Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So, you want a watch with extremely poor build quality to save a few bucks on something you wear in the open all day long? OK, then.

----------



You obviously haven't seen the 42% of high schoolers (I'm assuming they have the same % as the general population, it actually could be higher) who own Iphones in the US... Where do they get the money for that? Also, High schooler spend loads of money on supposedly useless thing (many of them work); $350 dollars won't phase them if they want it enough.

----------



Because the LG watch looks like crap. Sorry buddy...


It does not look like crap; more like a black rectangle with no personality. It's not stylish like the Moto 360 or Zen watch but it's not offensive. Some people buy watches for fashion but I bought it for the functionality aspect and it runs the same software as the models costing 3 times as much.
 
Most of the things you mentioned medicaly are not happening without a blood sample. Glucose Nope, lytes nope, O2 saturation maybe.

Lock and unlock my car? why my fob does that for me
If the watch does half of what people are hoping it would cost far more

See there's your problem, talking about things you have zero knowledge of. Sorry to break this to you, but non-invasive glucose monitoring is being studied. Apple hired a major researcher in non-invasive glucose monitoring. Is it happening soon? No. Ever? Likely.

Before responding, consider if you have any idea what you're saying,or if you have absolutely any knowledge as to the subject you are responding to. Thanks
 
I think the need to recharge it daily is going to be a pretty significant negative.

As an owner of a Gear S I will say I thought the above would be a concern but in the end it's not really. I'm so used to charging my phone and other devices at night, plugging in my watch is nothing new. In fact the wife and I have integrated "charging stuff" with the end of our day before we head to bed. Let the dogs out, lock doors, check windows, plug in 1,234 devices, set alarm, go to bed.

IMO Apple stands a good chance at being successful with wearables. Better if they would make it a Solo Product. The fact that it needs to be within BT Range is a bit of an advantage overall vs nothing but not enough for me to warrant owning a wearable.

I personally love my Gs but mainly for the fact that I don't have to worry about being within BT Range. If I leave home without my phone or decide to ride bikes, etc. nothing about its functionality changes. I still get and receive text messages, emails, calls, and have access to my contacts and calender too.

I jump in my car and it tethers BT to my Sync system, streams music and funnels calls right to me. Seamless. One silly thing I like about it is that I can keep my phone in silent mode so that it's vibrating and noises don't disturb anyone. In fact during the day it's been nice not hearing a peep from it. Instead I can simply wear my watch and be the only one who knows that I am looking at my messages/communications.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why it isn't more comfortable and easy to glance at my wrist to see the time versus taking my phone out of my pocket. So I still get a lot of use out of my watch. It also looks nice. I suspect the Apple Watch will have some good uses. It may not be worth my giving up my watch to wear it. But if you aren't currently wearing a watch, then this will by a nice addition for you. You have an unoccupied wrist and so have space for this device.

I have to say I agree with NY Guitarist on this one.
I stopped wearing a watch about a decade ago when I realized that I was literally always within eye-shot of a clock. TV, Stove, Coffee Maker, wall clocks, office clocks, clocks on computers, in my car, on my devices, and yes on my phone. My wrist might be more convenient that pulling out the cell but it's less convenient that checking the wall, or looking at my computer screen etc. Just as the iPhone had to do a heck of a lot more than make calls to entice me, a smart watch will have to do a heck of a lot more than tell time to get me to wear one.

And no, acting as a dumb terminal for my phone does not count.
 
Very likely to buy one before it is specked out? That's a bit crazy to me. I'll need to see the battery life and price tags before even considering to purchase one.
 
I've had my Pebble for a few weeks now (which, btw, could be found for 80 bucks over the last few days). It's really nice once you get the right watch faces/apps and learn how to deal with the few iOS shortcomings. I can only imagine that the Apple watch will work more seamlessly and have more functionality, despite it's relatively poor battery life and lack of water resistance. After spending time with the Pebble, I'm definitely sold on smart watches. So nice to keep my phone in my pocket or on the charger and still be able to keep up with incoming notifications.
 
Depressingly .. We are talking of individuals with no income...spending disposable income money on something that will be disposed of in less than a year for a fraction of their new price on eBay.

Or ...will Daddy wise up in time to put the mockers on one spending binge too many ... "Whaaaaat? £400 for a wrist-brick? Gerrrourahere you cheeky so and so! Get a job doing a paper round ...then tell me if you're still keen to blow your pocket money on what will be known within six months- as Apples Final Folly!"

