Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
All I know is, whoever is was leaking planted information learned of their redundancy on June 5th.
 
It’s very clearly an official render, just maybe for a previous iteration/variation of the final design.

That’s what I always thought, yet the dominant opinion on these forums was always “It will not look like that! It will not be ski goggles!” Yet that’s more or less what we got; in fact, the real thing is even bulkier than that ubiquitous render.

I also never thought the $3K price rumor was a fake leak so they could surprise us with a much lower price. And in the last week or so, I started to think it would cost more than $3K and unfortunately, I was right.
 
That’s what I always thought, yet the dominant opinion on these forums was always “It will not look like that! It will not be ski goggles!” Yet that’s more or less what we got; in fact, the real thing is even bulkier than that ubiquitous render.

I also never thought the $3K price rumor was a fake leak so they could surprise us with a much lower price. And in the last week or so, I started to think it would cost more than $3K and unfortunately, I was right.
Maybe original documents were for $3000 but with the past few years inflation they adjusted to $3500?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gasu E.
weren't the rumors by @Analyst941 fed to him by his sister who worked at apple, which were actually designed to find the mole?

if that's the case, I think what's worse is that apple has better design concepts for control center and wallet which they aren't releasing.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1041.jpeg
    IMG_1041.jpeg
    344.1 KB · Views: 178
I wonder if the insufferable John Gruber will admit that Mark Gurman got it right about the “eye sight” aspect on the front of the device after he shot down the idea of it.

Mark: “Jony Ive lobbied for “an outward-facing display that would let you see the eyes of the user.”

John:“I’ll buy this front-facing display rumor if there’s a Cylon mode. Otherwise I’ll stick with my previous understanding that this is an internal joke that has been taken as real; that it would look goofy, not humane; and that even if it didn’t look goofy, it would make no sense to add the financial cost of an outward-facing display to an already-expensive device, and even less sense to incur the battery-life drain of powering that external display on an already-battery-life-constrained device.”
 
I must say that I love that Apple uses design elements on future devices.

so many aspects of Vision Pro are taken from the Watch, AirPods Max or iPhone.

I also can’t believe that there were no Wallet updates…
 
It’s very clearly an official render, just maybe for a previous iteration/variation of the final design.
That is a render by Ian Zelbo from 2021. It is based on leaked info / pictures / descriptions that he receives from various talking heads, who pay him for doing the renders.

 
LOL, around $3,000 is a miss?

How can anybody seriously say that? The supply chain says the parts cost around $3,000 and it's up to Apple to price in their profit.
 
weren't the rumors by @Analyst941 fed to him by his sister who worked at apple, which were actually designed to find the mole?

if that's the case, I think what's worse is that apple has better design concepts for control center and wallet which they aren't releasing.

Yeah that was the things I was looking forward to the most too. I find control center to be a little clunky and not look as nice as it could. And wallet could use some attention too.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.