Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[WW] MRVille VIII: Something has Survived... GAME OVER, Vampires win!
- Thread starter jav6454
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I think that whilst the narrative gives clues it can't be interpreted too literally. The safe assumption is that we currently have active wolves and vampires with between 3 and 4 baddies.
Stonyc, your hunch is off, I'm one of the good guys. Unless this all comes down to that unfortunate Mexbearpig defence on day 1 - that was the last time I try to be nice to a player who I worried might get kicked out early as had just happened to me in the last simple game.
But stonyc is a prime candidate for infection, an experienced player who a baddie would be keen to recruit plus he was a baddie last game round which might make people give him the benefit of the doubt this time around.
I'll say now, it's my fiancee's 30th this weekend so with one thing and another I won't be able to get on as much. A bit of a hassle if I'm forced to defend myself but I can clear up my position pretty quickly f I need to.
That's fine. I've seen how this goes and there's not normally anything you can say to convince people otherwise, thankfully this time I can. I'll see how this one pans out but I'll say it again, I'm one of the good guys.
I'll say this... it's a hunch. I'm not sure it's right, but I think I might have spotted something that could go one of a couple different ways, and part of that is dependent on how others end up voting.
Isnt everyone an experienced player by now, so part of that reasoning fails? As far as what he was in the last game, I dont even know what I was in the last game. These games are all running together, and playing two at a time makes it worse (the extended voting period is not helping).
I think at least 3 people are trying to fly under the radar, which is a usual strategy at this point in the game as they sit back and let us vote each other off. On that basis, I vote for Melkorr.
I suspect JimN is one of the hunters.
I'm not going to change my vote until I see more evidence that he is not or there is a better choice for the lynching.
It's your right to wait, as I am... this could be a big lynching round either way.
I am going to with ravenvii he has been really quite after the first day which makes me think he is trying to hide and hope none of us go after him.
iBlue
Her posting seems off this game. Even when she was moving house she posted more last game. I think she might be laying low this game to not arose suspicion.
Her posting seems off this game. Even when she was moving house she posted more last game. I think she might be laying low this game to not arose suspicion.
The same reason I voted for ravenvii the last round and will continue to stick with my gut on this one. He has kept quiet after a very active start and it just continues to feel off.
speaking of iBlue, could you politely pass on to her that those bunch of nouveau dead that just showed up literally wiped out every single baked good they could put their stiff hands on?
They might not have been wolves, but sure they ate like some.
And then they just disappeared. Barbarians.
^ I think it's odd but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, if only to see how you play after friday. 
You really had it in for Plutonius, perhaps as an overlap from the simple game (getting sick of that, it's like grudges and confusions are carrying between games. I really hope only one at a time can be played in the future.) and then you seem to keep going at JimN, who doesn't exactly seem guilty, and then you go after me, someone you have never played with, for the reason of my posting frequency [which is plenty frequent, actually*] during and after a move (right before christmas, I might add)?Melkorr. I think -aggie- may be right, you've been conveniently under the radar so far but you've tripped it now.
edited to add: *I just checked. I have 27 posts in this thread (and I don't get involved in rule discussions) and 25 in the previous thread. You may be interested to know that you have 20 in this one. Laying low indeed.
You really had it in for Plutonius, perhaps as an overlap from the simple game (getting sick of that, it's like grudges and confusions are carrying between games. I really hope only one at a time can be played in the future.) and then you seem to keep going at JimN, who doesn't exactly seem guilty, and then you go after me, someone you have never played with, for the reason of my posting frequency [which is plenty frequent, actually*] during and after a move (right before christmas, I might add)?
edited to add: *I just checked. I have 27 posts in this thread (and I don't get involved in rule discussions) and 25 in the previous thread. You may be interested to know that you have 20 in this one. Laying low indeed.
Last edited:
I admit I was wrong about plutonius and it wasn't personal or a grudge as you suggest. As for JimN we sorted it out in the other thread and that wasn't personal either. It was more to do with their posting styles which I will have to get used to.
I haven't been posting that much because this complex game has been less interesting then the last one which we both played.
If you want to keep voting for me go ahead, I can't prove my role seeing I am a villager.
However you seem to be retaliation voting and jumping on aggies reason. Your defense is that you have 7 more posts then me (by that logic Melrose is in the firing line too with 19 posts). Then attacking my voting, I guess "the best form of defense is attack".
I'd like to hear why you aren't a WW/vamp and if you convince me then I'll change my vote. Until then it stands.
Well my vote isn't purely retaliation, though I do commonly do that, particularly when I know the vote is misplaced because that makes me wonder if it's a baddie purposely trying to get an innocent lynched. You brought up the posting frequency between the games and I pointed out the flaw in that. I am not one for hiding in the shadows because it's a trait that tends to annoy me, actually. I like talking to people in these games. I find it much more interesting that way.
I seldom vote for people who are new to the complex game because I want to learn their playing styles first but something felt strange about the way and the people you've accused. (though I certainly understand how easy it is to be mislead and have incorrect intuitions in a game like this. I've unwittingly done the same plenty of times.
) Unfortunately (as usual) I didn't get a role I can prove either. (stupid random.org never picks me for a hunter, which I really want to try.) All I can say is that I'm not one of the bad guys and my reasons for being here are just to stay alive and enjoy the game, for good reasons. I've died as an innocent villager early in a few games now and it really sucks. Just don't want it happening this time, especially as am trying to keep the game active and work out who the real baddies are, which sometimes takes time.
Not sure what else to say really.
(Oh and the comment about grudges/confusions wasn't just you, I get the feeling that happens with some people in these games and it's one reason I hope we can run one game at a time.)
Whooo, the raven-ster is baaack!
With a proper keyboard, that is!
Now where's that statue you promised me, Melrose?
With a proper keyboard, that is!
Now where's that statue you promised me, Melrose?
The Tina Fey statue? It's been erected in the village square. Have at it. I won't look.
Not a lot of activity today...
I'm assuming that because chrmjenkins hasn't been resurrected as of yet, that either a) our Sorcerer is dead, or b) the Sorcerer doesn't want to use their resurrection on chrmjenkins for some reason, or maybe c) is inactive.
No reason for chrmjenkins to lie about being the Seer, so I kind of discount b) except in the instance that the Sorcerer is infected or has their reasons for not using it on chrmjenkins... so I kind of lean towards a), followed by c)... but who knows.
I'm assuming that because chrmjenkins hasn't been resurrected as of yet, that either a) our Sorcerer is dead, or b) the Sorcerer doesn't want to use their resurrection on chrmjenkins for some reason, or maybe c) is inactive.
No reason for chrmjenkins to lie about being the Seer, so I kind of discount b) except in the instance that the Sorcerer is infected or has their reasons for not using it on chrmjenkins... so I kind of lean towards a), followed by c)... but who knows.