Depends on if the economy of scale makes it less worthwhile to develop an A14X which is largely the same as the M1, or indeed if the iPad Pro is to gain more Mac-like features which will leverage the extra features of the M1 (Thunderbolt, RAM options). Particularly if the Pro line is reduced down to just the 12.9" as these rumours keep insinuating. I'd call it maybe 60:40 in favour of A14X.I really don’t. I think Appoe was very specific from a marketing standpoint that the M1 is the Mac family of chips which includes some items iPads don’t need (extra USB modules, memory modules, etc).
I think the iPad will get the A14X, however I think tear downs and performance tests will show that they are very similar chipsets
Really no, even a regular LCD has some characteristics that are better than OLED (full RGB sub pixels; no requirement for PWM dimming; on average better off angle viewing and better colour accuracy). OLED is only really better for black levels and HDR content (high contrast). mini LED is meant to close the gap, giving you all the benefits of LCD while improving on black levels and contrast. I'd say that makes it equal to or better than OLED, while micro LED is the holy grail of screen tech, but still a long way off.For anyone still confused:
LCD < miniLED < OLED < microLED