Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People don't use email for personal communication as much in my group of friends. Hell, I don't even have anyone's email address. Text messaging is faster and more convenient. Why are you knocking a technology because you don't like it?? :confused:

Widgets and multitasking do not result in low battery life for phones. Who are you to say that widgets aren't useful for someone else?

Google developed Android.... it didn't purchase it. Someone else correct me if I'm wrong. And most people who use Android have and continue to use iOS via iPods and iPads.... Why do you think people are as closed off as you when it comes to diversifying brands? It is good to use many brands to form a better opinion of technology. Obviously you haven't used Windows in the last few years if you think that people assume crashing computers is a major part in their computer usage...

You make some really strange assumptions about millions of people here. Maybe you should step back and try to open your mind a little bit. I don't worship Apple for everything they do, I just recognize when they do a good job. In some instances it is more obvious than others but in some cases other companies are succeeding where Apple fails.

</end rant>

:apple:

Google bought Android from a company as mentioned above by someone.

Multitasking does result in lower battery life. It's simple math, multiple apps running in background at same time means you consume more power. Just like more cylinders in cars consume more gasoline. Or more shower heads in your house consume more water overall. Idk about widgets because that's more complicated than multitasking in terms of power consumption. Some are just widgets to toggle settings like bluetooth, wifi, etc. Some consume data which requires more power. Apple's multitasking method is not true multitasking. It's very similar to the concept of computer RAM. And only certain services can be multitasked (audio for example) and no more than one app is running at a time.

Also, text messaging IS email. On the front end, it looks and feels different but in the back end, it's the email protocol. Every phone number is an email address (i.e. 123-456-7891@verizon.com). The only difference is that text messaging is email with many features disabled. You can't send certain files (word docs, powerpoint, etc.) through text but you can through email. And text only works through cellphones (albeit there are some websites or smartphone apps that send text messages) versus email working on a multitude of devices (laptop, desktop, etc.).

Email is still used widely for businesses. It's more featured and there are many client software for it. And generally, it's free like Gmail or Yahoo or Hotmail. Text messaging is essentially the same thing but it's more popular for social communication. I wouldn't use email when I ask my friends where they are or if they want to hang out. Not all of them have smartphones or email-enabled phones or even data plans. But every phone made in the last decade or so has text messaging abilities. It's the same technology but tailored to fit different situations.
 
Does anyone know if the Apple Back to School Promotion will be announced tommorow?

I heard the promotion should start between june 6th-10th, do you guys think it would be announced tommorow? Thanks.
 
Im waiting for tomorrow to decide if I continue with my iphone 4 or buy a new android device, maybe the Samsung Galaxy S II.

I love Apple products (I have ipad, iphone 4, mac mini, imac...) and I loooove the look of iOS, but its just ages away from android in terms of system options and other options. iOs is very limited, or thats what I feel.

Besides, I hate the 3.5 inch display. Too small when new android devices come with 4.3 inch displays! Please Apple, bring us widgets, emulators, themes, etc.

The most thing I hate about iOS is that there is no desktop. I mean, as soon as you unblock the device the icons come and theres no space for widgets, not even to see the wallpaper behind.

I hope iOS 5 has a LOT more new stuff than iOS4.
 
Ipod does not run Ios.

I love competition. Android have lot's going for it against Ios. This should force Apple to innovate more.
But I can't respect a company that relies on buying it's software, copy features from other companies and allowing pirated software in its appstore.

It is strange that a huge company like Google don't have to follow the same rules as averge joe: youtube.com. 90% pirated stuff. Google search enginge: the biggest warez tracker in the net. 90% of downloaded Android apps are pirated.

This is a main selling point for Android. It is open. Run every app for free. Run emulators with SNES games/other pirated romz. Google does not care. They make their money from advertising.

If Google cared about its customers, they should fight piracy. Have some control over it's appstore so malware cant be uploaded there. This would also stop the piracy between different App developers.

Malware on Google app store: I should read the review of every single app to see if it is a malware? What stop people to report apps without malware? At least 350K Google phones have so far been infected.

Android was bought by Google. Version 3 is the first totally own Google version. Google still haven't released a stable 3.0 version.

