Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
For anyone who needs and uses maps globally on a regular basis as I do, Apple maps is bad, really bad, to the point of unusable.

Up until few weeks ago I had google maps working and functioning near flawlessly on my iOS devices. Apple took that away, yet they say all they work towards is a "positive end user experience". Had that been true google maps would of stayed on iOS devices until Apple's maps were ready for prime time.
Think of all the road travelers, realtors etc who bought iPads and used google maps heavily, they must be furious.

I doubt Apple maps is going to improve much in the short term. People who often rely on google maps will be more motivated to switch to Android now and good on Apple for that, they deserve it.

Need good map software on your portable device buy android but try and find an android tablet that works as well as an iPad, I can't. To gain google maps by going android I loose a out in other areas. So, what do you do, buy an android tablet for maps and use iPad for everything else? What a joke.

Apple can get people eating from their hands and then they screw up like this, on a major piece of software, that's hard to understand. Apple maps isn't even ready for beta. Why? There's towns, cities, streets, addresses, buildings missing, it takes forever to load, topography is off. This problem isn't just in my backyard in Ontario Canada, it's a problem nationwide, in USA, Europe all over. All this so we can have turn by turn, lol, then we best begin altering our freeways as Apple maps seems to think I can make left and right turns anywhere.

Want a tablet that has great map software out of the box? Buy android. That's what this turned into overnight.

For now...

Google-Maps-Web-App.jpg
 
Does it suck too? heh heh.. Of course not...I don't know how much longer everyone want to debate about IOS 6 map. Apple already made their choice and If anyone read the behind the scene story, they should know that Google will never give IOS the best Google map. The Best Google map is reserved for Android. There are plenty of alternative to Google map app. The true users already move on. They will either get an Iphone 5 if they can mitigate the map problem. If not, they move on and buy something else..

http://prcand.me/2012/9/25/apple-maps-actually-improved-in-ios-6-for-china

http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/152918/how-google-was-skyhooked-by-apples-new-ios-6-maps

Apple contracted with the best mapping company in China, AutoNavi, which Apple didn't bother to do anywhere else.

OTOH, Maps in China only has Chinese maps, so if they travel abroad, they'll be surprised to find themselves with no TomTom maps.

http://appleinsider.com/articles/12...pples_ios_6_maps_are_instead_praised_in_china

What exactly is the point of repeating the same argument over and over and over again?? :cool:)

Many of us here are wondering exactly the same thing about your posts.
 
Another experience today where apple maps performed better than google maps, bing, Nokia maps.

Had them all route to a grocery store. Apple, google, Nokia found the location although apple maps just showed a list without indicating which one it was. It was the first item on the list.

Bing generally seemed disfnctional, constantly wanting to place me in Seattle. I had to zoom into the location found from other maps and tell it to route. It routed along a partial toll road for no good reason. Non toll road just as fast or faster.

Nokia found the location easily but also routed via toll roads.

Google found the location easily. It's the only one that realized that a new expressway here had been extended. However, it came up with the worst route, a long roundabout approach that maximized time on the toll road. Passing the location and coming back from behind. There was no alternate routing option provided. Their provided route was not reasonable. In practice, I'd end up making my own route based on the map.

Apple maps shined. It came up with three very reasonable routes and allowed me to choose. Non of the routes involved any toll roads. They were all routes we'd consider.

I find myself constantly testing the new apple maps. So far I have found few problems and often better experience then even google provides.

At least in the US, I think this issue has been way over blown.

And I love the Siri integration. The following works!
"Take me home"
"Navigate to best buy"
Etc.

I value the added function over questionable missing google maps.
 
Need good map software on your portable device buy android but try and find an android tablet that works as well as an iPad, I can't. To gain google maps by going android I loose a out in other areas. So, what do you do, buy an android tablet for maps and use iPad for everything else? What a joke.

heh heh, can you describe you specific problem and what steps did you take to solve them that did not work? Tim Cook already established that IOS 6 map is not as good as Android map. But he mentioned a lot of apps that potentially can replace Android map for a good segment of users. So which part of these apps that does not work for you..

