Haven't we been saying/praying for this for years now? Apparently Apple is happy with the MBP design and is sticking to it.Shouldn't 2020 be the year of a "complete" redesign?
I think this is it. The slimmer bezels, updated thermal design, and magic keyboard are the redesign, they just started it with the 16". I think this is the design we've got until they move to mini-LED and ARM.
It‘s good to see Apple un-iveing its products.
Apple don’t even fully understand 4K yet and you’re seriously expecting them to go 8K? Wait another five years or so.Why can't it output 8K?
I hope so. And a MacBook Air in the same form factor of the current 13" one with a 14" screen. That would replace my MacBook Air that turns 10 next year! 😱Many people think that it will actually be 14".
That’s not gonna happen. Ever.Yep, now just put back the flipping HDMI port and I'm ready to buy again.
Agreed. The laptop is a very mature design. Change for the sake of change becomes counterproductiveHaven't we been saying/praying for this for years now? Apparently Apple is happy with the MBP design and is sticking to it.
"Apple don’t even fully understand 4K yet and you’re seriously expecting them to go 8K? Wait another five years or so."Apple don’t even fully understand 4K yet and you’re seriously expecting them to go 8K? Wait another five years or so.
I hope so. And a MacBook Air in the same form factor of the current 13" one with a 14" screen. That would replace my MacBook Air that turns 10 next year! 😱
That’s not gonna happen. Ever.
Apple don’t even fully understand 4K yet and you’re seriously expecting them to go 8K? Wait another five years or so.
I hope so. And a MacBook Air in the same form factor of the current 13" one with a 14" screen. That would replace my MacBook Air that turns 10 next year! 😱
That’s not gonna happen. Ever.
Apple’s USB-C ports are not just USB but also Thunderbolt which does have security modes.There is one major factor which will fundamentally limit USB: it doesn't have any secure mode for traffic passing over the link. The big difference between HDMI and DVI is not audio, it is HDCP and without a ‘studio' approved link protection mechanism with hardware keys any link mechanism would be unsuitable for high value video. Now, you might say:
Sure, your average daily compute doesn't need HDMI but also USB is a waste of compute power for delivering video when a direct and dedicated interface can do it much easier and far more conveniently in the wild. USB-C video devices just are not and most likely will not be abundant for a very very long time. It was foolish and premature to remove it and most other manufacturers are carrying it. Ive I am guessing in his never ending quest to flatten the world to as thin as possible did this. Or maybe it was for symmetry? Who knows but it is a functional nightmare for video which is a primary workload for a "Pro" line compute device.
- You can add encryption, not without a hardware replacement because there must be a secure video pipeline between the GPU and the sink device.
- Try and get a normal CPU to do nGb/sec of encryption and see how much it hits performance.
on MBP '15 it doesn't take much to cook the computer, just rendering vide you will see 90C heat. Has this kind of issue been fixed on newer laptops? I am not in the business of buying $3000 laptops with un-repairable components to be cooked to death.
Blame it on Jobs. Jobs had such high regards for Ive that he gave Ive special privileges to do whatever he wanted. The design team pretty much had precedence over the engineering team (remember antennagate?)Actually, I can’t put all the blame on Jony Ive. He’s not a computer guy, he's a designer, in love with design. Whatever he designs he’s in love with, and he apparently loves thinner. But he’s not the only guy in the company, nor should he ever have been the most important one.
Cook and the rest of the cookies simply seem to have lost interest in Macs, and gave Ive a free hand to play, to do whatever he pleased. It’s a wonder we haven’t been offered something as thin as a piece of paper, with no bezel at all, which you could fold up into your wallet. It’d have no ports, of course, and pretty much everything else would have to be sacrificed, but it could use all the services Apple’s so pleased to offer. And it'd be soooo cooooool!
Apple should, and surely still could make the really great stuff which made them so successful to begin with. But I’m not holding my breath, because I don’t get the impression they really care any more.
The man's been working at Apple just as long as Steve Jobs and has been the head of the industrial design team an equal length of time. I'm sure he knows a thing or two about designing computing devices.Actually, I can’t put all the blame on Jony Ive. He’s not a computer guy, he's a designer, in love with design. Whatever he designs he’s in love with, and he apparently loves thinner. But he’s not the only guy in the company, nor should he ever have been the most important one.
