That's fine for you, but I don't see how you can say "that is the point". Just before you were trying to make general value claims about the Geekbench scores between the M2 Air and 14" Pro, and between the binned and non-binned pro. But when I do, all of a sudden it's not about that and just about your subjective needs.
We all know this - not sure what you think you're clarifying here.
It has a media engine, not the media engine.
It seems like you were initially trying to make out that the M2 wasn't generally a lower value buy compared to the M1 MacBook Air and base model 14" Pro, but once we start to get into the reasons why those other two devices are generally better value buys, all of a sudden the goalposts change and it's just this big subjective soup where no points really matter anymore. I do get that argument, but it seems like that should have been your argument from the start.
As I said many times, if someone likes the M2 Air better, all the power to them. It's a good computer, but in every Apple lineup over the years there are generally some devices in the lineup that are considered better value for money, and some devices in the lineup that aren't. The M2 isn't very easy to recommend, and it sits in an unfortunate sandwich between two of the better value for money buys.
It's not impossible to recommend, it's just not easy to recommend. And if you look around you'll find most people share the same sentiment.