Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
All true, though Eriksson's record with Mexico was not as good.

I had the opportunity to see him in person as we beat Mexico 2-0 in that World Cup qualifier in Columbus this spring. I still remember the shouts of Dos a Cero!

He didn't look like he enjoyed his trip to the US. :D
 
Further Adebayor developments... first, Cesc Fabregas has been showing off a bit of leg to the press to point out the grievous wounds he apparently suffered at the feet of the stamp-happy striker...

cescnewfinal_891484a.jpg

Crumbs. But of more interest to the rest of us is the news that Manchester City are planning on contesting the FA's charge of improper conduct relating to the goal celebration.

They apparently plan to point out the large amount of abuse the player suffered during the game as mitigation, as well as the fact that Van Persie allegedly swore at Manchester City supporters as he celebrated his goal. I suspect that they may also point to the fact that Manchester United's Gary Neville was only fined – not banned – following his similar antics against Liverpool as they seek to avoid a suspension.

As I've said previously, I think his behaviour was totally wrong but I'm kind of hoping – for purely selfish reasons – that he doesn't end up with the two or three match ban that the press have been mooting. You see, if he is banned the three matches following his current ban would be against Aston Villa, Wigan Athletic and Fulham – and those last two matches are ones against teams who we may very well be fighting against to avoid relegation come the end of the season. As such, I wouldn't mind seeing one of the Premier League's most in-form strikers in action against them – and it would help keep him sharp for the following two games against Birmingham City and Burnley, once again a couple of teams we could be tussling against at the end of the campaign.

Like I say, selfish reasons – but seeing as so many people seem to be relishing the prospect of seeing us relegated, I feel no shame in putting our interests before those of other clubs. ;)
 
As I've said previously, I think his behaviour was totally wrong but I'm kind of hoping – for purely selfish reasons – that he doesn't end up with the two or three match ban that the press have been mooting.

I wish they postponed the ban until after the Man United game. It's not going to be a real comparison between the teams, since Mark Hughes is missing 100 million pounds worth of strikers for the game. Ferdinand is also missing but City is definitely going to be more barebones.

I suspect that Man City will be able to successfully fight the unsportsmanlike conduct charge, especially seeing as he's already going to miss three games for the stamp on RVP.
 
They ought to postpone his ban until City (Manchester) play City (Hull). Being denied the chance to play against the Mighty Tigers would surely be a nightmare scenario for any professional, and a fitting punishment for his crime.

Meanwhile, we're watching the Sheffield derby at the moment and unfortunately for Fizzoid and pachyderm the Blunts are 3-0 up as we head towards half time. This misery is compounded by the fact that the red and white striped buffoons insist on playing music after they score, a heinous crime far greater than treading on a prone Dutchman.
 
...... As I've said previously, I think his behaviour was totally wrong but I'm kind of hoping – for purely selfish reasons – that he doesn't end up with the two or three match ban that the press have been mooting. You see, if he is banned the three matches following his current ban would be against Aston Villa, Wigan Athletic and Fulham – and those last two matches are ones against teams who we may very well be fighting against to avoid relegation come the end of the season. As such, I wouldn't mind seeing one of the Premier League's most in-form strikers in action against them – and it would help keep him sharp for the following two games against Birmingham City and Burnley, once again a couple of teams we could be tussling against at the end of the campaign... ;)

Since Fulham will finish midtable, they won't be in a relegation battle with you, but I do see your point on the other teams.

I also don't see the ban going past the 3 games he already has.
 
Since Fulham will finish midtable, they won't be in a relegation battle with you, but I do see your point on the other teams.
I'd expect a comfortableish mid-table finish for them too, but I'm banking on the added pressure of Europe causing them a few hiccups in the League to help us out – we've seen it happen to teams in the past. Fingers crossed, and all that. :eek:
 
I was listening to a podcast - the Guardian's I think - recently and the pundits got into a heated debate over the notion that the Europa cup is a poison chalice for mid-table sides, because their position in the league is so tenuous that additional fixtures overwhelm them and send them hurtling towards relegation. Fulham was used as an example.

Personally I don't think that is the case, but I do agree that regional competitions like the Champions League and Europa Cup will brutally expose thin sides - people complain about managers cynically sending out a "B" team but it should instead be seen as a chance for squads to develop depth in real competitions. The problem is that supporters want to see their team put out its stars and a creditable performance, so there has to be some balance. I'm watching MLS teams (which have a reputation for being thin anyway) struggle with this in the CONCACAF Champions League right now.
 
Meanwhile, we're watching the Sheffield derby at the moment and unfortunately for Fizzoid and pachyderm the Blunts are 3-0 up as we head towards half time. This misery is compounded by the fact that the red and white striped buffoons insist on playing music after they score, a heinous crime far greater than treading on a prone Dutchman.

Well, almost the classic game of 2 halves! We did score 3 (maybe even 4) goals, but were still on the end of a 3-2 defeat. 2 pretty decent goals from us though. I know it was never going to be a free flowing game but we just weren't creative enough. Arguably, Buxton was fouled for his own goal, but that's football...
 
If one thing annoys me, it's stupidity.

First of all, the Brummie in the pub who sidled up to Miss Jaffa Cake and – clocking her City shirt – earnestly asked her if there was a chance Dean Windass might feature this afternoon. There indeed was, although it would be for Darlington seeing as that's where he's player/assistant manager these days.

Secondly, Stupid Boy who sits behind us – he's been there for years asking his silly questions and making his inane statements. An example – he was once critical of Boaz Myhill because he never scores, surely such a tall chap as he could at least get on the end of a couple of headers and get a goal or two?

For those unfamiliar with the Hull City squad, Boaz Myhill is a goalkeeper.

