wow. nice. i wonder why apple didn't at least put this info on their website?
Then it would be an admission of using low quality screens in earlier rev. contrary to their marketing hype. How many people who knew the screen sucked but kept it anyway "just because" would be up in arms? and exchanging/returning two week old laptops they'd have to resell.
Actually, if the screen is as good as the comparison shots in the article it would finally equal Apples advertising hype. The original screens sucked. Don't care what anyone says, I had one and returned it because of the screen. I know I wasn't the only one.