Cook and the rest of the cookies simply seem to have lost interest in Macs, and gave Ive a free hand to play, to do whatever he pleased. It’s a wonder we haven’t been offered something as thin as a piece of paper, with no bezel at all, which you could fold up into your wallet. It’d have no ports, of course, and pretty much everything else would have to be sacrificed, but it could use all the services Apple’s so pleased to offer. And it'd be soooo cooooool!
Apple should, and surely still could make the really great stuff which made them so successful to begin with. But I’m not holding my breath, because I don’t get the impression they really care any more.
You've hit the nail on the head. Computing devices, and the needs of people who use them, are much more complex than just "a thing or two". I'm sure he contributed many good ideas, but he should have been kept on a leash.The man's been working at Apple just as long as Steve Jobs and has been the head of the industrial design team an equal length of time. I'm sure he knows a thing or two about designing computing devices.
Ive designed the keyboard?Why didn't they make Jony publicly apologize for the abomination that was the butterfly keyboard, like how they supposedly wanted Scott to apologize for the Apple Maps debacle, and then supposedly fired him because he wouldn't publicly apologize?
Or maybe he hasn’t even left yet (though he will soon) and he’ll continue working with Apple (and other customers) for another ten or twenty years.Or maybe him "leaving" was him quitting and saying "screw you" to Tim Cook for how he's running Apple.
Apple's priorities for their Macs did change several years ago, that's the problem. And despite their now bringing back a reliable keyboard, I'm not optimistic that they're returning to the culture of overall useful quality for which they were once known.Apples's priorities as a company for their computing devices need to change
Unfortunately the only 10nm parts that Intel has been able to get working are low power. Sure they’ve got some 15W parts the last couple months, though rather low clocks (slower than the 14nm parts) but Apple just updated the 15W 13” MBP not four months ago.Ice Lake parts that are a perfect fit for the 13” MBP are available *right now*, Dell is already shipping laptops with them. That means Intel is confident they will get yields up to acceptable levels to ship these things in volume, which is needed for them to be profitable. If they were not confident and instead planned to skip 10nm completely, they would not have partnered with a relatively big partner like Dell, for decently popular device like the XPS 2-in-1, but instead pushed them to stick with the 9th gen or 10th gen parts. If 10nm Ice Lake was ‘almost dead’ Intel would at best work with some unknown low-volume manufacturer, similar to what they did with the rare 10nm cannon lake i3 that was found in some Chinese laptops.
You are confusing the rumored skip to 7nm for their desktop parts and highest-end laptop parts. There will likely not be Ice Lake for these segments. Makes a lot of sense because at these power envelopes Ice Lake has fewer benefits, and typically they are used with separate dGPU so Gen11 graphics are irrelevant. By focusing completely on the ‘premium‘ ultraportable chips and selling them at higher margin Intel can at least recuperate some of the loss they incurred from their troubled 10nm process.
For the 13” MBP the currently shipping Ice Lake chips are perfect, and eliminate the biggest drawback of their 8th and 9th gen counterparts: the weak GPU. That, and the 16 GB LPDDR3 limitations. I’m 100% sure Apple will use them if Intel can supply them in volume. If they already gave up on that, they would have updated the 13” along with the 16” already.
You must have intentionally missed the part where I was complaining about soldered STORAGE.You bought a ThinkPad X395 with soldered DRAM? Wait a minute, you’re lambasting Apple, but you bought a Lenovo with soldered DRAM? WTF?!?
Okay, my bad...so if I understand correctly, soldered DRAM = GOOD, soldered STORAGE = BAD.You must have intentionally missed the part where I was complaining about soldered STORAGE.
15” MacBook Air with the magic keyboard please.
If we’re going to have the privelidge of getting a high quality brand new scissor switch mechanism, that no other laptop in the mark has, this better start at $2000 and no less. We don’t want cheap plastic laptops!!
Soldered DRAM is only really bad if they don't make the memory upgrade cost comparable to aftermarket upgrades.Okay, my bad...so if I understand correctly, soldered DRAM = GOOD, soldered STORAGE = BAD.
No, and it will never be fixed unless they make the laptop a lot thicker. This in combination with the heat those Intel CPUs produce it's even hard for a company like Dell or HP who don't value asthetics that much to cool them properly.