Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My thoughts about the new Macbook pro line:

I am new here, but I am following this forum for some time now. I did some research using sites like: anandtech; wikipedia and other sites.

So my thoughts: I think the line-up will be more or less the same as last year. I expect the same number of laptops as now. I know some sites say there will only be 4, but Apple has choosing these before with a reason and think they will keep it. Also on the forum you read a lot of people buying BTO’s and these come with some good margin.

So:13 inch and a 13 inch BTO, 3 times a 15 inch and of course the 17 inch.

Old 13 Inch 13 inch 15 inch 15 inch 15 inch 17 inch
Processor P8600 P8800 I5-520M I5-540M I7-620M I7-620M
Speed 2.4 GHz 2.67GHz 2.4Ghz 2.53GHz 2.66Ghz 2.66GHz
TDP 25W 25W 35W 35W 35W 35W
Price ($) 241 241 225 257 332 332
New
Processor I7-2629M I7-2649M I5-2520M I5-2540M I7-2620M I7-2620M
Speed 2.1GHz 2.3GHZ 2.5GHz 2.6GHz 2.7GHz 2.7GHz
TDP 25W 25W 35W 35W 35W 35W
Price 311 346 225 266 346 346

So except the 13 inch the new version of the old chip will be used. Same TDP and prices more or less the same. Quad core uses to much power and therefore will not be used. The speed indication which apple uses is in line. Starting at 2,1 GHz till 2,7 GHz for the fastest with this line up. The i3 chip for the 13 inch (only i3-2310M) uses to much power: TDP 35 W instead of 25 W like it uses now) so this one will not be used

The 13 inch is a problem, but that was also last year the case. I think the main problem is the price of the chip. It is much more expansive then the old processor at introduction. This is probably because the IGP is included in this chip, but last year it was not good enough the leave the 320M out of the 13 inch. So Apple decided to keep the old chip with the 320M. This year with the better IGP there is the possibility they leave the graphics card out on the “standard” 13 inch.. The new Nvidia 520M will probably be the new card for the BTO and maybe the normal one.

So margin is under pressure (especially for the 13 inch) because of the higher price of the chip, so some possibilities. Higher price point, but think they will try to keep the price stable as much as they can. Use another chip, maybe an old Arrendale chip, but it will be much more favourable to have the same chips so you can also use the same memory and get purchase advantage. So the price needs to come from other parts and therefore the super drive (SD) needs to go. If it will on all formats? I am not sure, but it is a opportunity to sell the laptop for same price and sell an add-on (like screen, SD box like air etc.) separately. This parts generate a lot of margin. Chance to include more battery, save weight and you nearly never you have to use it. I would leave it out.

For the other formats, the Nvidia 525M will probably the choice, because it is the updated 4 series, which was the updated 3 series of Nvidia (Which was used 330M). The 5 series uses most of the parts of the 4 series according to Anand and so TDP will probably be the same. No battery loss for Apple which is very important.

Casing will keep as it is, but SSD’s are used. Some say it is hard to make it work with two parts (SSD and HDD), but this is a computer manufacturing and software developing company so they will make it work. There are some sites who did also make it work (using Unix methods for instance), so I expect no problems. It is the way it will go, like Jobs said.

Screens no updates.

One more thing and that is also which will decide the introduction date: Light Peak. It is so quiet about the technology from Intel. Normally, like the new SNB chips, the reviews and other stuff is already on the net before they introduce it. So two possibilities: A) it is far from ready B) Apple will use it first. I hope option B.

If this is the case then it depends when LP and the SNB dual core chips are available.

1: LP and SNB are available next month, then it will be end feb.
2: LP not yet ready and apple will introduce it then maybe march/April. But no later because then option 3 will (and needs to be) chosen.
3: LP not ready then depends SNB and Nvidia are ready for mass production which is probably end feb.

What do you think? Some strong points or not?
 
I generally agree with your thoughts except on a couple of points. If Apple ditches the ODD, which is a good possibility, for a better battery, Apple would have plenty of leeway to use the 45 W quad core processors (this would be BTO, probably).

The second point is that the screen resolutions will probably be increased. By how much I don't know, but this can be seen by the new MacBook Airs. The average consumer won't react well when he/she sees that the 13" MBA has better resolution than the 13" MBP.

As for Light Peak, while I do strongly hope for it to come with this refresh, I'm not optimistic. We'll have to see, but if it does show, that will be a nice surprise.
 
I generally agree with your thoughts except on a couple of points. If Apple ditches the ODD, which is a good possibility, for a better battery, Apple would have plenty of leeway to use the 45 W quad core processors (this would be BTO, probably).

The second point is that the screen resolutions will probably be increased. By how much I don't know, but this can be seen by the new MacBook Airs. The average consumer won't react well when he/she sees that the 13" MBA has better resolution than the 13" MBP.

As for Light Peak, while I do strongly hope for it to come with this refresh, I'm not optimistic. We'll have to see, but if it does show, that will be a nice surprise.

