Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Tide will roll the next two weeks and will be big USC fans the next three weeks. All the Trojans need to do is...

  1. Beat UCLA this week to clinch the Pac-12 South
  2. Beat ND at home in two weeks
  3. Find a way to outscore Oregon in the Pac-12 Championship Game in three weeks

...and all the Bammers will be jumping for joy. Then all the Tide have to do is beat a very capable Georgia team the next night in Atlanta and they're back on their way to the BCSCG.

Easy enough, right?

LOL... I like your thinking!!!!
 
The Tide will roll the next two weeks and will be big USC fans the next three weeks. All the Trojans need to do is...

  1. Beat UCLA this week to clinch the Pac-12 South
  2. Beat ND at home in two weeks
  3. Find a way to outscore Oregon in the Pac-12 Championship Game in three weeks

...and all the Bammers will be jumping for joy. Then all the Tide have to do is beat a very capable Georgia team the next night in Atlanta and they're back on their way to the BCSCG.

Easy enough, right?

It's really not that crazy...
 
LOL... I like your thinking!!!!

It's really not that crazy...

It could happen. It really could.

I can also see UTexas, who has been playing much better the last couple of weeks, sneaking into Manhattan the week after Thanksgiving and upsetting K-State.

If all of that happens, we might be looking at another all-SEC championship game. Possibly even another rematch of last year. :eek:
 
It could happen. It really could.

I can also see UTexas, who has been playing much better the last couple of weeks, sneaking into Manhattan the week after Thanksgiving and upsetting K-State.

If all of that happens, we might be looking at another all-SEC championship game. Possibly even another rematch of last year. :eek:

It would cause an uproar. It would never happen with both teams having a loss.
 
It would cause an uproar. It would never happen with both teams having a loss.

Certainly wouldn't be likely, but if you look at the BCS rankings as of now, there are only three teams between the SEC champ and #1 and only five teams between LSU and #2. As unlikely as it seems, if USC beats ND and Oregon and UT beats K-State...

  1. Kansas State
  2. Oregon
  3. Notre Dame
  4. Alabama
  5. Georgia
  6. Florida
  7. LSU
  8. Texas A&M
  9. South Carolina
  10. Florida State

...you're looking at Alabama moving up to #1 if they beat UGA. Florida would move up to #2, but only if they can beat Florida State without their starting QB. If they can't, then something has to give.

On the Sunday the final BCS is released, the voters and the computers have to rate a team that lost yesterday #2 even though they lost to a team way down the poll, or they have to vote LSU #2 just because that's how the flawed voting system works (one team loses, the teams below them move up a slot).

And before you tell me a two-loss LSU team couldn't possibly move up from #7 to #2 on the last day of the season, I ask you to remember the final 2007 BCS poll.

Obviously there's a bit of difference because so many teams had two losses instead of just one, but the principle is the same. Voters will have to not move losing teams (who lost to much lower-ranked teams) down to prevent moving LSU up. Will they? We probably won't get to find out.
 
Barring a blowout loss by Oregon or ND to USC in that all 1 loss team scenario, neither of them will drop far enough to have an all SEC championship. The people - outside of SEC country - and media don't want it. They have a hard on for the conference and will certainly put 1 SEC team in an all 1-loss BCS scenario, but they're not that blind to put 2.

Plus any other SEC besides 'Bama is so far behind KState, Oregon, and ND in the computers, it would take a vast human poll advantage to make up for that (esp KState and ND), except perhaps Florida. Georgia's computer ranking is awful.
 
Certainly wouldn't be likely, but if you look at the BCS rankings as of now, there are only three teams between the SEC champ and #1 and only five teams between LSU and #2. As unlikely as it seems, if USC beats ND and Oregon and UT beats K-State...

  1. Kansas State
  2. Oregon
  3. Notre Dame
  4. Alabama
  5. Georgia
  6. Florida
  7. LSU
  8. Texas A&M
  9. South Carolina
  10. Florida State

...you're looking at Alabama moving up to #1 if they beat UGA. Florida would move up to #2, but only if they can beat Florida State without their starting QB. If they can't, then something has to give.

On the Sunday the final BCS is released, the voters and the computers have to rate a team that lost yesterday #2 even though they lost to a team way down the poll, or they have to vote LSU #2 just because that's how the flawed voting system works (one team loses, the teams below them move up a slot).

And before you tell me a two-loss LSU team couldn't possibly move up from #7 to #2 on the last day of the season, I ask you to remember the final 2007 BCS poll.

