Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What buying season is upon us?? Back to school season! What do more students buy, a $3000 PowerMac or a $1500 iMac?? I think delaying the new PowerMacs to reduce inventory is a good idea business wise, but I agree with some people here who say the promotion isn't enough.

However, I think Apple is dropping the ball by not bringing out new iBooks and PowerBooks. Used to work for decent sized computer company and this time of year was when students were buying up notebooks like crazy. Guess they're counting on the new iMac to deliver.
 
I've got a feeling that we'll see iBook and PowerBook updates in August along with the launch of new PowerMacs.

If the PowerMac does get boosted to 1.4GHz, the PowerBook could easily be pushed to 1GHz, which would allow the iBook to scale to 800MHz.

The portable line updates would be minimal, but could definitely increase sales for back-to-school.
 
Originally posted by Jack Tenric
First of all. I am not a spoiled child. I worked damn hard to get a Mac after years of saving without a job. When I got one finally, I was blown away by all but the speed. The G4 733 w/ Radeon 8500 runs games like crap. I need a machine with REAL speed. You obviously base your speed comparisions on a Mac vs Mac basis. Compared to the current batch of PCs, my 733 just doesn't cut it and neither does the DP 1GHz. The video drivers for the Mac Radeon 8500 need work. Games run slower than they did on my old GF2 MX. The new DDR Macs and 10.2 are what will help bring Apple back into the running again.

As to the learning patience bit. I have tons of patience but AMD had DDR RAM in '98. That goes beyond patience. Apple needs this upgrade quite badly if they want any level of respect in the computer community. I'm not complaining about 1 month. I have waited years for this.

Alright newbie, you asked for it. Here we go!

First, I didn't call you a spoiled child, I said you sounded like one. Didn't your mother ever teach you the difference between acting like something and being something?

Second, don't blame video card problems, driver or otherwise, on Apple. ATI writes the Radeon drivers, not the good people in Cupertino. Get your facts straight.

Third, I honestly don't care HOW long you saved to buy your Mac. I too scrimped and saved to buy mine, as did a lot of other folks on this board. If you're looking for symathy here you've come to the wrong place. Quit playing the poor little me card. I'm not buying it.

Fourth, you're Godd*mn right I'm comparing Macs to Macs. Were we talking about llamas? Did I miss something? I don't give one half a sh*t how fast my Mac runs compared to some other guys PC. I want my computer to do what it's supposed to do, and that's run well. I don't care how fast the new AMD or Intel chips are, they'll never support an OS that actually runs well! That's why you use Macs, right? Because they run well? Because of the Mac OS? Please tell me it's not because they match your interior decorating scheme a little better. I'm not saying speed doesn't matter. It does, especially if Apple wants people to switch. I'm just saying that you've already done that, so quit your b*tching and shut the hell up. You want a faster Mac? Great. Let me tell you a secret, my friend. WE ALL WANT A FASTER MAC!!! Get over yourself.
 
Jack Tenric:

"I have tons of patience but AMD had DDR RAM in '98."

Wrong. The first DDR chipset for AMD chips was the AMD 760, and it was first available for review to Anandtech (a prominent PC tech site) on October 30th, 2000. I'm pretty sure that the first DDR chipset for Intel was the VIA Apollo Pro 266, which Anandtech was able to review on January 18th, 2001.

The Apollo Pro 266 is particularly interesting because, like the Xserve chipset, it has a 133mhz FSB and a 133-DDR AKA 266mhz memory bus. I also believe it was VIA's first shot at a DDR chipset for any platform, so it may not be best-case. You can read about it here: http://www1.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1402
 
Originally posted by wsteineker


Alright newbie, you asked for it. Here we go!

First, I didn't call you a spoiled child, I said you sounded like one. Didn't your mother ever teach you the difference between acting like something and being something?

Second, don't blame video card problems, driver or otherwise, on Apple. ATI writes the Radeon drivers, not the good people in Cupertino. Get your facts straight.

Third, I honestly don't care HOW long you saved to buy your Mac. I too scrimped and saved to buy mine, as did a lot of other folks on this board. If you're looking for symathy here you've come to the wrong place. Quit playing the poor little me card. I'm not buying it.

