To be fair Peyton didn't win that SB, the defense did. Osweiler could have won that game had he started.Reports are that he was salty about being benched which is mind boggling given the situation and outcome we were all expecting.
To be fair Peyton didn't win that SB, the defense did. Osweiler could have won that game had he started.Reports are that he was salty about being benched which is mind boggling given the situation and outcome we were all expecting.
Holy smokes..... That is a boat load of money for a QB that, well really hasn't proved himself.
Meanwhile the Olivier Vernon deal just screwed the DE market for years.
I hate free agency. It's basically a good way to ruin your capMeanwhile the Olivier Vernon deal just screwed the DE market for years.
That's what I thought was one of the reasons.Reports are that he was salty about being benched which is mind boggling given the situation and outcome we were all expecting.
Definitely overpaid, but now that more likely drives Fitzpatrick's value up. The Jets should have extended his contract when they had a chance. Now who do they have Geno Smith?4 years, $72 million. THat's crazy.
Absolutely not. Ryan Fitzpatrick isn't a long term answer and he's also 8 years older than Brock Osweiler.That's what I thought was one of the reasons.
Definitely overpaid, but now that more likely drives Fitzpatrick's value up. The Jets should have extended his contract when they had a chance. Now who do they have Geno Smith?
I understand he's not a long term solution, but I do think Osweiler's and Bradford's contracts have driven up his value. When Bradford is getting nearly 20 million, and he's not really shown to be durable, Osweiler his still largely unproven and his numbers are no better then Hoyer's. He's in driver's seat at this point in terms of where he goes and how much he'll get.Absolutely not. Ryan Fitzpatrick isn't a long term answer and he's also 8 years older than Brock Osweiler.
Its more if SF trades him to the browns, since they hadn't cut him (AFAIK).If Kaepernick does sign with the Browns,
Mark Sanchez to the Broncos... Which only means that he'll win a Superbowl next year and add to the misery of being a Jets fan![]()
Mark Sanchez to the Broncos... Which only means that he'll win a Superbowl next year and add to the misery of being a Jets fan![]()
Can't believe the Broncos traded for Mr. Butt-fumble.
Can't believe the Broncos traded for Mr. Butt-fumble.
What are they supposed to do ? They have no QB.
Actually Sanchez might do pretty good with the Broncos.
I would say we still don't.![]()
Well Sanchez did take the Jets to 2 straight AFC championship games when the Jets had a great defense and a few weapons on Offense.... it was only when the jets dismantled all of their skill position players that he really struggled. but who can blame him, the Jets didn't have anyone who could get open to save their lives..... Broncos have plenty of weapons on offense and they have an amazing defense, I wouldnt just write this off as a mistake, Elway has been a great GM and knows what he's doing.
I expect them to find a QB by some other means, because Sanchez isn't it.Agreed. People are assuming that Elway got Sanchez to be a pocket QB like Manning, Brady, Brees and Rodgers. Everyone knows that's not even close to why Elway traded for him. 2 straight AFC Championships right after being drafted behind a defense which was arguably not as good as what the Broncos had. Denver might have lost a few pieces but the idea is that Elway still believes he can build a solid defense to at least make the playoffs. All Sanchez has to do manage the game. Elway is putting Sanchez in a position to succeed and is not relying on him to pass for 3,500 yards and 25-30 TD's.
I expect them to find a QB by some other means, because Sanchez isn't it.
Can't believe the Broncos traded for Mr. Butt-fumble.