You're right about the screens. I thought the 13 inch had 1440x900 like the air, but not :eek: so this will propably will be like the air. Then the 15 inch should also be updated because else the 13 and the 15 will have the same resolution. BTO options as standard most probably option?

I highly doubt about the quad core, but who knows......
 
You're right about the screens. I thought the 13 inch had 1440x900 like the air, but not :eek: so this will propably will be like the air. Then the 15 inch should also be updated because else the 13 and the 15 will have the same resolution. BTO options as standard most probably option?

I highly doubt about the quad core, but who knows......

The quad core is really just very wishful thinking. I can imagine Apple not including it simply because... but who knows. I would love to see resolutions keep increasing, but OS X has the problem in that all the text is just going to get smaller and smaller. Hopefully Lion addresses that...
 
The 13" should be 1440x900, 15" should be 1680x1050 and 17" remain at 1920x1200. Please, no 16:9!

If they remove the optical drive, they can probably work a discreet GPU in for the 13" Pro and/or more battery for all.
 
Spor, you sure have a lot of time on your hands! That was quite a post for mere speculation :eek:
 
Very long shot, but I've just had an idea.

11" MBP with no optical drive, and a 13" with a slightly bigger footprint with an optical drive. No reason for them not to...?
 
Very long shot, but I've just had an idea.

11" MBP with no optical drive, and a 13" with a slightly bigger footprint with an optical drive. No reason for them not to...?

So what exactly would be the difference between an 11" MBA and an 11" MBP? Besides the words "Air" and "Pro".
 
Well less emphasis would be put on it being so thin, leaving more room for a proper processor, not sure about gfx, as nobody is as yet, glass screen surround, more storage space?

Like an ultraportable that's more useful than a MBA
 
No, Steve has said he will not implement touch screens on any computers for a while, as it is not ergonomically satisfying to have a vertical touch screen. instead, the trackpad will be improved so that all touch gestures can be done within the hardware present
 
All I actually want to see in the update is

  • An anti-glare (matte) screen
  • A higher-resolution screen
  • A non-Chiclet keyboard
  • Smooth edges at the front (for a more comfortable typing/user experience)
New processors, more RAM, SSD as standard, etc, would be nice, but not a deal-breaker (given my usage).
 
CPU: Sandy Bridge
GPU:Intel Integrated Intel HD, the laptop is too small for a discrete
RAM: 4GB default
HDD: 320GB default
Connectivity: Most likely going to stay the same, I think apple will wait for light peak before making any changes
Chassis: Slight Changes
Battery: improved
 
CPU: Sandy Bridge
GPU:Intel Integrated Intel HD, the laptop is too small for a discrete
RAM: 4GB default
HDD: 320GB default
Connectivity: Most likely going to stay the same, I think apple will wait for light peak before making any changes
Chassis: Slight Changes
Battery: improved

But what clock speed in the Sandy Bridge? After seeing the Intel announced CPUs, can anyone logically take a stab at which speeds they would put into the 13"? I'm hoping it's a healthy bump ahead of the 2.4ghz core2duo.
 
But what clock speed in the Sandy Bridge? After seeing the Intel announced CPUs, can anyone logically take a stab at which speeds they would put into the 13"? I'm hoping it's a healthy bump ahead of the 2.4ghz core2duo.

If Apple does implement SB in the 13" it would probably be the i7-2629 and i7-2649. They run at 2.1 GHz and 2.3 GHz respectively. And just to be clear, those are Intel's low voltage processors, not their standard voltage i7's.
 
I'm hoping it's a healthy bump ahead of the 2.4ghz core2duo.

Clock speeds aren't everything. Nehalem provided ~15% clock for clock increase over Core and now SB provides another ~15% over Nehalem. We would still be stuck with Pentium 4 if clock speed was the only thing that matters.

If Apple does implement SB in the 13" it would probably be the i7-2629 and i7-2649. They run at 2.1 GHz and 2.3 GHz respectively. And just to be clear, those are Intel's low voltage processors, not their standard voltage i7's.

Way too expensive. Those chips cost as much as the i7 used in high-end MBP. Probably i3-2310M (2.1GHz) and i5-2410M (2.3GHz) though it's not impossible that 13" MBP will use i5 in both models (i5-2410M and i5-2420M in that case) as they are priced pretty similarly as current C2Ds. 35W isn't too much as the IGP is included in that TDP.
 
As I posted in the other thread, I think this is where the MB and 13" MBP will become more differentiated:

MB: i3 (2310 - 2.1 GHz), 2 (maybe 4) GB ram, 320 GB hard drive, 1280x800

MBP low end: i5 (2520 - 2.5 GHz), 4 GB ram, 320 GB hard drive or 64/128 GB SSD*, 1440x900

MBP high end: i7 (2620 - 2.7 GHz), 4 GB ram, 500 GB hard drive or 128/256 GB SSD*, 1440x900

As they will use the intel graphics, it makes sense to go with the 2310 chip for the mainstream model (standard i5 clockspeed, fastest turbo graphics). For the high end model, the only i5 model above the 2520 runs at 2.6 GHz - a 4% increase in clock speed - not really worth the extra $$$. Again, the 2620 i7 has the same speed turbo graphics as the 2520 i5 chip. Both of these chips have 35 W TDPs.

