On the point of user numbers - I would expect this "iPhone BBM" to be based on jabber (like iChat), and presumably you'd be "BBMing" everyone with iPhones, GTalk, iChat and so forth.
Few people, if any, are arguing about "free" messages. While BBM has some (other) definite advantages, "free" really isn't one of them. While the apps themselves aren't free, it is "free" to IM people all over the world.Even when abroad. My colleague is currently abroad in America, his friends are in the UK - he BBMs all his other friends for free and they BBM him back. I can't see why you would argue about a service like this.
I'm not sure how less barriers to communication and free are at odds with each other. Heck, it worked for email, which at one point in its history included, for many, per-minute charges for dialup users.I take your point on board that we should encourage less barriers to communication on different platforms, however BBM is free.
No corporate security department? As in "none"? Sorry, but that's a pretty strong claim that in my experience is just incorrect. I've worked with several companies where YM was used for company related business. I've also seen Skype used.
You can't compare BBM to traditional IM systems. To talk to someone on MSN/AIM you both have to be consciously logged into the system. BBM is always-on. There's nothing to load up or log into. You can only compare BBM to texting, in which case the advantages of BBM have been detailed. My thoughts are that, while I love BBM and it has its place on BBs, it is unnecessary for iPhones because iPhone-iPhone communication is already easy to do because of the iPhone's threaded texting. But other advantages like free international messages and read receipts may make it worthwhile.Few people, if any, are arguing about "free" messages. While BBM has some (other) definite advantages, "free" really isn't one of them. While the apps themselves aren't free, it is "free" to IM people all over the world.
The disadvantage is that it doesn't work with most people you know.
I'd say it would be better to have a system that can communicate with anyone.
I understand, but is this really that big a deal? The push-enabled IM app that I use (IM+) takes maybe 4-5 seconds to startup and autologin (1-2 seconds if I've connected recently). The SMS app takes maybe a second. Is this difference really that big? I have push enabled for up to 30 minutes after I quit IM+, but I can configure that to be as long as 3 days. With push, it's almost the same as SMS.You can't compare BBM to traditional IM systems. To talk to someone on MSN/AIM you both have to be consciously logged into the system. BBM is always-on. There's nothing to load up or log into.
Well, while BBM itself may not be necessary, some of the BBM features would certainly be useful. For me, the biggest would be encryption. However, I don't think it's likely that we'll see any of these features in an Apple app, but perhaps the IM apps will add some.My thoughts are that, while I love BBM and it has its place on BBs, it is unnecessary for iPhones because iPhone-iPhone communication is already easy to do because of the iPhone's threaded texting. But other advantages like free international messages and read receipts may make it worthwhile.
I understand, but is this really that big a deal? The push-enabled IM app that I use (IM+) takes maybe 4-5 seconds to startup and autologin (1-2 seconds if I've connected recently). The SMS app takes maybe a second. Is this difference really that big? I have push enabled for up to 30 minutes after I quit IM+, but I can configure that to be as long as 3 days. With push, it's almost the same as SMS.
Really? Cuz I know with YM, you can text messages to someone not logged in and they will get them the next time they log in.You can't compare BBM to traditional IM systems. To talk to someone on MSN/AIM you both have to be consciously logged into the system. BBM is always-on.
Is signing up for a free account that big a deal?Well, in an IM client, the person you're sending a message to must be signed on to receive a message (also, they must have a Username/Account).
Given the recent Apple/AT&T allegations, it appears that they're trying to kill free messaging. I don't think Apple will make an app like that (but I'd really love to be wrongIf Apple implements a built-in app made for the iPhone, using iPhone servers (which is why Apple will limit it to iPhone users, cost), it will allow great communication.
It's not that people are against this. I think it's that people don't really think that it's as necessary or as important as other features. I'd rather see Apple fix the mail app, than provide an iPhone-only app that many people can't access (the beauty of IM and SMS is that you don't need an iPhone -- a PC, mac, or other phone can be used).I still don't get why people would be against this? It makes me feel that people don't know what BlackBerry Messaging.
It's not that people are against this. I think it's that people don't really think that it's as necessary or as important as other features. I'd rather see Apple fix the mail app, than provide an iPhone-only app that many people can't access (the beauty of IM and SMS is that you don't need an iPhone -- a PC, mac, or other phone can be used).
All this reminds me of the anti-MMS ranting whenever someone posted that it should have been included.