A) Yes it is open to interpretation.
B) Again, for the third time, I can only respond to what someone here TYPES not what they think or mean. It’s hard to have a debate when the other side keeps changing after all right?
OP claimed Apple invented smartphone, they simply did not. They might have re-invented the modern smartphone, to use the buzz word, but then someone might as easily say it was a refinement of existing ideas. Watch the keynote for the introduction, Steve Jobs basically gives you a point by point on how they took existing ideas and put their spin on it. Again, open to interpretation and opinion.
Clearly you are in the dying throes of any argument; being a jerk to me and others. Moving on