
Only "dongle" I bought after seeing this on my MacBook Pro's specs - simultaneously.
Just change the TB2X2 to USB-CX2 - thank you very much. Put one on each side - just to amuse yourself!
USB-C is the future - when they control the cables.
![]()
Only "dongle" I bought after seeing this on my MacBook Pro's specs - simultaneously.
Just change the TB2X2 to USB-CX2 - thank you very much. Put one on each side - just to amuse yourself!
USB-C is the future - when they control the cables.
The configuration you just described is exactly the one I've espoused previously.
This would be a perfect bridge computer to last 3-5 years, at which point USB-C will be more ubiquitous and universal, no pun intended.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/drewha...ve-jobs-did-listen-to-customers/#5e945c5087f3
2016 version was released in October. Which puts it currently at 2 years and 4 months. So it'll be close to 3 years by the time WWDC rolls around, but well short of 4. But given all the problems they've had, maybe they're pushing up the redesign?
Or maybe they're pushing up the redesign as otherwise there's not much they can do this year due to Intel and AMD being heavily delayed on Ice Lake and Navi.
That’s good to know. Unfortunately, that link you posted goes to nowhere. Can you try again?
Odd. MR seems to have *’d it out for some reason.
Here’s a different version of the same thing:
https://www.google.com/search?q=usb-c+MagSafe
Hopefully this one works. And I’ve updated the original comment with that also.
I think the ONLY think they should keep is the Touch ID button like they did with the MacBook Air.Apple should omit the touchbar, and more importantly the keyboard, as both are useless.
I think the ONLY think they should keep is the Touch ID button like they did with the MacBook Air.
Touch ID is nice indeed.
The TouchBar on the other hand is a steaming pile of you-know-what. It's a classic case of "we have this technology so let's shoehorn it in" — which is the exact kind of thing Jobs railed against. No doubt, easy customization is a feature, but the losses and tradeoffs are simply too large.
Get customizable LED icons into keys with (good) tactile response, and then we're talkin'. I've used FunctionFlip for years to make the function keys do what I want, and proper support for that kind of functionality (rather than a fantastic hack, which FF is) would be a real benefit.
The really pathetic thing is that this stuff is all Design 101.
if Apple had added the touchbar as an additional row above the F keys, I think the feeling around it would be completely different. it would be an Additive feature.
however, replacing the physical keys with forced touchbar integration as mandatory is the mistake.
People use the function keys for more than just brightness/volume adjusting. taking them away for the touchbar does nothing to help those peoples workflows.
I know in my brief playing around with one it made my life a miserable hell. I spent a LOT of time in VIM using function keys. And REQUIRE the ability to touch type use the ESC key. the MBpro w/ touchbar, due to this, they keyboard to me is literally unusable.
This is what we want - and the defenders of Apple's virtue are slaying us for asking!
PCIe channels controlled by PCH - is that not relevant in this discussion?![]()
Unfortunately, that ship sailed in 2016 and I do not seeing it changing.
Intel's 45w TDP H-Series have x16 lanes of PCIe 3.0 on the CPU itself, of which x8 are assigned to the GPU and x4 + x4 are assigned to the two Alpine Ridge or Titan Ridge TB3 controllers. The PCH in the 2016 MacBook Pro (CM236) has x20 lanes of PCIe 3.0 of which at least x4 is being used by the PCIe storage along with some additional lane for the various and sundry items that need PCIe bandwidth, which then communicates with the CPU via an 8GT/s DMI 3.0 bus. This applies to the 15” model only.
The 28w TDP U-Series used in the 13” MacBook Pro now have x16 lanes on the CPU (up from x12) of PCIe 3.0 along with a built-in PCH, the CPU lanes are assigned x4 + x4 PCIe lanes used by the 2 TB3 controllers and x4 used by the PCIe storage.
The built-in PCH handles any of the other devices (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, keyboard, T1, et al.)
I suspect Apple thought about a mixed port setup, but decided against it for a couple of reasons -
1) Making all four (4) ports the same with the same capabilities simplifies things for users in Apple’s eyes.
2) Apple wants to insure that Thunderbolt 3 AND USB-C are both able to get themselves established instead of people simply ignoring them in favor of using USB 3 ports which is now the absolute lowest common denominator port.
