I'm talking compared to the MB, not other machines. My assumption was that this discussion was about the differentiation of the MB and MBP lines, not of the MBP versus "insert anything here."
I said higher res, not high-res, and matte coating. Those should have been taken as in comparison with MacBooks.
My bad for mis-reading 'higher'. However, you were not implying the MacBook Pro's were Pro's over the MacBook, you were implying they were Pro's because they are Pro machines. But if we go with what you meant to imply, that they are way ahead of the MacBook - yes.
Still, the quality build of the supposedly 'Pro' machines is dreadful. Yes, a small percentage will pickup flaws from the factory, but it took me 3 MacBook Pro's to get one that didn't have yellowing on the screen (which Apple said was within spec). Screw the contrast and viewing angle - if the screen has visible yellowing which will muck up calibration and that is said to be 'within spec' I can't call that a Pro display.