Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Probably not; depends on the dimensions of the display assembly and how compatible the display connectors are.
 
I've decided to go ahead and wait for the redesign. HOPING that Apple stays true to what power users may want.

Get rid of the ODD, maybe a tad thinner, and a slight bump in the specs from the late 2011. That would be grand.

Of course keeping a matte screen option, and the hdd/ram user replaceable.

Thats the stuff.
 
Probably not; depends on the dimensions of the display assembly and how compatible the display connectors are.

Understood. Very wishful thinking on my part.
 
in response to the rumors circulating about a possible April announcement of "thinner" MBPs:

Would said announcement be the big redesign this thread is about?

The rumors around that potential announcement don't sound nearly as drastic as some of the posts in this thread or other sources (e.g. rumors about the redesign posted by MacRumors)
 
This. But I would love to have a 24-hour battery than the retina display (which ever one is cheaper for Apple), but a 24-hour battery has to happen sooner than later.

7870 won't happen. It runs too hot. And I for one am hoping that they keep the 16:10 aspect ratio the same. I want either a 1920x1200 on the 15" or a 3360x2100 retina display.
 
This. But I would love to have a 24-hour battery than the retina display (which ever one is cheaper for Apple), but a 24-hour battery has to happen sooner than later.

I'd guess later, and the only way it would happen is if other internals used less power, battery technology isn't really progressing, the MBPs design shows that, the only way they could improve battery life was to literally make the battery bigger...
 
This. But I would love to have a 24-hour battery than the retina display (which ever one is cheaper for Apple), but a 24-hour battery has to happen sooner than later.

From an early test of a desktop Ivy Bridge part by AnandTech: if we compare power consumptions of the SB 2600K to that of the IB 3770K, power efficiency has improved by ~17.4% under full load. At idle, ~3.3%.

Anand noted:
Under load however the power savings are significant. The Core i7 3770K pulls 27 fewer watts while delivering better performance than the 2600K. Again, translating this to what you can expect in notebooks I'd say that peak battery life likely won't be affected, but battery life under load will be better with Ivy.

Namely, with a CPU mostly idle or under low stress, battery life should not improve by much. However, the greater the average stress, the more battery life should be extended.

I know CPU is not the only component consuming power, but it plays a major role, and given the above, I wouldn't expect a 24-hour battery life any time soon.

We should get up to 1 hour of extra battery life for a MacBooks rated at 7 hours.
 
I'm really hoping Apple makes SOME kind of MacBook Pro related announcement in April. Whether that is to refresh the late 2011 or give us a redesign. If it's a redesign and it doesn't stack up to the previous models, then I can still get a late 2011 and not feel like I'm buying an outdated computer.

If they keep the same design, I can rest easy that my purchase will serve me well for years to come. Especially since it will have all of the upgradeable features. That ODD will surely be replaced by a SSD eventually.

So April would be grand, no matter which direction they go.
 
Actually, Intel had announced in September 2011 that their Haswell chips will be out next year and will offer your laptop a 24-hour run time and a 10-day standby mode with a single charge.

Apple has always been a world-leader in bringing to the fore-front advanced technologies before anyone else does, so it would only make sense if they bring the 24-hour laptop out this year preemptively.

Anand noted:


Namely, with a CPU mostly idle or under low stress, battery life should not improve by much. However, the greater the average stress, the more battery life should be extended.

I know CPU is not the only component consuming power, but it plays a major role, and given the above, I wouldn't expect a 24-hour battery life any time soon.

We should get up to 1 hour of extra battery life for a MacBooks rated at 7 hours.
 
This. But I would love to have a 24-hour battery than the retina display (which ever one is cheaper for Apple), but a 24-hour battery has to happen sooner than later.


Not this. I would much rather have a retina display with a marginal increase in battery life just due to the fact of the new ivy bridge cpu's. Your not going to see a 24 hour battery in the 2012 MBP's. It better frickin have retina display though.
 
I guess I'm going to wait until next year and buy one before heading off to college. I'm thinking the 17" would be the way to go :)

I graduate this May FROM college so I would love the new one for grad school. I know the most recent one came out last winter, so does anyone know when the new one will come out? This coming fall or winter perhaps? I guess I should wait..
 
I graduate this May FROM college so I would love the new one for grad school. I know the most recent one came out last winter, so does anyone know when the new one will come out? This coming fall or winter perhaps? I guess I should wait..

The early 2011 came out in Feb I think.

But the upgrade will have IB which is in April I think.
 
I graduate this May FROM college so I would love the new one for grad school. I know the most recent one came out last winter, so does anyone know when the new one will come out? This coming fall or winter perhaps? I guess I should wait..

I'd be willing to bet a lot of money that the new Macbook "whatevers" will come out before August Back to School. Now, what these new macbooks will be/look like ... that I don't know.
 
Actually, Intel had announced in September 2011 that their Haswell chips will be out next year and will offer your laptop a 24-hour run time and a 10-day standby mode with a single charge.

Apple has always been a world-leader in bringing to the fore-front advanced technologies before anyone else does, so it would only make sense if they bring the 24-hour laptop out this year preemptively.