Fourth, you're Godd*mn right I'm comparing Macs to Macs. Were we talking about llamas? Did I miss something? I don't give one half a sh*t how fast my Mac runs compared to some other guys PC. I want my computer to do what it's supposed to do, and that's run well. I don't care how fast the new AMD or Intel chips are, they'll never support an OS that actually runs well! That's why you use Macs, right? Because they run well? Because of the Mac OS? Please tell me it's not because they match your interior decorating scheme a little better. I'm not saying speed doesn't matter. It does, especially if Apple wants people to switch. I'm just saying that you've already done that, so quit your b*tching and shut the hell up. You want a faster Mac? Great. Let me tell you a secret, my friend. WE ALL WANT A FASTER MAC!!! Get over yourself.

You are obviously not worth listening to if you are only interested in comparing only Mac vs Mac. You seem to be a Mac advocate. Good, so am I. I'm constantly recommending Mac to people. How can you convince people to switch? One way is to compare hardware to PCs. That's why Apple does the PhotoShop/Quake3 comparisions. PC to Mac comparisions matter, whether you like it or not.

"Third, I honestly don't care HOW long you saved to buy your Mac"

You obviously do or you wouldn't have replied to that.

"Quit playing the poor little me card. I'm not buying it."

I played no such card. I mearly stated how I purchased my system. You on the other hand have decided to attack me from the start. If you cannot post to a forum without acting more civilized then you really should not post at all. You said that I was acting spoiled, but this is not the case, when you consider that I was comparing Mac to PC. If I was comparing Mac to Mac then yes, I most certainly would be acting spoiled.

If you think that I'll never be satisfied with system speed then you are mistaken. I would be plenty happy with my old 66MHz system. There are lots of great old apps and games that run on it. I am hoping to run the current games well and if you even had any knowledge of the Mac gaming scene you would realize that Mac gaming performance is far behind the performance you get on the PC. These new systems from Apple should help level the playing field in this area somewhat. This is excellent news and while I can't wait too much longer, this is merely because I require a faster machine such as a DDR equipped system for some upcoming tasks that I will be doing.

"Second, don't blame video card problems, driver or otherwise, on Apple. ATI writes the Radeon drivers, not the good people in Cupertino. Get your facts straight."

Perhaps you should stop assuming what people know or think before you blame them. That's a nasty habbit that gets people in trouble. Seriously, I'm not insulting you by saying that. I am just saying that it's better to go with facts and not assume things. It's obvious that ATI does the drivers. I'm not blaming Apple for that. Nowhere was that stated. I was stating the general Apple situation for gaming. ATI just happens to be a piece of the puzzle, a factor to include if you will.

I could say that I hope you never get a better computer in your life but I'm not going to be like that. That's just wrong. It is my wish that you too will some day be able to enjoy a newer system. There's nothing like trying out a new computer for the first time.
 
Originally posted by ddtlm
Jack Tenric:

"I have tons of patience but AMD had DDR RAM in '98."

Wrong. The first DDR chipset for AMD chips was the AMD 760, and it was first available for review to Anandtech (a prominent PC tech site) on October 30th, 2000. I'm pretty sure that the first DDR chipset for Intel was the VIA Apollo Pro 266, which Anandtech was able to review on January 18th, 2001.

The Apollo Pro 266 is particularly interesting because, like the Xserve chipset, it has a 133mhz FSB and a 133-DDR AKA 266mhz memory bus. I also believe it was VIA's first shot at a DDR chipset for any platform, so it may not be best-case. You can read about it here: http://www1.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1402

Ah, good. Thanks for clearing that up. The page that I was getting that info from must have been full of crap then. Of course even so, we've been waiting a while for DDR. I appologize for the error.
 
See, your problem is lack of knowledge. There are many people out there who are more knowledgable than you. These people work at Apple, Motorola, Microsoft, AMD, ATi, nVidia, Intel, and so on.