Surely they wouldn't put an i3 into the MBP? There are too many cheap i5 laptops being advertised at the moment. I guess even if they did, there's only 1 i3 chip, so the high-end would have to be at least an i5.

*If the launch of 25 nm SSDs happens in time, it is supposed to halve the cost/double the storage for the same money.
 
As I posted in the other thread, I think this is where the MB and 13" MBP will become more differentiated:

MB: i3 (2310 - 2.1 GHz), 2 (maybe 4) GB ram, 320 GB hard drive, 1280x800

MBP low end: i5 (2520 - 2.5 GHz), 4 GB ram, 320 GB hard drive or 64/128 GB SSD*, 1440x900

MBP high end: i7 (2620 - 2.7 GHz), 4 GB ram, 500 GB hard drive or 128/256 GB SSD*, 1440x90. /QUOTE]

I really think a low end i3 for the mb and a better one for entry Mbp and the more expensive 13" Mbp i5
 
As I posted in the other thread, I think this is where the MB and 13" MBP will become more differentiated:

MB: i3 (2310 - 2.1 GHz), 2 (maybe 4) GB ram, 320 GB hard drive, 1280x800

MBP low end: i5 (2520 - 2.5 GHz), 4 GB ram, 320 GB hard drive or 64/128 GB SSD*, 1440x900

MBP high end: i7 (2620 - 2.7 GHz), 4 GB ram, 500 GB hard drive or 128/256 GB SSD*, 1440x900

As they will use the intel graphics, it makes sense to go with the 2310 chip for the mainstream model (standard i5 clockspeed, fastest turbo graphics). For the high end model, the only i5 model above the 2520 runs at 2.6 GHz - a 4% increase in clock speed - not really worth the extra $$$. Again, the 2620 i7 has the same speed turbo graphics as the 2520 i5 chip. Both of these chips have 35 W TDPs.

Surely they wouldn't put an i3 into the MBP? There are too many cheap i5 laptops being advertised at the moment. I guess even if they did, there's only 1 i3 chip, so the high-end would have to be at least an i5.

*If the launch of 25 nm SSDs happens in time, it is supposed to halve the cost/double the storage for the same money.

Apple currently uses 3 different processors (aside from the 2.8 GHz BTO) across its 15" and 17" models. They'll likely continue to do so also use the 2.6 GHz i5-2540.
 
If they released a 13" this year that was extremely different in how it is presented (Missing Optical, much much better processor and video card) BEFORE they update the Mac mini's, I would seriously consider selling my not even 1 year old 2010 MacBook Pro 13".

Your move, Apple.

I am indeed hoping for optical to go away. It's clunky and space hogging and I never use it for what it's actually meant for. And if OS X came on USB stick I wouldn't even buy an external one either. I'd use the mini that I would be getting as soon as they're updated for any DVD ripping or other DVD related things. But really, I can't even remember the last time I used an optical drive to install anything other than OS X. Everything I buy either already has drivers on the computer, has drivers on the website or doesn't need drivers at all so I have never even used the DVD/CD's that come with anything I buy. Here's praying optical goes the way of the Floppy. Apple can help.

I'm also hoping for at least an i3 or i5 and some sort of discreet (Or discrete?) graphics card in its place.

Speaking of graphics. 1440x900 is a given as has been shown by the Air's current 13" resolution. There's no way it'll skip the MBP at least. (If not also the white MB's eventually.)

Battery is fine as it is for me. But I wouldn't protest having one or two more cells in there.

SSD/HDD dual option. I want an SSD with 64-128GB built-in like the Air, but also a slot for a HDD. But I'm expecting it to just have a normal HDD slot. In which case, I'll keep my new SSD and put it in there. If it has 64, it will NEED a second HDD slot for a normal HD or another SSD because I need at least 128. I would want it to have room for a 12mm HDD because I plan on buying a 1.5 TB laptop drive when they're available.

RAM needs to remain user replaceable. I have 8GB and I plan on reusing it dammit!

And please file down the sharp edges along the palmrest. They dig into my wrists so much! It hurts me, Steve! It's just as bad as the CrackBook!

Of course, if the 2011 MBP isn't anything like this, I'm perfectly happy keeping my 2010 model for another 2 years.
 
If the mbp 13" doesn't have:
sandy bridge
Upgrade in graphics
loss of optical drive
better battery
body design change

I won't be buying an apple laptop
 
Why does the body design matter? And the battery's better than most other laptops out there. The only problem with the Unibody design is the sharp edges. I'd say all they need to do is round them down and it'll be fine.
 
Why does the body design matter? And the battery's better than most other laptops out there. The only problem with the Unibody design is the sharp edges. I'd say all they need to do is round them down and it'll be fine.

Well the body design matters because I want something new and different. Thinner :D. and you can never have enough battery life.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.