Yeah like h.246, Apple's evil take-over-the-world video format. Or AAC, which stands for "Atrocious Apple Compression". And HTML/CSS ... and PDF. All evil Apple formats. Oh wait! Let's not forget PNG! Or SVG! Those bastards!
Actually, Apple
has taken the approach that rather than simply support existing technology for which plugins have already been written, they'll use their industry might to get YouTube to
convert all their videos to Apple's preferred format. Yeah, I'm sure that'll work for the rest of the net, too.
Getting back to what I actually said, who said anything about "evil take-over-the-world"? It's the opposite, unfortunately: which websites use h.264 or AAC? I'm sure there are some, but compare that to the numbers that use Flash or Windows Media or AVI. For that matter, Microsoft has "standardized" a number of its technologies recently; that doesn't make them THE standard.
Oh, and if you can't tell, I'm totally making fun of you. You're loony. The only case you can make for Apple pushing their own format is with iTunes DRM, which is dying at Apple's own hand.
You obviously can't read. I said nothing about them
pushing their own formats, a losing proposition in any case. They're simply failing to support anything but. iTunes in particular is guilty of this -- even some formats supported by QuickTime can't be used with their proprietary "media library". Gimme a break!
Flash came with my iMac, it's a plug-in just like on Windows. WMV is a hack because Microsoft stopped supporting it on the Mac, and handed it off to Flip4Mac.
Again, read: by "hacks" I was referring to getting these common media formats to work with Apple's QuickTime media framework and their iTunes media library. "Media" is defined extremely narrowly by these applications.
Flash isn't on the iPhone because of a couple reasons: first, it's not a standard. No, No, NO. NO. Shutup. It's not a standard. It's just not, it's just popular.
Not good enough. Apple's ads (which were the start of this whole sub-thread) make a claim of "the real internet" not "the ISO approved internet". Normal people understand the former to mean that most sites, whether they use Flash or anything else, will function the same on the iPhone as on a normal browser. You know what that means? It means "standards" take a backseat to compatibility when the two are in conflict.
A small minority of nerds are demanding it, but normal users don't care.
Normal users never visit sites that use flash, or video sites that don't conform to Apple's narrow rules?