These are the people who make the decisions. And remember, they know more than you. They have also probably have had more education in the field. Plus, as an added incentive, in most cases their jobs depend on the decisions they make.
- Did something get lodged in your butt or do you always say things like this to people? I'm hoping your just being sarcastic. As this is all for fun.
Great, an "ad hominem" attack.

You may not have picked this up from my post, but I am an Apple shareholder. As such, I elect the board of Apple. Those are the people I trust with my money. Jobs is one of them.

Apple and other tech companies have people who knoe more than you. This is fact. You may try to dispute it, but you would fall flat on your face. These people are the ones who make the decisions. I am perfectly willingt to trust their decisions. As a consumer, I sure wish Apple was going to come out with a 10Ghz G5 in a week. But I will not rabidly speculate on it. See, here's the thing: if people expect more than they 'get,' they will feel shafted. And unhappy potential customers are not people who earn money.

Ever wonder why Apple hates rumormongering so much? Look at Apple's stock prices in the attacked GIF from last year. See the giant drop right after Macworld? Can you guess why? Hint: rumors led people to expect better stuff than apple had. Even if you believe that rumors buoyed the stock up in the first place, the low right after macworld was a good bit lower than anything before it.

Thats my money, you see.


Oh, on another point, you didn't criticise my arguments. You just insulted me. I guess that means you can't find any flaws...
 

Attachments

  • aapl.png
    aapl.png
    11 KB · Views: 389
Jack Tenric:

wsteineker was being a bit of an ass wasn't he? Funny when the Macs start looking slow that the Macheads start flaming dissenters.

"I am hoping to run the current games well and if you even had any knowledge of the Mac gaming scene you would realize that Mac gaming performance is far behind the performance you get on the PC."

I have to agree with you here. I've never been impressed with the speed of any game on my G4 (dual 800). I'm thinking about getting a GF4TI for it; the GF2MX is a dog and OSX is a pig. 10.2 should be nice anyway.

(I might add that my Athlon 1.53 on PC133 with GF2TI-4200 absolutely flies in games.)
 
monitors...

maybe they are indeed clearing out the monitors and not so much the PowerMacs. don't all the monitors(other than the 23") still have a blue apple logo on them? i thought they would have changed to silver awhile ago to match the quicksilvers. maybe they are doing it now. just a thought.
 
Originally posted by Jack Tenric
You are obviously not worth listening to if you are only interested in comparing only Mac vs Mac. You seem to be a Mac advocate. Good, so am I. I'm constantly recommending Mac to people. How can you convince people to switch? One way is to compare hardware to PCs. That's why Apple does the PhotoShop/Quake3 comparisions. PC to Mac comparisions matter, whether you like it or not.

You'll note that I didn't say that comparative speed wasn't important. In fact, I said it was a huge factor in getting people to switch. Hell, my favorite part of every MW keynote is Phil Schiler's Photoshop bake off. I just said that Mac to Mac comparison is key when discerning the importance of upgrades. As a loyal Apple user, I have no intention of running out to buy a Windows system, no matter how great its performance, gaming or otherwise. I, like most others, use Macs because they're reliable and easy to use. Hardware matters, but the OS is still the key selling point here.

"Third, I honestly don't care HOW long you saved to buy your Mac"

You obviously do or you wouldn't have written such a long retort.

"Quit playing the poor little me card. I'm not buying it."

I played no such card. I mearly stated how I purchased my system. You on the other hand have decided to attack me from the start. If you cannot post to a forum without acting more civilized then you really should not post at all. You said that I was acting spoiled, but this is not the case, when you consider that I was comparing Mac to PC. If I was comparing Mac to Mac then yes, I most certainly would be acting spoiled.

I think that if you check all of my posts, you'll find that they're fair, honest, and occasionally helpful. I do not, however, pretend to tolerate whiners very well. I think it's fair to say that your first post was more than a bit whiny, so I don't apologize for addressing it as it needed to be addressed. Listen to me or not, that's up to you. As for the Mac vs. Mac vs. Mac vs. PC issue, we'll meet in the middle and consider both. That way you're only acting half childish.

