Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You could buy like 1.2 lunches & coffee with Tim Cook with that kind of money!!


Omg, can't believe I was the first one to crack that! Lol, just read through three pages of posts to make sure I wasn't just stepping on somebody else's line. ;0)
 
I think you'll find that having an important place in history significantly drives up the demand for such a piece.

So, yes, having an important place in history indeed does have a significant impact on monetary value.


Maybe, maybe not. Supply and demand are the two factors which exclusively determine price.

For example, the mud that mired great armies changed the fate of nations. It is historically important. But the supply of, say, Cartheginian mud is nearly unlimited, and it is therefore worth very little.

There is no demand for historically important mud. None whatsoever, despite some mud "having an important place in history."

Supply and demand determine price. Nothing else.

----------

[/B]

Oh please,the iPhone 5 sold faster than any other iPhone and they got the iPad Mini which was a colossal hit yet the stock dropped,you sure they're following Apple's performance or some weird speculation?;)


I think that they are following the present value of the expected future earnings stream.

The expectation over the past many months is that Apple's future earnings stream ain't what it used to be.

----------

I think you meant to use a different word, not "cache". Maybe "cachet".


You are 100% correct. Thanks!
 
I got a working Colecovision ... how much can I get for that??? :confused:

Coleco was all but paying people to buy that loser of a machine. ;) Actually I take that back, they were paying people. Discount vacations, coupons and other special deals.

----------

I could get a fully-loaded Gateway tower for half that, AND it wouldn't have Apple banning 2-button mice.

Yeah, but would the Gateway WORK? :D

----------

This is the most ridiculous waste of money and it exemplifies the fanboy mentality that is Soooooo off putting to so many people.

You have absolutely no idea who actually bought that computer to say that, none whatsoever. The article says it was bought in Germany. Could've been a company that bought it just for a museum.
 
You could buy like 1.2 lunches & coffee with Tim Cook with that kind of money!! Omg, can't believe I was the first one to crack that! Lol, just read through three pages of posts to make sure I wasn't just stepping on somebody else's line. ;0)

I believe BornAgainMac alluded to it on page 1.

That is more expensive than having a cup of coffee.
 
You have absolutely no idea who actually bought that computer to say that, none whatsoever. The article says it was bought in Germany. Could've been a company that bought it just for a museum.

From the article: "The buyer, Mr. Breker said, was a wealthy entrepreneur from the Far East, who wishes to remain anonymous."
 
This story gave me hope for my old Commodore VIC20, in my loft that I have carried around from place to place. Then I checked eBay and saw bids starting at 99p. ;)

I'll give you $6.71 for it :) Must be working in mint condition with mint paperwork in original box which must also be in mint condition. :)
 
I got a working Colecovision ... how much can I get for that??? :confused:

Hey~! Same here -- just needs a new power supply. And the joysticks might not be working after all this time.

The games should be fine though... my favourite -- VENTURE!! Also got Mountain King, Grog's Revenge, Looping, Centipede, Defender, Fortune, Donkey Kong, Carnival, Jukebox, Monkey Academy and Burger King! Oh and that other game with the mummies... oh -- Quest for Quintanna Roo!!

ah, the nostalgia...
 
Last edited:
It is a little strange how their early branding may suggest a religious implications by the use of the *bitten apple* as the brand logo and then pricing their first product, Apple-1 for *$666*. :eek: I do not buy anyone's comment that it was a coincidence. These guys were not dumb nor naïve.....

Don't know how you read that into it, and I could be totally off here, but I'm pretty sure it was a depiction of Sir Isaac Newton watching the apple fall from the tree, and whilst enjoying a bite of the fruit, formulating his Universal Law of Gravitation. A fitting logo and typical Jobsian touch.
The price: another bit of whimsy perhaps by those two 'kids' just like their incorporation date of April Fools Day.