Let's not talk in general terms, we already had 2000+ posts that talked about the potential pro and con of Apple map. Why not turn this thread into something useful for user. Share you problem and see if someone has a solution for you.. If you don't have a problem today, all you are doing is just rehashing someone else warm over complaint...and it is a waste of time for everyone.

----------

You might say that I should pay for an App, but:

1) Why should I when iOS 5 did it for free?

2) How do I know these Apps will actually offer me anything useful? That Maps is incapable of filtering the results so that only relevant options are shown does not fill me with confidence. I could spend £40 only to find that the App has no transit directions here.

I suppose my city being the 6th biggest in the country stands for nothing.


heh heh, so what do you want to accomplish in this forum debating the issue? Tim Cook already said sorry and Apple screwed up on the map. And there will be no Google apps in IOS ever.. So what are you going to do about your problem?

----------

OTOH, Maps in China only has Chinese maps, so if they travel abroad, they'll be surprised to find themselves with no TomTom maps.

Sure. But China is the number 2 smartphone country in the world and having a good map in China is a pretty important step too...
 
By far the worst maps program I have ever used, and I've used many. Apple is rightfully ashamed of the horrible product they put out. The only people that like it are the fanboys, but then again their opinion never means anything anyway.
 
IMO they should have stayed with google another year and made the maps app with full coverage of the world and everything being accurate.

Quote:
However what people forget is that the only have employee numbers in the thousands (engineer employees etc not retail ones). This means apple doesn't have the major user base to BETA test features/hardware software etc.

If you have a look at all the launches of new ios's and iphones/ipads etc bugs and problems always occur after the launch becuase there are millions of users testing them in wildly varying conditions.

Apple will now have a couple of months worth of data coming in from millions of ios 6 users to help correct + improve the maps app. If apple were to continue for another year testing/improving the maps app behind closed doors whilst still using google maps it wouldn't get no where near the amount of data from its employees than from its ios 6 users. The exact same applies for SIRI. They both needed to be released into the wild such to speek, to get millions of users data back to help improve the software. Both should say BETA on the website!
 
heh heh, can you describe you specific problem and what steps did you take to solve them that did not work? Tim Cook already established that IOS 6 map is not as good as Android map. But he mentioned a lot of apps that potentially can replace Android map for a good segment of users. So which part of these apps that does not work for you..

Let's not talk in general terms, we already had 2000+ posts that talked about the potential pro and con of Apple map. Why not turn this thread into something useful for user. Share you problem and see if someone has a solution for you.. If you don't have a problem today, all you are doing is just rehashing someone else warm over complaint...and it is a waste of time for everyone.

----------




heh heh, so what do you want to accomplish in this forum debating the issue? Tim Cook already said sorry and Apple screwed up on the map. And there will be no Google apps in IOS ever.. So what are you going to do about your problem?

----------



Sure. But China is the number 2 smartphone country in the world and having a good map in China is a pretty important step too...

Before you read and criticize my or anyone else's post try reading the whole thing first.

Of course I tried linking google maps web URL to my home screen ... it loads very slow and has less functionality than the google maps iOS app. Same goes for all the maps apps I checked out in the App Store. All are not as good as the google maps iOS app was.
 
I'll even go a step further than this.

At this point, from the apology from Apple, numerous posts on here, major new stories, and abundance of 'Damn You iMaps' type pages that have popped up, it should be fairly clear that their is definitely a problem.

Most of the people claiming, "it works fine for me" are checking it in areas they know.

The apology itself is probably not just to counter the bad press. Apple have one thing that no-one here has - actual per user usage statistics of the app from the server end, time used, number of queries failing to find a result, etc. And I suspect the usage dropped off a cliff a short time after iOS 6 came out and that's why Apple are concerned.
 
Fuel for the fire. Google does worse than Apple in finding cities in Ontario

Old Maps vs. New Maps

Worse ? Did you even read your article ? Google Maps fared better, returned results for every query (something Apple didn't) even if those results were wrong. That's according to the author of your piece. What he said he found was that :

Given our set of data, old Maps doesn’t fare that much better than new Maps.

