Will you go see The Mummy when it comes out?

Discussion in 'Community Discussion' started by JamesMike, May 17, 2017.

  1. JamesMike macrumors demi-god

    JamesMike

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Location:
    Oregon
  2. Plutonius macrumors 604

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire, USA
    #2
    I generally refuse to see remakes. It's time for Hollywood to start making non-superhero original movies again.
     
  3. Scepticalscribe Contributor

    Scepticalscribe

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    The Far Horizon
    #3
    My thoughts, too.
     
  4. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #4
    So you didn't see the 1999 Mummy movie (with Brendan Fraser) because the 1932 movie was the original :eek:

    I'll probably go see it, So far the trailers look good and I like some of the changes they seemed to have made in the movie. I may wait until it hits TV, by way of on demand, or netflix as the cost of movie tickets is prohibitively high
     
  5. Adam Warlock macrumors regular

    Adam Warlock

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2016
    #5
    That would require Hollywood hire real writers instead of C- and D-grade fanboys, and/or for greedy execs to stop scouring pop culture looking for things to taint with their ridiculous 'modern' or 're-imagined' take in an effort to make some easy money on nostalgia.
     
  6. Scepticalscribe, May 18, 2017
    Last edited: May 18, 2017

    Scepticalscribe Contributor

    Scepticalscribe

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    The Far Horizon
    #6
    I think that the point @Plutonius was trying to make - which is a fair one - is that increasingly, Hollywood relies on remakes rather than seeking out new stories.

    It is not just that this is unimaginative (even if it is trying to tell an old story in a new way), it is that, sometimes, the original was so good that it said and told all that needed to be said and told.

    The movie Nosferatu is almost a century old (it was released in 1922, a masterpiece of German Expressionism) yet I have rarely seen a more spellbinding telling of that tale.
     
  7. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #7
    Which is why I mentioned the 1932 version, because the complaint about hollywood not being original, is not a new argument.
     
  8. Dingster101 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2015
    #8
    That one still freaks me out! Along with Salems Lot!
     
  9. D.T., May 18, 2017
    Last edited: May 18, 2017

    D.T. macrumors G3

    D.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Location:
    Vilano Beach, FL
    #9

    Of course there are sequels, remakes and "tentpole" flicks to fund the movie industry, but there's plenty of original (I'd include from existing written source material), non-superhero movies out every year, which are fantastic (obviously just being "original" isn't a license for excellence).

    Just from 2016 that we've seen (and in a few cases purchased and have re-watched 3+ times):

    Moonlight
    Paterson
    Don't Breathe
    Kubo and the Two Strings
    Green Room
    Moana
    Hunt for the Wilderpeople
    Hell or High Water
    Arrival
    Manchester by the Sea
    The Nice Guys
    The Invitation
    The Handmaiden
    Zootopia
    Everybody Wants Some
    Fences
    Hacksaw Ridge
    The Lobster
    Loving

    That a W I D E range of genres too, animated, thriller, comedy - some indie horror, dark incredibly offbeat satire, engaging thoughtful sci-fi, beautiful heart wrenching drama, really smart funny original "kids" animation (with powerful adult observations) - you name it, there was probably a film just in the last year that would satisfy every film lover.
     
  10. Scepticalscribe Contributor

    Scepticalscribe

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    The Far Horizon
    #10
    No, but - with the passing of time, the worship of profit (to the exclusion of art and the craft of telling a story), and the development of CGI which can serve as a spectacular distraction (rather than focussing on proper, skilled, serious acting, genuine script writing, and finding good stories to tell), the complacent and intellectually lazy temptation to re-make what has been told before (because it worked) seems to have become ever more pronounced in Hollywood.
     
  11. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #11
    I disagree with the sentiment, One major factor is the high cost of making those films and then add in the marketing. It costs studios 100s of millions of dollars, a single film flop can put any studio in dire straights. With risks that high, its understandable that many studios are rather adverse to the risks and return to tried and true franchises.

    Also factor in viewing habits and the typical consumer seems to be more willing to see something tried and true then something that's completely different and unheard of.
    --- Post Merged, May 18, 2017 ---
    Also lets be clear, Studios make movies to make money, they don't do it out of some sort of artistic altruistic behavior. They are looking to make money and there's nothing wrong with that.
     
