-There's no need to remove it either. Both the MDP and Thunderbolt are integrated into the same port...so why yank MDP portion and leave Thunderbolt when there is already an integration. In addition to the fact that existing displays support DP/MDP not Thunderbolt.
-Thunderbolt replace Ethernet? ALL the routers out there (including Apple's) have Ethernet ports.
With the redesign and next version, I expect on the 13'':
- Ivy Bridge chipsets : with an iGPU 20 to 30% more powerful than the current Intel HD 3000 as well as optimized drivers, it should be enough for most common user's needs.
- USB 3.0: they appear to be native to the Ivy Bridge chipsets, so no reason not to include them. Coupled with Thunderbolt, it'll be a great mix of ports.
- 1440 X 900 resolution screen: just like the 13'' MBA.
- Better battery life: doable thanks to better power management by the Ivy Bridge chips (?).
This is what I hope, but cannot say I am too confident in:
My conclusion as well. That said though, Apple needs to be prepared to utilize the extra space for something 99% of users will perceive as a good trade-off. Plus, those changes will still have to keep the MBP line separate from the Air. Take out the OD and the distinction lines get kind of fuzzy (at a casual glance). Typical problems associated with expanding a product line.- No Optical Drive: adding up to Job's claims when presenting the MBA, there's this piece of news http://osxdaily.com/2011/05/04/mac-os-x-10-7-lion-to-be-distributed-through-mac-app-store/. Still, it's a long shot.
- SSD Flash Storage for OS and Apps.: mixed with HDD for file storage.
I think Apple will just wait until they can make use of SSD's exclusively. A 500GB Conventional Hard Drive "spec bump" (vs. the current 320) is most likely.
Not even sure if this is even on their radar. (It certainly isn't on mine as I like the keyboard the way it is).- Better Keyboard: The new Asus netbooks' Metal Keyboards appear to be not only good-looking, but also high-quality. Apple might have to up their game.
The cost to re-tool Shanghai for this and basically scrap the current process would be enormous. No. Apple has put too much money into this I think. Although lighter, the machine wouldn't be any faster or have more battery life. It would be purely cosmetic and I'm not sure that would be enough.- New Material: Liquid Metal and Carbon Fiber being the ones most people talk about.
Also, no dGpu in the MBP13. It's all integrated from here on out. They settled that argument the last go around.
But you certainly could be right on all counts. I'm merely basing my arguments on the fact that MBP sales are brisk as it is. Surely, there's somebody in Cupertino who says, "It ain't broke so don't fix it". Maybe Ivy Bridge and another thunderbolt-like trinket will be all we can expect until 2013? Nobody would lose their jobs over this and I doubt the stock would tank.
I really hope they merge the air and pro and simply call them macbooks. Also eliminate the white polycarbonate macbook.
Why... is it bothering you?Also eliminate the white polycarbonate macbook.
never gonna happen because apple would be putting all their eggs in one basket. With 3 current markets (MB, MBP, Air) it has 3 lots of refreshes to do to draw sales from these markets, at the same time they would be taking a big risk in assuming everyone wanted the 'same' when people love to brag they have the 'air' or 'pro'; part of being a mac user for many peoplealso the three lines offer different level of power, flash storgae, portability etc etc for a wide rage of prices. Well i was only commenting but now it looks like im trying to be horrible so il stop lol
![]()
I think apple could make a unified macbook that will make everyone happy. I upgrades will obviously be available for power users who need the extra juice. Imagine after they kill the white macbook they combine the air and pro into a laptop that's a bit thicker than the air and a bit thinner than the pro and it will be simply called Macbook. These macbooks can come in
11", 13", 15", 17" with prices starting at $799 for the smaller macbook with bare minimums and as you go up the ladder you can get more features and upgrades. I think customers will not only be OK with it bit would love it. Thanks in would imagine it would be easier for apple too since their product lines have now been simplified.
What about the people who love the design of the MBA but hate the design of the MBP (and vice verca)? It's better to have variety. Something for everyone. The MBP line is a great all around computer, and it's still the thinnest around compared to it's competitors, so I'm not sure why you think it should be merged with the air. The air is for those who want the best portability. If you look at other computer manufacturers, they all have a low end line (MacBook), a high end line (MacBook pro) and an ultraportable line (MacBook air).
If they are merged, the "MacBook" that you propose might not be thin or portable enough for the former MBA users, and it might not do everything that the former MBP users would expect it to do.
A redesign can certainly happen this year. Not much has to be done.
A new MBP with 15+ hour battery life ( removing the optical drive ), lighter, thinner, dual storage ( flash + HDD ), IPS display.
You know Apple can easily do it right now if they wanted too![]()
Patrick J said:Everyone forgets a key point. They can't make it thinner, and it's not due to the cd drive. It's because of the Ethernet port.
Take a look on the left hand side, it's impossible to make the body any thinner.
It's funny how everyone associates taking the cd drive out with the laptop getting thinner.
So can every other port currently built into the design including the SD slot which is easily handled by a USB adapter now. But that doesn't mean people want to nursemaid and drag freaking adapters around with them. It defeats the purpose of mobility. There are just too many universities and offices married to Ethernet to relegate that port to an afterthought.Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; nl-nl) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
Ethernet can be provided through a thunderbolt port.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; nl-nl) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
Ethernet can be provided through a thunderbolt port.
Everyone forgets a key point. They can't make it thinner, and it's not due to the cd drive. It's because of the Ethernet port.
Take a look on the left hand side, it's impossible to make the body any thinner.
It's funny how everyone associates taking the cd drive out with the laptop getting thinner.
New Material: Liquid Metal and Carbon Fiber being the ones most people talk about.
Everyone forgets a key point. They can't make it thinner, and it's not due to the cd drive. It's because of the Ethernet port.
Take a look on the left hand side, it's impossible to make the body any thinner.
It's funny how everyone associates taking the cd drive out with the laptop getting thinner.
Apple will NOT use carbon fiber. They would lose their EPEAT Gold rating and the immense bragging rights of their computer's limited environmental impact. Carbon fiber is incredibly damaging to the environment to produce and is almost impossible to recycle. Now I'm not sure about liquid metal, but if it isn't at least as recyclable/low impact on the environment as aluminum, expect it to stay the same.
I personally believe they will take their design queues from the iPhone 4/5 in addition to the Macbook Air. They will definitely take out the optical drive, it simply does not fit in with Apple's new philosophy of downloadable software, and it is just a waste of precious space and battery power. If they don't remove it completely, I expect something along the lines of the Mac mini where you can purchase it with another HDD instead of the optical drive.
In addition, and something I'm extremely hopeful for, is the standardization of SSDs across all lines, especially if multiple hard drives were offered. A smaller, and cheaper SSD (say 64 GB) could be used for the boot drive and hold constantly used files and programs, and a bigger HDD could hold pictures, videos, music and games, simply spinning up only when needed. In the era of hybrid graphics systems, I don't find this to be too far out of an idea, especially if the company in question is Apple.