Gotta give you 10/10 for irony there...i dunno, i think the M2 air will establish itself, and in time, it will be the air to beat. and i agree, 'their points are petty valid'....
Gotta give you 10/10 for irony there...i dunno, i think the M2 air will establish itself, and in time, it will be the air to beat. and i agree, 'their points are petty valid'....
I wasn't even talking directly about that issue. I was speaking more about the echo chamber of youtube. Buuuuuut, since you brought it up, with the new design, different screen, upgraded processor, higher res webcam, etc, etc. there certainly is an argument to be made that it is just as good a value. Your hard line stance is what is wild.I could link articles and videos all day and it would never be enough if you want to ignore the reality in front of you. Their points are petty valid, which is the MBA M1 in 2020 was a far easier recommendation to make than the M2 MBA is in 2022.
The M2 is fine, but at the higher price point it is open to some more scrutiny, some less favourable comparisons to other devices, and you have to think harder about what you really value.
The M1 MBA was universally the money buy. The M2 isn't in quite the same way. Outside this thread, this is highly non-controversial. So much pushback for such a mild opinion - it's wild.
I wasn't even talking directly about that issue. I was speaking more about the echo chamber of youtube. Buuuuuut, since you brought it up, with the new design, different screen, upgraded processor, higher res webcam, etc, etc. there certainly is an argument to be made that it is just as good a value. Your hard line stance is what is wild.
Yeah the 2 MBA is 0.3" more when measured diagonally, but does anyone know if the screen is actually **larger** or **smaller**? Like the area of the screen. The notch is still a large area that could be used for more menu bar drop down menus (e.g. in Bbedit) or more 3rd party menu bar icons. I also like to go to "System Preferences > Dock" and actually hide the menu bar to gain more vertical space on my laptop, this is worthless now with a large black hole in the top middle.The M2 MBA screen is 0.3" larger in the diagonal than the M1 MBA. That is exactly the size that allows the menubar to move up into the notch area and leaves the area below purely for app content. The effect is a screen that is slightly taller leaving more room for content.
It's definitely bigger. I just measured with a sewing tape, and the diagonal from the bottom edge of the menu bar at the top left (slightly below the notch) to the lower right corner of the actual visible display is 13 7/16", or 13.4375".Yeah the 2 MBA is 0.3" more when measured diagonally, but does anyone know if the screen is actually **larger** or **smaller**? Like the area of the screen. The notch is still a large area that could be used for more menu bar drop down menus (e.g. in Bbedit) or more 3rd party menu bar icons. I also like to go to "System Preferences > Dock" and actually hide the menu bar to gain more vertical space on my laptop, this is worthless now with a large black hole in the top middle.
I don't have a windows laptop to compare with, but Apple Silicon is definitely faster than a 2018 Intel Mac.Hi,
I’m using MacBook Air 2018 8gb/256gb, I’m facing issue lagging for that outlook mac and open the Ms office such as excel and words.
It’s also lagging in WhatsApp apps as compare to windows laptop.
I am planning to change to M2 but I wonder if there is any improvement m2 in this apps?
Apple seems to really like that 999 floor on their laptop market. I don't know if this is 100% always true but it feels like it lately. My guess is that the M1 Air would’ve stuck around at 999 regardless of inflation if the M2 Air couldn’t hit the 999 target at launch. The “sub 1000 dollar” notebook seems like one of those board member marching orders given to the CEO.I'm only speculating, but it seems that if inflation and supply chain etc weren't going on they would have dropped the price of the M1 below its original price, and the the M2 wouldn't be quite so expensive. Probably something like:
M1 MBA - $899
M2 MBA $1099
The content area (area below the menubar and notch) is the same size as the full screen on the M1. You are gaining space because the menubar can be moved up above that area leaving all the room below for app content.Yeah the 2 MBA is 0.3" more when measured diagonally, but does anyone know if the screen is actually **larger** or **smaller**? Like the area of the screen. The notch is still a large area that could be used for more menu bar drop down menus (e.g. in Bbedit) or more 3rd party menu bar icons. I also like to go to "System Preferences > Dock" and actually hide the menu bar to gain more vertical space on my laptop, this is worthless now with a large black hole in the top middle.
True!Thanks for showing how 1 nand chip doesn’t make a machine slow.
$400 more for us in Australia, too. I bought the 10/24/1TB model in Midnight. That one is $3249 here.Well, US folks are paying "only" 200$ more, while some of us in Europe have to fork out 400€ more.
As I said many times, if someone likes the M2 Air better, all the power to them. It's a good computer, but in every Apple lineup over the years there are generally some devices in the lineup that are considered better value for money, and some devices in the lineup that aren't. The M2 isn't very easy to recommend, and it sits in an unfortunate sandwich between two of the better value for money buys.
