Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Connect an Intel Mac

This should probably go without saying, but older Macs based on Intel architecture won't come along for the ride into the spatial computing future. Though Apple hasn't come out and said it officially, only Apple silicon Macs are likely to have the processing horsepower to communicate with Vision Pro, which itself relies on Apple's M2 processor to do the heavy lifting.

There are many Intel Mac Pro 2019s that are faster than the M1 chip computers. Those won't be supported? That can't be right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Connect an Intel Mac

This should probably go without saying, but older Macs based on Intel architecture won't come along for the ride into the spatial computing future. Though Apple hasn't come out and said it officially, only Apple silicon Macs are likely to have the processing horsepower to communicate with Vision Pro, which itself relies on Apple's M2 processor to do the heavy lifting.

This is speculation. It may be true, but we don’t know yet. They might require Apple Silicon to enable that new high performance screen sharing mode. But it’s incorrect to say that Intel Macs aren’t powerful enough to communicate with the AVP. Screen sharing, which is based on VNC, has been around for ages. So has RDP. Both of those protocols work just fine on even 15 year old Intel Macs and PCs. So even if Intel Macs won’t work via official AVP screen sharing, they will certainly work via third party solutions like those already available on the iPad (e.g., Screens) and those third party solutions will likely enable multiple displays as well if you want that.
 
There are many Intel Mac Pro 2019s that are faster than the M1 chip computers. Those won't be supported? That can't be right?
Yeah, I don't understand why they leapt to that conclusion.

I can use sidecar on an ipad with my intel macbook. Will this be significantly different than sidecar?
 
So you think there is no advantage to having it be more open? Say to standard video inputs or more than one user?

Seems like unnecessary restrictions.

I am not going to say there are no advantages. The same argument has been made about the HomePods. I wish they were blue tooth that any of my devices could use. But I suppose I am a pragmatist, wanting Apple to open up their walled garden is going to happen as fast as talking to my mother before she had her first cup of coffee. If I tried, she would just ignore me.

There is one small advantage with my HomePods being closed. They are always available to my apple devices :)
 
No doubt about "it would be more ideal..." I wish it will be that way too. This story implies that it will not. But while it's still one big ball of mostly vapor/imagination, we can easily imagine it will or won't.

With an M2, I wish it was basically a full Mac so I could pack it plus a bluetooth keyboard and mouse/trackpad for my ALT laptop concept. But all rumors seem to dismiss that possibility entirely for this version. It looks like Mac apps will need to be running on an actual Mac and Vpro can simply be a super-sized Mac screen on demand. Presumably that M2 is busy managing all of the stuff unique to Vpro without much spare horsepower to be a Mac too. I recall that copy & paste wasn't available on the original iPhone, so there will almost certainly be even some simple wants that are not there out of the gate.

As to sharing things from Mac to Vpro apps and back again, that too will prove desirable... and whether this "just works" or doesn't is to be determined. My guess is that there will be issues at the beginning that may get resolved as it becomes clear that Apple missed some wants that will manifest by many users.

Airplay 2 latency: all I could offer is fake it now to a television: MB airplay 2 through AppleTV to a TV. See what you think of the latency. My guess is that is a good approximation.

Since FCP runs on iPad, someone using a video editing app in Vpro might be using that app... or iMovie... or something dedicated for Vpro.

No idea about the physical drawing monitor concept.

And how reference images could be displayed, dedicated apps or Mac screen only, etc is all TBD.

To all of this, you can find out in a few weeks. You'll have a good list to carry in to a demo and see if it can do things you want to do or not. As is, there is a general concept that this can run multiple iPad apps at the same time. So anything we think of the we want it to do but don't know if it can could be roughed up in iPad apps. Conceptually, if someone has a current and older iPad or two, they have the ability to fake 3 floating iPad windows right there.

Then we have this "anything on a Mac screen" capability too... which I believe will translate to anything on Mac Screen SPACES, so that there is actually many Mac screens available with unique Mac apps running on them... but only a single screen view at a time. I suspect Mission Control with many spaces will largely work the same way as it does on a Mac now. So anything that works with Mission Control & Spaces probably works with a virtual Mac Screen in Vpro.
Ah yes it might have been the iPad FCP app.
Cool, thanks for the tips.
Yes, everything will be clear soon!
 
  • Like
Reactions: HobeSoundDarryl
I still don't see the point in interacting with apps and media on a 2D plane floating in a simulated 3D space. Perhaps I need to try it to understand, but I don't foresee any benefits for me vs using a large high-res display.

The simplest benefit is TRAVEL. It's hard to take the large, high-res display with you. This virtual version will be small, light and easily mobile.

If you never travel, or never need to compute beyond an iDevice or laptop screen when traveling, this may not be for you. But if you want to get stuff done everywhere on a large, high-res display, this one should be a great option when away from the one probably anchored to a desk at a single location.

