You do realize that most of the people who were part of the iPhone/iOS team who worked with Jobs are still working at Apple right.
[doublepost=1534260368][/doublepost]
I'm sure you know that they have their own brains and don't have to do everything Steve thought/liked, right?
That's obviously your opinion. And ok, 2 hair bigger then. There are more or less same size, but with the X, the stupid bezel is eliminated. Obviously I have no doubt there would be people perfectly happy with a tiny miniscule 2" display if opportunity was presented. But that does not mean they are on a large numbers.
Having played around with the 3G I discovered how the simplicity has been lost. It's hard to explain as a modern phone is not too difficult to use. But the simplicity that the earlier versions of iOS (or iPhone OS, or whatever it was originally called) has been lost.
Jobs was against a user interface that required a stylus. He thought having to take out a stylus every time you wanted to do anything was ridiculous, rather you should be able to use the device with your finger.
RidiculousPresently there is way too many iPhone models and storage sizes offered in 2017-2018. I am not sure if the 2018 iPhone X plus size will sell well if at that price and the available options are still on the market.
When Apple released the iPhone 6 Plus model there was a lot of pint up demand for a larger display, as at that time the only option was a 4” display model. Presently we have a 4”, 4.7”, 5.5” and 5.8” display sizes, plus iPhone 6S, 7, 8 and X. This confusion is reminiscent of what is available in the Android world. Cook being a market supply guru, sure does not know what will sell well and at what price for the 2017-2018 year.
Consumer will always purchase the model that gets them the most technology at the lowest price. The tech enthusiast that upgrade every year are the minority. If I wanted a 4.7” or 5.5” screen I as the consumer can choose from the 6S, 7 or 8. Do I want a headphone jack, wireless charging, etc. Comparing price and performance the 7 is your best bet in less you want the headphone jack. Apple should have kept the line up simple offer the 6S, 8 and X.
I am not sure if the 8 is still going to be offered for CY 2018-2019, however if this is the case then people will opt for that model vice the 2018 iPhone X plus model as the price would not be competitive when compared to the 8 plus model.
The iPhone X 2017 model sold relatively well as reported by Apple, however I am not sure the same will be true for a plus model considering the new tech was revealed in 2017. I believe Cook understands that, thus the reason to lower prices across the range.
Their should keep the lineup simple 5.8”, 6.1” and 6.5” The 4” SE model is now the 6.1” considering the single camera, no 3D Touch and not sure what else more. What I never liked about the 6 and onward design language is the curved edge/rim, compared to the SE and prior where it was flat, it made it easier to hold without the edge pressing against and into your fingers. If the edges were flat like the SE and prior the 4.7” and onward would be comfortable to hold for an extended period of time. Don’t get me wrong there will be initial demand for 6.5” model due to the plus model users upgrading. I suspect more will gravitate to the 6.1” or 5.8” models.
[doublepost=1534259929][/doublepost]
With 2TB of none iCloud storage, I use 500GB and only require less than 64GB of physical device storage. Not sure who requires 512GB of device storage, are these supposed to be replacing external storage devices. How productive is someone on a 6.5” phone with thelimitations iOS imposes, considering most complain that an iPad Pro is not a replacement as a computing device.
I find it contradictory that Apple for years pushed people toward cloud storage while limiting physical storage, now that cloud storage is cheap their are offering more physical storage. I am receiving mixed messages.
Who the heck needs 512 gigs of storage in their phone? Like seriously. I’m having issues filling up 60 gigs on my 256 gb phone. And I have plenty of apps photos and my whole music library downloaded.
I think they’ll go with 128/512. We’ve seen that in the past even though it does not make sense at all.
I don't buy that one either. Apple just became the first trillion dollar company in American history, they just had their best third quarter ever, beat every analyst's expectation, ARPU is at an all time high, and the iPhone X remains the best selling iPhone. The most expensive iPhone is also the best selling iPhone, which never used to be the case until the X was released. What, among all of those things, could possibly lead someone to think "Well gee, we better lower the price because the market clearly thinks this thing is too expensive"?Because it didn’t sell as many as they expected or hoped Even if it sold a lot.
Excellent and superb points for the higher storage need. Thank you!!Ridiculous
1: user doesn’t want to pay for 2TB or storage.
2: user doesn’t live in area with good service.
3: user prefers to have some stuff stored locally.
4: user often finds themselves in locations with no cell/wifi service at all but wants to watch movies.
Examples: Airplanes / Office building basements / Camping etc.
Can someone explain how the LCD model fits into the line up besides the "budget" phone? It's screen is a mix between the non-plus and plus, which I am sure appeals to some but will lack some of the key features. So what is the point of it?!
Hope not, as according to the interwebs the Note Line in the past was not a top seller for Samsung.Once again Apple copying Samsung.
I don't buy that one either. Apple just became the first trillion dollar company in American history, they just had their best third quarter ever, beat every analyst's expectation, ARPU is at an all time high, and the iPhone X remains the best selling iPhone. The most expensive iPhone is also the best selling iPhone, which never used to be the case until the X was released. What, among all of those things, could possibly lead someone to think "Well gee, we better lower the price because the market clearly thinks this thing is too expensive"?
Their device actually holds the S-Pen, and that's something I don't see Apple even considering.Hmmmm, I wonder how Samsung does it.
Maybe because the party won't last forever and good leaders could recognize the need to jump proactively ahead of being forced to dodge.
Recent rises and slumps:
SUV craze in the 1990s
Tech stock craze in the late 1990s
Cheap mortgages craze in the mid 2000s
The "party" of high-cost, ultra-low-durability, and continued "stretch" for the sake of change (reduction in intuitive UIx, headphone jacks, buttons, ports, magsafe, touch ID, etc) can't last IMHO.
Hmmm. Apple hits Trillion-Dollar valuation. Competition doesn't.Hmmm.... competitors increased market share by offering higher performance, features, and a lower price, while Apple’s sales were lower than expected.
Really???
Who could’ve seen that coming??? Oh, yeah... everyone outside Apple headquarters.
The question is... how much money did they have to pay for that market analysis?
Can someone explain how the LCD model fits into the line up besides the "budget" phone? It's screen is a mix between the non-plus and plus, which I am sure appeals to some but will lack some of the key features. So what is the point of it?!
When was the last time that removed ports returned to devices by some miracle?
3.5 mm jack is dead on mobile devices. It is over.