Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

1st gen users, have you upgraded?

  • No.

    Votes: 122 71.3%
  • Yes.

    Votes: 49 28.7%

  • Total voters
    171
Why are so many people wishing for an always on display? Genuine question... I lift my arm and my display comes on, when I'm not looking at my watch it's off and not wasting energy. I genuinely don't see the point.

And those always on displays are very dim...so, it's not like other people around you can see that it is on! :D
 
I'd like to see other colors of ceramic, too. Rado's got quite a range of silvery, gray, and gold-brown colors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thai
Why are so many people wishing for an always on display? Genuine question... I lift my arm and my display comes on, when I'm not looking at my watch it's off and not wasting energy. I genuinely don't see the point.

You think I have the answer as to why an always on display is requested? I was just indicating it's talked about on this forum quite frequently (Aside from a round version being heavily discussed). I have zero interest for the display to be on consistently.

I actually toggle 'Raise to Wake' off. I just tap the screen or push the Crown if I want to see the display activated.
 
Last edited:
You think I have the answer as to why an always on display is requested? I was just indicating it's talked about on this forum quite frequently (Aside from a round version being heavily discussed). I have zero interest for the display to be on consistently.

I actually toggle 'Raise to Wake' off. I just tap the screen or push the Crown if I want to see the display activated.

I didn't think you had an answer .... merely yours was the last post to mention it so the logical post for me to reply to
 
My Sport 42mm is going fine, though I am finding battery life can run right down to 0% if I go for a bike ride. Not sure if I want to upgrade right now because it's worth seeing Watch OS 4 provides in June and it's now a bit over 6 months to the next Watch.
I just need to charge my Watch a bit extra to get through days when I cycle, though I should have upgraded on day 1 and will do so in September
 
Why are so many people wishing for an always on display? Genuine question... I lift my arm and my display comes on, when I'm not looking at my watch it's off and not wasting energy. I genuinely don't see the point.

I'm with you in 90% of my day... But the last 10% when laying in my bed or sitting in a weird position, the watch doesn't turn on when lifting my screen - if they could make it flawless: great, but second best thing would be a power-save-clock thing... Just a dark color time or something - maybe no complications and the most minimalistic analogue would be cool? OLED is known for being able to do this without drawing a lot of battery because the rest of the screen would be off.
 
Why are so many people wishing for an always on display? Genuine question...
I would guess they are watch fans who like wearing something with more character than a featureless blank screen.
Ariel Adams at A Blog To Watch sums it up well in his review of the Samsung Gear S3.
In the context of smartwatches, the application of this point is directly related to the fact that a black screen offers limited to zero function or communication value for the wearer and the world around him or her. In fact, the only communication value from a fashion perspective in most smartwatches is the case and strap – which are typically underwhelming or basic. Further, the most popular smartwatches are so common that they become generic and lose the ability to say something unique about the wearer.


And those always on displays are very dim...so, it's not like other people around you can see that it is on! :D
Not the case with the Gear S3, they have come up with a solution that allows a bright, low power always-on display with full colours and animation which doesn't destroy the battery life. If they can do it why shouldn't Apple offer the option in the next generation?
The screen on the Samsung Gear S3 in the persistent always–on state is colorful (not monochromatic as in others), bright given the OLED structure, and animated. This latter point is important because it not only means the information can change, but that you can have movement such as a moving seconds hand. For me, what is important is that the screen is highly visible, attractive, and viewable from across the room. That's a big deal in my book. [David's note: I recall taking pictures of the Samsung Gear S3 at the of the August debut and waiting for the screen to switch to the Always-On mode. It was still so bright and legible that it took me a while to realize that what I was looking at was already the reduced power mode.]
 
I'm generally happy with my AW, though the thought of being water proof and having a GPS is a draw for me. So far I've not succumbed to any sort of temptation. Thanks to the weather, my running as been curtailed this month, so I'd not really be able to take advantage of the GPS that much anyways.
 
My Sport 42mm is going fine, though I am finding battery life can run right down to 0% if I go for a bike ride. Not sure if I want to upgrade right now because it's worth seeing Watch OS 4 provides in June and it's now a bit over 6 months to the next Watch.
I just need to charge my Watch a bit extra to get through days when I cycle, though I should have upgraded on day 1 and will do so in September

Do you have AC+ on yours? If your battery is draining constantly, you might be able to get a free replacement.
 
No, I just put it on eBay and bought an Apple Watch 2 actually. Thinking about it again, its by no means certain that a new watch will be coming out in September.

