Totally agree.
I wouldn't mind a weaker but cheaper Macbook for writing on. That would actually be a really neat device to have for its portability. But additional portability isn't worth that much.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
12-Inch MacBook Now Available in Apple Retail Stores via Personal Pickup
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I wouldn't mind a weaker but cheaper Macbook for writing on. That would actually be a really neat device to have for its portability. But additional portability isn't worth that much.
With so much of one's data in the Cloud, it is pretty easy to move at will between multiple computers. It seems to me the MacBook is well-suited for people who switch between computers depending on their immediate need for power or portability.
If you are concerned with longevity at all, then clearly you are not in an economic bracket that can justify this.
Qanta handled both this and the Watch. My guess is that they were overwhelmed and that Apple will be shifting back to FoxConn.
I was really interested in this at first announcement. Now that time has gone by though I have come to my senses. It just doesn't offer enough capability to be worth the asking price. At least not to me. Now the new Surface Pro 4 however....might be buying another Windows machine. (Wow, I can't believe I am saying that.)
As someone who owns both the rMB and the SP3, I honestly fail to see how the Surface Pro offers a whole lot more functionality. Yes, it is marginally faster, when it is not throttling, but for regular, average use, no, it's no faster, and the reality is that for anything sustained, the Surface will throttle so quickly that the end effect is not all that different. Plus, the SP3 gets about half the battery life of the MacBook while having a wholly crummy interface device in the keyboard and touchpad...
Looks like you might be the one with myopia. I have a fully decked out 15" rMBP but since getting the 12" MB, I use the latter 80% of the time for photo editing my often quite large panoramic files from the Nikon D810. The colour gamut on the MacBook Air screen is so poor IMO that nobody should be doing photo editing on them. There's not as much difference in speed between my MBP and MP as might be expected since Photoshop is so poor at using CPU cores.
Thats why I am looking at the Surface Pro 4 with Windows 10. But thanks for the input.
I understand. I'm still not convinced that the end result will be all that different from the 3. It will still use 15w processors. It will still use fundamentally the same type cover. It's a good device for someone who needs a tablet that doubles as a laptop (works well for my specific work needs). Otherwise, it's a poor laptop replacement.
Categorically untrue. If you are going to make a statement like that, back it up. The rMB is fully modern in every way. Sustained CPU capability is far from the only measure of the overall capabilities of a computer. The rMB trades off the ability to do sustained processing, which is relatively rare in most modern ultramobile computing. The rMB is one of very few computers on the market that is built to the recognition of this reality, and instead trades off processor power that is generally unused in such a computer, taking up space, generating, heat, noise and consuming battery, for a processor better suited to the job that can do so in the smallest footprint possible with no fan, minimal heat, and no noise.
If you need a workstation, the rMB is not the right choice. Fortunately, a huge number of people don't need a workstation, a huge portion of those who think they do probably don't, and not to worry, the vast majority of laptops on the market are still built to suit the user who thinks they need a lot of processing power. Like I said, the rMB is one of very, very few laptops built to the paradigm that balances power with size and efficiency.
OK. Some users need more ports (including me) to plug many types of peripherals.
Other users store everything inside Macbook, so they don't need to worry about storage.
I am not that guy. I need a USB disk as my library plus download disk and OneDrive sync disk. Internal storage is way too small (128GB ). So I constantly need to use at least one USB port to access those data. And I need even more ports to transfer data between disks without using internal storage.
Maybe a user with more stuff stored at cloud or simply buy Macbook with over 256 GB storage don't need to worry much about this.
Oh, I may need to install more than one system on it for some backup purpose.
Other users store everything inside Macbook, so they don't need to worry about storage.
I am not that guy. I need a USB disk as my library plus download disk and OneDrive sync disk. Internal storage is way too small (128GB ). So I constantly need to use at least one USB port to access those data. And I need even more ports to transfer data between disks without using internal storage.
Maybe a user with more stuff stored at cloud or simply buy Macbook with over 256 GB storage don't need to worry much about this.
Oh, I may need to install more than one system on it for some backup purpose.
You keep that external drive connected even when out and about?
A pathetic laptop with one port, required additional pricey dongles, a dog mobile processor, a 480p camera, etc., and an unjustified ridiculously high price is not a "set of preferences". And pointing out the fact that all this adds up to a pathetic excuse for an Apple laptop is not a sweeping generalization about "preferences". An overpriced, poorly performing, poorly thought out laptop should be criticized for the joke, Tim Cook money grab that it is.