While a working IBM PC sells for 14.95$ plus shipment...:p:apple:

Don't be cruel! It might have been a fairly large/heavy box, so the shipping might actually be more? lol

On a more serious note, IBM in 1980 was a dominant business powerhouse selling typewriters and business mainframes, so their 1981 IBM-PC wasn't as much of a new trend as it was a logical extension of their business offerings. While this new-fangled IBM-PC was developed and came into existence on the 'watch' of Frank Cary and John Opel, they didn't truly create said computer, more of a collaborative effort born out of the company's extensive computing knowledge. So it's hard to pin the credit for the IBM-PC to any single individual.

MICROSOFT's Bill Gates on the other hand (with Paul Allen), while not the creative genius Steve Jobs was, has almost singularly been credited with the foundation of MICROSOFT. Through this, he has also done a lot of good to better this world, and especially recently with his philanthropic foundation. Perhaps one day original/initial copies of MICROSOFT Basic or MS-DOS will fetch respectable sums, although with the millions of copies distributed, it might be difficult to ascertain such authenticity.

Either way he too is most certainly guaranteed a place in history.
 
Coleco was all but paying people to buy that loser of a machine. ;) Actually I take that back, they were paying people. Discount vacations, coupons and other special deals.



The Coleco version of Zaxxon was pretty good and the machine made good use of sound and colour for the time.
 
It's not a Mac.

It is an Apple computer. I'm not sure if it was ever really called an Apple 1 computer, just like the very first Macintosh is just called Macintosh and nothing else, the first iPod is called iPod and nothing else, the first Pentium processor was called Pentium and nothing else.

Actually "Apple Computer 1" was printed right on the circuit board and I think on the documentation as well.
 
What a waste of money

Wow, for that much cash the buyer could have had lunch with Tim Cook!
 
or a nice reliable Honda Civic for each day of the week!

----------



Woz is still round... didn't he build most of them himself? He might help repair it for a small fee?

Hehe, I'm sure he'd love to drop by in his private airplane and fix a malfunctioning circuit.
 
As dumb as it sounds.... I'd be willing to pay an extra $100-150 "Apple tax" if Apple sold a "Steve Wozniak signature edition" iPhone 5S or 6.

Everyone wins.

1) The die-hard Collectors win, because having an authentic Woz signature on your latest product is a win for them

2) The Apple-haters win, because they have new reason to criticize the fanboys of yet another 'vanity product'. These are the same crybabies that criticize and loathe people who pay extra for vanity license plates on their cars.

3) Apple wins because this is easy to implement, and a signature from Woz costs the company very little, except to pay Wozniak his cut of the profits. Margin padding for the company. And the Investors win too because they care about a company being able to make easy profits.

4) Woz wins because he has a new part-time job putting his signature on brand new Apple iOS products. And he gets some pocket change to buy more bags of Cheetos or something.


ADDENDUM: and eBay wins big too! :D
 
Maybe, maybe not. Supply and demand are the two factors which exclusively determine price.

For example, the mud that mired great armies changed the fate of nations. It is historically important. But the supply of, say, Cartheginian mud is nearly unlimited, and it is therefore worth very little.

There is no demand for historically important mud. None whatsoever, despite some mud "having an important place in history."

Supply and demand determine price. Nothing else.

While you are technically correct that supply and demand are what determine the price of any given good, that's not the point.

While I'm sure you can come up with any number of bizarre scenarios in which historical importance doesn't actually drive up the demand, the fact is that in this particular case, the historical importance of such an object is likely to significantly contribute to its demand (hence the high price paid). The high demand for it was clearly not due to its productive capacity -- thus a reasonable conclusion would be it was due to its historic importance. Its historical importance is therefore instrumental in the determination of the monetary value.

All I was pointing out is that your statement, "An important place in history has little to do with monetary value." is simply not true. Does historical importance ALWAYS determine monetary value? Obviously not (your mud example provides excellent support for this point). However, often the historical importance of an object does indeed significantly impact the monetary value by driving up demand for it, as is most likely the case here.


P.S. And if you really want to get nit picky, "Supply and demand determine price. Nothing else." isn't technically true anyways. There are plenty of cases in which supply and demand don't determine price. Minimum wage?
 
Last edited:
The auction price represents the original purchase price of $666 plus Apple Care from the date of manufacture until the end of June 2013.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.