I agree. I don't believe another revised version of the Apple Watch is going to debut in September. My guess is, if the 18 month cycle is current, March 2018 will be the next major version released.
 
I upgraded from S0 38mm to S2 42mm pretty much at launch.

I find my AW will last a couple of days when I wear it; I alternate it with other watches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44267547
I agree. I don't believe another revised version of the Apple Watch is going to debut in September. My guess is, if the 18 month cycle is current, March 2018 will be the next major version released.

My thoughts as well - My main hopes now is just for an awesome software launch this summer with WatchOS 4.0 - There are small, but very useful stuff they could do pretty easily without dragging down power etc. (Just dynamic complications with badge for unread mails etc. and a watch face where I can set it to show alarm in a corner when its set and display weather when it's not set for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44267547
I agree. I don't believe another revised version of the Apple Watch is going to debut in September. My guess is, if the 18 month cycle is current, March 2018 will be the next major version released.

Yeah, saw a post on here that there'll be a refresh in the fall but the only change is battery life; but no design changes.
 
Yeah, saw a post on here that there'll be a refresh in the fall but the only change is battery life; but no design changes.

It's rumored as well that LTE will be incoming aside from the battery. That doesn't interest me, but others are requesting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xDKP
While the general performance of my Series 0 is quite disappointing on the newest version of Watch OS, I still don't feel compelled to upgrade yet.

If I do upgrade though, it'll probably not be another SS model.
 
I own two 1st generation watches. Haven't upgraded. Maybe 3rd gen. will prompt me to.

I really appreciate the current design, but I'm not compelled to upgrade again to the same design for two generations if September releases a minor upgrade again. I am looking forward to a major overhaul with a newer/refreshed look if March 2018 is the next followed date.
 
GPS can be disabled, thus battery life is extended beyond.
Afaik GPS is automatically disabled if the coupled iPhone is within reach of the Watch. So people who always have their iPhone with them are most likely to see the improved battery life.

Why are so many people wishing for an always on display? Genuine question... I lift my arm and my display comes on, when I'm not looking at my watch it's off and not wasting energy. I genuinely don't see the point.
As has been written: The mechanism is not perfect yet. Neither in activating when desired nor in preventing "false alarms", costing energy and drawing unnecessary attention.

Also, sometimes you do not want to actively raise your arm to read the time or incoming notifications, as it could be disturbing in certain situations (even be considered rude) or simply because one is lazy or busy with his hands doing other tasks that prevent raising the arm.

And finally there is the psychological aspect: Even if the wrist raise mechanism is working, you still have to wait for some 2/10th of a second before the display is really on. While this is not directly relevant in most (if not nearly all) situations, it gives the feeling of the Watch being somewhat laggy. And if Apple did not completely abandon user experience, this is something they have to consider.

My thoughts as well - My main hopes now is just for an awesome software launch this summer with WatchOS 4.0 - There are small, but very useful stuff they could do pretty easily without dragging down power
I'm really looking forward to how they will evolve watchOS. Chances are that the possible optimizations are pretty much already included in watchOS3. What's up next are new features and a general evolution of watchOS. However, I'm expecting those to be (in part) limited to Series 1 and above, as Series 0's hardware is already at its limits with watchOS3.

watchOS4 will most likely still run on Series 0, but owners will probably have to consider a tradeoff between speed and features before they upgrade.
 
watchOS4 will most likely still run on Series 0, but owners will probably have to consider a tradeoff between speed and features before they upgrade.

Or just limit some of the new most power hungry features, like they have done with iPod Touches and old iPhones in the past
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44267547
I really appreciate the current design, but I'm not compelled to upgrade again to the same design for two generations if September releases a minor upgrade again. I am looking forward to a major overhaul with a newer/refreshed look if March 2018 is the next followed date.
A redesign is ok as long as they keep the same watch band connectors - wouldn't want to lose my investment in bands.
 
A redesign is ok as long as they keep the same watch band connectors - wouldn't want to lose my investment in bands.

Agreed. I have well over 25 bands. Losing the band design change would be extremely unfortunate. But the way Apple executed the band switching seamlessly and it's a major selling point for ease/customization, I don't foresee this happening anytime soon. Although, the discussion has many times has risen before of what if.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xDKP
Of course Apple will change the band connection. They want to sell you more bands.
 
If I had been able to sell my 1st gen, I would've considered it. I have a 42mm SS. I tried selling it with the included Milanese Loop and red sport band (OEM) at $350 and no one wanted it. I'm not 'giving' it away, so I ended up keeping it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max Your Macs
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.