If someone has a "preference" for a such device, buy a $200 Chromebook, but don't defend this ridiculous 12" Macbook as a buyer preference. It's the joke of the industry.
I really liked the looks of it online in all the photos. Then I finally got to see it in person, touch it, use it, etc. While it doesn't seem that under powered (used it for 20 minutes), I really don't like the looks or ergonomics of it at all. Everything is so crammed together. It looks like Apple tried real hard to fit a full size keyboard edge to edge and it has very little appeal.
Very sad. But at least now my decision to pick up a MBPr 13" has been decided. Now to wait for the CPU upgrade and USB 3.1 spec.
Very sad. But at least now my decision to pick up a MBPr 13" has been decided. Now to wait for the CPU upgrade and USB 3.1 spec.
That is right.
I even install some huge applications on external disk to save space on internal one because OS is not suitable to install on external disk.
Therefore external disk will stay with me 7/24.
In that case you are an extreme edge case of mobile users, and someone for whom the rMB is probably not appropriate. Lucky for you, most of the laptops on the market still cater to you!
You just proved my point in the post you replied to. You did exactly what I described. Read my post you replied to and then read your reply. Exactly as described.
And no, I clearly said if this type of device is something one prefers they should buy a $200 Chromebook and not this ridiculous, overpriced excuse for a laptop.
Nice strawman. First, no one has a "need" for this 12" Macbook over something similar. They might prefer something like this laptop, but there are similar, cheaper, better alternatives, and there's no excuse for Apple to have made so many ridiculous compromises. It could have been a perfectly good laptop, but Tim got carried away with the obsession on profit margins.
You have zero need for a pickup, but if someone said they were going buy a crippled, slow, one seater, low towing power, low capacity, soon to be obsolete, pickup; that also required additional pricey truck dongles to be able to use effectively; and that's also priced similar to a full featured high-end luxury car, I bet you wouldn't go around defending such a purchase. You would rightly criticize such a pickup and tell pickup buyers to identify the flaws and look for better, similar, price appropriate alternatives.
Last edited:
The difference isn't a mid 90's laptop to the Macbook, it's something slightly larger, slightly heavier. We're talking tiny numbers. Or better still it's not like comparing an iPad to an iPod, I guess.
Miniaturisation costs money but that isn't what the Macbook is. It's standard sized chips, just smaller and cheaper components. So where is that added cost going?
I disagree, it looks like a cross between the first MacBook Air and the 12" PowerBook. After using the keyboard since April I've come to like it. It's a matter of changing how you type a bit. Think of it more like an enhanced touchscreen. A light touch works best, and is surprisingly efficient. I now find the chicklet-style keyboard on my work PC (similar to the MacBook Air) a bit tiresome.
I hesitate to even respond to you because you are so obnoxious, but I really can't let this stand. Please explain to me how a $200 Chromebook with a crap screen, crap keyboard, crap touchpad, crap battery life, running a cloud operating system that is incompatible with anything other than Google services and websites, with 2-4GB of RAM and 16-32GB of eMMC storage is in any way shape or form the same as a laptop that runs full OS X, can drive an external monitor or connect to virtually any peripheral device made, with one of the best screens to ever grace a laptop at any price, in a 2lb package with near 10 hours of battery life, 8GB RAM and up to 512GB of high speed SSD storage?
Samsung, Acer, and Lenovo make similarly-priced Core M notebooks. Asus makes one that's dirt cheap at around $700, but it has a lower resolution screen, 4GB RAM, and 128GB storage. Core M is a pricey chip.
Every one of your comments was said about the original MacBook Air. My guess is that in a year or two, this will become Apple's mainstream notebook, just as the MacBook Air did. Might they add a second USB-C port or change the single port to Thunderbolt 3? Maybe, maybe not. Skylake will bring some GPU enhancements and when Intel finally does get to 10nm we'll see an increase in battery life.
Ask Lenovo, Samsung, and Acer, who all have Core M-based notebooks at about the same price as Apple. Only Asus has gone lowball on pricing, and they can't be making much, if any money on it (it's heavier than the MacBook, as well).
The 13" Pro is nearly twice the weight and twice the volume as the rMB. It's extremely noticeable.
And no, the chips used in the rMB are NOT standard size, and the components used are NOT cheaper.
Sheesh, if you guys are going to make these kind of ridiculous statements, there needs to be SOME semblance of truth behind them.