There are dozens of accessories on the market that will allow the use of a stylus (e.g., Wacom), a 120hz monitor (e.g., pretty much any gaming monitor) for the Mac, or any of hundreds of cameras available. However, I am not aware of any way whatsoever to get certain software development tools onto the iPad.
Indeed, the only way to use an iPad for development is to remote-access another proper computer - whether through ssh or a gui-based software. I would argue that is not really used the iPad for development through, as the development is happening on another computer and the iPad is just a dumb terminal in that situation.
Basically, I can't think of any point of view where someone can't get work done on a Mac, or that a Mac isn't a real computer. It might not be the most optimal tool, and it might require cumbersome accessories that make it's use not ideal; but it can work in every situation. On the flip side, there are many situations where the iPad cannot be used to get work done under any circumstance because there are no accessories or software to get around it's inherent limitations.
I really enjoy using a iPad but until you can do a full backup on it without a computer then it will not replace one. with iOS 11 it will get a lot better but not there yet
SurfacePro doesn't really work well as a tablet from my own personal experience. its a laptop that has a touch screen. Where as the iPad Pro is a tablet with additional input options keyboard/pencil.If it's being called -- and marketed -- as a computer, then why is it OK to have a touch screen when a laptop (or iMac, for that matter) isn't?
Not trying to agitate anyone, just truly wondering.
(Yes, I know one it's a tablet... but so is a SurfacePro)
As with many on this forum, I feel somewhat conflicted about buying the new iPad Pro. It looks like a great device, and iOS11 will make it even better. However, the Verge got it right....if I am going to make this my main computer, then I probably should get 256GB storage.....not because I need that much, but because 64GB is just too small. Then, when I add the Apple keyboard and pencil, I am looking at $1,000. If this is my main device, I will probably upgrade every 3 years or so, which is typical for iOS devices. That's $333 per year.
On the other hand, I could purchase the base model MBP for $1299 (granted it only has 128 GB storage, but that would be fine for me). However, I would probably upgrade on a 5 year cycle because laptops are just not evolving as fast as mobile devices. The OS, technology, and applications for laptops are more mature then for mobile devices. Anyway, that's $260 per year.
So, the annual cost is roughly the same.....maybe a small premium to move to an iPad as a primary device. What I really need to decide is how I want to interface with my primary device. Touch First or Keyboard/Mouse. If the answer is that I will primarily use the Apple smart keyboard on the iPad for input, then I should probably just get the MBP and buy a device with an OS designed for keyboard/mouse. On the other hand, if I am one of those unique individuals that has a use pattern that frequently and seamlessly moves from touch to pencil to keyboard input methods, then the versatility of the iPad Pro makes more sense.
My problem is that I really don't know if I fit into this category of user. If I am going to just bang away on the Apple smart keyboard, then moving to the iPad seems pointless. I really won't know until I try out the new iPad pro with iOS 11. Unfortunately, testing it at the Apple store probably won't give me enough real world experience to know for sure....so, it's a leap of faith.
If it's being called -- and marketed -- as a computer, then why is it OK to have a touch screen when a laptop (or iMac, for that matter) isn't?
Not trying to agitate anyone, just truly wondering.
(Yes, I know one it's a tablet... but so is a SurfacePro)
I think this is the most exciting the iPad has been since the original iPad came out, but it has everything to do with iOS 11. The 10.5 inch iPad Pro just happens to be a good device that can take advantage of the new features. I'm tempted to buy one, it may do everything I currently use my MacBook for.
Just read the Engadget review of the 10.5"...a little disappointing in the battery dept. None yet on the Pro2 12.9
I was leaning towards the 10.5 (instead of my original intention to get the Pro2 12.9) but the middlin' battery now makes me pause.
This refresh on the whole brings something to the table (esp in terms of storage), but I'm not completely sold on it.
If you have a pro 9.7 or the 12.9 and aren't needing more space, I'd opt out of this refresh.
TechCrunch reported 12-15 hours with regular mixed use, the Verge 8-9, Engadget 9-10 in testing and "days" in regular use.Uh, shouldn't the 10.5 have the same battery as the 12.9? Could have sworn Apple had said it was the same, and others have also said so.
Guess real world tests give a more accurate indicator. I sure hope the 10.5 isn't worse. I had the original 12 inch, and decided to go with the 10.5 due to the smaller bezel and in my opinion the perfect balance (of screen size/ bezel and weight).
But if the battery is actually worse, then that will make it a pretty substantial downgrade :/
Yes, but please start thinking a bit: in Desktop-Mode the UI of the app is like macOS, in Touch-Mode the UI of the App is like iOSTwo different operating systems: imagine using an iPad with a mouse and using macOS with your fingers, it would be a horrible experience.
Uh, shouldn't the 10.5 have the same battery as the 12.9? Could have sworn Apple had said it was the same, and others have also said so.
Guess real world tests give a more accurate indicator. I sure hope the 10.5 isn't worse. I had the original 12 inch, and decided to go with the 10.5 due to the smaller bezel and in my opinion the perfect balance (of screen size/ bezel and weight).
But if the battery is actually worse, then that will make it a pretty substantial downgrade :/
I am always stunned by the inability of posters here to analyse and project their needs into a buying decision. This is a thoughtful post, but it shows the problem.If I am going to just bang away on the Apple smart keyboard, then moving to the iPad seems pointless. I really won't know until I try out the new iPad pro with iOS 11. Unfortunately, testing it at the Apple store probably won't give me enough real world experience to know for sure....so, it's a leap of faith.
TechCrunch reported 12-15 hours with regular mixed use, the Verge 8-9, Engadget 9-10 in testing and "days" in regular use.
Just feel like people are looking for excuses here.
The 10.5 battery life is better than the crappy one they saddled the Pro 9.7 with, but not a full step foward. Read the Engadget review on the 10.5
The 12.9 has a bigger battery. This was always the case.
What about a senior executive on an airplane marking-up his/her company's strategic plan? Is that a professional use of a computing device?
I'm definitely tempted by this.
Is it just me, or are these reviewers getting worse at their job?
I watched a few reviews and literally learned nothing beyond the advertised features and overused buzzwords. "The bezels are smaller". "There are four speakers". "Its buttery smooth". Or the always useless... "The newest iPad is Apples best iPad yet".
I would argue users needing a file look up will have additional problems. Its a step in the right direction.With iOS 11, iPad Pro actually has the potential of replacing laptops for many (not all).
Files app is a game changer.