Apple may also have data that suggested that the reason Thunderbolt 1/2 never took off the way they wanted had to do with lack of familiarity as the port resembled Mini DisplayPort and some customers failed to realize the port’s actual capabilities.
In Apple’s eyes, the current port arrangement allows users to have more USB ports if their workflow trends more that way or more Thunderbolt 3 ports if they are power users along with a 25/75, 50/50 or 75/25 split. I agree with this approach as each port is now a peer to every other port, the device can be charged from either side and the user can mix and match peripherals to create a machine deeply customized to their particular needs.
The flip side is that one area that Apple really does need to do a MUCH better job in is educating consumers and especially its Apple Store staff about how USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 work, the benefits and how to create economical solutions, alternative workflows and setups that minimize a user’s discomfort with the change and keeping the cost of making the change low when they decide to upgrade. Right now, even Apple Store staff are uncomfortable with USB-C/TB3 based on my anecdotal people watching during Genius Bar appointments.
Wild. I wasn’t aware that such a workaround existed. Have you tried them, and are they any good? I’m guessing they don’t charge us quickly, but I’m curious how much of a drop off there is.Odd. MR seems to have *’d it out for some reason.
Here’s a different version of the same thing:
https://www.google.com/search?q=usb-c+MagSafe
Hopefully this one works. And I’ve updated the original comment with that also.
You also have to realize that most customers do not care about the inner workings of USB-C/TB3 or their strengths/weaknesses from a perf perspective.
What they care about is:
A) Why don’t my existing peripherals work?
B) I have to spend more money on a dock/adapter?
C) I have to carry an adapter with me wherever I go?
And in a bizarre way, I think Apple thought that having all 4 matching ports that are primarily identified as USB-C, especially on the PC side of the fence, that at least it would connect with customers.
*****
The answers to their questions should be:
A) Your existing peripherals will work but may require a new cable to connect to your computer, please tell me what peripherals you need to connect?
B) Depending on how many peripherals you need to connect to your computer, you may need a dock, but this really is not any different from how you may have worked with the 2012-2015 MacBook Pros and in many cases, you can connect an existing Thunderbolt 2 dock using a TB3<->TB2, preserving your existing investment.
If you do not currently have a dock, you have options, but first, let’s see if you would benefit from one.
C) Not necessarily...do you carry a wired mouse or a USB 2/3 flash drive with you? If you do, then you may need a USB-C to USB-A adapter.
Do you connect to HDMI devices frequently? If so you may need to purchase a USB-C to HDMI cable.
Do you carry a USB hard drive with you? If you do, and the cable is removable, then a simple USB-C to USB 3.0 Type B cable can be purchased from Amazon for $7.99.
*****
These are by no means the end all, be all of everyone's circumstances, so Apple Store personnnel need adequate training if they have not already received it.
This sort of training is no different than training personnel to deal with the change from Touch ID to Face ID.
Apple should always be making sure that it is adequately educating employees about Macs as much as they do about iPhones. Moving the iPad Pro to USB-C makes this education doubly important. If Apple is not, then someone needs a kick in the ass in the C Suite.
Features this thing needs:
- Emoji-bar optional.
- No condom keyboard.
- Matte screen option.
- nVidia GPU.
- User upgrade-able Ram and SSD.
- Apple pencil support built in the Trackpad.
- Mag-safe
- Cooling solution that doesn't throttle (excessively).
- Illuminated Apple logo on the back, just because damn it.. it's a Mac!!
I don't see the 10 key returning. Hopefully, I am wrong because you need to repent and stop using that HP right away. Come back to the light.my
my 2009 MBP 17" is still kicking..but had to uopgrade the hard drive recently 80gb is not enough.. lol. and software is no longer updatable. but i'm still using it. wonder if apple saw that theres many of us that don't want to part with our 17" and are waiting. I also LOVE my illuminating apple, and it better have a 10 key too, don't you dare give me a MBP with no 10key, that alone is the reason why I havnt bought another Mac Laptop and the reason i'm on a 18" HP right now id like to see it come back to Apple laptops.