Oh, and it likely does a bunch of thing things too besides only this mobile super-sized monitor use. And some of those may prove appealing as all is revealed soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
I am not going to say there are no advantages. The same argument has been made about the HomePods. I wish they were blue tooth that any of my devices could use. But I suppose I am a pragmatist, wanting Apple to open up their walled garden is going to happen as fast as talking to my mother before she had her first cup of coffee. If I tried, she would just ignore me.

There is one small advantage with my HomePods being closed. They are always available to my apple devices :)

LOL, good points.

I'll fully admit that you're right about talking about Apple opening things up. I am wasting my time. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
I agree. I just didn't want to speculate that to feed the pessimism fires.

Again, I look at apparently Apple people reviewing the cheapie 1080p versions and gushing at crispness of views in productivity and I have to extrapolate the crispness to the leap to 4K-per-eye. I don't know how to do the "retina" pessimism thing on this at 4K placed only an inch or two away from our eyes. My gut says resolution should thoroughly impress any actual eyes who give Vpro a try.

But I'll give the pessimists some space here: until any of us can actually have a look with our eyes, there's room for ANY imagination to go anywhere. Fortunately, most of the imagination gets converted to reality in a few weeks... at last!

There's no doubt the VP will look much better than anything else, but will it look 8x the price better? I suppose for some price isn't an issue, and honestly if it was going to fulfill an important function I wouldn't care either as I have no issue spending $3500 on a desktop computer for example. I just think the other negatives it has going for it will mire it down and make those other "inferior" products make more sense.

Edit: Maybe not 8x the price when you factor in the VR side of it. A virtual screen/AR set of glasses might be anywhere around $400-$600, add in a decent VR headset like the Quest 3 and now you are at about 1/3 the price, but at least you can segregate the functions instead of, for example, being forced to wear a clunky VR headset when all you want is AR and/or a virtual screen.
 
There are a lot of AR glasses announced, not just AR but they also provide a huge screen just like the VP does. IMO VR and AR/virtual screen technology needs to be separated, at least until we can figure out how to make both in something as small as glasses. The VP tries to do too much, it's probably great as a VR unit ignoring the crazy price, but as far as AR and having a virtual screen it's overkill to be wearing a huge, clunky headset.

Vpro as regular glasses will likely need a breakthrough in some kind of wireless energy to power it. Best option for you to avoid "clunky" is to NOT buy this one and wait until that breakthrough is realized.

I do not foresee the wireless energy thing being resolved anytime soon. If not, we need micro-batteries that are super dense that can fit into the frame of regular glasses, along with all of the other tech. Seems quite distant into the future too.

With neither breakthrough impending, the simple glasses version of Vpro appears to be far off. WAIT if that is crucial. In the meantime, others may just tolerate a bigger package. Fortunately, there are buyers willing as evidenced by a look back at- say- Apples first laptop...

e71641be11df773f6230b9bba7ee6bdd.jpeg


...and any of the early generations of cell phones...

first_cell_phone.png

Had the whole market refused to carry that "clunky" to motivate continued efforts, you may own no MB or iPhone today.
 
Last edited:
All this fun aside... I have one question. Will this work with my MacBook in clamshell mode? Sure I want to use this on a plane, but not if I have to have my MacBook screen open too. Doubt anyone here can answer that for me, will have to try it out for myself. And no doubt, it will evolve over time.

Fake a test now: Airplay from your MB through AppleTV to a TV. Begin clamshell mode. Does it work? If so, then that is probably a good approximation of how it would work with Vpro. If it doesn't work, you probably know it won't work with Vpro either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
I work in finance (bond trading) and do need a lot of screen real estate... I have 4 32" screens stacked and all are full....So this would probably appeal to someone in my field... However I could not picture myself going through a whole work day with a vision pro on my head, it just doesn't seem sustainable.

Why would you go through a whole day? You are already set up with 4 32" screens to use for that.

Now, if you were traveling and wanting to have the same setup on the go, could you put up with it when you need to see those screens while on the plane/train/ship? A few hours... or a few checks throughout a day's travels... like you might do on a laptop while traveling?

I lean positive on this product but in no way do I see it as a full-time REPLACEMENT for "as is" screens. I mostly see it as ALT laptop screen. Most of my work in on a desktop on a desk with a giant screen. Sometimes I have to travel and that shifts me to a tiny laptop screen. For those "sometimes", I can see this delivering my desktop screen where I am. Once I'm back from the travels, it parks like the laptop parks and I'm back to using my desktop screen again.

I would think it COULD be this way for you too... as there's probably no practical way to take the 4 32" screens with you when you travel... and even more unlikely to pull them out and set them all up on the plane (for example). But a small, mobile bit of tech like Vpro might be able to simulate that view even in a cramped airplane seat.
 
