Now only if Google would pay the price to get my RSNs back. ☹️
Unfortunately for the consumer, the NFL didn't want to bend to Apples demands (global rights, no buy up cost, etc.). This deal will ultimately be more profitable for the NFL, which is why they chose it over the deal Apple wanted. The NFL has never been about what the fans or even the players want. It is a business that exists to serve the interests of 32 billionaires.Just like I predicted. And you know who lost out greatly in this deal? The NFL. Because Apple would have paid them the 3 billion dollars a year they wanted.
Our cable (actually fiber) provider told us that they were dropping the television service and suggested that we get DirectTV. No sale. We kept the fiber internet but switched to YouTubeTV for the TV+virtualDVR viewing. So far it has been better than the cable provider’s TV offering. Of course, like most cord cutting options, it is not any cheaper than the old cable+television service and we still have to pay for other streaming services. Oh, well…If you want cable, get cable...
It’s YouTubeTV not the same as YouTube at all. More like cable television programming with a virtual DVR.YouTube? Another reason not to watch.
This is YouTubeTV, not YouTube. Very different experience. Think more like old school cable programming but streamed.…
With it being YouTube, I do however have an amusing mental image of towering NFL players stopping mid-game to encourage viewers to like and subscribe and pause for a moment to thank this game’s sponsors… and the fact that I only think this probably won’t really ever happen is kind of sad too…
DirecTV had about 99% reliability -- I've had it for decades and I don't think I even missed much of a game.Apple would have done this so much better than Google, but Google for sure can do it better than DirecTV
No way am I going to stream it illegally.Do yourself a favor and learn how to stream any game you want online. You're still watching somebody's commercials. Asking some people to pay extra for something other people get for free with commercials is just perverse. And for a blackout zone to go any further than 20 or 30 miles is also just greedy and gross.
Yes, there will be a stand alone package. You will not be required to sub to YTTV.Once again, a complete fail. Forced to purchase YTTV and the NFL package. No stand alone package.
I have F1’s monthly service for $9.99 per month. It’s not a bad deal really.
Yes to Formula 1 for AppleTV+. An exciting and actually quite sophisticated sport, truly international brand, high (in quantityI wish they would ignore NFL which is primarily in the US, and go for global sports.
NFL has plenty of coverage in the US, but has very little interest outside the US.
They should focus on F1 (which has a 300% higher TV viewership than NFL), or major league football (aka soccer in the US).
They would get a ton more subscribers if they were able to stream those services. Not that I have any interest in football, I would love to see better streaming support for motorsports.
![]()
Is F1 Bigger Than The NFL? (The Numbers) - FLOW RACERS
Is F1 larger than NFL? Compare audience, revenue, global impact and more to understand the magnitude of both sports.flowracers.com
MSG login from a family member up north. And ESPN+No MSG on YTTV? How do you watch the Rangers (noting your avatar)?
I'm obviously in the minority here, but I have no idea why people think this is good news? I've already explained to co workers why. The biggest thing I keep seeing being repeated is "yeah but now it can be a stand alone service". I have had Sunday Ticket for 5 years or so, and never had Direct TV or their subscription. It was already a stand alone service and has been if you wanted it.
Google is also a company that constantly makes half assed software (long list). People don't use those services because they are half assed clones of other software or service as the current market leader. So, Google ends up not supporting them and quickly abandons them. They roll out so many platforms/services every year and 90% of them fail. I'm fully expecting a jankier UI and less features.
Also, Google is legit in the news every other month for being sued from various countries for collecting and selling our personal data. Google's motto is "do no evil" because they literally do evil **** lol. So, it's not a matter of if but when they will be sued for collecting and selling Sunday Ticket Subscribers personal data.
I also think the "stand alone service" part of it is temporary. I might be putting on my tin foil hat, but I do think after a few years they do attempt (not saying it will work or stay that way) to make Sunday Ticket exclusive to their YouTube TV subscriptions. I hope I'm wrong, but just basing this off their long track record.
Not really seeing as you don't need YouTube TV to get it "Starting next season, "Sunday Ticket" will be available as an add-on package on YouTube TV and standalone à la carte on YouTube Primetime Channels."Think this might get embarrassing for Google’s YouTube TV service when the price gets unveiled. It’s going to be $64.99 per month plus whatever they decide the add on is going to be charged. I think it’s going to make DirectTV look like a bargain bin. Don’t think this is an embarrassing loss for Apple as it’s going to be painful to football fans.
Ask a football fan if they'd rather see their favorite team in-person or watch them on TV at home and you'll find almost no one that'd rather watch at home.
RSNs are dead. Apple killed all of RSN deals for MLS teams, would not be surprised if something similar happens to MLB and NBA teams soon if Apple’s method is successful.Now only if Google would pay the price to get my RSNs back. ☹️
MLS is smallfry. They're testing the water. MLB makes WAY too much money from both national and RSN's to piss them off, and they have a streaming service already that they don't need a 3rd party for.RSNs are dead. Apple killed all of RSN deals for MLS teams, would not be surprised if something similar happens to MLB and NBA teams soon if Apple’s method is successful.
Where is that? I refuse to subscribe to Sky just for F1 (£70 minimum per month), and Spanish coverage is dire…. Alonso Sainz Alonso Hamilton Sainz Alonso Sainz Alonso Sainz Verstappen Alonso Sainz Alonso Alonso Sainz, etc….I have F1’s monthly service for $9.99 per month. It’s not a bad deal really.