  12. T'hain Esh Kelch macrumors 601

    T'hain Esh Kelch

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2001
    Location:
    Denmark
    #12
    Yes I will. Tom Cruise movies are usually quite well produced, and enjoyable. Most of them aren't perfect, but they tend to be better than the average movies out of Hollywood. And he's quite a good actor on top.
     
  13. BeefCake 15 macrumors 65816

    BeefCake 15

    Joined:
    May 15, 2015
    Location:
    near Boston, MA
    #13
    I saw the trailer and it doesn't feel like a remake..the original was great when it came out but the story is cheesy if you watch again today.
     
  14. AlliFlowers Contributor

    AlliFlowers

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Location:
    L.A. (Lower Alabama)
    #14
    I rarely get to the theater, but that's why I have subscriptions to HBO and Starz. I will wait the year, but definitely looking forward to seeing this movie.
     
  15. Scepticalscribe Contributor

    Scepticalscribe

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    The Far Horizon
    #15
    But if they focussed on telling a good story, recruiting actors with acting skills (and not just the proverbially pretty), and wrote good scripts (the late Carrie Fisher excelled at this), they might not need to spend so much on either special effects of marketing.

    I accept that they exist to make a product, but it wild be nice if they product were not as derivative, imitative, and entirely lacking in originality as so many movies are nowadays.
     
  16. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #16
    Its just not CG that is driving up the costs and marketing is something that cannot be avoided if you want people to know about your movie.

    I will say also Hollywood has an incredible depth of actors and writers. I don't think they need to recruit better actors because they have some great ones now.
     
  17. Plutonius macrumors 604

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire, USA
    #17
    I agree that many of the movies we watched are remakes and not the original. To me though, I consider the first time I see a movie to be the original and any subsequent movies are remakes. Most movies made in 1932 are no longer shown in any format so I don't feel hypocritical when I feel that the 1999 Mummy was the original.

    Last movie I went to had almost 25 minutes of trailers before the movie and they were all remakes / super hero stories / continuations of previous movies. How many remakes of "Spiderman" does there need to be ?

    I agree 100%. Any business should do what they think is best. It's only my opinion I'm stating when I say that I don't like all the remakes so they will not be getting my money.
     
  18. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #18
    Something has changed and its a good change. Studios seem to focus in an healthy way on trailers. Always a staple of their marketing push but now it seems its almost an industry unto itself, and in many cases trailors give away many of the plot twists found in movies. With a handful of exceptions I usually avoid seeing them, at least on YT. At the theater, I'm a captive observer so no avoiding it.
     
  19. rhett7660 macrumors G4

    rhett7660

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Location:
    Sunny, Southern California
    #19
    This is why I will be going to see it also. I like Tom Cruise as an actor and I like most of his movies. There are a few scenes in the trailers that were a little head scratching and eye rolling, but overall it looks entertaining and there is talk that this will be the first of the Monster Movies ala 1940-50's era style of monster movies.
     
  20. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #20
    Matinee FTW.
     
  21. ActionableMango, May 18, 2017
    Last edited: May 18, 2017

    ActionableMango macrumors G3

    ActionableMango

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    #21
    My understanding is that the summer blockbusters are actually an important part of a studio's ability to continue to make original movies. You won't accidentally sink the company when funding a few risky movies, provided you also are releasing something the company can bank on that year.

    In other words, the original movies that you like may only have been possible because lots of teenagers bought tickets to see Transformers.
     
  22. Scepticalscribe Contributor

    Scepticalscribe

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    The Far Horizon
    #22
    Well, I suppose the fact that I don't much like Tom Cruise as an actor may also influence my stance on this.
     
  23. UL2RA Suspended

    Joined:
    May 7, 2017
    #23
    Yes, mostly due to my crush on Sofia Boutella (the actress playing the mummy).
     
  24. jav6454 macrumors P6

    jav6454

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Location:
    1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
    #24
    Agreed. I can see super-hero, but remakes? No. Leave the originals in peace for at least 60 years.
     

Share This Page