There seems to be a significant difference in the way the two companies approach the task of returning search results, with Google doing whatever it takes to get any result out, while Apple seems to prefer accuracy above all.

In the end, this is not really a particularly useful test insofar as determining the accuracy of Maps. At best, we get to see how good Apple is as at finding things, but with targets as big as whole towns we’re unlikely to unearth any information that is really useful.

IE, Google Maps does a better job of keeping people interested and did return more accurate results (the original piece showed that Apple gave about 400-500 good results to Google's 900 in your own piece).

Way to distort reality and spin an article to make it say what it doesn't say.

----------

Please help! How do I get back Google Street View?

http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/live-street-view/id486967765?mt=8

----------

Before you read and criticize my or anyone else's post try reading the whole thing first.

Of course I tried linking google maps web URL to my home screen ... it loads very slow and has less functionality than the google maps iOS app. Same goes for all the maps apps I checked out in the App Store. All are not as good as the google maps iOS app was.

I'm happy that you finally realise what it feels like to be on the other side of the fence, with people throwing out "Apple did no wrong!" in your face to tell you your issue is imaginary over and over again and won't let you freely post your criticism. It's always your fault, not Apple's fault. ;):D

Maybe now you'll stop doing it to me and others when it comes the time ?

----------

The apology itself is probably not just to counter the bad press. Apple have one thing that no-one here has - actual per user usage statistics of the app from the server end, time used, number of queries failing to find a result, etc. And I suspect the usage dropped off a cliff a short time after iOS 6 came out and that's why Apple are concerned.

They also changed the marketing material, to better reflect their strong points without pretending their solution was one of the best out there.
 
Apple's way of doing it will certainly provided more choice and better accuracy as many have stated previously by having third party app providers constantly trying to be the ONE app you use for transit or simply the best one in your city.

If this is truly the case, why is Apple not doing that with Turn By Turn directions for cars?

Why not for everything else in iOS too?

The principle can be applied to anything. Someone else can do it better.

I think the answer is clear - Apple knows that it really can't match what Google had in this area, so it's just giving up.

What if I want to travel between two distinct areas? Two Apps? One App that covers both? It just seems like the idea has been thought up by someone who'll never, ever use it.
 
If this is truly the case, why is Apple not doing that with Turn By Turn directions for cars?

Why not for everything else in iOS too?

The principle can be applied to anything. Someone else can do it better.

I think the answer is clear - Apple knows that it really can't match what Google had in this area, so it's just giving up.

What if I want to travel between two distinct areas? Two Apps? One App that covers both? It just seems like the idea has been thought up by someone who'll never, ever use it.

Why? Because there are already many companies that provide the turn by turn data for the entire world. And that data does not need to be updated on as little as a minute by minute basis.

What we are talking about here is a local provider telling you that a bus is running 5 minutes late so it may provide the best routing solution. The road you are driving on isn't going to "change" many times during the day (or if it is, that is traffic related which again is supplied by a third party or crowd sourced)
 
Worse ? Did you even read your article ? Google Maps fared better, returned results for every query (something Apple didn't) even if those results were wrong. That's according to the author of your piece. What he said he found was that :



IE, Google Maps does a better job of keeping people interested and did return more accurate results (the original piece showed that Apple gave about 400-500 good results to Google's 900 in your own piece).
I did the ******** test on this guys material. For instance, he claims that Google returns Shandong, China if you search for "Government Landing Ontario". That is not the case, not on maps.google.co.uk, and not on iOS 5. The test is full of these purported "mistakes" that turn out to be fabrications of a faulty test. Another example is "Kingsbridge Ontario", which he claims Google places in Kingsbridge, United Kingdom. Again, maps.google.co.uk and maps in iOS 5 correctly returns the Ontario location.

Don't thrust this ******** test.

Oh, I did the same random no-******** test on the original test of Apple maps. They check out. Surprise-surprise, fanboy-in-chief Gruber links to a ******** tests in defense of Apple maps, which is based on pure fantasy or ****** coding.
 