Ohh you better believe in this electronic age that those kids are going to hit up pops, moms, granny, and grandpa for every red cent they can get their hands on. Now hopefully, (what I would do) moms and pops will tell the kid, okay you put $175 and I'll take care of the rest. A good graduation or birthday gift as well.

I love watches but I just can't see this thing being of any value pass the time frame an iphone will be in it's original birth. As iOS develops, that particular chip gets left behind more and more. Perhaps this is the reason for NOT making the watch a stand-alone timepiece and to just keep it tethered to the latest phone/iOS. And for that reason, I can see longevity in it.
 
so.. more Chinese *percentage wise* than US are going to buy smartwatch?

so. 250 million smart watches from China confirmed?

Let's face it, in some region of the world, people commonly lie to make themselves feel better about their ability to afford something
 
See there's your problem, talking about things you have zero knowledge of. Sorry to break this to you, but non-invasive glucose monitoring is being studied. Apple hired a major researcher in non-invasive glucose monitoring. Is it happening soon? No. Ever? Likely.

Before responding, consider if you have any idea what you're saying,or if you have absolutely any knowledge as to the subject you are responding to. Thanks

So the best you have is to say I have no knowledge? Wrong

I have been in the laboratory field for 16 years. Is blood glucose happening now... NOPE... Inthe next five years... NOPE People have been working and an AIDS cure for 20 years.. hows that working?

So maybe you should quiet down
 
Am likely to be one of the 10% but it somewhat depends on how viable it is to develop apps on the phone.

If it's a close environment (iPod nano...) I'll not be interested, if it's open I'll be keen to see if I can integrate it into my home automation. Maybe even for things like the XBMC setup.
 
Many problems with this survey. First of all, the pricing hasn't been fully announced yet. Second, the sample size of 4,000 is very low.

And also, there's only data from 4 countries? I don't understand why this is even on the front page.
 
See there's your problem, talking about things you have zero knowledge of. Sorry to break this to you, but non-invasive glucose monitoring is being studied. Apple hired a major researcher in non-invasive glucose monitoring. Is it happening soon? No. Ever? Likely.

Before responding, consider if you have any idea what you're saying,or if you have absolutely any knowledge as to the subject you are responding to. Thanks

You had me until this response, well the tone of it. This is a discussion, not a fight.

I'm wearing a Dexcom G4 now, and it looks like they are working with Apple on using the tracking for the Health App, which I'm excited about. As for the noninvasive CGM, that technology is exciting, but even the subcutaneous ones are for indicative use only, and not for adjusting the insulin.

Dexcom, Minimed, and Animas, among others, are working on the closed loop system, but for diabetics, and the consequence of an insulin overdose can be deadly (car crash, BS drop below 40 mg/dl, and the consequences of that loss of bodily control), where an insulin underdose has long-term consequences (complications of eyes, heart, kidneys, etc.). There are a great many things to consider before it can be a closed loop system.

Anyways, which companies are working with Apple on the non-invasive BG measurements?

As for the cancer screening, that is exciting stuff. I think, at the rate we are discovering things, the first trials may be 5-7 years away, rather than 20-30, but that is exciting for my children!
 
See there's your problem, talking about things you have zero knowledge of. Sorry to break this to you, but non-invasive glucose monitoring is being studied. Apple hired a major researcher in non-invasive glucose monitoring. Is it happening soon? No. Ever? Likely.

Before responding, consider if you have any idea what you're saying,or if you have absolutely any knowledge as to the subject you are responding to. Thanks


Seems to me that he was right..... No need to be a douche bag about it.
 
I'm not sure those decades of being on the cutting edge really work in your favor. The people who were first in line to get a color television didn't necessarily turn into the first to own a VCR. As we get older, our needs change, and we're more likely to want something that's reliable and comfortable, rather than new and novel. When we were younger we were more likely to think we'd find a more technological way of doing something useful in our lives.

The older folks who didn't understand our passion for the leading edge when we were younger weren't always old fuddy-duddies. They jumped in with both feet when they were younger, and eventually got set in their ways (using technology that was once brand new). There's no reason to think it won't also happen to us!