You're just moving the goalposts. You seemed to take major issue with the idea that the M2 is generally lower value for money compared to the M1 Air and base model Pro, but when we started getting into the specifics of it all of a sudden you're arguing that value is subjective and people can buy what they want.
I loved the original 12" Retina MacBook (despite how slow it was, and I had the base model). IMO it is Apple's best laptop design ever by FAR, especially if it had MagSafe and the USB-C port. However, now that I've been using the larger screen on this M2 Air for about a week (midnight, base storage, 16GB RAM) I don't think my nearly 40yr old eyes would want to go back to 12". But man, my daughter still uses a 12" MacBook and I pick it up and just marvel at it to this day. Love, love, love that design (minus the keyboard, obv, though I liked it too, just can't trust it).Yes, I had a 2013 Haswell Air. My daughter still uses it. (one battery replacement done)
It was/is a great computer
I had a first gen MacBook Air (2008) , a 11" MacBook Air (2011) then a 2013 Haswell MacBook Air, then a 12" MacBook (2016), and now this.
Ofcourse I have also had several MacBook pros and a few desktop Macs in that time, but the 'throw in your bag and go' Macs seem to have started with the MacBook air.
My favorite physical design was the 12" MacBook no question. If they made that again just as it was, but with an apple M processor, I would absolutely get one.
The 11" MBA was nice and portable, but terrible screen, and the aspect ratio was not good.
As someone else pointed out, swap is not sequential reads and writes. It is small random reads and writes and that means latency will matter more than top sequential speeds. The strategy with an 8 GB/256 GB M2 MacBook is to make sure that latency stays as low as possible. Make sure you keep a substantial amount of free space available on the internal 256 GB SSD and you probably won't notice any slowdowns. This probably will require use of an external drive though for most uses.Now that being said, I imagine swap will occur the first time I have a big audiobook project going. We'll see if I notice. But I'm betting really hard that I won't. Am I saying you can't make the M2 Air show the difference in storage speed? No. But I am saying with pretty solid confidence that anyone who would consider a 256GB machine will never know the difference. And I say that in a "Holy ****, this computer is so fast!" way, not a "Lame non-nerd dummies will be bamboozled by Apple's crafty marketing liars into buying a trash computer!" way. 😉
I was just mentioning swap because that's the benchmark that the YouTubers/podcasters were all crying about as a theoretical place where it would matter. Also, sequential read/write of a file large enough to perceptually tell the difference (that is, "Does it feel slow if I don't measure?" not "Is it actually measurably slower?") seems a very very corner case for a 256GB computer of any kind because you'd have to be doing it all the time before getting the M2 and after.As someone else pointed out, swap is not sequential reads and writes. It is small random reads and writes and that means latency will matter more than top sequential speeds. The strategy with an 8 GB/256 GB M2 MacBook is to make sure that latency stays as low as possible. Make sure you keep a substantial amount of free space available on the internal 256 GB SSD and you probably won't notice any slowdowns. This probably will require use of an external drive though for most uses.
I value no sound from fans, weight, footprint and battery life.
The MacBook Pros has so little value to me that I would rather pay $2000 for a MacBook Air than getting a 14" MacBook Pro for free and being forced to use it.
I want an even lighter and smaller Mac than the MacBook Air, such as the 12" MacBook. Unfortunately, Apple doesn't make a computer like that anymore.
Great video! Still wanted the smallest, fastest MacBook available, and that’s still the MBA M2, so I don’t regret my 10/24/1TB/midnight purchase one bit.
Fantastic review that puts a lot of things into perspective.
It’s a shame Apple didn’t just go for 16/512 as standard, and charges more for that model.Reading this thread up until here is like trying to bash the head against a brick wall. Exhausting.
they just needed to not cheap out on the 256 model and saved a lot of headache. make it 8/512 standard with the faster ssd speeds for that new starting price. Most people would have been very happy with thatIt’s a shame Apple didn’t just go for 16/512 as standard, and charges more for that model.
Then we wouldn’t be having these arguments, but for those using an MBA M2 8/256 from a dreary Windows PC or an Intel Mac will be having a great time and clearly aren’t using their devices for really endless full-on work.
I do lots of video editing with Camtasia on the M2 and it never breaks a sweat - and didn’t on the M1 MBA, either.
Yeah, Apple knows their market well, the 8/256 will be perfect for the vast majority of users, slower SSD speeds or no.they just needed to not cheap out on the 256 model and saved a lot of headache. make it 8/512 standard with the faster ssd speeds for that new starting price. Most people would have been very happy with that
Oh well, the fact they are still struggling too keep up with demand tells me they aren't losing much sleep over any of this lol.