If you think that I'll never be satisfied with system speed then you are mistaken. I would be plenty happy with my old 66MHz system. There are lots of great old apps and games that run on it. I am hoping to run the current games well and if you even had any knowledge of the Mac gaming scene you would realize that Mac gaming performance is far behind the performance you get on the PC. These new systems from Apple should help level the playing field in this area somewhat. This is excellent news and while I can't wait too much longer, this is merely because I require a faster machine such as a DDR equipped system for some upcoming tasks that I will be doing.

I don't doubt that Mac gaming performance isn't up to far with the Wintel world. And I do have quite a bit of knowledge of the Mac gaming scene, as I'm a fairly active gamer who keeps up to date on both availability and performance via both personal gameplay and reviews/benchmarks. I'm just saying that if gaming is the sole reason you're on the Mac you've been sold a bill of goods. Get real about this one. Apple's sales, unlike many PC manufacturer's, aren't driven by the gaminng market. Their focus is on education/creatve pros/home users. All that and, until recently, they've been right at the top of the heap in terms of game performance.

"Second, don't blame video card problems, driver or otherwise, on Apple. ATI writes the Radeon drivers, not the good people in Cupertino. Get your facts straight."

Perhaps you should stop assuming what people know or think before you blame them. That's a nasty habbit that gets people in trouble. Seriously, I'm not insulting you by saying that. I am just saying that it's better to go with facts and not assume things. It's obvious that ATI does the drivers. I'm not blaming Apple for that. Nowhere was that stated. I was stating the general Apple situation for gaming. ATI just happens to be a piece of the puzzle, a factor to include if you will.

Speaking of assuming being a nasty habit, maybe you should give your post a look. I once heard a story about pots calling kettles black. You may not have blamed Apple directly for writing bad drivers, but you sure went out of your way to heap the lion's share of criticism on them for poor driver performance. I think it's fair to say that you inferred that it was somehow Apple's fault that your video card's performance was substandard. Again, I won't argue with you about the current state of Apple gaming, but it's not even remotely all their fault. Hardware develpers (ATI, NVidia), driver authors, game developers, and Apple all share the blame for this one. Don't single Apple out just because the problem show up while you're fragging on their machine.

I could say that I hope you never get a better computer in your life but I'm not going to be like that. That's just wrong. It is my wish that you too will some day be able to enjoy a newer system. There's nothing like trying out a new computer for the first time.

I, too, want a newer machine. The whole point of this is that if we can wait this long, what's one more damn month? Jesus man, think seriously here for a minute. Are those few extra dropped frames (if you even have any with that setup) going to kill you if you have to wait an extra month for the next big thing? Best of luck to you, Jack, and no offense, but get real.
 
Originally posted by Jack Tenric
Wow another person getting personal attacked. These forums rock.

I caught my fair share of heat when I was a newbie. Just be careful not to go throwing facts out in a self righteous manner, especially if you haven't checked them first. Best of luck to you man. I hope things cool off for you and you find this place to be a nice home on the web. I know I have. :)
 
why the anger, people?

maybe it's because the US is 'at war'--uh, duh... no.

maybe it's because it's really, really hot (at least where I am)--uh, duh... no.

maybe it's because anger and lashing out is more fun--uh, huh... could be!

so many flaming posts towards one another and, more importantly, toward Apple.

I'm not saying we need to coddle Apple. they're a billion dollar company just like all the other billion dollar companies. if they could have been Microsoft and Jobs could have been Gates, you know what? they would have. so, they don't need our sympathy.

however, they don't need to be constantly bashed and insulted based on rumors! if they suck so bad, why are so many of you bothering to wait for anything? if they've let you down so many times in the past, why get hyped up on RUMORS? hell, why get so angry about reality?

to spew so much hatred towards people is really disturbing to read. I come hear for fun, speculation, and information, not to watch people beat the crap out of each other and Apple.
 
Re: monitors...

Originally posted by tjwett
maybe they are indeed clearing out the monitors and not so much the PowerMacs. don't all the monitors(other than the 23") still have a blue apple logo on them? i thought they would have changed to silver awhile ago to match the quicksilvers. maybe they are doing it now. just a thought.