What we are talking about here is a local provider telling you that a bus is running 5 minutes late so it may provide the best routing solution.

My local bus provider doesn't do that. Not having transit information in the app like its built into Google Maps is just poor sorry. The transit information for Montreal and its surrounding area was great in Google's stuff (still is, just not available from the native app in my iPhone anymore).
 
Worse ? Did you even read your article ? Google Maps fared better, returned results for every query (something Apple didn't) even if those results were wrong. That's according to the author of your piece. What he said he found was that :



IE, Google Maps does a better job of keeping people interested and did return more accurate results (the original piece showed that Apple gave about 400-500 good results to Google's 900 in your own piece).

Way to distort reality and spin an article to make it say what it doesn't say

I did read it. Did you?

This, however, doesn’t tell the whole story. If we look at the standard deviation in the sets of results that both engines identify as being in Ontario, there’s a very juicy bit of information to be had: Google’s is 221, while Apple’s is only 78—and the Apple results are top-heavy, with only a very tiny minority of locations reported as being far off the intended mark.

This is very important, because it confirms what I mentioned above: That Google will return a result, any result, no matter how far fetched. Thus, some of the locations it returns are hundreds or thousands of kilometers off target.

Apple, on the other hand, seems to be going for accuracy: either it returns a result that is spot-on, or it returns nothing.
The test shows that google only returns more results because it tries to return something, anything, no matter how wrong. It works a lot like google search, which encourages you to keep refining your search term until you get the results you expect. But Apple is returning much more accurate results. If it does find some reasonable, it is mostly telling you the truth: it didn't find it. It is not giving you some place in the other side of the world.

We can question the test methodology and the coding behind it (which the author welcomes), but as it is, the results are what they are.

IMO, there is some issue with the API being used in the iOS5 test. Edit: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11614721/clgeocoder-geocoding-is-hopelessly-inaccurate
 
Last edited:
Originally I was disgusted with the new Apple Maps app, but I've turned a 180 on my view and think it's great now (for what I use it for).

What I didn't like about it the first time I saw it was due to how it does traffic updates. My wife installed iOS6 on her iPad 3 so I wanted to compare it against my iPhone 4 at the time with the old maps app. The traffic data was non existent on Apple Maps...at least that's the way it looked to me at the time.

Now that more people are using the new Maps app (with location services), the better the data is around my area (Chicagoland) and I find it extremely accurate for letting me know where heavy traffic is. Much more accurate than google maps could ever do. I also like the fact that if traffic is flowing smoothly that there's no line on the road...it keeps things a lot cleaner. Now if there was a way to filter out the road construction warnings and whatnot it would make this feature even that much better.

I use a stand a lone gps for my navigation, I have a ton of job sites that I need saved so I prefer to rely on a device that only has one job and it's navigation....so I haven't really experimented with the navigation features of my iPhone 5 and iOS6 yet. The traffic data what I need in a map app, and the new Apple app delivers. Color me happy....I have no use for a google app and will likely not even download it if it's ever released for iOS6 and beyond.
 
iMaps is **** as of now. Even the CEO admitted it.

They will improve maps no doubt. As of now it is useless. I drive in and out of london and it doesn't function as a navvy unlike Google maps and tomtom which i've used in the past.

Jobs would've never have allowed this to happen. With reports saying they had another 3/4 year with Google maps, things just seem like they've been rushed. Apple should take less ignorant paths next time. Especially with software which they do so well....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did read it. Did you?


The test shows that google only returns more results because it tries to return something, anything, no matter how wrong. It works a lot like google search, which encourages you to keep refining your search term until you get the results you expect. But Apple is returning much more accurate results. If it does find some reasonable, it is mostly telling you the truth: it didn't find it. It is not giving you some place in the other side of the world.

The test isn't valid. His findings simply don't check out. Do the searches yourself. For instance, this tool claims Google maps place you in Shandong, China, if you search for "Government Landing Ontario". Now, what smart people do when they see results that are unbelievable is that they double-check; is this really the case?

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Government+Landing+Ontario

It isn't. The guy messed up, and the Apple faithful sing Halleluja. Entertaining, really.
 
