Least android stick to one cable and that's USB C which is what apple should use but as always they are behind the times as we await for them to catch upWHY just WHYYYY Apple is fragmenting so much of its products? Why clinging on to Lightning if iPad Pro was getting a USB-C anyway?
Latest iPad Pro isn't that much different from 10.5" I bought in 2017. It is shinier, faster, and less bezels sure. But it isn't much more pro than then one I already have. My iPad also has the same 8000mAh battery even it's still Lighning port. Power sharing can also be done via Lightning, if Apple allows it to. This lineups are confusing for most. Travellers must hold on to both USB-C and Lightning cables because of this fragmentation, WHYYYY???
Please don't become the Android manufacturers we desperately try to avoid. Consolidate and think, what do you want Apple? Sticking with Lightning, or moving on to USB-C? Pick a side already!!
Switching iphones to USB-C would be tragic in a world full of USB-A charging ports, cables and accessories. I don’t want to have to replace a dozen Lightning cables and accessories when I don’t even own one USB-C device. The vast majority of Apple customers own Lightning and USB-A products. USB-C only applies to a small minority of Apple customers worldwide. When I finally upgrade my iPhone it will be to Qi charging which is available at far more locations than USB-C
Apple makes a lot of coin on its Made for iPhone program. I don't think Lightning is going anywhere---normies don't care, although I agree with you---USB C everywhere would be ideal.A USB-C to Lighning cable would be almost as ridiculous as the Lightning earpods.
I love Lightning but can we just go to USB-C for everything please?
It literally is ONE extra cable.
So you need to carry one power adapter and two cables.
Indeed, complaining about that sounds silly to me too.
Switching iphones to USB-C would be tragic in a world full of USB-A charging ports, cables and accessories. I don’t want to have to replace a dozen Lightning cables and accessories when I don’t even own one USB-C device. The vast majority of Apple customers own Lightning and USB-A products. USB-C only applies to a small minority of Apple customers worldwide. When I finally upgrade my iPhone it will be to Qi charging which is available at far more locations than USB-C
Anyone with AirPods already needs a Lightning cable, so having iPhone switch to USB-C means they would now have to carry an extra cable, just for iPhone. And there are a lot more of them than MBP or 3rd gen iPad Pro owners—who are already carrying that Lightning cable
Year-over-year improvements aren't earth-shattering. Stop the presses.Latest iPad Pro isn't that much different from 10.5" I bought in 2017. It is shinier, faster, and less bezels sure. But it isn't much more pro than then one I already have. My iPad also has the same 8000mAh battery even it's still Lighning port.
By one reading, they will, it's just gonna take time. The new iPads are old exterior shells with new innards, they've kept the old ports for that reason. By another reading there will remain two classes of devices, ones with Lightning and the ones with USB-C. Until last year that line was drawn between iPads and Macs, now it is drawn between non-Pro iPads and the iPad Pro, ie, just shifting the dividing line a bit.Consolidate and think, what do you want Apple? Sticking with Lightning, or moving on to USB-C? Pick a side already!!
It really is, it's great that I only need one cable and that's USB C. Even the galaxy Buds come with USB C so it's nice not worryingMy Android phone came with a fast charger which was USB-A, and a USB-A to USB-C cable. So out of the box I could fast charge my USB-C phone and connect to my USB-A MacBook.
To do the same thing you'd need two Apple chargers with two different cables, purchased at an extra expense.
The "ecosystem" is a joke.
I think the percentage of iPhone buyers that buy any kind of Lightning based accessories is pretty small. Charging docks probably sold the most in this category but this is now moving to Qi-charging. Very few people will have bought Lightning-based headphones, even less Lightning to USB-A or SD-card adaptors.The user-friendly time to switch the iPhone to USB-C would have been when they dropped the headphone jack and lots of people needed to buy new headphones, adapters, docks etc. Of course, that’s not the most profitable time...
Quite right. What’s next - Macs with only USB-C?
The user-friendly time to switch the iPhone to USB-C would have been when they dropped the headphone jack and lots of people needed to buy new headphones, adapters, docks etc. Of course, that’s not the most profitable time...
As for the cable... Dear Apple, it’s an $800+ phone - stop being Scrooge and include both cables.
By one reading, they will, it's just gonna take time. The new iPads are old exterior shells with new innards, they've kept the old ports for that reason. By another reading there will remain two classes of devices, ones with Lightning and the ones with USB-C. Until last year that line was drawn between iPads and Macs, now it is drawn between non-Pro iPads and the iPad Pro, ie, just shifting the dividing line a bit.
Didn’t Kuo recently state that it wouldn’t be getting neither fast charging nor USB-C? I guess the flip-flopping from now until September begins.
I have to agree with you. I have an older MBP (USB-A) and iPad Pro (Lightning) so today I don't "need" USB-C on my iPhone. However, as I update my devices, I don't want to be in your current situation of having to carry multiple cables because of different ports.Well everyone can stick with their own opinion. I stand by mine, that Apple should do the transition to USB-C as quick as possible. iPhone is the best place to start, just like the iPhone 5 introduced the Lightning port. In my opinion, the next iPhone should also make USB-C official.
I thought back in 2012, billions of Apple users also own a bunch of 30 pin cables laying around the house? Didn't stop Apple to make the switch, I see no reason to do the same now? It's not the end of the world, because Lightning would still work with older devices. And you do know Apple still sells the 30-pin until today, right? So it's not really a sudden death, just a stop gap that Apple should put a distinct line in between.
This may sound silly to you, but to me who happens to travel quite often, and own the new Macbook Air, with 11" iPad Pro and iPhone 8+ , then maybe you'll understand. Everything else is on USB-C except for this tiny little iPhone that requires one specific cable to charge.
If apple took $10 off the price of the phone and left out the charger and lightning cable, I would buy that model.This type of article surfaces at least once a month.
A fast charger is the least of my interests. Not when I have access to my charger at home, at work, in the car, I can charge my iPhone anytime I need to and the 5W charger works perfectly fine for my needs. I suspect the 5 W charger Apple includes, (even though dated), works perfectly fine for the majority of iPhone consumers, that wouldn’t likely even really appreciate a fast charger anyways. I think if someone wants a fast charger, Apple should sell it separately for those who actually would appreciate it.
It's stuff like that which has put me off apple products they are just conning the customers with awful pricing and not giving you value for money for what it provides.It’s a disgrace that they are still shipping a 5w wall plug with a phone in 2019.
It’s an even bigger disgrace that you have to spend €60 on a usb c to lightning cable and wall plug when you buy an iPhone for €1180+ In 2019 to get 2019 charging speeds.
They will probably drag their heels on ditching lightning for iPhone for the next 3 years too.
It’s reasons like this - price and feature lag that are hurting Apple.