Obviously there's a bit of difference because so many teams had two losses instead of just one, but the principle is the same. Voters will have to not move losing teams (who lost to much lower-ranked teams) down to prevent moving LSU up. Will they? We probably won't get to find out.

I'm not saying it can't happen, I'm just saying that the BCS commission will find a way to not let it happen. Nobody will watch the game. As far as I know the last BCS championship was the lowest rated one ever. They'll give Ohio State an AP national championship before they let SEC vs SEC again.

Also, I said it earlier, the SEC aint all that this year. I don't think those teams (4-9) are necessarily deserving of their spot. We'll see come January.
 
Barring a blowout loss by Oregon or ND to USC in that all 1 loss team scenario, neither of them will drop far enough to have an all SEC championship. The people - outside of SEC country - and media don't want it.

I don't want to see it, either. Just think it will be interesting to see how things unfold if all those upsets happen. My gut tells me it's going to end up being K-State vs. Alabama in the final.

Also, I said it earlier, the SEC aint all that this year. I don't think those teams (4-9) are necessarily deserving of their spot. We'll see come January.

We shall see indeed.
 
No excuse, but I think after the big win over LSU, the team didn't have it in them for the following week. They did not look good at all on Defense or Offense for that matter. But this is one reason why I love College Football. Bring it on and lets see how the dice roll!

Speaking of rolling... Roll Tide!!!!! :D
 
Keep in mind, it also has to be considered who those teams play in bowl games. If they're playing sub-par competition because of fan bases, than it's not really going to prove anything. We'll really get to see though with Alabama, and Georgia most likely getting into BCS bowls.

If the Dawgs lose the SECCG they won't get a BCS Bowl
It would likely go to Florida if they win out or LSU / A&M if they don't
Either way, a Dawg loss puts them out of a BCS Bowl IMO
The Dawgs are always considered outsiders while LSU/Florida are darlings
And with Johnny Football, you can add A&M to that list now
 
The official Heisman campaign for Johnny Football is underway.


Keep in mind, it also has to be considered who those teams play in bowl games. If they're playing sub-par competition because of fan bases, than it's not really going to prove anything.

The same can be said of the weak competition the Big 12 and Pac-12 have faced in conference play.

Ultimately, though, you play against who they put in front of you, and the best indicator of conference supremacy is typically interconference games. Bowl games are the epitome of that.

If the Dawgs lose the SECCG they won't get a BCS Bowl
It would likely go to Florida if they win out or LSU / A&M if they don't
Either way, a Dawg loss puts them out of a BCS Bowl IMO
The Dawgs are always considered outsiders while LSU/Florida are darlings
And with Johnny Football, you can add A&M to that list now

Florida is going to have a hard time beating FSU without Driskel, I think.

I don't know that UGA is necessarily considered an "outsider", but if they get their second loss on the last day of the season, I don't expect them to be as attractive to bowls as other teams who are riding longer winning streaks (like LSU and A&M). The Johnny Football Heisman hype certainly won't hurt our case to jump over LSU for that last BCS slot if we win our next two games.
 
The same can be said of the weak competition the Big 12 and Pac-12 have faced in conference play.

The Big-12 and Pac-12 have probably had tougher schedules this year.

Ultimately, though, you play against who they put in front of you, and the best indicator of conference supremacy is typically interconference games. Bowl games are the epitome of that.

Eh, the only real decent indicator is the BCS bowls. Many of the bowls have to select a bowl eligible team from a conference. So you end up with teams like Minnesota playing South Carolina.

Go take a look at the bowl projections on ESPN
 
Maryland and Rutgers to bail to the Big 12?

http://espn.go.com/college-football...hts-talks-join-big-ten-conference-sources-say
The University of Maryland is in serious negotiations to join the Big Ten Conference, sources told ESPN on Saturday.

If Maryland goes from the ACC to the Big Ten, Rutgers of the Big East is expected to follow suit. The addition of Maryland and Rutgers would give the Big Ten 14 members as the league gears toward negotiations on a new media rights deal when its first-tier rights expire in 2017.

No date has been set for a potential announcement, though it could come as soon as Monday.

Maryland president Wallace Loh has been handling the conversation with Big Ten officials, a source said.

One source told ESPN that Maryland athletic director Kevin Anderson has informed key staffers that there are ongoing discussions.

One stumbling block for Maryland could be finances. Maryland's athletic department has recently dropped sports because of budget issues, and the ACC recently raised its exit fee to $50 million.