If Apple Watch succeeds, it will be mostly on the support of the youngsters who find ways to make it useful. Then they'll get set in their ways as they get older, and they won't understand the generations that follow them any more than we understand them: "What's this Hypernet? In my day we had the Internet, and it was good enough! And we actually drove our cars, and baked our own cakes from boxed cake mix."

I think that comes from jumping in with both feet and buying the first Betamax off the truck, only to learn that lesson by buying the first HD-DVD.
 
I have no interest in this watch and I'm skeptical of these projections. I think there are a lot of reasons why this launch (and category) are different from previous Apple successes. But who knows, obviously Apple is not to be underestimated. Personally I think the watch is kind of ugly, and it doesn't seem to provide much functionality (if any) on top of the current smartwatch offerings unless you love the design and the UI, both of which seem unimpressive to me. This is all highly subjective, obviously.

I would buy a watch that gave me this:

Physical design of the moto360 (without flat tire)
Built in GPS (AFAIK only Sony has this)
Offline music playback (via BT headphones)
Battery life that lasts at least two full days
Display tech that's readable in the sunlight, and somewhere close to 300ppi
Waterproof (submergible)

So basically a Sony Smartwatch3 in a Moto360 body, without the flat tire. I don't think we're too far from that. Maybe the next version of the Moto360 will be the winner.
 
Apple Newton Law: will apply to the Apple Watch.

Good idea. The realisation... not so good.

Dead On Arrival I'm afraid.

But. It will perhaps shake up the top management and make them realise that innovation isn't just bringing out different sized version of the iPhone.

Good. Sorted. Fine. Done.


OMG you are so wrong lol. It's not a teeny iPhone because is has "THE KNOB." It's like a magic knob or something.

----------

I don't understand why it isn't more comfortable and easy to glance at my wrist to see the time versus taking my phone out of my pocket. So I still get a lot of use out of my watch. It also looks nice. I suspect the Apple Watch will have some good uses. It may not be worth my giving up my watch to wear it. But if you aren't currently wearing a watch, then this will by a nice addition for you. You have an unoccupied wrist and so have space for this device.

Let's say you DO need to get the phone out of your pocket after you glance at your wrist. Do you think having a lump sticking way up over your wrist might make it harder to get into said pocket?
 
So the best you have is to say I have no knowledge? Wrong

I have been in the laboratory field for 16 years. Is blood glucose happening now... NOPE... Inthe next five years... NOPE People have been working and an AIDS cure for 20 years.. hows that working?

So maybe you should quiet down

Congratulations that means absolutely nothing, and you know nothing about it.
 
I think that comes from jumping in with both feet and buying the first Betamax off the truck, only to learn that lesson by buying the first HD-DVD.
Speaking as an Amiga owner and Betamax owner, I agree.

----------

Let's say you DO need to get the phone out of your pocket after you glance at your wrist. Do you think having a lump sticking way up over your wrist might make it harder to get into said pocket?
I have an iPhone 6+. So, no, I don't think an Apple Watch on my wrist is going to keep me from getting my fingers into my pocket.
 
So, you want a watch with extremely poor build quality to save a few bucks on something you wear in the open all day long? OK, then.

----------


I'm not sure what you mean. What I'm saying is that I don't view the Apple Watch as a fine watch. Every variation looks like a sport watch to me. Further, charging my daily watch every day (or more) isn't something I would be willing to do. If I were to get one, it would be the sport model to wear for workouts and active stuff.

How you get "I want to buy cheap watches" from that is beyond me. :confused:
 
Dear Apple,

you really really need to convince me to buy this :apple:watch. I am a smart customer, and I need smart arguments for my perhaps dumb purchase decision getting a smart bluetooth extension–running on a dumb battery–for my already very very smart iPhone. :cool:

Best regards,
:apple:fanboy
 
I'll be getting the stainless steel model. Not sure about the strap yet.

I've had a Pebble for a year or so. I use it when I'm out, not much at home. I can see using the Apple Watch when cycling or in meetings or when giving lectures. I like getting discreet alerts that I can glance at rather than having to pull out my iPhone to see what the message was.

As others have pointed out, we don't yet know everything the Watch will do, so surveys of this sort are interesting but premature.
 
It's interesting to see that in China, it's more than 50% people (very and somewhat) likely to get one, whereas they're about 10% of people from the Western countries feel the same.

I predict the percentage will meet in the middle somewhat when the actual products arrive, where people in China and people from Western countries who actually buy one are equally in the range of 30 to 40%.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.