Want to share your amazing Apple Vision Pro experience with a friend or relative... No problem! To do so, just carefully unstrap the device from your head... untangle the power lead and battery pack. Detach you Zeiss prescription lenses from the unit. Check which prescription your friend or relative has (You can order another set of lenses for the great price of $99 from Apple to be delievered in a few short days). Once you have them, fit the new lenses to your Vision Pro. Securely strap the Vision Pro to your friend or relative's head and make sure the battery pack is safely attached. They are now ready to share your experience!

It just works!

...or you could just hand them your phone.
 
Also very confused by this. Initially I thought that would be a great selling point. Basically create a multi monitor setup without actually have the monitors. Sure working in spaces on a larger screen is convenient, but still not the same as "multiple monitors" unless the virtual display is a giant screen where you can have multiple tabs visible side by side. If the screen is just a giant version with the same visibility as the Mac, that's not good.
You can have multi window setup.

Why would you wirelessly cast all those screens, desktops from mac? Just open those apps on Apple Vision Pro.

You can have a huge safari floating on the right, a Mac screen in the middle, and Mail and Messages app on the left, or Infuse app playing some movie or video, while having Office opened in the middle, and Mac screen on the right.

You've got endless possibilities, actually.
 
Vpro as regular glasses will likely need a breakthrough in some kind of wireless energy to power it. Best option for you to avoid "clunky" is to NOT buy this one and wait until that breakthrough is realized.

I do not foresee the wireless energy thing being resolved anytime soon. If not, we need micro-batteries that are super dense that can fit into the frame of regular glasses, along with all of the other tech. Seems quite distant into the future too.

We will still be stuck with wired glasses for a while although some units like the Xreal ones can even suck power from your phone instead of a battery pack. I'm honestly ok with the wire and battery pack for now as battery technology matures, it's just the incredibly clunky nature of the VP (and really any current VR headset) that pushes me away. There are many companies making *almost* glasses sized units. But even *almost* still gets you something that at least only sits on your nose and ears that you can put on and off as easily as glasses. Honestly, the more I think about it, the more amazed I am that Apple truly is releasing something so incredibly clunky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
“This is stupid no one is going to pay $600 for an iPhone”

“Why do I need an iPhone again?”

“The iPhone is not the future and it will flop”.

Steve Balmer: “the iPhone will never be a success”
good point, i’m sure in like 3 or 4 years you’re gonna walk down the street and everyone is gonna be wearing one of these 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
It's not just that, and it may seem trivial for some, but my wife's first remark on seeing this was about her hair and makeup. You are going to take these off with mussed up hair and red circles around your eyes, I've used VR goggles long enough to know this fact. These aren't going to be breakthrough until they are the size of glasses, which is why IMO Apple should have released a smaller, more glasses-like AR/virtual screen unit. I'm not even sure why they are pushing for the VR side of it.
No doubt at all that hair/makeup/etc are likely to be casualties in using this product... just like if that wife opts to take a motorcycle ride, wear a baseball hat for a while, strap on a diving mask for a swim, etc. Even a convertible can be a hair disaster if one takes a ride with wet hair.

And yet, men and women buy convertibles, ride motorcycles, wear baseball hats, dive, etc. If at the end of usage one needs perfect hair, don't use it. I see people opt to sleep on airplanes and head positions against airplane seats/walls can yield hair disasters. I see people using headphones and that mussing up the hair by the end of the flight too. Yet such people still fly anyway and still opt to sleep or use headphones while flying.
 
Last edited:
Want to share your amazing Apple Vision Pro experience with a friend or relative... No problem! To do so, just carefully unstrap the device from your head... untangle the power lead and battery pack. Detach you Zeiss prescription lenses from the unit. Check which prescription your friend or relative has (You can order another set of lenses for the great price of $99 from Apple to be delievered in a few short days). Once you have them, fit the new lenses to your Vision Pro. Securely strap the Vision Pro to your friend or relative's head and make sure the battery pack is safely attached. They are now ready to share your experience!

It just works!

...or you could just hand them your phone.
Why this comparison? They’re different devices for different purposes.
 
LOL, good points.

I'll fully admit that you're right about talking about Apple opening things up. I am wasting my time. 😂

Sad but true. Even a person like myself who lives completely in the garden can see value to their opening up, but Apple is a business, and a very successful business at that, and will act in its own best interests. I can't find fault in that. I find it funny those that think its the death of apple if they don't open up (not you).

Off topic, but I have been using Macs since the first one, 1984, and have never been a fan of windows (though I actually have been given 4 PC's to review, another story). I once changed jobs into a company that was 100% windows and I assumed I would have to change. Nope. They told me it was fine to use my Mac and it integrated just fine. Darn. Opportunity lost.

So yeah, this device is probably going to be as walled off as the HomePods. It's not a device for the whole world of electronics. It is a device that integrates into their garden. Just what it is. Might as well wish I could get a Big Mac at Wendy's.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.