This is what we want - and the defenders of Apple's virtue are slaying us for asking!
No, the two ports on a particular side share 40 Gb/s of I/O bandwidth. So, used as TB3 Ports, they have to split their bandwidth; but as USB-C Ports (which is actually USB 3.1 gen2, IIRC), both Ports on a particular side can run at full-speed (10 Gb/s), with bandwidth to spare for DP, I think.
That was a lot of typing. A lot of very unnecessary typing.
You started on the right track, though. "The fact is that we are over two years on since the introduction of the 2016 MacBook Pro." Indeed. And yet, over two years later, there are still so many people complaining vociferously about it. Why is that?
When you can sit back, reflect, think, and then answer that question with objectivity, you'll have a lot more insight into the nature of the real problem. (Hint: this particular situation is not the same as most of the other historical examples you cited. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence).
Additionally, in your zeal to type a novel, you apparently didn't bother to read the last page or so. Cost is not what most of us have been discussing. You seemingly also missed the part where I said I have a 2017 15" rMBP sitting under my coffee table, right here, next to me, collecting dust. Perhaps you think it's a $3000 decorative knick knack? I assure you that's not the case.
Y’know this “that was a lot of unnecessary typing” is condescending and unhelpful. He’s trying to be informative and productive and you’re just blindly dismissing, and insulting, his efforts.
I’m sure he read that you have a 2017 MBP sitting under your desk not being used. Why? If you don’t want or use it and you already had a perfectly good MBP that meets your needs why did you buy it? If you can’t return it, sell it and get some of your money back. If you say you’re just leaving it sitting there without using or selling it then I call BS. That whole line of reasoning and your condescending attitude to his efforts to help question your credibility.
I actually don’t think he read. That’s the point. Too much typing and not enough reading.
It really is sitting there. It’s a backup and basically a local postgres machine.
I did read and I have read the responses from so many users on this forum whose sole mission in life, it seems, is to complain about how Apple is/was/has been and forever will be screwing them over by taking away their MagSafe, USB-A ports, SD Card slot and HDMI port.
But Apple has released three (3) iterations of both the 13" and 15" MacBook Pro with no retreat on the ports offered and doubled down (quardupled down?) with the release of the 13" MacBook Air in October.
Your argument has been that it did not have to be this way, and while I readily acknowledge that it probably did not, that an interim step could have been to replace the Thunderbolt 2 ports on the 2015 MacBook Pro with TB3 to help ease users into USB-C, that is not what Apple chose to do. By this time in 2019, arguing about whether it had to be this way or how Apple needs to put those ports back on the rumored 16"/16.5" MacBook Pro is futile and pointless. Apple very seldom retreats on these things and the iPad Pro going USB-C last year drives home the point even more. It is done, it is over, it is time to move on or move over (to Windows).
As Detnator pointed out in his post, my "Get over it" post is not because I lack empathy, but because in nearly every thread I have participated where the MacBook Pro was the subject breaks down the exact same way as this thread has. The Legacy Port Contingent starts with their wishlist of things that need to be put back in the next MacBook Pro and the USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 Admiration Society extolls the virtues of what Apple has done and it proceeds to devolve rapidly. I, along with many others, have offered genuine solutions to as many problems as we can, while listening to people who seemed determined to cling to the old ways or else they will go buy Windows and then the Mac will die because they left. At this point, I would say to them...okay.
In almost every thread, including this one, people are still asking for a full size Gigabit Ethernet port, FireWire 800, MagSafe, SD Card, HDMI, USB-A and even a couple of other things that make zero sense in 2019. Every possible negative issue that gets an iota of coverage turns into a 300+ posts thread about the useless Touch Bar, the horrible keyboard, blown out speakers that macOS should have stopped, the stagelight issues, anything that is different from the last MacBook Pro, which are...OMG...the last good thing Apple made, according to the posters. The 2012-2015 MacBook Pros are held up as the gold standard and I can sure as hell tell you after changing out 2012s and 2015 MacBook Pros over the past two leases that they are not the magical unicorns that people here try to portray them as. Crap breaks, batteries bulge, motherboards lose their $#!7 and sometimes you get it fixed inside AppleCare and sometimes you don't and the business eats the cost.