Apple users are often accused of cultism. I have never seen anything like the fanatics of Android followers. They have done huge surveys about this. Most Android users would never buy anything Apple. Most Apple users would buy Android if they would offer something that is better.
 
Those are some god awful-looking signage in the photos.

The original iCloud
 

Attachments

  • Joe Btfsplk.gif
    Joe Btfsplk.gif
    19.6 KB · Views: 866
Phew! I bought a 2TB Western Digital WiFi drive and have 6 more days to return it. Hope Apple announced a new (cheaper) Time Capsule tomorrow
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

Thanks for letting me know that.
 
Right, because you have exclusive insider information that nobody else does.

It is simple logic.
1) Before a hardware release we would get info on production streams like: displays, NAND, camera and so on. This information is "leaked" about 3 month before anything is released.
2) Contrary what tech geeks believe: The hardware specs on the phone is secondary. The important thing is the software/os.

Ios5 is more important then a dual core Iphone with 8 megapixel camera.

Ios5 has to be ready for release, before Iphone4s/5 is released. Apple does tends to test it's software before going live. Ios 2-3-4 had about 3 month of beta testing. This is the reason why Iphone4s/5 has to be released later.

Apple soon has to start educate people about specs vs real world performance. The 5 megapixel camera on Iphone4 is better then many 8+ megapixel cameras that other companies have. In the most reviews Iphone4 is still top 3 in picture quality.

Same with processor speed.
Tegra dual core is barely beating the single core A4 in real world tests.

About 30% of the A4/5 CPU is graphic acceleration. This is something that Apple can do, since they have control over the graphic layer in the phone.

That is the reason why the single core Iphone4 800 mhz still are in the top 3 tests speed wise. The 1.2 ghz dual core Texas instrument powered phones are between 5-15% faster.

5-15% is totally irrelevant in real world usage
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

You're right I'm thinking of apple's "multitasking."

I thought people said widgets disn't use much power?

I just see using a phone number as being easier than using an email address because it's one less thing you need to have from a person. Text messaging just seems more instantaneous.
 
Thats right.

The good thing about iOS is that its VERY STABLE. That was the main reason i bought the iphone 4. Previously I had a symbian phone which was just ****. Nothing worked, I couldnt even check my email... These things are SO EASY to do on iOS, which is its main attractive. Also all of the apps in appstore are stable, or at least 90% of them. Great apps.

But still, its just feels short of options. No themes, no widgets, no choosing icons, font type, keyboard type, etc. I would just like some of these things.

Also, iTunes is a HUGE advantage. Very easy to sync apps, music, videos, podcats, etc. But syncing photos is a PAIN in the ass. Theres no way just to sync different subfolders... I cannot sync subfolders from folder A and folder B, for example. That should be something very easy to do, but no way. I can only sync subfolder from folder A or folder B...

The look of iOS is just beautiful. Apple takes care of this aspect, but improvements are needed now, and BIG ONES.

Where is the innovation????????

I can feel widgets will be inside an icon called "dashboard" and not on a desktop page...
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

I'm going through the same thing. I have a 3G S and my contract is ending this month and I need to see how the new iOS is gonna be and if it's worth the wait for a new iPhone that may or may not come September. I'm really being tempted by the Samsung Galaxy S 2 right now because it looks amazing and is available now.
 
Also, text messaging IS email. On the front end, it looks and feels different but in the back end, it's the email protocol. Every phone number is an email address (i.e. 123-456-7891@verizon.com). The only difference is that text messaging is email with many features disabled. You can't send certain files (word docs, powerpoint, etc.) through text but you can through email. And text only works through cellphones (albeit there are some websites or smartphone apps that send text messages) versus email working on a multitude of devices (laptop, desktop, etc.).

Sorry buddy but you're pulling THAT out of your ASS!!

SMS runs on a VOICE channel protocol developed long long ago - probably from Nortel as Nortel, Nokia (not Nokia-Siemens as that was after), Ericsson LB.A/B, and another I cannot recall - built the SWITCH that controlled voice and SMS.