Maryland and Florida State were the only two of 12 schools that voted against a $50 million exit fee out of the ACC, but lost the vote. Loh was quoted in the Washington Post on Sept. 13 that he was against the hike from $20-50 million on "legal and philosophical" grounds. The Post reported that Loh said Maryland planned to be in the ACC for years to come.

A source told ESPN that the Big Ten has been itchy about further expansion since Notre Dame made its official move to the ACC two months ago in all sports other than football. The source said the Big Ten can justify Maryland and then possibly Rutgers since they are all contiguous states to the Big Ten footprint.

One source told ESPN that Loh and Anderson don't have ACC ties so there wouldn't be a strong emotional pull to stay with the conference. Loh is a former provost at Big Ten member Iowa.

However, the chancellor of the Maryland system, Brit Kirwan, has been on the Maryland campus for 30 years and has strong affiliation for being a charter member of the ACC, according to a source.

One source with Maryland ties said there is a strong affinity for the ACC and making the move to the Big Ten may not be a unanimous decision among the school's board of regents.

Big Ten officials did not respond to numerous requests seeking comment. ACC officials also did not respond to a request for comment. Maryland officials would not comment when asked after the Terps' football game on Saturday.

If these dominoes were to fall then Connecticut would emerge as the most likely candidate to fill Maryland's spot in the ACC. The ACC will be at 14 members in 2013-14 with the addition of the Big East's Pittsburgh and Syracuse and 15 in all sports except football when Notre Dame joins, which could be as early as fall 2013.

Rutgers' exit fee from the Big East would be less expensive. The buyout to leave the Big East is $10 million if the school provides 27 months' notice. However, the league has allowed West Virginia, Pitt and Syracuse to leave the league without honoring the 27-month requirement by paying a higher exit fee.

The Scarlet Knights would be the ninth member of the Big East to leave or announce they were leaving the league since 2004. Six of those defections have occurred in the past year -- Pitt, Syracuse and Notre Dame to the ACC; TCU and West Virginia to the Big 12 and Rutgers to the Big Ten.

The Scarlet Knights were charter members of the Big East's football conference, which began in 1991.

Maryland also was a charter member of the ACC, one of eight schools to start the league in 1953.
 
Go Baylor!!! sorry to all K-State fans, but i like chaos, and also perhaps being catholic Notre Dame has a soft spot in my heart, or maybe it's because of the movie Rudy :p

Go Stanford!!! would like to see a ND vs Alabama bowl game, it would be gravy if it was the national championship.
 
@ Maryland and Rutgers

That would be cool for the Big Ten

I don't mind seeing K State losing, but I'd prefer they win to help ensure no SEC in the championship.
 
OU barely pulled out a win today. Not impressed with our performance. Looks like no NC game for K. State, and looking likely that Oregon won't make it either. The mother ****ing luck of the Irish. :rolleyes:
 
@ Maryland and Rutgers

That would be cool for the Big Ten

I don't mind seeing K State losing, but I'd prefer they win to help ensure no SEC in the championship.

Re: Maryland/Rutgers Big Ten

I don't know how that's good for the Big Ten. Media market? Not really - DC? Whatever. How much draw does Rutgers really have in the NJ/NYC market? They're mediocre football teams and Maryland has had a solid basketball history, but has been average lately. Plus Maryland's athletic dept is bleeding money and would have to somehow cough up a huge exit fee.

@#$@#$!!!! C'mon KState and Oregon, what the eff? All the rabid SEC fans are jumping for joy tonight. Now we've got ND, with still a very difficult road game at USC, and a bunch of one loss teams headlined by Alabama jumping at #2.

And how about Ohio State? I bet they sure hate themselves. One of two undefeated teams in the country and no one is talking about them.
 
WOW! Guess we didn't have to wait long for the rankings to be reassigned! HAHA. ND is clearly the #1 seed and I think Alabama becomes the #2. So much for all that talk about Oregon/K-State deserving a title game...:rolleyes:
 
Re: Maryland/Rutgers Big Ten

I don't know how that's good for the Big Ten. Media market? Not really - DC? Whatever. How much draw does Rutgers really have in the NJ/NYC market? They're mediocre football teams and Maryland has had a solid basketball history, but has been average lately. Plus Maryland's athletic dept is bleeding money and would have to somehow cough up a huge exit fee.

Well they probably don't have too much market at the moment, but with the Big Tens money and marketing power they'll be able to penetrate those crowds. If not for football than definitely for basketball seeing as the Big Ten has become the premier basketball conference. Who knows though.