My local bus provider doesn't do that. Not having transit information in the app like its built into Google Maps is just poor sorry. The transit information for Montreal and its surrounding area was great in Google's stuff (still is, just not available from the native app in my iPhone anymore).

I'm sorry, but I'm pretty impressed with the HopStop app...and a bunch of Montreal specific transit apps came up as options when I picked a random trip from a hospital outside of town to a downtown location.

Multiple bus/train options or I could have asked for either specifically...and it shows Caroline's burned from the walk, energy saved, great graphics...awesome app.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    240.8 KB · Views: 90
I did the ******** test on this guys material. For instance, he claims that Google returns Shandong, China if you search for "Government Landing Ontario". That is not the case, not on maps.google.co.uk, and not on iOS 5. The test is full of these purported "mistakes" that turn out to be fabrications of a faulty test. Another example is "Kingsbridge Ontario", which he claims Google places in Kingsbridge, United Kingdom. Again, maps.google.co.uk and maps in iOS 5 correctly returns the Ontario location.

Don't thrust this ******** test.

Oh, I did the same random no-******** test on the original test of Apple maps. They check out. Surprise-surprise, fanboy-in-chief Gruber links to a ******** tests in defense of Apple maps, which is based on pure fantasy or ****** coding.

When I put Government Landing Ontario into Apple Maps, I get Holland Landing Fire department on 984 Gorham St, Newmarket Ontario, L3Y 5G9, CA. When I put it into google maps safari I get...surprise... Government Landing ONPOW.

Apple Maps is wrong, as usual.
 
The test isn't valid. His findings simply don't check out. Do the searches yourself. For instance, this tool claims Google maps place you in Shandong, China, if you search for "Government Landing Ontario". Now, what smart people do when they see results that are unbelievable is that they double-check; is this really the case?

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Government+Landing+Ontario

It isn't. The guy messed up, and the Apple faithful sing Halleluja. Entertaining, really.

Actually it looks like apple's geocoding API has varying levels of support around the world: see the answer to this post

Well, it would appear that yes, Apple's CLGeocoder is nothing like as accurate for forward geocoding (address -> coordinates) as the Google Maps Geocoding API, particularly outside of the USA. Using an Address Dictionary with all the fields filled out as fully as possible works a lot better than a simple address string, but it's still no where near good enough. Where Google will (usually) give you coordinates within 5-10m of the street number, Apple will give you coordinates somewhere in the right street, if you're lucky.

EDIT: Found Apple Developer Technical Note TN2289 which details Supported Countries for CLGeocoder. It would appear that Portugal is in its list of Partially Supported Regions, which it describes as:

The following are territories are not fully supported, either because coverage is more limited or for other reasons. For example a location may only be able to be geocoded to road level as opposed to a specific address point on that road.

Which matches my results with CLGeocoder in Portugal. I guess I'll just have to wait for improved coverage.
 
the worse for me wasnt even the maps. It was fine up until the LTE starting switching over to 3g and back n forth and the internet got stuck where by the maps didnt work. blue dot stuck and had to shut it down and wait for strong signal to get it back. frustrating. Esp when I was on hwy.

so many bugs everywhere between carriers and ios6. My iphone 4 is missed. However, that was ios 5.1.1 so there were a few updates to get it upto par. I hope ios6 will be the same and quickly!

I have 2 weeks to see.:rolleyes:
 
Here is my little imput about Apple Maps. Yesterday, I was looking for a specific address. While I was stopped at a stop sign, Apple Maps told me to take a left, then 2 seconds later, told me to take a right. LoL!

Friday night, I was taking home a friend and his kid. We were in the middle of crossing a bridge and Apple Maps freaked out and lost my position. It began trying to re-rout me due to the roads under the bridge. It told me to take a left in 300 ft then take a right on another road. My icon kept bouncing around the screen like that old game Pong. It was funny.

The other day, I was driving down a road that has been there before I was born and Apple Maps thought it was two separate roads side-by-side. Again, it freaked out and did not know what road to be on. Again, like Pong, kept bouncing around from road to road.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.