SMS Originating on the OLD switches allowed for sending SMS
SMS Terminating allowed for receiving SMS.

^ MOBITEX had a specific technology that allowed sending email on a partition of the switch yet isolated from standard voice channels - the same system that RIM perfected some 12-14yrs ago as well with those 857/957 devices.

I worked for a company with access to the switch 15yrs ago provisioning SMS on VOICE channels with TDMA, then to GSM/GPRS/EDGE … Rogers Wireless.

SMS existed for several years BEFORE Glenayre upgrades allowed the switch to SEND SMS to emails … the GGSN or another component handles that.

Let me make this clear to you … SMS is NOT EMAILS … its TEXT! It rides on the VOICE channel and does NOT use the same ports or protocols that EMAIL in ANY SHAPE OR FORM (pop/pop3/IMAP/MAPI etc) rides on. Just before the network backbone was upgraded to handled "yournumber@yourprovider.com" does /= (NOT equal) SMS being emails.

Please research intensely to ensure you understand this.
 
Google bought Android from a company as mentioned above by someone.

Multitasking does result in lower battery life. It's simple math, multiple apps running in background at same time means you consume more power. Just like more cylinders in cars consume more gasoline. Or more shower heads in your house consume more water overall. Idk about widgets because that's more complicated than multitasking in terms of power consumption. Some are just widgets to toggle settings like bluetooth, wifi, etc. Some consume data which requires more power. Apple's multitasking method is not true multitasking. It's very similar to the concept of computer RAM. And only certain services can be multitasked (audio for example) and no more than one app is running at a time.

Also, text messaging IS email. On the front end, it looks and feels different but in the back end, it's the email protocol. Every phone number is an email address (i.e. 123-456-7891@verizon.com). The only difference is that text messaging is email with many features disabled. You can't send certain files (word docs, powerpoint, etc.) through text but you can through email. And text only works through cellphones (albeit there are some websites or smartphone apps that send text messages) versus email working on a multitude of devices (laptop, desktop, etc.).

Email is still used widely for businesses. It's more featured and there are many client software for it. And generally, it's free like Gmail or Yahoo or Hotmail. Text messaging is essentially the same thing but it's more popular for social communication. I wouldn't use email when I ask my friends where they are or if they want to hang out. Not all of them have smartphones or email-enabled phones or even data plans. But every phone made in the last decade or so has text messaging abilities. It's the same technology but tailored to fit different situations.

Sms is no more email than twitter is. They all let you communicate but they are implemented completely differently. If sms was really just email then you could send people premium rate emails and I really hope no one can do that. People construct gateways to thrunk information between mediums but that does NOT make them the same thing.
 
The worst thing about android is that every manufacturer designs the UI different, and then its very hard to get updates in time.

With iOS you get every update in time and they are all stable.

But I need a bigger screen in the iphone. 3,5 is too small nowadays. 4 or 4.3 would be awesome in iphone 5, but this wont happen of course.
 
Ipod does not run Ios.

I love competition. Android have lot's going for it against Ios. This should force Apple to innovate more.
But I can't respect a company that relies on buying it's software, copy features from other companies and allowing pirated software in its appstore.

It is strange that a huge company like Google don't have to follow the same rules as averge joe: youtube.com. 90% pirated stuff. Google search enginge: the biggest warez tracker in the net. 90% of downloaded Android apps are pirated.

This is a main selling point for Android. It is open. Run every app for free. Run emulators with SNES games/other pirated romz. Google does not care. They make their money from advertising.

If Google cared about its customers, they should fight piracy. Have some control over it's appstore so malware cant be uploaded there. This would also stop the piracy between different App developers.

Malware on Google app store: I should read the review of every single app to see if it is a malware? What stop people to report apps without malware? At least 350K Google phones have so far been infected.

Android was bought by Google. Version 3 is the first totally own Google version. Google still haven't released a stable 3.0 version.

Apple users are often accused of cultism. I have never seen anything like the fanatics of Android followers. They have done huge surveys about this. Most Android users would never buy anything Apple. Most Apple users would buy Android if they would offer something that is better.

Most Android users I know have Macbooks. Apple is more than iOS (for a few more years anyway).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.