@#$@#$!!!! C'mon KState and Oregon, what the eff? All the rabid SEC fans are jumping for joy tonight. Now we've got ND, with still a very difficult road game at USC, and a bunch of one loss teams headlined by Alabama jumping at #2

Agreed. Have to hope that ND is as good as their record.

And how about Ohio State? I bet they sure hate themselves. One of two undefeated teams in the country and no one is talking about them.

Yup. They'll be the preseason #2 next year. I don't think they are good enough to win the national championship this year though, maybe next year.

----------

WOW! Guess we didn't have to wait long for the rankings to be reassigned! HAHA. ND is clearly the #1 seed and I think Alabama becomes the #2. So much for all that talk about Oregon/K-State deserving a title game...:rolleyes:

To be fair,

Stanford is a top 10 team, and lost in OT to Notre Dame. not really any excuses for K-state though. But I'd say they are still just as deserving as Alabama and/or Georgia playing in a weak SEC this year.
 
WOW! Guess we didn't have to wait long for the rankings to be reassigned! HAHA. ND is clearly the #1 seed and I think Alabama becomes the #2. So much for all that talk about Oregon/K-State deserving a title game...:rolleyes:

So when Alabama, the all-world consensus #1 lost at home to the #15 ranked team led by a freshman (admittedly amazing freshman, but still a freshman) QB with an all right defense, there's a laundry list of excuses and it's okay. This isn't even factoring in 'Bama getting outplayed 3/4 of the LSU game and over half the A&M game.

But if Oregon, the #2 team loses at home in OT to the #13 team in the country with a top 10-12 defense, it proves they're a joke or overrated. Sounds fair and balanced. Let's not even consider all the injuries they [Oregon] have.

The KState is just inexcusable though. Too much pressure. It goes to show you that regardless of schedule (see: OSU) running the table is an incredibly tough task and teams that do so should be rewarded.
 
Stanford is a top 10 team, and lost in OT to Notre Dame. not really any excuses for K-state though. But I'd say they are still just as deserving as Alabama and/or Georgia playing in a weak SEC this year.


Don't get me wrong, Stanford played very well and definitely not taking anything away from them my post was more towards Oregon and their fans being so confident and trash talking when Alabama lost to TEXA&M.

K-State, well they have no excuse. They, straight up, got beat.

If and when ALA becomes the #2 seed, I can't wait to see all the comments crying about how the computers messed up and how it favours the SEC. At the end of the day, K-State and Oregon controlled their own destiny and the entire country knew what would happen if both those teams lost.

----------

So when Alabama, the all-world consensus #1 lost at home to the #15 ranked team led by a freshman (admittedly amazing freshman, but still a freshman) QB with an all right defense, there's a laundry list of excuses and it's okay. This isn't even factoring in 'Bama getting outplayed 3/4 of the LSU game and over half the A&M game.

But if Oregon, the #2 team loses at home in OT to the #13 team in the country with a top 10-12 defense, it proves they're a joke or overrated. Sounds fair and balanced. Let's not even consider all the injuries they [Oregon] have.

The KState is just inexcusable though. Too much pressure. It goes to show you that regardless of schedule (see: OSU) running the table is an incredibly tough task and teams that do so should be rewarded.

I'm not making any excuses for any team. My point was that regardless of your seed, it's never an easy game especially at the end of the season where ranked teams are making that final push and when are division games ever easy especially at this point of the season? Oregon just learned that tonight.
 
WOW! Guess we didn't have to wait long for the rankings to be reassigned! HAHA. ND is clearly the #1 seed and I think Alabama becomes the #2. So much for all that talk about Oregon/K-State deserving a title game...:rolleyes:

Before tonight, I thought that the chances that two of the undefeated teams would lose this weekend were close to zero. Wrong. Alabama still has at least one very tough game ahead, and I don't think that Auburn will be a pushover. But at least they have more of a shot at a BCS repeat than they did last week at this time.
 
Before tonight, I thought that the chances that two of the undefeated teams would lose this weekend were close to zero. Wrong. Alabama still has at least one very tough game ahead, and I don't think that Auburn will be a pushover. But at least they have more of a shot at a BCS repeat than they did last week at this time.

Again, you can never overlook division games but if 'Bama gets that 2 seed tomorrow, you can bet Saban isn't going to let TexA&M happen all over again when they play Auburn. The final week should be a good one!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.