That will only work if you either put a low power CPU in a normally sized laptop. Haswell could bring substantial improvements in efficiency, but it will not cut power consumption down 75%, and even then, the CPU is only one of many power consumers, even if it is a big one.

I would be happy with improved battery life under light and medium load, but I don't want a MBP equipped with a low power CPU like the Air.
 
The early 2011 came out in Feb I think.

But the upgrade will have IB which is in April I think.

Oh I am so confused lol. I spoke w. an Apple rep through the Chat system and she told me the latest one came out last winter or last fall, like in November. Then I read somewhere that the newest one is PROBABLY coming out this spring.
 
These are what we call opinions. In my opinion (there's that key word again) the 13" MBP isn't to scale with the 15" and 17" since it does not have a dedicated graphics card.
Its not on the same scale because it's cheaper. Nothing more. The fact that 2 out of the 3 models in the same line have dedicated GPU's has nothing to do with it. Apple has so decreed it.

Also in my opinion, there is a very minor difference between the 13" MBA and the 13" MBP.
Spec wise? The ability to open one up for upgrades and not the other? Faster machine? Wow. You need to open your eyes. The MBP13 shares far more similarities to the 15/17 than it does the Air.

My point... err opinion is... you and many others are trying to align the word "Pro" with some universal definition that doesn't exist in the world of merchandising. It's just marketing hype... like "Pro" toothpaste or pro underwear (which I'm sure exist somewhere)
 
Oh I am so confused lol. I spoke w. an Apple rep through the Chat system and she told me the latest one came out last winter or last fall, like in November. Then I read somewhere that the newest one is PROBABLY coming out this spring.

February is considered Winter.
 
Oh I am so confused lol. I spoke w. an Apple rep through the Chat system and she told me the latest one came out last winter or last fall, like in November. Then I read somewhere that the newest one is PROBABLY coming out this spring.

The early 2011 model appeared in february 2011
The late 2011 model appeared in october 2011

see the buyers guide for more details.

A 2012 model will most likely happen, and as you said, might come out in spring (april - june seem reasonable).
 
Regarding battery life:
We should get up to 1 hour of extra battery life for a MacBooks rated at 7 hours.
Another point worth noting is the progress in battery capacity Apple seem to have made with the 3rd gen iPad: increased from 25 Wh to 42.5 Wh (+70%).

Granted thickness has increased as well, but that may be due to a thicker LCD panel: in the presentation video, they explain that due to pixels being so tiny and tightly packed, they had to be elevated from the signals layer to avoid interferences.

If they managed to increase battery capacity while retaining the same thickness, I guess we can expect the same kinds of gains in the next MacBooks, bringing battery life to a very rough theoretical of (7h + 1h) + 70% = 13.6 hours.

And that's with the current physical dimensions of the battery. The volume freed by the optical drive equals about 40% of the battery. Adding that to the already increased estimate: 13.6h + 40% = 19 hours.

While this number sounds unrealistic today, given the advances that seem to have been made (may be confirmed by iFixit next week), it doesn't seem that far fetched.
 
Last edited:
Second time I'm quoting myself, but in case anybody's interested:
If they managed to increase battery capacity while retaining the same thickness,
It turns out, the new battery has (very likely) increased in volume. From this article by AnandTech once again:
Apple addressed the issue by increasing the new iPad's battery capacity by 70%. If the leaked PCB photos are accurate (they look to be), Apple increased battery volume by shrinking the motherboard size and increasing the thickness of the tablet.
So my estimates are completely off :).
 
Let's think a little! What is Apple's strategy and what are the facts?

- They discontinued the xServe
- They neglect the Mac Pro
- They leave firewire, optical drive, maybe ethernet
= they back out from the professional market

- They create the iCloud
- They transform mac OS to iOS
- They force the thin designs and ssd
- They said: Macbook air is the future of MACBOOKS

Conclusion:

- The new macbook pro will be like a macbook air
- No optical drive, no professional ports, no HDD
- Why should we need big HDD if there is iCloud? - we need little but fast ssd-s

So I think the new macbook pro will be the same as the macbook air, maybe they drop the names and there will be only one line, the Macbooks in 4 sizes, thin design, ssd-s etc.

God I hope this isn't the way it's heading otherwise I've wasted the majority of my education learning something that was being phased out by the time I graduated... FUN.

I don't want to have to use windows anymore.
 
So I think the new macbook pro will be the same as the macbook air, maybe they drop the names and there will be only one line, the Macbooks in 4 sizes, thin design, ssd-s etc.

Interesting, but I think it will be this way:

- Apple drops the 13" MBP
- the MBA become the MacBooks with 11" and 13"
- the MBP 15" and 17" remain Pro-models, but will be thinner, more MBA like
 
I may as well buy now. New design's aren't always perfected until the next update before the first major re-design. As the current machines are perfect.
 
I may as well buy now. New design's aren't always perfected until the next update before the first major re-design. As the current machines are perfect.

Exactly my thoughts. I am going to wait to see/hear the announcements but a late 2011 15" MBP for $1599 is a good buy.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.