I know the 15" and 17" still have the pinstriped thing going on with the graphite Apple logo, and I'm pretty sure the 22" does too. I think you're right about the monitorrs getting a much needed refresh. Hopefully it'll be more than just a new case design, too. I'd love a little bit of that HD technology to trickle down to the low end for sharper display and higher resolution.
 
Originally posted by wsteineker
You may not have blamed Apple directly for writing bad drivers, but you sure went out of your way to heap the lion's share of criticism on them for poor driver performance. I think it's fair to say that you inferred that it was somehow Apple's fault that your video card's performance was substandard. Again, I won't argue with you about the current state of Apple gaming, but it's not even remotely all their fault. Hardware develpers (ATI, NVidia), driver authors, game developers, and Apple all share the blame for this one. Don't single Apple out just because the problem show up while you're fragging on their machine.

I never went out of my way to heap criticism on Apple for driver performance. I stated that the driver performance of the ATI Radeon 8500 for Mac sucked. I don't see where you made the leap that I was blaming Apple. They are not to be blamed for this at all.

"Hardware develpers (ATI, NVidia), driver authors, game developers, and Apple all share the blame for this one."

Uh... That's what I just said in my previous post.

By the way, I went to Apple because I was sick of Microsoft and their business practices. I knew that gaming wasn't quite as good at the moment on Macs but that's no reason not to strive for equality between the two in that area.

Apple is an awesome company but there is nothing wrong with trying to get them to move along a little faster and better. It's not like DDR just came out last month and I want it installed right away. It's been a year or so with two series of system revisions to the tower models.

"I caught my fair share of heat when I was a newbie. Just be careful not to go throwing facts out in a self righteous manner,"

Then you should have tried to learn from that and not act like they did to you. There was nothing self righteous about it, I was merely stating my experiences and hopes for Apple. Nothing more.
 
Originally posted by demars


Some of the other news is intriguing, especially the new monitors. One anomaly in the line as it exists right now is that, in my opinion, the iMac LCD is superior in quality to the stand-alone LCD monitors. The variation in brightness with extreme viewing angle is really amazing in the iMac, but I don't think the other LCDs from Apple have this property. I wonder if the new monitors will. Should be interesting to see what happens.

What? the iMac's screen has LESS viewing angle (both vertically and horizontally) and LESS contrast then the 17" display.
_________________________________
iMac's monitor

Typical viewing angle: 120 degrees horizontal; 90 degrees vertical
Typical brightness: 200 candela per meter squared
Typical contrast ratio: 300:1
_________________________________
17"(i have this one)

Viewing angle (typical)
160° horizontal; 160° vertical

Brightness (typical)
200 cd/m

Contrast ratio (typical)
350:1

i suspect the new 17" iMac monitor will have similar specs as the current model as this will help keep the price down.
Also with the swivel monitor on the iMac there is less need for a nice viewing angle.

However i find that colours are more true with the higher viewing angle. Get yer fax straight dude. The new (purported) screen is a much needed improvement over the current offering. Of course some larger resolutions are in order as well.
 
wsteineker:

"I'd love a little bit of that HD technology to trickle down to the low end for sharper display and higher resolution"

But I don't think Apple will do that. If the smaller monitors get higher res, then they eat into the sales of the bigger ones.

Jack Tenric:

"I stated that the driver performance of the ATI Radeon 8500 for Mac sucked."

I thought about getting an 8500 for a long time, but I didn't because it was ATI, and I've been happy with that decision as more and more of the truth comes out. (ATI sucks.)

boobers:

"What? the iMac's screen has LESS viewing angle (both vertically and horizontally) and LESS contrast then the 17" display."

I've come to believe the only way to evaluate an LCD is to look at it in person.
 
Originally posted by Jack Tenric
I never went out of my way to heap criticism on Apple for driver performance. I stated that the driver performance of the ATI Radeon 8500 for Mac sucked. I don't see where you made the leap that I was blaming Apple. They are not to be blamed for this at all.

"Hardware develpers (ATI, NVidia), driver authors, game developers, and Apple all share the blame for this one."

Uh... That's what I just said in my previous post.