Anyway, he joined in with the 'Brown Out' chants today with much gusto (Stupid Boy that is, not Myhill who didn't reveal his position on our managerial situation), adopting the gruff voice he does when chanting to try to mask the fact he's eleven and his balls haven't dropped yet, before declaring to his equally clueless dad we ought to get Phil Parkinson in as manager instead. Phil Parkinson. Phil bloody Parkinson. Honestly.

On that note, negativity annoys me when there's a match on. I know people aren't happy and all that, but I'm of the opinion that during those 90 minutes players need our support and encouragement. Performances and individuals should be accountable and should be questioned, but when we're fighting for points I don't think it's the time and place to get on the player's backs, do that after the final whistle.

Finally, a word of caution to any gurning idiots – don't ask me if I'm 'going to keep going when City get relegated' as one twunt did at the bus stop on Friday upon spotting the City badge on my bag, because questions of such high stupidity are liable to elicit the same response that Adebayor produced when confronted with a sliding Van Persie. Bloody buffoons.

Anyway, I'm annoyed because we were bloody awful today, the poorer out of two very poor sides. The only players in my mind to come out of the match with any credit were Myhill (who, despite not getting on the scoresheet kept us in it with some excellent goalkeeping), Kamil Ghilas (who looked lively when he came on in the second half) and Stephen Hunt (who was his usual hardworking self, albeit with little end product).

Our league fixtures for October read thus (I'm not counting the hiding we're liable to receive at Liverpool next week if we play as we did today) – Wigan Athletic (H), Fulham (A), Portsmouth (H) and Burnley (A). Following those four games I think we'll have a good indication of exactly where we're at, and at that point there may be cause to take a long hard look at the manager's position if things haven't improved. Please note though that if we do find ourselves looking for a new gaffer, Phil Parkinson seems to be perfectly happy at Charlton Athletic so let's leave him to it.

Phil bloody Parkinson. :rolleyes:

Anyway, I've had better afternoons.
 
Jaffa, I watched your match on the telly here, and it was indeed dire to sit through, although Chucho Benitez looked pretty good. Too bad he plays for Birmingham City.:(

Hopefully your side will get it sorted out, otherwise you'll join Pompey in the Championship I'm afraid.
 
An entertaining match at West Ham. Not the best performance from Liverpool in defense, but looking better going forward thanks to El Nino.

Carragher had a sloppy first half, culminating in the penalty (Alessandro Diamanti couldn't decide whether to take it it with his left or right foot apparently, since he sort of kicked it with both!).

I'll take the three points and it's good to see Torres in-form but not so happy to leak 2 goals...I have sneaking feeling that, say, Chelsea would have kept a clean sheet.

If one thing annoys me, it's stupidity.

Agreed - when I attended the USA-Mexico qualifier last spring, I had to put up with an idiot USA fan a couple rows back. He was absolutely blotto drunk, and shouted obscenities the whole match, some of which came alarmingly close to outright racism... The worst part was (and remember, us 'Mericans were outnumbered in our own stadium by the Mexico fans) that the Mexico fans didn't shout back at him or start anything, they just rolled their eyes and cheered their team...which humiliated me even more, it made us look like sore winners and bigots. It nearly ruined the experience. Supporting the national team is my big chance to cheer the USA without feeling too jingoistic, and this fool nearly spoiled it.

A less subtle form of stupidity than what you had to deal with, but irritating nonetheless.


EDIT: The sixth minute of injury time? Are you kidding? Looks like Ferguson made the appropriate child sacrifice today!
 
EDIT: The sixth minute of injury time? Are you kidding? Looks like Ferguson made the appropriate child sacrifice today!
We have three time 'zones' (is that the word?) here in Englandshire – GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) which is observed in the winter months, BST (British Summer Time) which is observed, unsurprisingly, in the summer, and OTT (Old Trafford Time) which is observed whenever Manchester United are chasing a result in the dying minutes of a match.

There's a feeling that Old Trafford Time should be scrapped, as not only is it unfair on other football teams but it's also said to lead to more accidents in Scotland.
 
OTT for sure...it seems like Man U get more late, late, LATE winners than any other side out there. Maybe they are just that good. Maybe SAF is Satan. Who knows? :D

Columbus battled back from 2 goals down to draw 2-2 in an away match with second place Chicago in a very tight match. We are three points up on Chicago with a game in hand, and headed for the best regular season record for the second season in a row. Go Crew!
 
What a joke. 2 MORE minutes that suppose to be added? And it's not like the time was added because of an amazing play or anything. There were 3 or 4 chances in which the game was stopped because of a goal kick or throw in or useless midfield tackle. There is no justifying this what-so-ever.
 
Apparently Hughes was told by the officials that extra time (over and above added time) would be added because of City's goal celebration, but two extra-extra minutes for a goal celebration sounds excessive, to say the least.

Fergie sounds a little cocky after the victory (he can afford to be with his record I suppose), but if City can put three past his boys without Adebayor he should be a little worried. Future Manchester derbies might not be so much fun for United.
 
:eek: i came into this thread thinking it was about the NFL footbal
Fret not, you can still tell us your thoughts on the progress of Englandshire's own NFL franchise, the Accrington Stanleys.

AccringtonSCrest1[1].gif

...two extra-extra minutes for a goal celebration sounds excessive, to say the least..
Hughes was on the radio earlier saying they've seen the video of their celebration and timed it – it came in at 45 seconds. I'm surprised Mr M Atkinson (West Yorks) didn't book them for time wasting. ;)

Maybe SAF is Satan.
He's not, but he's close friends with him as this photo proves...

newsmlmmd.8f75199128ddaf55f49def4f44b481cd.2b10b.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.