I wonder how much of Cook's progress was a result of the momentum he inherited. Nothing ground breaking has come out in Cook's regime so far - bigger iPhones, bigger iPads, worse off laptops and everything is super expensive.I'm no Cook fan, but its hard to deny that he's taken Apple to new heights that Jobs never did, where as Ballmer did the opposite.
My favorite part about the Watch is how easy it is to swap out bands. I’m wearing different bands all the time. For me fashion is more than just making an expensive gold watch. And I would be very surprised if Ive expected the gold watch to sell in mass quantities.
Honestly I wish Apple board would change the org structure. Make Tim Cook chairman and Jeff Williams CEO. Lisa Jackson could report directly to Cook but everyone else would report to Jeff. Then Tim can focus on those things he really cares about like privacy, the environment, human rights and there will be someone at the top to focus on real product development, not just how can we squeeze more money out of existing customers.
lets see iPhone 1, $599. Cheap at the price.I wonder how much of Cook's progress was a result of the momentum he inherited. Nothing ground breaking has come out in Cook's regime so far - bigger iPhones, bigger iPads, worse off laptops and everything is super expensive.
If the WSJ article is to be believed, the Apple Watch was mostly Ive and probably came to be about despite Apple executives and not because of them.
Well, aside from anyone here who happens to work at Apple probably 90% of this thread is conjecture and opinion ¯\_(ツ)_/¯This is pure conjecture. There were plenty of complaints about Apple products when Steve Jobs was running the show.
And while it performed well relative to the market, it didn't live up to even Apple's expectations for the Apple Watch.I wonder how much of Cook's progress was a result of the momentum he inherited. Nothing ground breaking has come out in Cook's regime so far - bigger iPhones, bigger iPads, worse off laptops and everything is super expensive.
If the WSJ article is to be believed, the Apple Watch was mostly Ive and probably came to be about despite Apple executives and not because of them.
Don't forget that Apple University is educating and training thousands of future designers and CEOs. Hopefully they won't bring all of Jobs' and Ive's poor qualities with them but there are many rising stars waiting in the wings once Cook steps down.This was sadly inevitable after Cook became CEO. Apple has increasingly focused on pleasing shareholders, which means operational efficiency, quarterly projections, short-term ROI and minimal risk. Apple got where it is because it was willing to take bold risks and lead the market in design and innovation, but Cook isn't a leader, he's just a caretaker. A very skilled caretaker, who can keep the boat sailing indefinitely, but not someone who can take them somewhere new and uncharted.'
Ive was the CEO Apple needed after Jobs' death.
No it's not.This is going to be worse than losing SJ.
I used Linux for years for work (and Solaris, and BSD, etc.). Yes, you can spend all day customizing it to sorta kinda look nice and sorta kinda work like a Mac, but hope you don’t need much commercial software, and hope you don’t mind keeping a terminal window up and spending all your time tinkering constantly.Yeah, I know... Well, sorta. I ran Linux for all of 6 months between my Windows and OSX days. You can make it what you want, or so ‘they’ say. I never got good enough with it to make it easily usable. I was just thinking that if OSX becomes just another Microsoft, then what’s left?
It’s true. Life really was better before the SW prequels.You are right but the guy you were quoting was a typical “everything was better 20 years ago” guy.
Well, aside from anyone here who happens to work at Apple probably 90% of this thread is conjecture and opinion ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
And yeah, you make a good point. There are always going to be some flops and some things which don't perform as expected.
I don't think anybody would accuse Jobs-era Apple of being complacent, though, and that seems to be the tone these days. (opinion)
My guess is the Apple Fellows had that freedom. I know they were given free reign to work on any project they wanted to.Any other that has been instrumental in such huge success.
Sure. But a perfect example is Apple cables. I could post numerous photos of frayed cables from the Steve Jobs era. Yet most hot takes I’m seeing the past few days are [insert product or feature I don’t like] exists because Steve wasn’t there to reign Jony in. While at the same time some of these people are saying he’s been checked out for years. So he’s been checked out yet every decision they don’t like is his doing. I’m sorry but both can’t be true.Well, aside from anyone here who happens to work at Apple probably 90% of this thread is conjecture and opinion ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
And yeah, you make a good point. There are always going to be some flops and some things which don't perform as expected.
I don't think anybody would accuse Jobs-era Apple of being complacent, though, and that seems to be the tone these days. (opinion)
How could it flop when it was never designed to be a big seller?So Ive pushed for the expensive watch that flopped but was also frustrated by money-focused board members?
The actor or the physicist?Maybe they could hire Brian Cox. He has the boyish breathless wonder voice thing down![]()
“Ive also grew frustrated as Apple's board became increasingly populated by directors with backgrounds in finance and operations rather than technology or other areas of the company's core business.”
Yep. The money-hungry era.
And it might well be the fall of Apple if they aren’t careful
Don't forget that Apple University is educating and training thousands of future designers and CEOs.
Apple will never again be the company it was prior to 2011. There is not going to be another Steve Jobs. No one can replace him. To me this is a sad story about Jony Ive finally realizing things were never going to be the same again and wanting to move on.
I don’t have a problem with operations people running Apple. It’s a complex company and that skill set is probably best placed to understand all of the pieces on the board.
In fact if you have truly amazing creatives, computer scientists and product people you don’t want them running the company or even managing vast departments of people - you want them working on amazing products.
It’s difficult to predict if this is ‘the beginning of the end of Apple’. Innovation tends to happen in waves. The smartphone wave is subsiding. Let’s see how Apple fares in catching the AVR & electric car waves & then we can judge.
Finally, is Cook as good as Jobs? He’s obviously a truly exceptional CEO but Jobs was one of the few business geniuses of his generation (and probably of this era).