You said:

"The G4 733 w/ Radeon 8500 runs games like crap. I need a machine with REAL speed. You obviously base your speed comparisions on a Mac vs Mac basis. Compared to the current batch of PCs, my 733 just doesn't cut it and neither does the DP 1GHz. The video drivers for the Mac Radeon 8500 need work. Games run slower than they did on my old GF2 MX. The new DDR Macs and 10.2 are what will help bring Apple back into the running again."

Nowhere in this post did I detect even a HINT of blame placed on anything but the system. Yes, you payed lip service to the drivers, but you proceeded to bash Apple and NOT ATI for the problem. That's where I took issue with all of this.

In your second post, you started to cough up ATI as the source of the problem, but continued to heap blame on Apple for the general state of Mac gaming. No blame at all on the software developers who ship Mac games 6 months behind Windows versions, if ever. I just want you to be fair. Apple takes enough heat from Wall Street. They don't need it from you. Not over this.
 
qwerpafw
You may not have picked this up from my post, but I am an Apple shareholder. As such, I elect the board of Apple. Those are the people I trust with my money. Jobs is one of them.
Yes, I picked up that you're a shareholder. I'm sure your votes have a profound effect on the outcome of elected shareholders. I agree you should trust who's in charge since you put them there, right?

However, my comment was based on what you said to another person, which I find to be rather silly. It goes without saying that Apple etc know more than most of us about their business practices..
Apple and other tech companies have people who knoe more than you.

I still think you've got something up your butt. I'll continue to spread rumors with the rest of the world. Which I didn't, but maybe you didn't see who posted which comment. Oh and I didn't mean to insult you, I was just pointing out that your comments were insulting - Incase you didn't realize it. However, my insult was light hearted. I was defending someone else's opinion. I never stated my own. However, you can continue to rant if you like and I'll continue to laugh.
 
wsteineker:

"No blame at all on the software developers who ship Mac games 6 months behind Windows versions, if ever."

Hey, what about Warcraft III, on the same disk as PC, released the same day. Really slick, Blizzard rocks. It does appear PC's play it better, but whatever.

On a similar subject, I wish Apple would bite the bullet and eat the cost of getting good graphics into all the desktops, including eMac and iMac (not the 15" one). They should take action to help the Mac gaming scene, I think shipping no G4-based desktop with less than a 64mb GF4MX would be a good place to start (well, actually a GF2MX was a good start, but we need more).
 
And now for the edit...

Originally posted by Jack Tenric
By the way, I went to Apple because I was sick of Microsoft and their business practices. I knew that gaming wasn't quite as good at the moment on Macs but that's no reason not to strive for equality between the two in that area.

So you openly admit that you were aware of the gaming performance gap, yet you compain about its existence. That's hypocrisy. As for wanting improvement, I feel you. I, too, would like some improvement here. I just don't think it's right to bash Apple for not delivering it when they've never promised to do so.

Apple is an awesome company but there is nothing wrong with trying to get them to move along a little faster and better. It's not like DDR just came out last month and I want it installed right away. It's been a year or so with two series of system revisions to the tower models.

I don't disagree that they're lagging. DDR is long overdue, yes. As are a few other things. I just don't think b*tching about it in the forums is the way to achieve anything. Face it, what's posted here is inconsequential to Apple. Don't run around making demands with no real hope of having them met.

"I caught my fair share of heat when I was a newbie. Just be careful not to go throwing facts out in a self righteous manner,"

Then you should have tried to learn from that and not act like they did to you. There was nothing self righteous about it, I was merely stating my experiences and hopes for Apple. Nothing more.

That's the way the world works, my friend. I wouldn't be able to stand up for myself now if I hadn't taken it then. Besides, I noticed that some of the flames had valid points nestled deep inside. I learned from them, as I hope you do from this. Again, best of luck to you. :)
 
Originally posted by ddtlm
wsteineker:

"No blame at all on the software developers who ship Mac games 6 months behind Windows versions, if ever."

Hey, what about Warcraft III, on the same disk as PC, released the same day. Really slick, Blizzard rocks. It does appear PC's play it better, but whatever.

No argument here. Blizzard rocks! Unfortunately they're the exception to the rule.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.