to understand whyMac OS has been a second class citizen for a long time.
Then let’s also say the third one.No chance I'm updating until at least the 2nd round of software updates to fix all the bugs.
I have some apps that only work on Ventura.Why can’t you go back?
i personally don't see quicker, just for the sake of it, as a benefit at all, if it means that the OS is not stable at all, with all kinds of sketchy behaviors.
it also doesn't necessarily mean that you'd have to wait for three years for new features, but postponing a release to something equivalent to what we get with a .3 or .4 release would be highly preferable, at a non-fixed pace between 12-18 months when it feels "ready", at least as far as i'm concerned.
those who urgently need such features earlier, are free to join the beta plans
in theory,you are correct...Those that want 3 year updates are free to skip updates for 2 years then upgrade on the third. Problem solved.
Over time potions of the MacOS since Big Sur have been converted from Intel only to universal supported to ARM native. Functionally the OS looks the same to the user but underneath a lot has been changing. Searching and graphic acceleration are two examples that have been greatly improved over time. Safari display web content is an another, the speed improvements are very evident if you have a fast ISP connection.how is that they can add so few features but not have it as stable as the previous release? how does it just suddenly become less stable?
Why do you feel the need to announce this?I hope so.... I'm not upgrading my iPhone to iOS 17 until Sanoma is out.