I own several MacBook Pros (2011, 2012, 2015 and 2016) and I appreciate all these as products of their respective times. Each has strengths and weaknesses. For instance, the Late 2011 absolutely has the best feeling and most stable keyboard out of all of them, but it is not svelte in the least or as cool or has a Retina screen. I like svelte, I really do and I hope 10nm Sunny Cove, Navi GPUs, LPDDR4 DRAM and better battery technology lets me keep svelte and cool.
To me, the sheer mental and emotional energy spent on complaining about the 2016-2018 MacBook Pro is simply astounding. The loud bleating of entitlement when I suggest to someone that they purchase an $8.00 cable to connect an older device, the sheer silliness of others proclaiming that they will have to carry around 5lbs and $200 worth of dongles to make the new MBP useful...I have heard it all.
For me, only me, I cannot speak for others, I don't want to see another USB-A port, HDMI, SD Card or MagSafe anywhere near the next MacBook Pro or MacBook Air ever again. I found solutions, I streamlined where I needed (bye bye FW800), I have noted those things that I do not particularly care for (the keyboard travel is too short, the slightly anemic battery life, the struggle to plug the charging cable into that tiny ass port in the dark, etc) and I have weighed it against the vices and virtues of my previous MacBook Pros and it this point, I am on the road to getting rid of anything without USB-C/TB3. I have more damn dongles to use on my work 2015 MacBook Pro than I do on the 2016 MacBook Pro. At least now the USB-C dongles I might ever need will also work with the new iPad Pro.
Moving forward, in my humble opinion, I think it would be worthwhile for all of us to spend our energies on finding solutions, sharing those with each other and where there are real issues with USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 (cables and Power Delivery are my top two), going to Apple and hammering them on items to be fixed, so that this technology can fulfill what it has promised. Maybe that is myopic or dismissing of users who have older MacBook Pros, but I cannot see how the complaining about legacy ports coming back is making any difference. Better keyboard mechanism (Magic Keyboard scissors), yes...a little thicker for better battery and better cooling, hell yes...two more 10Gbps USB-C ports hanging off the PCH on the 15-inch and moving the headphone jack to the LEFT side, a little smaller TrackPad, better education for Apple Store employees, better cable selection in store for legacy needs...I could get behind those. Holding Apple accountable to make the best possible MacBook Pro for the money is great, as long as everyone takes the reality into account.
PS - I am sorry my posts are so long, but I cannot do TL;DR.
[doublepost=1551201233][/doublepost]Alright, allow me to explain it to you:
Keyboards are designed for typing, not looking pretty. It must be as easy as possible to hit the key you want to hit as possible without looking at the keyboard, because looking at the keyboard means you're taking your eye off of the screen, which is where the content is. You don't want to have to do that.....
Now, that doesn't make it a worse keyboard experience in and of itself. In fact, adding light but not removing the tactile feel is a useful aid (backlight comes to mind). However, when the function keys and especially the escape key are replaced with keys that have literally no travel, bump, or any other tactile feel, that's when the keyboard suddenly becomes significantly worse.QUOTE]
Thank you! I've been reading all the posts here and wondering what type of work would benefit from having a smooth glass typing surface. I never use my iPadPro to type anything longer than a twitter message or text and even those brief messages take much longer to post. Any significant word processing would take much longer without the traditional keyboard. And for those who have suggested no keyboard at all, what are you thinking?
It's ok as long as you understand some of us actually carry their computers around everywhere. I'm dragging around my 15" because it's the smallest Mac that gets my job done. I wouldn't mind an actual Pro version with a battery fit for a computer, not a pocket calculator so I could REALLY work. Now I've got a huge external battery I'm forced to drag around which makes the Macbook Pro 15" the heaviest computer I've ever had to carry around. Still, I have to pay the price because I need to be able to work full day in various locations, usually without a power supply nearby.
Personally I have zero interest in a 16-16,5" machine. That being said, if they actually fit a laptop-sized battery instead of these pocket calculator ones OR a good keyboard instead of this butterfly crap, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. That is, unless they come up with something similar in a smaller form factor. 15" is ideal for me, and I don't care how thick it is. It can't be heavier than my current setup.