1600 vs 1866 on Late 2011 Refresh?
About to order a late 2011 17" i7 2.5 Ghz MBP, and of course will upgrade the ram to 8GB. I was wondering if the refreshed processors handle 1866Mhz better than the previous one? I've been reading this thread and it seems that the Kingston 1600 Mhz one is more stable than the 1866 Mhz one. Anybody with the new 2.4Ghz or 2.5 Ghz MBP care to try/test?
One more thing, IF BY ANY CHANCE the 1866 Mhz one is stable, wouldn't its CL 11 (inferior to the 1600's CL9) mean that even in spite the +Mhz, it would still perform slower than the 1600 Mhz CL 9? Or am i just a newb who doesnt understand CL well?
Please bear with my newbness!